Anatomical and anastomotic viability indexes for stratifying the risk of anastomotic leakage in esophagectomy with retrosternal reconstruction.

Background: Risk prediction of anastomotic leakage using anatomical and vascular factors has not been well established. This study aimed to assess the anatomical and vascular factors affecting the hemodynamics of the gastric conduit and develop a novel risk stratification system in patients undergoing esophagectomy with retrosternal reconstruction. Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 202 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent subtotal esophagectomy with gastric tube retrosternal reconstruction between January 2008 and December 2020. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage (AL), including the anatomical index (AI) and anastomotic viability index (AVI), were evaluated using a logistic regression model. Results: According to the logistic regression model, the independent risk factors for AL were preoperative body mass index ≥23.6 kg/m2 (odds ratio [OR], 7.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.44-26.00; P < 0.01), AI <1.4 (OR, 23.90; 95% CI, 5.02-114.00; P < 0.01), and AVI <0.62 (OR, 8.02; 95% CI, 2.57-25.00; P < 0.01). The patients were stratified into four AL risk groups using AI and AVI as follows: low-risk group (AI ≥1.4, AVI ≥0.62 [2/99, 2.0%]), intermediate low-risk group (AI ≥1.4, AVI <0.62 [2/29, 6.9%]), intermediate high-risk group (AI <1.4, AVI ≥0.62 [8/53, 15.1%]), and high-risk group (AI <1.4, AVI <0.62 [11/21, 52.4%]). Conclusion: The combination of AI and AVI strongly predicted AL. Additionally, the use of AI and AVI enabled the stratification of the risk of AL in patients who underwent esophagectomy with retrosternal reconstruction.

Novel Colon Preparation Method Combining Bowel Cleanser Reduction and Unique Walking.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Poor bowel preparation increases the difficulty of colonoscopy and affects lesion detection. In this study, we investigated the usefulness of a new bowel preparation method using polyethylene glycol electrolyte formulation containing ascorbic acid (PEG plus ascorbic acid: PEG-Asc, MOVIPREP) to improve bowel cleansing and shorten preparation time. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective study. In the new method, patients were instructed to take a laxative the day before the examination and PEG1L on the day of the examination. In addition, we instructed the patients to walk, which we designed. The primary endpoints were the degree of bowel cleansing (assessed by the Boston bowel preparation scale, BBPS) and time to the cecum. RESULTS: The conventional group reached the cecum in 606.5±225.8 seconds (mean±SD), whereas the introduced group reached the cecum in 500±217.1 seconds, a significantly shorter time ( P <0.05). In the BBPS, the score in the introduced group was significantly higher ( P <0.01): 6.8±2.14 points in the conventional group and 8.6±0.74 points in the introduction group. CONCLUSION: Pretreatment combining the 1L weight loss method and walking improves bowel cleansing and shortens the time to reach the cecum.

Microscopic venous invasion is a predictor of prognosis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing ineffective neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery is Japan's most effective treatment modality for advanced thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. However, the prognosis is not as expected. This study aimed to examine prognostic factors in patients with pathologically ineffective neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by curative esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma between December 2008 and July 2021. The patients were divided into the neoadjuvant chemotherapy effective group and the neoadjuvant chemotherapy ineffective group according to the pathological diagnosis. Clinicopathological data, prognosis, and recurrence were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 143 patients (121 males, 22 females; median age, 67 years) were included in this study. Of these, 34 patients were classified into the effective group and the remaining 109 patients were assigned to the ineffective group. The ineffective group had significantly worse overall survival and recurrence-free survival than the effective group (p = 0.0192 and p = 0.0070, respectively). In the ineffective group, multivariate analysis demonstrated that microscopic venous invasion was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (hazard ratio 2.44; 95% confidence interval 1.13-5.30) and recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio 2.43; 95% confidence interval 1.24-4.73). CONCLUSIONS: Microscopic venous invasion was associated with poor survival and cancer recurrence in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy ineffective group of patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Additional Microvascular Anastomosis to Gastric Conduit During Esophagectomy Reduces Anastomotic Leaks: Propensity Score Weighting Study.

