Renoprotective effect of the L/N-type calcium channel antagonist cilnidipine on puromycin aminonucleoside-induced nephrosis in rats.

The renoprotective effect of cilnidipine ((+/-)-2-methoxyethyl 3-phenyl-2(E)-propenyl 1,4-dihydro-2,6-dimethyl-4-(3-nitrophenyl)-3,5-pyridinedicarboxylate, CAS 132203-70-4), a L/N-type calcium channel antagonist, on puromycin aminonucleoside (PAN)-induced nephrosis was investigated in rats. In the Experiment I, rats were given an intravenous injection of PAN (70 mg/kg). Cilnidipine (3 mg/kg/day) and enalapril (CAS 75847-73-3, 5 mg/kg/day) were administered orally from 6 days after treatment with PAN (day 6) to day 26, and urinary analysis was performed on days 9, 15, 20 and 27. In the Experiment II, nephrosis was also induced by intravenous injection of PAN (70 or 100 mg/kg) in rats which were treated with cilnidipine and enalapril from days 6 to 10. Systolic blood pressure was measured on day 7 and urinary analysis was performed on day 10. On day 11, serum was collected and the kidneys were removed for immunofluorescence staining for nephrin and podocin proteins. In PAN-treated rats, the daily urinary protein excretion was dramatically elevated on day 5, reached a peak on day 9 and gradually returned to a normal level from days 15 to 27. Cilnidipine (3 mg/kg/ day) significantly suppressed the increase in proteinuria on day 9 and also improved the decrease in creatinine clearance without evident effect on the blood pressure. Furthermore, the elevations in serum total cholesterol and triglyceride tended to be suppressed by cilnidipine. The expression of nephrin and podocin proteins in PAN-treated rats showed the granular pattern in the glomeruli, while the intensity of staining seemed to be dependent on the urinary protein excretion level in the cilnidipine-treated rats. The results obtained in this study suggest a renoprotective effect of cilnidipine in PAN-induced nephrosis in rats.

Diluted isoflurane as a suitable alternative for diethyl ether for rat anaesthesia in regular toxicology studies.

Despite its explosive properties and toxicity to both animals and humans, diethyl ether is an agent long used in Japan in the anaesthesia jar method of rat anaesthetises. However, in response to a recent report from the Science Council of Japan condemning diethyl ether as acceptable practice, we searched for an alternative rat anaesthesia method that provided data continuous with pre-existing regular toxicology studies already conducted under diethyl ether anaesthesia. For this, we examined two candidates; 30% isoflurane diluted with propylene glycol and pentobarbitone. Whereas isoflurane is considered to be one of the representatives of modern volatile anaesthetics, the method of propylene glycol-diluted 30% isoflurane used in this study was our modification of a recently reported method revealed to have several advantages as an inhalation anaesthesia. Intraperitoneal pentobarbitone has long been accepted as a humane method in laboratory animal anaesthesiology. These 2 modalities were scrutinized in terms of consistency of haematology and blood chemistry with previous results using ether. We found that pentobarbitone required a much longer induction time than diethyl ether, which is suspected to be the cause of fluctuations in several haematological and blood chemical results. Conversely, only calcium ion concentration showed a slight difference from traditional results in the case of 30% isoflurane. Additionally, serum prolactin and corticosterone levels indicated that 30% isoflurane induced less stress than ether, confirming that 30% isoflurane can both provide results consistent with diethyl ether, while at the same time remove its disadvantages. As such 30% isoflurane appears to be a strong alternative anaesthetic agent for future regular toxicology studies in Japan.