Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Urol Int ; 53(3): 130-4, 1994.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7645138

RESUMO

Current clinical trials in disseminated prostatic cancer mostly use M0 or M1 to identify two prognostically different groups of patients. Soloway et al. [Cancer 1988;61:195-202] have shown a significant difference in survival depending on the extent of disease (EOD) on bone scan in M1 disease. Seventy-three prostatic cancer patients with bone-scan-proven metastases (T0-4 Nx M1 G1-3) from the Aust-Agder County in Norway with observation time 2-9 years were followed. The impact of T stage, grade, serum acid phosphatase status and EOD on survival was analyzed. EOD was assessed according to Soloway et al. No statistically significant difference could be demonstrated according to T stage or histological grade. A statistically significant difference in survival could be demonstrated both for normal versus elevated serum acid phosphatase and for EOD. EOD I/II had a better prognosis than EOD III/IV. Stratification of patients in EOD categories seems relevant, but the relative importance of the different EOD categories is not yet established.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Ósseas/secundário , Neoplasias da Próstata/mortalidade , Fosfatase Ácida/sangue , Idoso , Neoplasias Ósseas/mortalidade , Humanos , Masculino , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Fatores de Risco , Análise de Sobrevida , Taxa de Sobrevida
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...