BACKGROUND: Impaired gastric conduit perfusion during esophagectomy and reconstruction is considered a key risk factor of anastomotic leaks. The aim of this study is to evaluate the indication and feasibility of additional microvascular anastomosis (AMA) to the gastric conduit in esophageal cancer surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who received an esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction between July 2008 and July 2021 at a single center were reviewed. Patient characteristics, anastomotic viability index (AVI) of the gastric conduit measured with thermal imaging, and operative outcomes were analyzed using Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney U test. Two propensity score weighting methods (inverse probability of treatment weighting and overlap weighting) were applied to investigate whether AMA reduces anastomotic leaks. RESULTS: Of the 293 patients who underwent an esophagectomy over the study period, 26 received AMA. AVI in the AMA group was significantly lower than that in the control group (0.64 vs. 0.74, p = 0.026). Overall anastomotic leak rates were 3.8% in the AMA group and 12.4% in the control group. Using two different propensity score weighting methods, the same conclusion was obtained that AMA significantly reduced anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy (both p < 0.001). The logistic regression model for estimating probability of anastomotic leaks provided AVI criteria for AMA application and revealed that AMA significantly reduced the estimated leak rates by a maximum of 49%. CONCLUSIONS: Additional microvascular anastomosis significantly reduced anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy. The proposed AVI criteria for AMA application can help guide surgeons as to when AMA is needed.

A Multi-institutional Study to Diagnose the Risk of Lymph Node Metastasis Using a CRP Genetic Polymorphism Test Kit in pT1, cN0 Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: For patients with T1a muscularis mucosae (MM) esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) with lymphovascular invasion (LVI) or T1b submucosal (SM) ESCC, endoscopic resection is non-curative, and adjuvant treatment entailing esophagectomy or definitive chemoradiotherapy is necessary. This is because about 30% of these cases have lymph node (LN) metastasis. The purpose of this study was to test the utility of a CRP genetic polymorphism test kit for determining the risk of LN metastasis with the aim of eliminating additional invasive adjuvant therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective, multi-institutional, observational study. The CRP 1846C>T genetic polymorphisms were identified using a fully automated genotyping system. The primary end points were an 85% negative predictive value (NPV) for diagnosis of LN metastasis in pT1a (MM) and 80% NPV in pT1b (SM1) patients. RESULTS: A total of 742 ESCC (105 pMM, 166 pSM1 and 471 pSM2-3) patients who had received esophagectomy with 2- or 3-field LN dissection at 65 institutions were enrolled. According to this test, patients with the C/C and C/T genotypes were considered to be low risk. The NPVs using this test were 82.8% in pMM and 71.7% in pSM1 patients. CONCLUSION: CRP 1846C>T genetic polymorphism is not a useful diagnostic indicator for determining the risk of LN metastasis; however, the possibility that CRP gene polymorphisms are involved in the mechanism of lymph node metastasis in solid tumors still remains.

Risk Stratification of Postoperative Pneumonia in Patients Undergoing Subtotal Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Despite recent progress in surgical techniques and perioperative management, postesophagectomy pneumonia remains the most common complication. Thus, it is important to identify the risk factors of postoperative pneumonia and to improve perioperative management. This study aimed to clarify risk factors for postoperative pneumonia and subsequently stratify the risk of pneumonia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 154 patients who underwent subtotal esophagectomy were divided into two groups: patients without pneumonia and those with pneumonia. Their backgrounds and operative outcomes were compared. Furthermore, risk factors of postoperative pneumonia were evaluated using a logistic regression model. RESULTS: Postoperative pneumonia developed in 18.8% (n=29) of the study cohort. In the multivariate analysis, the independent risk factors for postoperative pneumonia were forced expiratory volume at 1 s (FEV1) <1.98 l [p=0.011; odds ratio (OR)=3.960; 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.380-11.400], thoracotomy (p=0.043; OR=3.110; 95%CI=1.030-9.320), operative blood loss ≥390 ml (p=0.013; OR=3.900; 95%CI=1.340-11.400), and recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy (RLNP) (p=0.014; OR=3.740; 95%CI=1.310-10.700). Patients were also stratified into the following four groups as per the number of significant risk factors: the incidence of pneumonia in patients with no risk factor, one risk factor, two risk factors, three risk factors were 7.0% (5/71), 13.7% (7/51), 43.5% (10/23), and 77.7% (7/9), respectively. CONCLUSION: FEV1 <1.98 l, thoracotomy, operative blood loss ≥390 ml, and RLNP were independent risk factors of postoperative pneumonia. Additionally, patients could be stratified into four groups according to the incidence of pneumonia.

