Representing performance of horizontal flow treatment wetlands: The Tanks In Series (TIS) and the Plug Flow with Dispersion (PFD) approaches and their application to design.

Horizontal flow wetlands have been designed using the so-called P-k-C* approach, which has been largely embraced by the treatment wetlands literature. P is meant to represent the equivalent number of apparent tanks in series (hydraulic factor), but also incorporates the loss of biodegradability as the wastewater undergoes treatment (kinetic factor). For design purposes, literature proposes fixed values of P. The proposal of this paper is to decouple hydraulics from kinetics and use the traditional concept of N or NTIS (number of tanks in series) as a function of geometric relationships of the wetland to be designed, leaving kinetic elements to be dealt with solely by the first-order removal rate coefficient (k). From the literature, a database with 41 wetlands with data from tracer studies was used, and a novel regression-based equation was derived relating N with the ratio length/depth of horizontal wetlands. This equation can be used at the design stage for estimating N and, hence, the output concentration of the pollutant using the traditional structure of the TIS model, with a possible inclusion of background concentration (C*). The paper presents all relevant equations, including those from the plug-flow with dispersion model (PFD), and it is shown how to convert from one hydraulic model to the other, what is also believed to be a novel approach in the treatment wetland literature. Finally, the area-based removal rate coefficients (kA) proposed by Kadlec and Wallace (2009) for designs of horizontal wetlands treating domestic wastewater based on the P-k-C* approach are converted into kA values for the TIS model in the paper.

Structural and functional spatial dynamics of microbial communities in aerated and non-aerated horizontal flow treatment wetlands.

A multiphasic study using structural and functional analyses was employed to investigate the spatial dynamics of the microbial community within five horizontal subsurface flow treatment wetlands (TWs) of differing designs in Germany. The TWs differed in terms of the depth of media saturation, presence of plants (Phragmites australis), and aeration. In addition to influent and effluent water samples, internal samples were taken at different locations (12.5 %, 25 %, 50 %, and 75 % of the fractional distance along the flow path) within each system. 16S rRNA sequencing was used for the investigation of microbial community structure and was compared to microbial community function and enumeration data. The microbial community structure in the unaerated systems was similar, but different from the aerated TW profiles. Spatial positioning along the flow path explained the majority of microbial community dynamics/differences within this study. This was mainly attributed to the availability of nutrients closer to the inlet which also regulated the fixed biofilm/biomass densities. As the amount of fixed biofilm decreased from the inlet to the TW outlets, structural diversity increased, suggesting different microbial communities were present to handle the more easily utilized/degraded pollutants near the inlet vs. the more difficult to degrade and recalcitrant pollutants closer to the outlets. This study also confirmed that effluent water samples do not accurately describe the microbial communities responsible for water treatment inside a TW, highlighting the importance of using internal samples for investigating microbial communities in TWs. The results of this study reinforce an existing knowledge gap regarding the potential for TW design modifications which incorporate microbial community spatial dynamics (heterogeneity). It is suggested that utilizing step-feeding could allow for improved water treatment within the same areal footprint, and modifications enhancing co-metabolic processes could assist in improving the treatment of more difficult to degrade or recalcitrant compounds such as micropollutants.

Treatment of landfill leachate using an aerated, horizontal subsurface-flow constructed wetland.

A pilot-scale subsurface-flow constructed wetland was installed at the Jones County Municipal Landfill, near Anamosa, Iowa, in August 1999 to demonstrate the use of constructed wetlands as a viable low-cost treatment option for leachate generated at small landfills. The system was equipped with a patented wetland aeration process to aid in removal of organic matter and ammonia nitrogen. The high iron content of the leachate caused the aeration system to cease 2 years into operation. Upon the installation of a pretreatment chamber for iron removal and a new aeration system, treatment efficiencies dramatically improved. Seasonal performance with and without aeration is reported for 5-day biochemical oxygen demand (BOD(5)), chemical oxygen demand (COD), ammonia nitrogen (NH(4)-N), and nitrate nitrogen (NO(3)-N). Since winter air temperatures in Iowa can be very cold, a layer of mulch insulation was installed on top of the wetland bed to keep the system from freezing. When the insulation layer was properly maintained (either through sufficient litterfall or replenishing the mulch layer), the wetland sustained air temperatures of as low as -26 degrees C without freezing problems.