Increased sensitivity of electrophysiological study by isoproterenol infusion in unexplained syncope.

UNLABELLED: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the interests of electrophysiologic study (EPS) after infusion of isoproterenol in patients with syncope and negative EPS in control state. METHODS: 1350 patients were consecutively admitted for syncope and EPS. Patients were included if they had no history of tachycardia, a normal Holter monitoring, a negative EPS in control state. EPS was repeated after infusion of 2-4 mug/kg of isoproterenol. RESULTS: 256 patients, 35 with exercise-related syncope and 105 with heart disease (HD), were recruited. After isoproterenol, an arrhythmia was identified as the sign associated with syncope in 102 patients (40%): SVT in 32 patients, VT in 36 patients, infrahisian 2nd or 3rd degree AV block in three patients and vasovagal reaction in 31 patients. Arrhythmias were more frequent in patients with HD (50/105) than in those without HD (52/151) (p<0.05); SVT tended to be more frequent in patients without HD (n=23) than in those with HD (n=9) (p<0.1); VT was more frequent in patients with HD (n=26) than in those without HD (n=10) (p<0.001). There was no relationship between a positive isoproterenol testing and occurrence of syncope at exercise (19/35 vs 81/221) (p<0.1). CONCLUSION: isoproterenol infusion increased the sensitivity of EPS in patients with syncope, related or not to exercise, and with negative study in control state, but principally in those with HD. However, SVT was diagnosed in patients without HD and EPS associated with isoproterenol infusion remained an important and rapid tool to establish this diagnosis.

Paradoxical effect of isoprenaline infusion.

BACKGROUND: Isoprenaline (isoproterenol) is a beta-adrenergic drug, used to increase the heart rate and, during electrophysiological study, to facilitate the induction of supraventricular (SVT) and ventricular tachycardias (VT). Decrease in heart rate during isoprenaline infusion is a rare phenomenon. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the incidence, the possible mechanisms, and the significance of a paradoxical bradycardia induced by isoprenaline infusion. METHODS: Electrophysiological study was performed for the evaluation of tachycardias (n = 551) or dizziness/syncope (n = 214) in 765 patients aged from 15 to 85 years. The study was negative in the basal state, and was repeated after isoprenaline infusion (2-4 microg/min). RESULTS: In 714 patients, this perfusion increased the heart rate to 100-140 bpm. A bradycardia was noted in 51 patients (7%). Two bradyarrhythmias were noted: (1) sinus or junctional bradycardia (cycle length - 10%) occurred in 43 patients, aged 15-70 years, generally studied for unexplained syncope (n = 37); a young age (40+/-16 years), syncope (n = 37) and absence of heart disease (n = 27) were more frequent than that in patients without isoprenaline-induced sinus or junctional bradycardia; another arrhythmia (SVT or VT) was induced in seven patients with syncope, five with heart disease and two without; six young patients (<50 years) had no syncope and were studied for SVT or VT; (2) eight patients, aged 65+/-11 years, developed second-degree atrioventricular (AV) block which was supraHisian (n = 4) or infraHisian (n = 4); they were studied for exercise-related syncope; they had no signs of myocardial ischaemia and AV block was reproduced by ajmaline testing: isoprenaline revealed organic conduction disturbance. CONCLUSION: The occurrence of paradoxical bradycardia was a rare finding during isoprenaline infusion (7%); sinus or junctional bradycardia was a sign of hypervagotonia, but was without clinical significance in 35% of these patients. The development of second-degree AV block was always pathological and associated with AV conduction disturbances, which occurred spontaneously during exercise. Isoprenaline infusion appeared to be a simple means to detect organic AV conduction disturbance in patients complaining of exercise or stress-related dizziness/syncope and unable to perform exercise test.

Electrophysiologic characteristics of atria in patients without heart disease.

