Use of the CRABEL Score for improving surgical case-note quality.

INTRODUCTION: Quality assurance of medical record keeping in general surgery is facilitated by use of the CRABEL Score. Critical appraisal and constant feedback to staff plays an important part in improving case-note quality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For each case-note audit, a house officer reviewed two sets of case notes for each of six consultant surgeons. Scores were awarded according to initial clerking, subsequent entries, consent, and discharge summary. Overall scores were derived by subtracting deductions for omissions in each category from a starting score of 100. A larger number of points deducted due to absent data leads to a lower overall score and indicates poorer quality case notes. After four audits, a clerking proforma specifically designed to address some of the common areas of weakness identified in our record keeping was introduced and a further audit was performed in March 2004 to assess its impact. RESULTS: The mean score was lowest in the September 2001 audit and improved over the next two audits. However, there was a small reduction in September 2003 compared to September 2002. When the individual sections of the score were looked at separately, the greatest contribution to a poor score comes from the 'subsequent entries' section since there are five entries scored individually leading to a cumulative effect on the overall score. Within both the 'initial clerking' and 'subsequent entries' sections, early audits showed poor performance across a range of areas but consistent poor implementation of the guidelines was seen in a small number of specific areas as record keeping improved. The quality of medical notes improved over the first three cycles but the improvement was not maintained subsequently. DISCUSSION: The CRABEL score has been shown to be a useful, reproducible and easy-to-perform objective assessment of the quality of medical record keeping. Repeated audit cycles have ensured that case-note quality remains a high priority and have also led to the development of standardised admission documentation. Introduction of the latter has led to a measurable improvement in medical record keeping.

Update on the use of percutaneous nephrostomy/balloon dilation for the treatment of renal transplant leak/obstruction.

PURPOSE: Retrospective evaluation of the efficacy of percutaneous nephrostomy and nephroureteral stent placement for treatment of post-transplant ureteral leak, and percutaneous nephrostomy and balloon dilation for treatment of post-transplant ureteral obstruction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were reviewed for all patients who underwent percutaneous therapy for complications after renal transplantation between January 1985 and June 1995. A total of 61 patients with complications (leak, n = 17; obstruction, n = 44) had been treated. Patients underwent percutaneous nephrostomy followed by antegrade placement of a nephroureteral stent. In addition, all patients with obstruction also underwent ureteral balloon dilation. Follow-up ranged from 9 weeks to 24 months. Positive outcome was defined as nonsurgical closure of leak, significant improvement in renal function, and removal of the nephroureteral stent with maintenance of stable renal function. RESULTS: Regarding ureteral leak, 10 of 17 patients (59%) healed after treatment. Seven patients (41%) did not respond and went on to surgical repair. All patients with early (n = 13) ureteral obstruction (< 3 months after transplantation), had improved renal function (P < .025). Sixty-two percent of patients with early obstruction were cured (tube out with stable renal function) and 38% went to surgery for ureteral repair. In patients with late (n = 31) obstruction (> 3 months after transplantation), renal function improved in only 58% (P < .01). Only 16% of patients with late obstruction were cured (tube out with stable renal function). Ureteral obstruction was persistent in the remaining patients and did not respond to multiple balloon dilations. All complications were minor and included 23 of 61 (38%) patients with urinary tract infections and nine of 61 (14%) patients with limited hematuria. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous nephrostomy is very effective in improving renal function in patients with early obstruction. It is moderately successful in treating ureteral leak. Ureteral balloon dilatation is moderately effective for treatment of obstruction in the early (< 3 months) postoperative period. However, balloon dilation is minimally successful in curing ureteric obstruction occurring more than 3 months after transplantation.