Hospitalisation outcomes in pneumococcal-vaccinated versus -unvaccinated patients with exacerbation of COPD: results from the HOPE COPD Study.

Background: Infectious exacerbations are crucial events that dictate the natural course of COPD patients. Pneumococcal vaccination has been shown to decrease incidence of community-acquired pneumonia in COPD patients. There is a paucity of data on outcomes of hospitalisation in pneumococcal-vaccinated COPD patients in comparison with unvaccinated subjects. The objectives of the present study were to evaluate the difference in hospitalisation outcomes in pneumococcal-vaccinated versus -unvaccinated COPD subjects hospitalised with acute exacerbation. Methods: This was a prospective analytical study on 120 subjects hospitalised with acute COPD exacerbation. 60 patients with prior pneumococcal vaccination and 60 unvaccinated patients were recruited. Outcomes of hospitalisation such as mortality rate, need for assisted ventilation, length of hospital stay, need for intensive care unit (ICU) care and length of ICU stay were collected and compared between two groups with appropriate statistical tools. Results: 60% of unvaccinated patients (36 out of 60) required assisted ventilation, whereas only 43.3% of vaccinated subjects (26 out of 60) needed assisted ventilation (p-value of 0.04). Most of the secondary outcomes were better in the vaccinated group. The mean±SD length of ICU stay in the vaccinated group was 0.67±1.11 days compared to 1.77±1.89 days in the unvaccinated group. The mean±SD length of hospital stay was 4.50±1.64 days and 5.47±2.03 days in the vaccinated and unvaccinated group, respectively (p-value of 0.005). Conclusions: COPD patients who have received prior pneumococcal vaccination have better outcomes when they are hospitalised for an acute exacerbation. Pneumococcal vaccination may be recommended for all patients with COPD who are at risk of hospitalisation with acute exacerbation.

Delayed lung function testing after COVID-19 to detect persistent lung function abnormalities - The DELTA - COVID-19 lung function study.

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has made its presence felt as the worst pandemic witnessed till date in the 21st century. The mortality and morbidity associated with COVID-19 does not end with the acute pneumonia and respiratory failure and consequences extend well into the subsequent weeks to months in a minority. After recovery from severe disease, symptoms, lung function abnormalities and radiological changes are known to persist for varying length of time in a small proportion of patients. Various studies report different incidences of lung function abnormalities post-COVID-19. The present study describes the occurrence, severity, pattern and risk factors for persistent lung function abnormalities post-COVID-19 patients. Aim: The present study was aimed to find out the occurrence of persistent lung function abnormalities in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 at three months of discharge who had normal previous lung function prior to COVID-19. In those with persisting abnormal lung function, the severity, pattern and risk factors for persistent lung function abnormalities were also studied. Methods: The present study was a retrospective study in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 who had radiological evidence of pneumonia at admission. Patients with prior abnormal lung function were excluded from the study. Lung function was analysed with spirometry, 6-min walk test and diffusion capacity between day 85 and 95 of hospital discharge and the occurrence, severity and pattern of impairment was described. Lung function impairment was correlated with baseline characteristics and univariate regression analysis was done to identify risk factors for persisting functional impairment. Results: 39 patients were included in the study. Spirometry at follow up showed a restrictive ventilatory defect in 26 out of 39 patients (64%) and a normal study was noted in 12 patients. One patient had an obstructive ventilatory defect. Diffusion impairment was present in 27 patients and normal transfer factor was seen in 12 patients. The degree of diffusion impairment was mild in 16 patients and moderate in 11 patients. Univariate regression analysis revealed that age, history of systemic hypertension, severe hypoxia at presentation, and extent of lung involvement by CT chest were associated with lung function impairment. Conclusion: Almost two-thirds of patients hospitalised with COVID-19 pneumonia have persistent lung function abnormalities at three months post-discharge. Advanced age, severe disease and medical comorbidities increase the risk of persistent functional abnormalities.

Acceptance and results of therapy with omalizumab in real world Kerala setting: reports from the ARTWORK study, Kerala, South India.

OBJECTIVE: Despite the availability of effective medications, only a minority of asthma patients achieve guideline defined asthma control. Treatment success depends on patient concurrence to the prescribed drug and adherence to treatment. It is therefore crucial to identify the patient preferences as well as attitudes towards asthma medications. Omalizumab is recommended as a preferred option in step 5 of asthma therapy. There have been few studies to address patient perspectives on omalizumab therapy in India. METHODS: This was a retrospective study. Patients with inadequate asthma control were considered for the study. Systematic evaluation was done to identify and correct modifiable factors that can worsen asthma control. Patients with persisting poor asthma control who were deemed suitable to receive this agent were evaluated with their attitudes toward acceptance or refusal and the reasons for opting out were noted. The patients who received omalizumab were followed up to determine the results of treatment and duration of adherence to therapy. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients out of 51 patients chose to avoid this drug. The reasons for opting out included erroneous perception of optimal asthma control, cost of therapy, and concern about adverse effects. Patients took omalizumab for a median duration of 6 months. Improved asthma control and decreased frequency of exacerbation was noted in all patients which persisted during the 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients needing step 5 therapy opt out of omalizumab. Cost of drug, duration of therapy and erroneous perception of good asthma control account for refusing treatment. Omalizumab affords excellent clinical benefits to patients who receive it, and the benefits extend beyond the duration of therapy.