BACKGROUND: The significance of atrial fibrillation or tachycardia (AF) induction remains debatable. Some believe that the presence of heart disease (HD) increases the sensitivity and decreases the specificity of programmed atrial stimulation (PAS). There are few data in patients without HD. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the results of PAS in asymptomatic patients without HD and in those with documented spontaneous AF, but without HD, to know the diagnosis value of the technique. METHODS: A total of 4,900 PAS were consecutively performed. The control group (I, N=67) was defined by the absence of preexcitation syndrome, dizziness/syncope, hypertension, history of tachycardia, or other documented HD together with a normal 2D echocardiogram and 24-hour Holter monitoring. They were compared to a group (II) of 54 patients with documented paroxysmal AF and without HD. PAS used one and two extrastimuli, delivered during sinus rhythm and two drive rates (600, 400 ms). Atrial-effective refractory periods (ARP), their adaptation to cycle length, and conduction times were noted. AF induction was defined as the induction of AF lasting more than 1 minute. RESULTS: Group I patients (1.4% of 4,900) were younger than group II (51 +/- 17 vs 65 +/- 11 years, P < 0.001). A single extrastimulus never induced sustained AF in group I, but did so in 11 group II patients (20%); sustained AF was induced by two extrastimuli in 15 group I patients (22%) and in 31 group II patients (57%) (P < 0.001). There were no ARP and conduction time differences in group I patients with and without inducible AF, but there was a longer sinus cycle length in patients with inducible AF (977 +/- 164 vs 838 +/- 141 ms, P < 0.02). There were no electrophysiological differences in group II patients with and without inducible AF. No group I patient developed spontaneous AF (follow-up 4 +/- 2 years). The sensitivity of PAS with one extrastimulus was 20% and the specificity 100%; the sensitivity of PAS with two extrastimuli was 57% and the specificity 78%. CONCLUSION: Sustained AF was not induced by one extrastimulus in control patients without symptoms, nor heart disease, but sustained AF was induced by two extrastimuli in 22% of these patients. The induction of a sustained AF by two extrastimuli should be interpreted cautiously, particularly in patients with a relative sinus bradycardia. However, the sensitivity of PAS with one extrastimulus was very low and two extrastimuli were required in patients with spontaneous AF to induce the tachycardia. Other electrophysiological parameters were not useful to differentiate patients with and without inducible AF.

Significance of inducible ventricular flutter-fibrillation after myocardial infarction.

AIM: The purpose of this study was to determine the factors associated with the induction of ventricular flutter/fibrillation (VFl/VF)and its prognostic significance in post-myocardial infarction. METHODS: Programmed ventricular stimulation was performed after myocardial infarction (MI) for syncope (n = 232) or systematically (n = 755); 230 patients had an induced VFl/VF and were followed during 4 +/- 2 years. RESULTS: VFl/VF was induced in 49/232 patients (21%) with syncope versus 181/755 asymptomatic patients (24%) (NS) and 94/410 patients (23%) with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40% versus 136/577 patients (22.5%) with LVEF >40% (NS). Cardiac mortality was 9%; LVEF was 33 +/- 15% in patients who died, 43 +/- 13% in alive patients (P < 0.004). In patients with LVEF <40%, induced VFl/VF, mortality rate was 31% in those with syncope, 10% in asymptomatic patients (P < 0.001), because of an increase of deaths by heart failure; patients with LVEF >40% with or without syncope had a low mortality (5% and 3%). After linear logistic regression, VFl/VF and LVEF were predictors of total cardiac mortality, but only LVEF <40% predicted sudden death. CONCLUSION: Syncope and the level of LVEF did not increase the incidence of VFl/VF induction after MI, but modified the cardiac mortality: induced VF increased total cardiac mortality in patients with syncope and LVEF <40%, but did not increase sudden death. In patients with LVEF >40%, induced VFl/VF has no significance neither in asymptomatic patients nor in those with syncope.

