Biofilm formation by Mycobacterium avium isolates originating from humans, swine and birds.

BACKGROUND: Mycobacterium avium includes the subspecies avium, silvaticum, paratuberculosis and hominissuis, and M. avium subspecies has been isolated from various environments all over the world including from biofilms in water distribution systems. The aim of this study was to examine isolates of M. avium subsp. avium and M. avium subsp. hominissuis of different origin for biofilm formation and to look for correlations between biofilm formation and RFLP-types, and to standardise the method to test for biofilm formation. In order to determine the best screening method, a panel of 14 isolates of M. avium subsp. avium and M. avium subsp. hominissuis, were tested for their ability to form biofilm in microtiter plates under different conditions. Subsequently, 83 additional isolates from humans, swine and birds were tested for biofilm formation. The isolates were tested for the presence of selected genes involved in the synthesis of glycopeptidolipids (GPLs) in the cell wall of M. avium, which is believed to be important for biofilm formation. Colony morphology and hsp65 sequvar were also determined. RESULTS: Nine isolates from swine produced biofilm. There was a significant higher frequency of porcine isolates forming biofilm compared to human isolates. All isolates were previously characterised by IS1311- and IS1245-RFLP typing. The ability to form biofilm did not correlate with the RFLP-type, hsp65 sequevar, colony morphology or the presence of gene sequences related to GPL synthesis. CONCLUSION: The observed differences in biofilm forming abilities between porcine and human isolates raises questions regarding the importance of biofilm formation for infectious potential. The optimised method worked well for screening of multiple isolates.

A novel IS element, ISMpa1, in Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis.

A novel insertion element belonging to the IS110 family was identified in Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis. The IS element, ISMpa1, is 1500 bp and has one ORF encoding a putative transposase. Three copies of ISMpa1 were identified in the M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis genome. The element had inserted into the 3' end of the highly conserved mycobacterial genes prrB and a homologue of M. tuberculosis Rv1593c, and between a putative cytochrome p450 oxygenase and a putative hydrolase. The IS element was present in all (n = 11) M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis strains but not detected in most other mycobacterial species examined, including 10 M. avium subsp. avium isolates of human, avian and porcine origin. However two porcine isolates of M. avium subsp. avium and the reference strain IWGMT49 did harbour ISMpa1. These three strains belong to a previously described subgroup of M. avium subsp. avium based on IS1245 restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) pattern and serovars. All of the M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis strains examined had an identical RFLP pattern when probed with sequences corresponding to the 5' end of ISMpa1, whereas a different pattern was seen in the positive M. avium subsp. avium strains. This novel IS element might be a useful tool in strain classification of M. avium subsp. avium and also for the identification of M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis when used in combination with IS900.

Detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis by buoyant density centrifugation, sequence capture PCR and dot blot hybridisation.

Detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (M. paratuberculosis) by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is often hampered by the lack of efficient methods for sample treatment. We report a protocol for analysis of faecal samples based on buoyant density centrifugation in Percoll and IS900 sequence capture PCR combined with a dot blot assay for detection of low-grade infection of M. paratuberculosis. Serial dilutions of M. paratuberculosis genomic DNA and M. paratuberculosis bacteria were used to assess the sensitivity of the method. The final evaluation was performed with spiked faecal samples, which also were analysed by culture. The presence of PCR inhibitory substances in processed faecal samples was evaluated by including a PCR internal control. By using buoyant density centrifugation, sequence capture PCR, and dot blot hybridisation, we achieved a sensitivity of 10(3)CFU (colony forming units)/g of faeces. The detection limit by culture was assessed to 10(2)CFU/g of faeces. We conclude that the described protocol is a fast and sensitive alternative to bacterial culture of faecal samples.