Risk stratification of anastomotic stricture using early postoperative endoscopic and computed tomography findings in patients undergoing esophagectomy with cervical esophagogastric anastomosis for esophageal cancer.

Anastomotic stricture (AS) is one of the major complications after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. We have previously reported that severe mucosal degeneration (MD) of the anastomotic site was associated with the incidence of AS. Meanwhile, there are few reports to correlate anastomotic internal circumference (AIC) with computed tomography (CT) with the incidence of AS. Therefore, this study was conducted to clarify the correlation of early postoperative endoscopic and CT findings with the incidence of AS. We assessed 205 patients who underwent esophagectomy. We then divided them into the non-AS group (n = 164) and the AS group (n = 41) and compared their background data and intraoperative and postoperative outcomes. We also evaluated the risk factors for AS using logistic regression model. Multivariate analysis revealed small AIC (P = 0.003; OR = 4.400; 95% CI = 1.650-11.700) and severe MD (P < 0.001; OR = 7.200; 95% CI = 2.650-19.600) as the independent risk factors for AS development. We also stratified the patients into the following four groups according to the incidence of AS: low-risk (normal AIC and intact or mild MD, 6.2%), intermediate-risk (small AIC and intact or mild MD, 29.4%), high-risk (normal AIC and severe MD, 42.9%), and very high-risk (small AIC and severe MD, 61.1%). Early postoperative endoscopic and CT findings were useful in predicting the development of AS after esophagectomy.

Effect of the postural transition in minimally invasive esophagectomy: a propensity score matching analysis.

BACKGROUND: The advantages of prone position in minimally invasive esophagectomy have not been well studied. This study aimed to investigate the safety and feasibility of a transition from the left lateral decubitus position to the prone position for thoracic procedures in minimally invasive esophagectomy. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients with thoracic esophageal carcinomas who underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy and laparoscopic gastric mobilization between January 2015 and December 2019. The left decubitus and prone positions were analyzed using propensity score-matched pairs for the baseline characteristics, morbidity, and survival. RESULTS: A total of 114 consecutive patients were included in this study; 90 (78.9%) were male and the median age was 67.2 years old. Of these patients, 39 and 75 underwent left decubitus and prone esophagectomy, respectively. Prone esophagectomy was associated with a lower incidence of pneumonia than that performed in the decubitus position (12.5% vs. 37.5%, p = 0.0187). With respect to the long-term outcomes, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups. The 4-year overall and relapse-free survival rates for prone and decubitus esophagectomy were 73.8% and 73.2%, and 84.4% and 71.8%, respectively (p = 0.9899 and 0.6751, respectively). Prone esophagectomy yielded a shorter operative time (total: 528 [485-579] min vs. 581 [555-610] min, p < 0.0022; thoracic section: 243 [229-271] min vs. 292 [274-309] min, p < 0.0001), less bleeding in the thoracic procedures (0 [0-10] mL vs. 70 [20-138] mL, p < 0.0001), a shorter length of postoperative hospital stay (19 [15-23] vs. 30 [21-46] days, p = 0.0002), and a lower total hospital charge (30,046 [28,175-32,660] US dollars vs. 36,396 [31,533-41,180] US dollars, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Transition into the prone position in minimally invasive esophagectomy is feasible with adequate postoperative and oncological safety and economical in esophageal cancer surgery.

Intraoperative nerve monitoring during esophagectomy reduces the risk of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy.

