Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Crohns Colitis ; 12(7): 826-834, 2018 Jun 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29955835

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Iron deficiency and iron deficiency anaemia are common complications in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] patients. Anaemia in IBD is attributable to chronic blood loss and/or impaired iron intake and absorption. International guidelines recommend intravenous iron supplementation in IBD patients, since oral supplements are frequently poorly tolerated and can exacerbate inflammation. Intravenous ferric carboxymaltose [FCM; Ferinject® 50 mg ferric iron[III]/mL suspension] was approved in Europe in 2007 for correction of iron deficiency, and can be administered in single 15-min infusions of up to 1000 mg. METHODS: A prospective non-interventional post-marketing study was performed in 101 centres in Germany to assess the efficacy, tolerability, and convenience of Ferinject® in clinical practice in a large cohort of IBD patients. Primary endpoints were haemoglobin [Hb] normalisation or increase ≥2 g/dL [responders], and normalisation of serum ferritin [s-ferritin] and transferrin saturation. Adverse events [AEs], clinical signs/symptoms, and disease activity indices were also analysed. RESULTS: In all, 224 subjects (127 Crohn's disease [CD]; 97 ulcerative colitis [UC]) were treated. Mean total iron dose was 1139 mg [range: 100 mg-4800 mg], with 76.7% of doses between 500 mg and 2000 mg; 63.3% of patients responded, and no adverse drug reactions or drug-attributed serious adverse events [SAEs] or deaths occurred. Mean increases of Hb [10.0 to 12.3 g/dL], ferritin [52 µg/L to 103 µg/L], transferrin saturation [TSAT, 15% to 25%], and s-iron [6.1 to 12.4 µmol/L] were significant [p = 0.0001]. Clinical scores and quality of life improved due to the amelioration of anaemia symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Ferinject®-therapy was proven to be effective and safe in a large cohort of patients with IBD-associated anaemia in routine practice. Rapid, high-dose application is convenient for physicians and reduces patients' time lost from work.


Assuntos
Anemia Ferropriva/tratamento farmacológico , Colite Ulcerativa/complicações , Doença de Crohn/complicações , Compostos Férricos/uso terapêutico , Maltose/análogos & derivados , Administração Intravenosa , Adulto , Anemia Ferropriva/sangue , Anemia Ferropriva/etiologia , Feminino , Compostos Férricos/administração & dosagem , Compostos Férricos/efeitos adversos , Ferritinas/sangue , Hemoglobinas/metabolismo , Humanos , Masculino , Maltose/administração & dosagem , Maltose/efeitos adversos , Maltose/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Transferrina/metabolismo , Adulto Jovem
2.
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res ; 10: 93-103, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29440920

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Iron-deficiency anemia and iron deficiency are common comorbidities associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) resulting in impaired quality of life and high health care costs. Intravenous iron has shown clinical benefit compared to oral iron therapy. AIM: This study aimed to compare health care outcomes and costs after oral vs intravenous iron treatment for IBD patients with iron deficiency or iron deficiency anemia (ID/A) in Germany. METHODS: IBD patients with ID/A were identified by ICD-10-GM codes and newly commenced iron treatment via ATC codes in 2013 within the InGef (formerly Health Risk Institute) research claims database. Propensity score matching was performed to balance both treatment groups. Non-observable covariates were adjusted by applying the difference-in-differences (DID) approach. RESULTS: In 2013, 589 IBD patients with ID/A began oral and 442 intravenous iron treatment. After matching, 380 patients in each treatment group were analyzed. The intravenous group had fewer all-cause hospitalizations (37% vs 48%) and ID/A-related hospitalizations (5% vs 14%) than the oral iron group. The 1-year preobservation period comparison revealed significant health care cost differences between both groups. After adjusting for cost differences by DID method, total health care cost savings in the intravenous iron group were calculated to be €367. While higher expenditure for medication (€1,876) was observed in the intravenous iron group, the inpatient setting achieved most cost savings (€1,887). CONCLUSION: IBD patients receiving intravenous iron were less frequently hospitalized and incurred lower total health care costs compared to patients receiving oral iron. Higher expenditures for pharmaceuticals were compensated by cost savings in other domains.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...