Clinical features of hypersensitivity reactions to oxaliplatin: a 10-year experience.

BACKGROUND: Oxaliplatin has become one of the major cytotoxic agents for the treatment of gastrointestinal tumors. As a result, several cases of the so-called oxaliplatin-associated hypersensitivity reaction have been documented. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We have retrospectively evaluated and characterized these reactions in our patient group by reviewing the files of 1,224 patients exposed to an oxaliplatin-containing regimen in order to provide useful clinical information for diagnosis and management. RESULTS: Three hundred and eight (308) patients who have never been exposed to platinum compounds developed symptoms compatible with a reaction to oxaliplatin that was verified by manifestation of at least similar symptoms on rechallenging. The reactions occurred after the first 5 courses, with a median course number of 9 (range 1-24). These reactions could be distinguished as (1) mild reactions occurring in 195 (63%) patients manifesting with itching and small area erythema either during treatment or within the next hours, and (2) severe reactions occurring in 113 (37%) patients within minutes of drug infusion manifesting with diffuse erythroderma, facial swelling, chest tightness, bronchospasm and changes in blood pressure. Oxaliplatin withdrawal was not required in patients with a mild reaction. Forty-eight (42%) patients having a severe reaction with appropriate premedication and prolongation of the infusion duration could tolerate 2-4 subsequent courses. For the remaining 65 (58%) patients, oxaliplatin withdrawal was inevitable because of the very severe reactions occurring on rechallenging. In addition, 3 patients presented with thrombocytopenia and 3 others with hemolytic anemia, all reversible upon oxaliplatin discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: Hypersensitivity reactions to oxaliplatin are underestimated. Although the reactions are not frequent during first courses, in extensively pretreated patients, they may become a serious problem. In the majority of patients, drug discontinuation might not be necessary. In patients manifesting a severe reaction, re-exposure to oxaliplatin should be considered only if the patient can tolerate the reaction and there has been clinical benefit from this therapy. Physicians and nursing staff should be aware of the risk and be well prepared.

Paclitaxel-ifosfamide-cisplatin as salvage chemotherapy in ovarian cancer patients pretreated with platinum compounds and paclitaxel.

BACKGROUND: The role of combination chemotherapy regimens in the management of ovarian cancer patients with tumors previously exposed to platinum compounds and paclitaxel has not yet been defined. The present phase II study evaluated the activity and toxicity of a paclitaxel-ifosfamide-cisplatin combination in the aforementioned group of patients. Given the in vitro and in vivo synergism between these three agents, it was believed that using a three drug combination would overcome tumor resistance to cisplatin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-five patients were enrolled in the study. The median age was 55 and the median performance status 1. Thirteen (37%) had potentially platinum sensitive, 12 (35%) had primary platinum-resistant and 10 (28%) patients had secondary platinum-resistant tumors. Treatment consisted of paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 as a 3 h i.v. infusion on day 1, cisplatin 75 mg/m2 i.v. over 2 h fractionated over days 1 and 2, and ifosfamide 5 mg/m2 i.v. over 1 h fractionated on days 1-2 with mesna uroprotection. Courses were administered every 3 weeks on an outpatient basis. Granulocyte-colony stimulation factor (G-CSF) was given at a dose of 5 microg/kg/day on days 4-10. A median of 4 cycles were administered with the delivered dose intensity at 85% of the planned dose for the three agents. RESULTS: Among 35 patients evaluable for response and toxicity, there were 10 partial responses with a response rate of 28.6% (95% confidence interval 12%-45%). Stable disease was recorded in 9 (25.7%) and progressive disease in 16 (45.7%) patients. Subgroup analysis revealed a response rate of 38.5% in potentially platinum-sensitive, 16.5% in primary platinum-resistant and 30% in secondary platinum-resistant tumors. The median response duration was 5 months (range 3-14 months), the median time to progression 6 months (range 3-18 months) and the median survival 12 months (range 3-44 months). Myelotoxicity was significant with neutropenia grade 3 and 4 occurring in 35% and 45% of patients, respectively. Eight episodes (5% of all cycles) of febrile neutropenia were documented and well managed with oral or i.v. antibiotics and G-CSF continuation until complete recovery. Grade 1, 2 and 3 peripheral neuropathy developed in 30%, 30% and 10% of patients, respectively. In conclusion, the three drug combination demonstrated a significant effectiveness in potentially platinum-sensitive tumors and a moderate efficacy in platinum-resistant tumors. The regimen, although myelotoxic, is tolerable with G-CSF support. Further investigation via comparative studies is required to define any superiority of the present regimen over doublets of the three agents in this group of patients.

Subsets of patients with advanced gastric cancer responding to second-line chemotherapy with docetaxel-cisplatin.

The role of docetaxel in combination with cisplatin in the management of gastric cancer resistant to first-line chemotherapy has not yet been defined. This multicenter prospective phase II study evaluated the activity and toxicity of the docetaxel-cisplatin combination in gastric cancer patients, whose tumors were primarily resistant to first-line chemotherapy or had tumor recurrence after chemotherapy. Treatment consisted of docetaxel 70 mg/m2 i.v. followed by cisplatin 70 mg/m2 both administered on day one, every three weeks. Thirty-two patients were enrolled in the study. The median age was 60 years and the median performance status (ECOG) was 1. Six (19%) patients had tumor progression during adjuvant chemotherapy, 19 (59%) had tumor recurrence after primary chemotherapy and 7 (22%) had tumor progressing while on first-line chemotherapy. Twenty (62%) patients had received non-platinum agents as first-line chemotherapy, while the rest had received the so-called "new generation" regimen that contained cisplatin. Among 32 patients evaluable for response, there were 5 (16%) (CI 95%-8%-35%) partial responses, all in patients that had received non-platinum agents as first-line chemotherapy. Stable disease was recorded in 8 (25%) and progressive disease in 19 (59%) patients. The median response duration was 4 (range 3-6) months, the median time to progression was 5 (range 3-6) months, the median survival after second-line chemotherapy was 6 (range 2-24) months and the median survival after first-line chemotherapy was 12 (range 4-36) months. Myelotoxicity was the main toxicity with grade 3-4 neutropenia occurring in 19 (59%) of the patients and febrile neutropenia in 4 (12%) patients. G-CSF support was given to 25 (78%) patients. Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia was recorded in 4 (12%) patients. In conclusion, the combination of docetaxel plus cisplatin appears to be a moderately effective regimen with acceptable toxicity when G-CSF support is provided. According to our results, it seems that patients, whose tumors were not exposed to cisplatin during first-line chemotherapy, were more likely to respond to this regimen.