Using a learning health system to understand the mismatch between medicines supply and actual medicines use among adults with cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Studies in separate cohorts suggest possible discrepancies between inhaled medicines supplied (median 50-60%) and medicines used (median 30-40%). We performed the first study that directly compares CF medicine supply against use to identify the cost of excess medicines supply. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included participants from 12 UK adult centres with ≥1 year of continuous adherence data from data-logging nebulisers. Medicine supply was measured as medication possession ratio (MPR) for a 1-year period from the first suitable supply date. Medicine use was measured as electronic data capture (EDC) adherence over the same period. The cost of excess medicines was calculated as whole excess box(es) supplied after accounting for the discrepancy between EDC adherence and MPR with 20% contingency. RESULTS: Among 275 participants, 133 (48.4%) were females and mean age was 30 years (95% CI 29-31 years). Median EDC adherence was 57% (IQR 23-86%), median MPR was 74% (IQR 46-96%) and the discrepancy between measures was median 14% (IQR 2-29%). Even with 20% contingency, mean potential cost of excess medicines was £1,124 (95% CI £855-1,394), ranging from £183 (95% CI £29-338) for EDC adherence ≥80% to £2,017 (95% CI £1,507-2,526) for EDC adherence <50%. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a conservative estimate of excess inhaled medicines supply cost among adults with CF in the UK. The excess supply cost was highest among those with lowest EDC adherence, highlighting the importance of adherence support and supplying medicine according to actual use. MPR provides information about medicine supply but over-estimates actual medicine use.

Effects of bronchodilator particle size in asthmatic patients using monodisperse aerosols.

Aerosol particle size influences airway drug deposition. Current inhaler devices are inefficient, delivering a heterodisperse distribution of drug particle sizes where, at best, 20% reaches the lungs. Monodisperse aerosols are the appropriate research tools to investigate basic aerosol science concepts within the human airways. We hypothesized that engineering such aerosols of albuterol would identify the ideal bronchodilator particle size, thereby optimizing inhaled therapeutic drug delivery. Eighteen stable mildly to moderately asthmatic patients [mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) 74.3% of predicted] participated in a randomized, double-blind, crossover study design. A spinning-top aerosol generator was used to produce monodisperse albuterol aerosols that were 1.5, 3, and 6 microm in size, and also a placebo, which were inhaled at cumulative doses of 10, 20, 40, and 100 microg. Lung function changes and tolerability effects were determined. The larger particles, 6 and 3 microm, were significantly more potent bronchodilators than the 1.5-microm and placebo aerosols for FEV1 and for the forced expiratory flow between exhalation of 25 and 75% of forced vital capacity. A 20-microg dose of the 6- and 3-microm aerosols produced FEV1 bronchodilation comparable to that produced by 200 microg from a metered-dose inhaler. No adverse effects were observed in heart rate and plasma potassium. The data suggest that in mildly to moderately asthmatic patients there is more than one optimal beta2-agonist bronchodilator particle size and that these are larger particles in the higher part of the respirable range. Aerosols delivered in monodisperse form can enable large reductions of the inhaled dose without loss of clinical efficacy.

Ozone-induced increase in exhaled 8-isoprostane in healthy subjects is resistant to inhaled budesonide.

The aim of this study was to quantify lung oxidant stress after short-term ozone exposure as reflected by 8-isoprostane concentrations in exhaled breath condensate (EBC) and to investigate the effects of inhaled budesonide on this response. 8-Isoprostane is a prostaglandin-F(2 alpha) isomer that is formed in vivo by free radical-catalyzed peroxidation of arachidonic acid. EBC is a noninvasive method to collect airway secretions. We undertook a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study with inhaled budesonide (800 microg) or placebo twice daily for 2 weeks prior to ozone exposure (400 parts per billion) for 2 h in nine healthy nonsmokers. Exhaled 8-isoprostane was measured by an enzyme immunoassay. 8-Isoprostane was increased 4 h after ozone exposure compared to pre-exposure values in both placebo (36.9 +/- 3.9 pg/ml, mean +/- SEM, vs. 16.9 +/- 0.7 pg/ml; p <.001) and budesonide groups (33.4 +/- 2.6 pg/ml vs. 15.8 +/- 0.3 pg/ml; p <.001). Pretreatment with budesonide did not affect the increases in 8-isoprostane (mean differences 3.4 pg/ml, 95% CI -8.9 to 15.7, p =.54). Short-term ozone exposure causes acute increase in lung oxidative stress as reflected by exhaled 8-isoprostane. This increase is resistant to pretreatment with a high dose of inhaled budesonide.

Comparison of the effects of salmeterol and formoterol in patients with severe asthma.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Several studies have demonstrated the superiority of salmeterol and formoterol to either regular treatment with albuterol or placebo. However, to date there have been no trials comparing the efficacy of salmeterol and formoterol in patients with severe asthma. DESIGN: We undertook a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study to compare 4 weeks of treatment with inhaled formoterol (12 microg twice daily) or salmeterol (50 microg twice daily) in patients with severe asthma whose conditions were not being adequately controlled by therapy with high doses of inhaled corticosteroids (i.e., > or = 1,500 microg daily) or with regular oral corticosteroid treatment. Morning pretreatment peak expiratory flow (PEF) during the last 14 days of the treatment period was the primary outcome variable. Patients recorded morning and evening pretreatment PEF, daytime and nighttime symptom scores, and any use of rescue medication. Spirometry and bronchial reversibility were performed after each treatment. RESULTS: Forty-two nonsmoking patients (29 women; mean age, 45 +/- 2 years; mean [+/- SEM] FEV(1), 61.8 +/- 3.4% of predicted) took part in the trial, and 27 patients completed the trial. The mean morning PEF was greater in patients receiving formoterol (mean increase, 14.4 L/min; 95% confidence interval [CI]. 0.2 to 28.6) or salmeterol (mean increase, 14.8 L/min; 95% CI, 0.5 to 29.1) compared with those receiving placebo, but there was no difference between these treatments. There were no significant treatment effects for any of the secondary outcome variables (i.e., FEV(1,) FVC, mean evening PEF, mean daytime symptom score, or nighttime symptom score). CONCLUSION: We conclude that the long-acting beta(2)-agonists salmeterol and formoterol improve morning PEF in patients with severe asthma, but that there is no difference in efficacy between the two drugs.