Differences in mechanisms and outcomes of syncope in patients with coronary disease or idiopathic left ventricular dysfunction as assessed by electrophysiologic testing.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the causes of syncope and the significance and differences in left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, coronary disease, and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). BACKGROUND: Risk stratification of and indications for an automated defibrillator could differ according to the cause of LV dysfunction. METHODS: Electrophysiologic study, including atrial and ventricular programmed stimulation, was performed in 119 patients with coronary disease (group I) and 61 patients with DCM (group II) with an left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40% and syncope. Patients were followed from one to six years (mean 4 +/- 2 years). RESULTS: Sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) was induced in 44 group I patients (37%) and 13 group II patients (21%); ventricular flutter (>270 beats/min) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) was induced in 24 group I patients (19%) and 9 group II patients (15%); and various other arrhythmias were identified. Syncope remained unexplained in 34 group I patients (30%) and 16 group II patients (27%). Prognosis depended on the heart disease: VT or VF induction was a predictive factor of mortality in coronary disease and identified a group with high cardiac mortality (46%), compared with patients with a negative study, who had a lower mortality (6%; p < 0.001) than in other studies. Cardiac mortality was only correlated with LVEF in DCM. CONCLUSIONS: Various causes could explain syncope in 70% of patients with coronary disease and DCM, but differences were noted: VT was frequent in coronary disease with a bad prognosis, and ischemia could explain syncope; in DCM, different causes such as atrial tachycardia could be responsible for syncope, but the prognosis only depended on LVEF.

Utility of transesophageal atrial pacing in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with unexplained syncope associated or not with palpitations.

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive studies are often negative in patients with syncope, normal surface ECG and without heart disease. The purpose of the study was to determine the diagnostic impact of an esophageal electrophysiological study performed during a consultation. METHODS: A total of 154 patients aged from 16 to 87 years were consecutively recruited for unexplained syncope; they had a normal ECG in sinus rhythm, no documented arrhythmia and no patent heart disease. Half of them complained of palpitations. Electrophysiologic study was performed during a consultation by transesophageal route: rate of 2nd d AV block occurrence during atrial pacing and sinus node recovery time were determined; programmed atrial stimulation using one and two atrial extrastimuli were delivered in control state and then after infusion of 0.02-1 microg/min of isoproterenol; arterial blood pressure was monitored. RESULTS: (1) Electrophysiologic study was positive in 107 patients (69%); (2) sinus node dysfunction was noted in 9 patients (6%); (3) atrioventricular conduction disturbances were noted in 2 patients (1%); (4) vasovagal reaction which associated a junctional bradycardia and a fall of arterial blood pressure and which reproduced spontaneous symptoms was provoked by isoproterenol infusion in 21 patients (14%); (5) sustained atrial fibrillation was induced in 23 patients (15%); and (6) paroxysmal junctional tachycardia was induced in 52 patients (34%). Patients with negative study were younger (44+/-21.5 years) than those with sinus node dysfunction or atrial fibrillation (71+/-9 and 63+/-14 years, respectively). The treatment was guided by these data: patients with inducible atrial fibrillation were treated by antiarrhythmic drugs and those with inducible paroxysmal junctional tachycardia by the radiofrequency ablation of reentrant circuit. Syncope disappeared in all patients but 2. CONCLUSION: Esophageal electrophysiologic study performed during a consultation was a safe, rapid and economic means to detect an arrhythmia (sinus node dysfunction or supraventricular tachycardia) in patients with dizziness/syncope and palpitations in half cases. Supraventricular tachycardia was clearly an underestimated cause of syncope in this population.

Influence of age on atrial fibrillation inducibility.

