Efficacy and safety of lemborexant in midlife women with insomnia disorder.

OBJECTIVE: Insomnia is common in midlife women. The efficacy and safety of lemborexant (LEM), a competitive dual orexin receptor antagonist, was assessed for 12 months in a subgroup of midlife women (age, 40-58 y) from Study E2006-G000-303 (Study 303; SUNRISE-2). METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled (first 6 mo) study of adults with insomnia disorder ( N = 949). During treatment period 1 (TP1), participants received PBO or LEM 5 mg (LEM5) or 10 mg (LEM10). During TP2 (second 6 mo), LEM participants continued their assigned dose; PBO participants were rerandomized to LEM5 or LEM10. Assessments included patient-reported sleep- and fatigue-related measures and treatment-emergent adverse events. RESULTS: The midlife female subgroup comprised 280 of 949 participants (TP1: PBO, n = 90 of 318 [28.3%]; LEM5, n = 82 of 316 [25.9%]; LEM10, n = 108 of 315 [34.3%]). At 6 months, median changes from baseline in subjective sleep-onset latency (in minutes) were -17.9, -20.7, and - 30.4 for PBO, LEM5, and LEM10 (vs PBO: LEM5, P = not significant; LEM10, P = 0.0310). At 6 months, mean changes from baseline in subjective wake after sleep onset (in minutes) were -37.0 (59.6), -50.1 (74.5), and -54.5 (65.4) for PBO, LEM5, and LEM10 (vs PBO: LEM5 and LEM10, P = not significant), with benefits sustained through 12 months. Greater decreases from baseline (improvement) in Insomnia Severity Index total score and Fatigue Severity Scale total score were seen with LEM versus PBO at 6 months; benefits continued through 12 months. Most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild to moderate in severity. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with the total population, subjective sleep parameters improved, and improvement was sustained over time in midlife women. LEM was well tolerated, suggesting that LEM may be a potential treatment option for midlife women with insomnia.

Comparison of the treatment effectiveness between lemborexant and zolpidem tartrate extended-release for insomnia disorder subtypes defined based on polysomnographic findings.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Patients with chronic insomnia may respond differently to therapeutic modalities. This study examined differences in response of individuals with 2 insomnia phenotypes-short sleep duration (I-SSD; < 6 hours) and normal sleep duration (I-NSD; ≥ 6 hours) determined by polysomnography-to treatment with lemborexant and zolpidem tartrate extended-release 6.25 mg (zolpidem ER), compared with placebo. METHODS: Study E2006-G000-304 (Study 304; SUNRISE-1; NCT02783729) was a global, randomized, double-blind, placebo, and active comparator-controlled, parallel-group study comparing lemborexant 5 and 10 mg in individuals aged ≥ 55 years with insomnia disorder. In this analysis, changes in subjective (self-reported) variables based on sleep diaries and objective variables based on polysomnographs were assessed after 1-month administration of study drugs. Data from participants with I-SSD and I-NSD were compared. RESULTS: In the I-SSD subgroup, both lemborexant doses provided significant benefit for sleep-onset latency (SOL), total sleep time (TST), and wake after sleep onset (WASO) vs placebo; zolpidem ER also provided significant benefit for TST and WASO, but not SOL, on both measures vs placebo. In the I-NSD subgroup, lemborexant and zolpidem ER provided significant benefit for TST and WASO vs placebo objectively but not subjectively; both doses of lemborexant provided significant benefit for SOL vs placebo subjectively, but not objectively. CONCLUSIONS: Both drugs, but lemborexant more consistently, showed subjective and objective benefits compared with placebo in participants with insomnia with objective short sleep duration. However, neither lemborexant nor zolpidem provided consistent benefits for participants with normal sleep duration on sleep-onset and sleep maintenance variables. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Lemborexant in Subjects 55 Years and Older With Insomnia Disorder (SUNRISE 1); URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT02783729; Identifier: NCT02783729. CITATION: Inoue Y, Nishida M, Kubota N, et al. Comparison of the treatment effectiveness between lemborexant and zolpidem tartrate extended-release for insomnia disorder subtypes defined based on polysomnographic findings. J Clin Sleep Med. 2023;19(3):519-528.