BACKGROUND: Despite the risk of recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) palsy during esophagectomy, no established method of monitoring RLN injury is currently available. METHODS: This study included 187 patients who underwent esophagectomy between 2011 and 2018. Among these, intraoperative nerve monitoring (IONM) was done in 142 patients (IONM group), while the remaining 45 patients underwent conventional surgery without IONM (control group). We investigated the incidence of postoperative complications with regard to the use of IONM. RESULTS: The overall incidence of postoperative RLN palsy was 28% (52/187). The IONM group showed a significantly lower incidence of postoperative RLN palsy as compared to that in the control group (p = 0.004). The overall incidence of postoperative pneumonia was 22% (41/187) in those with Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification beyond grade 2. There were no significant differences between the incidence of any grade of postoperative pneumonia and the use of IONM (p = 0.195 and 0.333; CD > 2 and > 3, respectively). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that tumors in the upper third [odds ratio (OR) 3.12; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-9.29] and lack of IONM use (OR 2.51; 95% CI 1.17-5.38) were independent factors causing postoperative RLN palsy after esophagectomy. CONCLUSION: IONM helps to reduce the risk of postoperative RLN palsy after esophageal cancer surgery.

Assessment of button-type jejunostomy for nutritional management after esophagectomy in 201 cases.

BACKGROUND: Many surgeons preferably place a trans-nasal feeding tube or a feeding enterostomy for post-operative nutritional management after esophagectomy. Various types of tubes (such as nasogastric, transgastric, transduodenal, or transjejunal tubes) have been used for enteral feeding; however, the appropriate enteral feeding routes have not yet been proposed. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of button-type jejunostomy. METHODS: We reviewed 201 patients who underwent esophagectomy with placement of a button-type jejunostomy at the Jikei University Hospital (Tokyo, Japan) between 2008 and 2019. The analyzed variables included clinicopathological characteristics, operative data, jejunostomy-related characteristics, and postoperative complications. Postoperative bodyweight loss was examined 6 months and 1 year after the operation. RESULTS: Refractory enterocutaneous fistula and bowel obstruction occurred in 13 (6.5%) and 14 (7.0%) patients, respectively. The body mass index at button-type jejunostomy removal was significantly lower and the duration of button-type jejunostomy placement was significantly longer in patients with a refractory enterocutaneous fistula (p = 0.023 and p < 0.001, respectively). Bowel obstruction was significantly more likely to develop in patients with a non-squamous cell carcinoma (p = 0.021) and in patients who underwent open abdominal procedures (p < 0.001). After 1 year, the median bodyweight losses were 12.1% and 15.6% in patients with short and long jejunostomy placement durations (p = 0.642), respectively. CONCLUSION: A button-type jejunostomy is durable and allows easy self-management for maintaining the bodyweight without any adverse events. However, it is strongly recommended that the button be removed within a year to prevent refractory enterocutaneous fistula formation.

Risk stratification of anastomotic leakage using eGFR and FIB-4 index in patients undergoing esophageal cancer surgery.

PURPOSE: Renal insufficiency and liver cirrhosis are identified as independent risk factors for anastomotic leakage (AL) after esophagectomy. However, research evaluating the incidence of AL using quantitative data to measure renal function and liver fibrosis remain to be limited. Therefore, this study was conducted to evaluate postoperative AL after esophagectomy using estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index. METHODS: In total, 184 patients who underwent esophagectomy were included in this study; then, they were divided into the non-AL group (n = 161) and AL group (n = 23), after which their background data and intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were compared. In addition, risk factors for AL were evaluated using a logistic regression model. RESULTS: Preoperative body mass index of ≥21.5 kg/m2, hemoglobin A1c level of ≥7.3%, FIB-4 index of ≥1.44, and eGFR of <59 ml/min/1.73 m2 were found to be significantly frequent in the AL group compared with the non-AL group. Multivariate analysis revealed FIB-4 index of ≥1.44 (p = 0.013; OR, 3.780; 95% CI, 1.320-10.800) and eGFR of <59 ml/min/1.73 m2 (p = 0.018; OR, 3.110; 95% CI, 1.220-8.020) as the independent risk factors for AL. In addition, we stratified the patients into three groups based on the incidence of AL as follows: low risk (5.5%, low FIB-4 index), intermediate risk (13.0%, high FIB-4 index and eGFR), and high risk (37.5%, high FIB-4 index and low eGFR). CONCLUSION: Preoperative eGFR and FIB-4 index were found to be useful markers to predict AL after esophagectomy.