The prevalence of AF is known to increase in the elderly. Some electrophysiological changes were reported in these patients, but the effects of age on AF inducibility and other electrophysiological signs associated with atrial vulnerability are unknown. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effects of age on atrial vulnerability and AF induction. The study consisted of 734 patients (age 16-85 years, mean 61 +/- 15 years) without spontaneous AF who were admitted for electrophysiological study. Study was indicated for dizziness or ventricular tachyarrhythmia. Programmed atrial stimulation was systematically performed. One and two extrastimuli were delivered in sinus rhythm and atrial driven rhythms (600, 400 ms). Univariate and multivariate analysis of several clinical and electrophysiological data were performed. AF inducibility, defined as the induction of an AF lasting > 1 minute, was paradoxically and significantly decreased in elderly (> 70 years) patients compared to younger patients (< 70 years) (P < 0.01). AF inducibility was present in 40% of 62 patients < 40 years, 39% of 99 patients age 40-50 years, 37% of 130 patients age 50-60 years, 38% of 222 patients age 60-70 years, and only 28% of 221 patients > 70 years. There was no significant correlation with the sex, the presence of dizziness, the presence or not of an underlying heart disease, the left ventricular ejection fraction, and the presence of salvos of atrial premature beats on 24-hour Holter monitoring. There was a significant correlation with a longer atrial effective refractory period in the elderly (226 +/- 41 ms) than in younger patients (208 +/- 31 ms) (P < 0.001). Other electrophysiological parameters of atrial vulnerability did not change significantly. Increased atrial refractory period and age >70 years were independent factors of decreased AF inducibility. Programmed atrial stimulation should be interpreted cautiously before the age of 70 years. AF induction is facilitated by the presence of a short atrial refractory period in these patients. Surprisingly, AF inducibility decreases in patients > 70 years because their atrial refractory period increases. Therefore, increased AF prevalence in these patients should be explained by nonelectrophysiological causes.

Significance of external cardioversion induced atrial tachyarrhythmias.

External cardioversion is used to stop VT or VF in emergency. Supraventricular tachyarrhythmias are sometimes noted after cardioversion in patients known to be previously in sinus rhythm. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the significance of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias induced by external cardioversion. The study population consisted of 22 patients who developed supraventricular tachyarrhythmias after transthoracic cardioversion (300 J) delivered to stop a VT or VF induced by electrophysiological study. Defibrillation used monophasic waveform. Supraventricular tachyarrhythmias complicated 6% of cardioversions for VT; before cardioversion, all patients were in sinus rhythm. After cardioversion, three patients developed a paroxysmal reentrant supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT), which was stopped by atrial pacing. The remaining patients developed AF that lasted from 3 minutes to 24 hours (n = 4). One patient remained in AF. AF developed after a sinus pause or bradycardia, which was due to the interruption of VT or VF in nine patients or was noted just when VT or VF stopped (n = 10). The analysis of clinical data indicated that all three patients who presented a PSVT had a history of PSVT. Among patients who developed a sinus pause dependent AF, two had a history of AF. Among ten patients who developed AF at the time of cardioversion, three had a history of AF. During follow-up (1-9 years), no patient without a history of AF developed spontaneous AF, but patients with history of tachycardias had arrhythmia recurrences. The mechanism of cardioversion related tachycardias can be a pause related dispersion of atrial refractoriness or an adrenergic reaction induced by VT or VF, factors that precipitate arrhythmias in patients with history of atrial arrhythmias (one third of patients). In conclusion, supraventricular tachyarrhythmia is relatively frequent after external cardioversion for ventricular tachyarrhythmia, has no prognostic significance in patients without previous history of atrial arrhythmias, but in those with history of tachycardias is associated with a high risk of recurrence.

