The Effect of Different Image Processing Techniques on the Measurement Accuracy of Endodontics File Length.

Statement of the Problem: Different software capabilities have been used in digital systems to increase the diagnostic quality of radiographic projections. Considering the availability of different enhancement techniques, it is necessary to determine the suitability of each technique for various diagnostic cases. There is controversy between studies over the effect of different digital enhancement techniques on the accuracy of file length measurements in endodontics. Purpose: The present in vitro study aimed to determine the effect of the software capabilities on the diagnostic accuracy to determine endodontic file lengths in photostimulable phosphor (PSP) radiographs. Materials and Method: In the present in vitro study, standard access cavities were prepared in 44 extracted human single-rooted permanent teeth. An endodontic file was placed in each root canal. PSP sensors were used for digital imaging using the parallel technique. All the images were reviewed on a same monitor; once normally with no software enhancement and once using software manipulations including pseudo-color, sharpness, emboss, and edge enhancement. The distance from the file tip to the rubber stop was measured on the images by an electronic ruler. Results: Significantly, all of the image enhancement techniques presented shorter measurements comparing to the actual length. The results revealed the significant accuracy of the measured error in the pseudo-color enhancement technique compared to other techniques. Conclusion: The results revealed significant differences between the initial measurements (the gold standard) and those made on the manipulated radiographs. In all cases, the measurements were significantly lower than the real values. Therefore, none of these digital enhancement techniques can increase the accuracy of file length measurements significantly. However, manipulation with the pseudo-color option resulted in fewer errors compared to other options and the normal images. Hence, for precise measurements of the endodontic file lengths, pseudo-color processing algorithm can be suggested when using PSP sensors.

Dosimetry of Three Cone Beam Computerized Tomography Scanners at Different Fields of View in Terms of Various Head and Neck Organs.

BACKGROUND: Marketing new radiography devices necessitates documenting their absorbed X-ray doses. Since the current literature lacks studies on new devices, we assessed the doses of two new devices that had not previously been assessed. OBJECTIVES: The new devices were compared to the Promax three dimensional (3D) scanner at two fields of view (FOV) in nine critical head and neck tissues and organs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventeen thermoluminescence dosimeters positioned in an average-sized male RANDO phantom were used to determine the dosimetry of the three cone beam computerized tomography devices (NewTom VGi, NewTom 5G, and Promax 3D) at two field of views (FOVs), one small and one large. The exposure by each device per FOV was performed five times (30 exposures). The absorbed and effective doses were calculated for the thyroid, parotid, submandibular gland, sublingual gland, calvarium, cervical vertebra, trunk of the mandible, and mandibular ramus. The doses pertaining to the different devices, the FOVs, and the tissues were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U, and Wilcoxon tests. RESULTS: The average absorbed doses, respectively, for the large and small FOVs were 17.19 and 28.89 mGy in the Promax 3D, 19.25 and 35.46 mGy in the NewTom VGi, and 18.85 and 30.63 mGy in the NewTom 5G. The absorbed doses related to the FOVs were not significantly different (P value = 0.1930). However, the effective doses were significantly greater at the smaller FOVs / higher resolutions (P = 0.0039). The doses of the three devices were not significantly different (P = 0.8944). The difference among the nine organs/tissues was significant (Kruskal-Wallis P=0.0000). CONCLUSION: The absorbed doses pertaining to the devices and the FOVs were not significantly different, although the organs/tissues absorbed considerably different doses.

Effect of Voxel Size on Detection of External Root Resorption Defects Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography.

