RESUMO
Conventional methods of roentgenographic cephalometry will yield differences in interpretation of growth or treatment changes depending on which methods of superimposition are used. The finite element method of analysis has been reported to have significant advantages since it does not require a reference frame to describe the changes that have taken place. This article describes the growth of a patient with a Class II, Division 1 malocclusion during approximately 2 years of orthodontic treatment with the use of conventional cephalometric growth and static analyses, as well as the finite element method. Thirty cephalometric points were digitized on the pretreatment and the posttreatment lateral cephalograms of a patient undergoing orthodontic treatment between the ages of 10 and 12 years. The finite element method provided a reference frame invariant description of the size, shape, change, and rotation of each of the 12 finite elements representing different anatomic structures.