Prognostic Significance of Preoperative Osteopenia in Patients Undergoing Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Osteopenia, which exhibits low bone mineral density (BMD), has been linked to sarcopenia and recently reported as a prognostic factor in various cancers. However, the prognostic significance of osteopenia in esophageal cancer remains unclear. Hence, this study aimed to clarify the impact of osteopenia on the prognosis of patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. METHODS: We included 229 patients who underwent esophagectomy. BMD was calculated as the average pixel density (Hounsfield unit) within a circle in midvertebral core at the 11th thoracic vertebra on preoperative computed tomography. We then divided the patients into the Osteopenia group (n = 159) and the Non-Osteopenia group (n = 70) according to the optimal cutoff value obtained from the receiver operating characteristic curve. Their clinicopathological data, prognosis, and recurrence were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean age was significantly older in the Osteopenia group (p = 0.047). The Osteopenia group had significantly worse overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) than the Non-Osteopenia group (p = 0.001 and p = 0.012, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed osteopenia was an independent prognostic factor for OS (p < 0.001; hazard ratio [HR], 2.243; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.422-3.538) and RFS (p = 0.008; HR, 1.739; 95% CI, 1.154-2.620). In logistic regression model, advanced age and cStage III-IV were independent risk factors for preoperative osteopenia. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative osteopenia is associated with poor survival and recurrence in patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Feasibility of enhanced recovery protocol in minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: Implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery has generally been applied to gastrointestinal surgeries; however, few studies have investigated minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of an enhanced recovery protocol after minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy. METHODS: Data were collected between January 2015 and April 2020 for patients who underwent esophagectomy. Of these patients, those who underwent minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy was selected for the investigation. Perioperative outcomes and nutritional index were compared using propensity score matching between the conventional group and the enhanced recovery group. RESULTS: A total of 119 patients were enrolled in this study. Of these, 73 and 46 were treated with conventional and enhanced recovery protocol, respectively. Forty-two pairs were matched in two groups. The enhanced recovery group showed a lower rate of pulmonary complications (9.5% vs. 28.5%, p = 0.0235), abdominal dysfunctions (16.7% vs. 42.9%, p = 0.0078), and shorter hospital stay as compared with the conventional group (17.5 days vs. 23 days, p = 0.0034). The loss of body weight (6.3% vs. 7.7%, p = 0.0065) and body mass index (5.6% vs. 8.1%, p = 0.0017) were significantly lower in the enhanced recovery group than in the conventional group. In contrast, nutritional biochemistry data did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the promotion of an enhanced recovery protocol in minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy maintains nutritional status without increasing postoperative complications.

Comparison of laparoscopic surgery and hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery in esophagectomy: A propensity score-matched analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic surgery (LAP) and hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) for mobilization of the stomach and abdominal lymph node dissection in esophagectomy have become standard procedures in Japan. However, the differences in outcomes between LAP and HALS have not been examined. We aimed to compare the safety and feasibility of these techniques in patients undergoing esophagectomy. METHODS: We assessed 171 patients who underwent esophagectomy and reconstruction for clinical stage 0 to IVa esophageal cancer; 108 patients were treated with HALS and 63 with LAP. Mortality, morbidity, and long-term survival were compared in all patients who had undergone these surgical procedures and then in 59 propensity score-matched pairs to correct for differences in baseline characteristics. RESULTS: In our analysis, HALS had a shorter abdominal operative time (84.4 ± 26.6 vs 110.0 ± 34.1 minutes, P < .0001), but LAP enabled a larger number of abdominal lymph nodes to be harvested with (17.9 ± 6.6 vs 15.4 ± 7.4, P = .0486). The 5-year overall survival rates were 62.1% and 74.5% (P = .1257) for patients who had undergone HALS and LAP, respectively, and the relapse-free survival rates were 67.0% and 72.3% (P = .7243). CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in postoperative mortality and morbidity between the two groups. This suggests that in addition to having a short operative time, HALS has good technical feasibility and is oncologically safe for patients with esophageal cancer.