BACKGROUND: Selecting a voxel size that yields minimal radiation dose with no significant compromise of the diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is particularly important. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the effect of voxel size on detection accuracy of simulated external root resorption defects using NewTom CBCT system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this diagnostic study, the roots of 90 extracted human central incisors were hypothetically divided into cervical, middle, and apical thirds. Variable-size defects were prepared in the buccal and lingual surfaces of the roots and CBCT scans were obtained with four different voxel sizes (150, 200, 250, and 300). Presence or absence of defects on CBCT scans was determined by three radiologists and the results were compared with the gold standard (actual size and depth of defects). Sensitivity and specificity values were calculated and reported for different groups. RESULTS: In the lingual surfaces, the highest specificity and sensitivity belonged to 300µm voxel size (92.9%), and 200 and 250µm voxel sizes (both 97.4%) in the cervical third, respectively. In the middle third, the highest specificity and sensitivity belonged to 250 and 200µm voxel sizes (84.6% and 100%, respectively). In the apical third, the highest specificity and sensitivity belonged to 300 µm voxel size (100% and 97.9%, respectively). In the buccal surfaces, the highest specificity and sensitivity belonged to 150 (75.0%), 300 and 250 µm voxel sizes (100%) and the minimum values belonged to 200 µm voxel size (60% and 97.3%) in the cervical third. In the apical third, the highest specificity and sensitivity were noted in 300 µm voxel size (100% and 97.6%, respectively) and the minimum values were seen in 200 and 150 µm voxel sizes (93.8%, 90.5%, respectively). In the middle third, 300, 250 and 200 µm voxel sizes yielded the highest specificity (88.9%), while 150 µm voxel size yielded the highest sensitivity (98.8%). CONCLUSION: Considering the similar diagnostic efficacy of all voxel sizes, 300 µm voxel size can be used with adequate efficacy for detection of external root resorption defects with minimal patient radiation dose and the shortest scanning time.

Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy and dimensional measurements by using CBCT in mandibular first molars.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and quantitatively evaluate the morphology of mandibular first molars using CBCT. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-four double-rooted mandibular first molars were evaluated by NewTom VGi CBCT. The distance from the furcation and apex to the cementoenamel junction (CEJ), diameter and thickness of canal walls, the buccolingual (BL) to mesiodistal (MD) ratio (ΔD), prevalence of oval canals at different sections and taper of the canals were all determined. In order to assess the diagnostic accuracy of CBCT, distance from the furcation and apex to the CEJ and thickness of canal walls at the CEJ and apex were compared with the gold standard values (caliper and stereomicroscope). Statistical analyses were carried out using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), paired t-test and repeated measures ANOVA. RESULTS: A high correlation existed between the CBCT and gold standard measurements (P<0.001). In dimensional measurements, length of mesial root was higher than the distal root and lingual furcation was farther from the CEJ than the buccal furcation (P<0.001). An important finding of this study was the mesiodistal taper of the mesiobuccal (MB) and mesiolingual (ML) canals; which was equal to 0.02. CONCLUSIONS: CBCT has acceptable diagnostic accuracy for measurement of canal wall thickness. Cleaning and shaping of the canals should be performed based on the unique anatomy of the respective canal; which necessitates the use of advanced imaging techniques for thorough assessment of root canal anatomy in a clinical setting. KEY WORDS: Permanent mandibular first molar, accuracy, cone-beam computed tomography, dimensional measurement.

The Effect of Emboss Enhancement on Reliability of Landmark Identification in Digital Lateral Cephalometric Images.

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of the craniofacial bones is the oldest method to measure the facial proportion ratio in orthodontics. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of emboss enhancement on the reliability of landmark identification in digital lateral cephalometric images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten digital lateral cephalograms were selected from the archive of an oral and maxillofacial radiology center. Using DIGORA software, these images were saved in two formats; common images and 3D emboss images. On these images, 32 skeletal, dental, and soft tissue landmarks were marked at least twice with a 2-week interval by four observers (two radiologists and two orthodontists). In order to determine the position of the marked landmarks (in x and y coordinates), a software was designed. The statistical analysis was performed in SPSS software and the reliability of each observer was obtained by means of intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: In three skeletal landmarks [Orbit (Or), condyl top (Cond), and pogonion (Pog)], the enhancement caused significant reduction in the reliability, and in four skeletal [Anterior Nasal Spine (ANS), B, A, and Basion (Ba)], two dental (U1 root, L1 incisal), and one soft tissue landmark (Menton soft tissue), the enhancement increased the reliability of landmark detection between the two phases of the study. Totally, ICC of embossed images in both x and y coordinates were greater than the typical images, but the difference was not statistically significant. However, the effect of enhancement on the improvement of the reliability of landmark identification was higher in the x-axis than the y-axis. CONCLUSIONS: Using embossed images is only effective in increasing the reliability of detection in a few numbers of cephalometric landmarks.