Causes and prognosis of cardiac arrest in a population admitted to a general hospital; a diagnostic and therapeutic problem.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the causes and the prognosis of consecutive patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest occurring in a general hospital. We assessed 28 females and 94 males (aged 13-82 years) who were resuscitated from cardiac arrest not attributable to acute myocardial infarction. Ventricular fibrillation (VF) was documented in 97. Non-cardiac causes were excluded. Non-invasive studies (24 h Holter monitoring, 2D echocardiogram, signal-averaged ECG, exercise testing, magnetic resonance imaging) and invasive studies (right and left ventricular angiography, coronary angiography and complete electrophysiologic study (EPS) were performed. RESULTS: An underlying cardiac disease was found in 107 patients (88%). Patients were followed for a period ranging from 6 months to 10 years (mean 4+/-5 years). Several causes for cardiac arrest were identified and treated specifically. The prognosis was variable. Among surviving patients the following causes of cardiac arrest were found: Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome (n=2), rapid supraventricular tachycardia (n=6), acquired or congenital long QT syndrome (n=7), complete atrioventricular block (n=3), proarrhythmic effect of an antiarrhythmic drug (n=5), vasospastic angina (normal coronary arteries) (n=5). Among ten patients with VF related to cardiac ischaemia two died suddenly. Ventricular tachycardia (VT) or VF was the main cause leading to resuscitation after cardiac arrest (n=64). The risk of recurrence of arrest is confirmed in the present study particularly in patients in whom VT/VF could not be suppressed by antiarrhythmic drug therapy (n=45) and in those where an ICD was not implanted (18 cardiac deaths (nine sudden cardiac deaths (SCD's)). The cause of cardiac arrest was not elucidated in 20 patients (16%). The prognosis of these patients differed according to the documentation of VF at the time of cardiac arrest: of those with documented VF (n=12), six patients died suddenly (one with an ICD); of those without documented VF (n=8), all are alive. CONCLUSION: To determine the precise cause of cardiac arrest was the first problem; the diagnosis of cardiac arrest clearly was erroneous in 8 of 122 patients (6.5%). In other patients, a ventricular tachyarrhythmia was identified as the cause for cardiac arrest in half of the population; the indication for an ICD is evident in this group. In 31% of patients with proven cardiac arrest, another arrhythmia requiring specific treatment was identified and ICD implantation was avoided; these patients had a survival of 92% at 3 years. In patients without an identified cause of cardiac arrest and negative EPS, the prognosis was unfavorable only in those with documented VF.

Postoperative ventricular arrhythmias after cardiac surgery: immediate- and long-term significance.

AF is frequent after cardiac surgery. However, ventricular arrhythmias are less known. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the causes and the prognostic significance of severe ventricular arrhythmias occurring after cardiac surgery. For 10 years, among 2,100 cardiac surgeries, 16 (0.8%) patients (13 men, 3 women; age 49-71 years, mean 62 +/- 9 years) without previous ventricular arrhythmias, with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction, and without acute cause of ventricular arrhythmias, developed VF (n = 4) or a sustained VT between 3 days and 3 weeks after cardiac surgery (coronary artery bypass grafting [n = 6], valve replacement [n = 10]). Rapid AF (n = 5) or slow AF (n = 1) were present at the time of VT/VF. Programmed ventricular stimulation occurred after up to three extrastimuli in the basal state and after infusion of 20-30 micrograms of isoproterenol. An echocardiogram, coronary angiography, Holter monitoring with heart rate variability (HRV) study were performed. Ventricular stimulation was negative in six patients (with AF); sustained and clinical VT was induced in 10 patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction > 0.40, except in one patient. Valvular prothesis and coronary bypass graftings were normal. In all patients, HRV was normal before surgery and decreased after cardiac surgery; before versus after surgery, respectively, HR 69 +/- 9 and 89 +/- 30 beats/min (P < 0.01), SDNN 117 +/- 31 and 50 +/- 11 ms (P < 0.001), low frequency (LF) 474 +/- 658 and 51 +/- 40 ms2 (P < 0.05), high frequency (HF) 115 +/- 23 and 33 +/- 32 ms2 (P < 0.05), LF:HF 4 +/- 3 and 1 +/- 0.6 (P < 0.01). Follow-up lasted from 6 months to 10 years (mean 3 +/- 2 years). In patients without induced VT, 1 patient died from asystole, 1 had an ICD but no subsequent events, and the other 4 untreated patients are free of events. Patients with induced VT were treated with amiodarone and beta-blockers except in one patient who died from extracardiac complications. Six of nine patients had no inducible VT with this treatment and are alive; 3 patients had inducible VT, 1 died suddenly before implantation of ICD, and 2 patients are alive with an ICD; recurrent VTs were noted in one patient and received an ICD. In conclusion, recent heart surgery may increase the risk of ventricular arrhythmias. The reduction of indexes reflecting sympathetic and parasympathetic tone could facilitate the occurrence of atrial arrhythmias (and then VT) in patients without ventricular arrhythmogenic substrate or the development of VT/VF in patients with a latent previous ventricular arrhythmogenic substrate. In patients without inducible VT, the prognosis is excellent and an ICD is not recommended in these patients. In those with inducible VT, there is a high incidence of responders to antiarrhythmic drugs with a favorable prognosis.