Five-year Outcomes of Chemotherapy With Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and 5-Fluorouracil Followed by Oesophagectomy in Oesophageal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative chemotherapy with surgery is the most effective treatment modality in Japan for advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). We evaluated the long-term outcomes associated with preoperative docetaxel/cisplatin/5-fluorouracil (DCF) administration followed by oesophagectomy in OSCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Overall, 76 consecutive patients with cStage IB-IIIC OSCC were enrolled. After two cycles of preoperative DCF, oesophagectomy was performed. Survival monitoring was performed and relevant risk factors were analysed. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 88.3 months. The 5-year overall and recurrence-free survival rates were 51% and 43%, respectively. In the multivariable analysis, cT3 stage [hazard ratio (HR)=1.81, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.08-6.16], incomplete chemotherapy (HR=2.35, 95% CI=1.37-4.02), poor clinical response (HR=1.82, 95% CI=1.01-3.29), and postoperative complications (HR=2.11, 95% CI=1.14-3.90) were independent predictors of poorer overall survival. CONCLUSION: The 5-year outcomes of preoperative DCF with oesophagectomy were favourable. Our findings can aid in the formulation of strategies aimed at improving prognosis in OSCC.

Quantitative Assessment of Blood Flow in the Gastric Conduit With Thermal Imaging for Esophageal Reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE: The study's primary aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of thermal imaging (TI) and its secondary aim was to compare TI and indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence angiography, with respect to the evaluation of the viability of the gastric conduit. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The optimal method for evaluating perfusion in the gastric conduit for esophageal reconstruction has not been established. METHODS: We reviewed the prospectively collected data of 263 patients who had undergone esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction. TI was used in all patients. ICG fluorescence was concomitantly used in 24 patients to aid comparison with TI. A cut-off value of the anastomotic viability index (AVI) was calculated using the receiver operating characteristic curve in TI. RESULTS: Anastomotic leak was significantly less common in patients with AVI > 0.61 compared with those with AVI ≤ 0.61 (2% vs 28%, P< 0.001). Microvascular augmentation was performed in 20 patients with a low AVI score and/or preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Overall ability was comparable between TI and ICG fluorescence regarding the qualitative evaluation of the gastric conduit. However, TI was superior in the quantitative assessment of viability. CONCLUSIONS: TI could delineate the area of good perfusion in the gastric conduit for esophageal reconstruction, which can help identify patients at high risk of anastomotic leak.

Early prediction of complex benign anastomotic stricture after esophagectomy using early postoperative endoscopic findings.

BACKGROUND: Benign anastomotic stricture after esophagectomy and reconstruction adversely affects oral intake and can increase the risk of aspiration pneumonia. Some patients experience relapse that requires frequent endoscopic dilatations. This study aimed to investigate whether the endoscopic appearance of anastomosis during the early postoperative period is associated with the complexity of subsequent anastomotic strictures. METHODS: Data of 213 patients who underwent esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction and early postoperative endoscopy between July 2008 and September 2018 were prospectively collected. Relationships among various risk factors, including the severity of mucosal degeneration of the anastomosis and complexity of anastomotic stricture, were studied using multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients (25%) developed anastomotic strictures at a median of 55 days after surgery, requiring a median of 5 endoscopic dilations. In multivariate analysis, severe mucosal degeneration was the only significant risk factor for any type of anastomotic stricture (P < 0.001). Twenty-seven patients (51%) developed refractory anastomotic strictures. In multivariate analysis, younger age (< 65 years) (P = 0.01), lack of neoadjuvant therapy (P = 0.02), severe mucosal degeneration (P = 0.03), and stricture development within 55 days (P = 0.01) were the risk factors for refractory stricture. The analysis of the risk factors for severe mucosal degeneration revealed that comorbidities and anastomotic techniques were independently correlated (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Early postoperative severe mucosal degeneration of esophagogastrostomy was the only predictor of strictures, regardless of their type. Mucosal degeneration, early postoperative stricture, younger age, and front surgery were associated with refractory anastomotic strictures.