Evaluation of a reference set based grading system for retinal nerve fiber layer photographs in 1941 eyes.

PURPOSE: To evaluate a reference set based grading system for retinal nerve fiber layer photographs. METHODS: A total of 1,941 retinal nerve fiber layer photographs (Canon non-mydriatic camera) were evaluated using a reference grading system. The reference system consists of 25 photographs of the retinal nerve fiber layer (Canon CF60U camera) of normals and patients with glaucoma. Each reference photograph represents a score for the visibility of the nerve fibers. Superior and inferior regions of the 1,941 photographs of the sample of the normal population were matched separately to the references. RESULTS: The standard deviation of between eyes differences was 2.76. This standard deviation compared reasonably to the standard deviation of 1.0 to 1.9 for real repeated measurements in an earlier study and indicates that the grading system has good accuracy in relation to the total range of 1 to 25. A clear relationship between photograph score and age was established. CONCLUSION: The photographic grading system demonstrated that it is viable in a different setting. Therefore, evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer photographs with a photographic reference set might help ophthalmologists and technicians to integrate retinal nerve fiber layer photography in their clinical practice.

Design of low cost glaucoma screening.

In 1991 the Netherlands Glaucoma Patient Association organized a glaucoma screening survey. This survey was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of a low cost screening setting. During a screening period of 8 days, 1259 subjects over the age of 49 years were examined by a team of non-ophthalmologically trained students. The following screening methods were used: visual field analysis (Henson CFS3000 perimeter), retinal nerve fiber layer photography (Canon non-mydriatic camera), intraocular pressure measurement (Pulsair non-contact tonometer) and determination of the peripheral anterior chamber depth (slitlamp biomicroscope, the van Herick method). In a later stage, subjects with glaucomatous abnormalities in the visual field and/or the photograph were re-examined by a glaucoma specialist using applanation tonometry, gonioscopy, ophthalmoscopy and Humphrey 30-2 visual field analysis. The time taken to conduct the individual screening tests in a subject varied from 1 to 5 min: perimetry took 5 min, photography 2 min, tonometry 3 min and angle-width determination 1 min. Fifty-six (4.4%) subjects showed glaucomatous defects in perimetry and/or photography. Thirty-seven could be re-examined and glaucoma was diagnosed in 16 subjects. Visual field defects and glaucomatous abnormalities in the photograph were confirmed by Humphrey perimetry in 72.7% and 35.7% respectively. Sixty-seven (5.3%) subjects had an intraocular pressure above 21 mm Hg, while no cases of angle closure glaucoma were found in this population. The costs of this screening setting were estimated at F1. 48,60 per screen. A future low cost screening survey might be limited to non-contact tonometry and visual field analysis with the Henson CFS3000 perimeter or a similar device, using suprathreshold testing with a limited number of points. Screening might be performed by non-medically trained employees. The costs of such a screening program may be estimated at F1. 16,- per screen and F1. 1.989,- per glaucoma case using a mobile screening unit (addendum).

Retinal nerve fiber layer assessment by scanning laser polarimetry and standardized photography.

PURPOSE: To determine whether, in a clinical setting, scanning laser polarimetry and retinal nerve fiber layer photography provide equivalent information on the retinal nerve fiber layer. METHODS: We prospectively studied 60 patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension and 24 healthy subjects. With scanning laser polarimetry, an estimate of the cross section of the retinal nerve fiber layer was obtained. By using a photographic reference set, we quantified photographs of the retinal nerve fiber layer. Visual fields were used to relate the results of both methods to functional damage. RESULTS: The scanning laser polarimetry measurements yielded reproducible cross-section values (coefficient of variation, 6.6%). Comparison of cross-section values and photograph scores gave Pearson correlation coefficients smaller than r = .4 (P < .01), improving to a maximum of r = .53 after compensation for offset. When cross-section values were compared to the mean deviation of the visual field, the Spearman correlation coefficients varied from an r of -.34 to -.53 (P < .01). Correction for offset resulted in an r of -.54 to -.65. When photograph scores and mean deviation of the visual field were compared, the Spearman correlation coefficients varied from an r of -.65 to -.71 (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Because r was maximal at .53, the information on the retinal nerve fiber layer obtained with scanning laser polarimetry and photography seems not equivalent. This result could not have been because of lack of reproducibility. Although the results suggested possible offset in scanning laser polarimetry, other methodologic differences must be considered to explain the differences between the two techniques.

Grading of retinal nerve fiber layer with a photographic reference set.

PURPOSE: We developed a new quantitative approach for the evaluation of diffuse atrophy of the retinal nerve fiber layer. METHODS: A simultaneous, visually supported grading system was designed, which consisted of a set of 25 reference photographs, numbered from 25 (broad, clearly striated nerve fiber bundles) to 1 (no nerve fibers visible). We prospectively evaluated this method by matching 60 retinal nerve fiber layer photographs of patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension and normal subjects to the reference photographs twice by three observers with varying experience levels in evaluating retinal nerve fiber layer RESULTS: Intraobserver and interobserver reliability, evaluated by the intraclass correlation coefficient statistics, was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.8). Intraclass correlation coefficients within observers were from 0.89 to 0.98 (lower limits 905% confidence interval, 0.84 to 0.97), and intraclass correlation coefficients between observers were from 0.81 to 0.91 (lower limits 95% confidence interval, 0.50 to 0.87). Clinical validity, in which the scores for upper and lower halves of photographs were compared with the mean deviation of the Humphrey 30-2 visual field program by using the Spearman correlation coefficient, was substantial (r = -.68, P < .01 for upper photo score and lower field mean deviation, r = -.53, P < .01 for lower photo score and upper field mean deviation). CONCLUSIONS: By using a reference set of of photographs of the retinal nerve fiber layer, we defined a method to derive a quantitative measurement of retinal nerve fiber layer with good reliability and to extend evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer photographs to nonspecialists.

[Diagnosis of systemic causes of uveitis; a matter of ophthalmologist and internist]. / Diagnostiek van systemische oorzaken van uveïtis; een zaak van oogarts en internist.

OBJECTIVE: To assess how often the aetiology is established in patients with uveitis, what systemic disease are found and what is the contribution of the internist to the diagnostic process. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: University Hospital Leiden, the Netherlands. METHOD: From January 1987 to April 1992, 342 patients presented with uveitis. All patients underwent a standard ophthalmological examination. Referral to an internist and individualised laboratory screening followed in patients with recurrent, chronic, bilateral or panuveitis. Recorded were: ophthalmological data, results of laboratory screening, results of analysis by the internist, final diagnosis and presence of systemic disease. RESULTS: 149 (44%) patients were examined by the internist, 18 (5.2%) were seen by another specialist. In 169 (49%) patients a specific diagnosis was made. 74 (22%) had a systemic disease, 74 a primary ocular disease. In 28 (8%) a systemic disease was presumed (5% were HLA-B27 positive, 3% had abnormal laboratory results); 5 (1%) patients had endophthalmitis as a complication of a septic process. CONCLUSION: In approximately 1/3 of the patients with uveitis a systemic disease was found. Examination by the internist tailored to the individual patient is essential in the evaluation of uveitis patients.