Detection of proximal caries using digital radiographic systems with different resolutions.

BACKGROUND: Dental radiography is an important tool for detection of caries and digital radiography is the latest advancement in this regard. Spatial resolution is a characteristic of digital receptors used for describing the quality of images. AIM: This study was aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of two digital radiographic systems with three different resolutions for detection of noncavitated proximal caries. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Diagnostic accuracy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy premolar teeth were mounted in 14 gypsum blocks. Digora; Optime and RVG Access were used for obtaining digital radiographs. Six observers evaluated the proximal surfaces in radiographs for each resolution in order to determine the depth of caries based on a 4-point scale. The teeth were then histologically sectioned, and the results of histologic analysis were considered as the gold standard. Data were entered using SPSS version 18 software and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used for data analysis. P <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. RESULTS: No significant difference was found between different resolutions for detection of proximal caries (P > 0.05). RVG access system had the highest specificity (87.7%) and Digora; Optime at high resolution had the lowest specificity (84.2%). Furthermore, Digora; Optime had higher sensitivity for detection of caries exceeding outer half of enamel. Judgment of oral radiologists for detection of the depth of caries had higher reliability than that of restorative dentistry specialists. CONCLUSION: The three resolutions of Digora; Optime and RVG access had similar accuracy in detection of noncavitated proximal caries.

Accuracy of linear measurement using cone-beam computed tomography at different reconstruction angles.

PURPOSE: This study was performed to evaluate the effect of changing the orientation of a reconstructed image on the accuracy of linear measurements using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-two titanium pins were inserted in seven dry sheep mandibles. The length of these pins was measured using a digital caliper with readability of 0.01 mm. Mandibles were radiographed using a CBCT device. When the CBCT images were reconstructed, the orientation of slices was adjusted to parallel (i.e., 0°), +10°, +12°, -12°, and -10° with respect to the occlusal plane. The length of the pins was measured by three radiologists, and the accuracy of these measurements was reported using descriptive statistics and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA); p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The differences in radiographic measurements ranged from -0.64 to +0.06 at the orientation of -12°, -0.66 to -0.11 at -10°, -0.51 to +0.19 at 0°, -0.64 to +0.08 at +10°, and -0.64 to +0.1 at +12°. The mean absolute values of the errors were greater at negative orientations than at the parallel position or at positive orientations. The observers underestimated most of the variables by 0.5-0.1 mm (83.6%). In the second set of observations, the reproducibility at all orientations was greater than 0.9. CONCLUSION: Changing the slice orientation in the range of -12° to +12° reduced the accuracy of linear measurements obtained using CBCT. However, the error value was smaller than 0.5 mm and was, therefore, clinically acceptable.

Evaluation of the accuracy of linear and angular measurements on panoramic radiographs taken at different positions.

PURPOSE: This study assessed the accuracy of linear and angular measurements on panoramic radiographs taken at different positions in vitro. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two acrylic models were fabricated from a cast with normal occlusion. Straight and 75° mesially and lingually angulated pins were placed, and standardized panoramic radiographs were taken at standard position, at an 8° downward tilt of the occlusal plane compared to the standard position, at an 8° upward tilt of the anterior occlusal plane, and at a 10° downward tilt of the right and left sides of the model. On the radiographs, the length of the pins above (crown) and below (root) the occlusal plane, total pin length, crown-to-root ratio, and angulation of pins relative to the occlusal plane were calculated. The data were subjected to repeated measures ANOVA and LSD multiple comparisons tests. RESULTS: Significant differences were noted between the radiographic measurements and true values in different positions on both models with linear (P<0.001) and those with angulated pins (P<0.005). No statistically significant differences were observed between the angular measurements and baselines of the natural head posture at different positions for the linear and angulated pins. CONCLUSION: Angular measurements on panoramic radiographs were sufficiently accurate and changes in the position of the occlusal plane equal to or less than 10° had no significant effect on them. Some variations could exist in the pin positioning (head positioning), and they were tolerable while taking panoramic radiographs. Linear measurements showed the least errors in the standard position and 8° upward tilt of the anterior part of the occlusal plane compared to other positions.