RESUMO
Background and aims: Guidelines recommend that patients with hepatic encephalopathy (HE) receive a high-protein diet (roughly 1 g/kg actual body weight). Concommitant sodium restriction, low health literacy, and food insecurity limit patients' ability to meet this goal. We aimed to determine the feasibility of home-delivered high-protein medically tailored meals (MTMs) for patients with a recent episode of overt HE. Methods: We enrolled patients with prior overt HE on active HE therapy in a 6-month trial of MTM. All received 21 home-delivered meals/week with protein snacks (mid-day and bedtime) for 12 weeks. Patients completed follow-up at week 24. The primary outcome was feasibility. Additional outcomes included change in protein and micronutrient intake (measured using 24 h dietary recalls performed by dieticians), cognitive function (Animal Naming Test [ANT]; EncephalApp Stroop), physical function (Liver Frailty Index [LFI]), and quality of life (Short Form-8 Health Survey [SF-8]). Healthcare utilization was also assessed. Results: Ten patients competed the study with >90% of MTM consumed. Protein intake rose from 74.6 ± 25.1 g at baseline to 93.8 ± 24.3 g on MTM (P = 0.04). Branched-chain amino acids also increased-valine 3.73 ± 1.26 g to 5.17 ± 1.28 g, isoleucine 3.32 ± 1.18 to 4.69 ± 1.55, leucine 5.83 ± 2.00 to 7.49 ± 2.07, all P < 0.001. The LFI score improved from 4.42 ± 0.32 to 3.96 ± 0.82 by the end of the MTM phase (P = 0.03). SF-8 quality-of-life scores improved from 55.5 ± 15.5 at baseline to 64.7 ± 18.3 after the MTM phase, to 64.4 ± 19.1 at the end of the study (P = 0.1). EncephalApp Stroop time improved from 227 ± 94 to 194 ± 58s by the end of the MTM phase (P = 0.08). ANT scores were similarly non-significantly improved. Conclusion: Home-delivered MTMs are feasible, increase protein consumption, and may improve patient wellbeing. A randomized trial is needed.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Multiple medications are associated with an increased risk of incident hepatic encephalopathy. Despite this known risk, medications such as opioids, benzodiazepines, gabapentin/pregabalin, and/or proton pump inhibitors are increasingly prescribed to persons with cirrhosis. Deprescribing is a promising intervention to reduce the burden of hepatic encephalopathy. Given that deprescribing has not been trialed in cirrhosis, we evaluated the barriers and facilitators to safe and successful deprescribing in cirrhosis. METHODS: We conducted, transcribed, and analyzed semi-structured interviews using qualitative methodology with 22 subjects. This included eight patients with cirrhosis and recent use of opiates, benzodiazepines, gabapentin/Lyrica, and/or proton pump inhibitors as well as 14 providers (primary care, transplant surgery, transplant hepatology). Interviews explored opinions, behaviors, and understanding surrounding the risks and benefits of deprescribing. RESULTS: Major provider-specific barriers included deferred responsibility of the deprescribing process, knowledge gaps regarding the risk of hepatic encephalopathy associated with medications (e.g., proton pump inhibitors) as well as the safe method of deprescription (i.e., benzodiazepines), and time constraints. Patient-specific barriers included knowledge gaps regarding the cirrhosis-specific risks of their medications and anxiety about the recurrence of symptoms after medication discontinuation. Patients uniformly reported trust in their provider's opinions on risks and wished for more comprehensive education during or after visits. Providers uniformly reported support for deprescription resources including pharmacist or nurse outreach. CONCLUSION: Given knowledge of medication risks related to hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis, deprescribing is universally seen as important. Knowledge gaps, inaction, and uncertainty regarding feasible alternatives prevent meaningful implementation of deprescription. Trials of protocolized pharmacy-based deprescribing outreach and patient-facing education on risks are warranted.