Effect of Psychoeducational Intervention on Donepezil Retention Rate and Analysis of Reasons for the Discontinuation in Patients with Alzheimer's Dementia: A Randomized Study.

PURPOSE: Medication discontinuation for patients with Alzheimer's dementia (AD) influences treatment efficacy. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of psychoeducational intervention (PI) on donepezil retention rates and identify the factors associated with donepezil continuation in patients with AD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and seventeen patients with AD were randomly allocated to the PI (n = 58) or standard care (SC; n = 59) groups. All patients were prescribed donepezil for 48 weeks. Primary endpoints were the 48-week donepezil retention rate and the reasons for donepezil discontinuation in the PI and SC groups. The secondary endpoint was the predictive factors, among the baseline clinical variables, for donepezil continuation in all patients. RESULTS: The donepezil retention rate was 62.1% (36/58) in the PI group and 66.1% (39/59) in the SC group. The most common reason for discontinuation in both groups was adverse events (PI, 12.1%; SC, 10.2%). Logistic regression analysis revealed that the results of the pentagon copying test in the Mini-Mental State Examination administered at baseline was a significant predictor of donepezil continuation for all patients in both the groups (odds ratio: 0.359; 95% confidence interval: 0.154-0.839). CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference between the PI and SC groups concerning donepezil retention rate in patients with AD. Our results demonstrate that the pentagon copying test can significantly predict donepezil continuation in patients with AD, indicating that impaired visuospatial and executive functions may reflect medication discontinuation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN-CTR:UMIN000012617.

Evidence-based insomnia treatment strategy using novel orexin antagonists: A review.

Most conventional insomnia medications are gamma-aminobutylic acid receptor agonists. However, physical dependence is a concern and one of the major limiting factors for long-term treatment. The dual orexin receptor antagonists, suvorexant and lemborexant, were recently approved for treating chronic insomnia, giving a novel pharmacotherapeutic option. Because there are no comparative studies on these drugs, a network meta-analysis was conducted, which is suitable for comparing interventions. According to this analysis, 5- and 10-mg lemborexant were superior to 20-mg suvorexant because of the greater improvement in initiating sleep after 1-week administration. Furthermore, 5-mg lemborexant (not 10 mg) and suvorexant were similarly well tolerated, without requiring discontinuation due to adverse events. We also overviewed the pharmacological and pharmacokinetic properties of lemborexant and suvorexant that may support these clinical outcomes. When compared to suvorexant, lemborexant quickly binds to the orexin receptors. The time to reach the maximum concentration after multiple administrations is shorter for lemborexant than for suvorexant. Considering these results, we recommend 5-mg lemborexant as an initial treatment for insomnia, followed by 10-mg lemborexant or suvorexant.

[Preclinical and clinical efficacy of orexin receptor antagonist Lemborexant (Dayvigo®) on insomnia patients].

Orexin receptor antagonists have been approved for insomnia, and the insomnia pharmacotherapy is being greatly progressed. Orexin is a neuropeptide produced in the lateral hypothalamic area, and its physiological role has been suggested to be a key mediator controlling the sleep-wake state. Orexin receptor antagonists are thought to induce physiological sleep by acting specifically on the sleep-wake cycle. Lemborexant is a dual antagonist acting on both two orexin receptors, the orexin 1 (OX1R) and 2 receptor (OX2R), with stronger inhibitory effects on OX2R. Since it binds to and dissociates from orexin receptors rapidly, the pharmacokinetics of its blood concentration may have an impact on its pharmacological action. In rats, lemborexant exhibited a sleep-inducing effect without altering sleep architecture. In the phase III studies in patients with insomnia, lemborexant significantly improved difficulties in falling asleep and maintaining sleep. While somnolence occurred as treatment-related adverse events in a dose-dependent manner, lemborexant was generally well-tolerated. Also, the effects on body sway and driving skills 8-9 hours after administration did not differ from those in the placebo group, suggesting little next morning residual effects. Subgroup analysis has shown that efficacy and safety of lemborexant were similar in patients with insomnia with comorbidities, suggesting lemborexant may also be useful for those patients. Based on the above results and others, lemborexant has been approved for the indication of insomnia in January 2020 in Japan. Lemborexant will give a new treatment option for patients with insomnia.