Comorbidities directly extracted from the hospital database for adjusting SSI risk in the new national semiautomated surveillance system in France: The SPICMI network.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of a comorbidity-based risk-adjustment model for surgical-site infection (SSI) reporting and benchmarking using a panel of variables extracted from the hospital discharge database (HDD), including comorbidities, compared to other models that use variables from different data sources. METHODS: The French national surveillance program for SSI (SPICMI) has collected data from voluntary hospitals in the first 6 months of 2020 and 2021, for 16 selected surgery procedures, using a semiautomated algorithm for detection. Four risk-adjustment models were selected with logistic regression analysis, combining the different patterns of variables: National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System (NNIS) risk-index components, individual operative data, and 6 individual comorbidities according to International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) diagnosis: obesity, diabetes, malnutrition, hypertension, cancer, or immunosuppression. Areas under the curve (AUCs) were calculated and compared. RESULTS: Overall, 294 SSI were detected among 11,975 procedures included. All 6 comorbidities were related to SSI in the univariate analysis. The AUC of the selected model including comorbidities (0.675; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.642-0.707), was significantly higher than the AUC of the model without comorbidities (0.641; 95% CI, 0.609-0.672; P = .016) or the AUC using the NNIS-index components (0.598; 95% CI, 0.564-0.630; P < .001). The HDD-based model AUC (0.659; 95% CI, 0.625-0.692) did not differ significantly from the selected model without comorbidities (P = .23). CONCLUSION: Including HDD-based comorbidities as patient case-mix variables instead of NNIS risk index factors could be an effective approach for risk-adjustment of automated SSI surveillance more widely accessible to hospitals.

Twelve months of routine HIV screening in 6 emergency departments in the Paris area: results from the ANRS URDEP study.

OBJECTIVE: In October 2009 the French National Authority for Health recommended that HIV testing be proposed at least once to all persons aged 15 to 70 years in all healthcare settings. We examined whether routine HIV screening with a rapid test in emergency departments (EDs) was feasible without dedicated staff, and whether newly diagnosed persons could be linked to care. METHODS: This one-year study started in December 2009 in 6 EDs in the Paris area, using the INSTI™ test. Eligible individuals were persons 18 to 70 years old who did not present for a vital emergency, for blood or sexual HIV exposure, or for HIV screening. Written informed consent was required. RESULTS: Among 183 957 eligible persons, 11 401 were offered HIV testing (6.2%), of whom 7936 accepted (69.6%) and 7215 (90.9%) were tested (overall screening rate 3.9%); 1857 non eligible persons were also tested. Fifty-five new diagnoses of HIV infection were confirmed by Western blot (0.61% (95% CI 0.46-0.79). There was one false-positive rapid test result. Among the newly diagnosed persons, 48 (87%) were linked to care, of whom 36 were not lost to follow-up at month 6 (75%); median CD4 cell count was 241/mm(3) (IQR: 52-423/mm(3)). CONCLUSIONS: Screening rates were similar to those reported in opt-in studies with no dedicated staff. The rate of new diagnoses was similar to that observed in free anonymous test centres in the Paris area, and well above the prevalence (0.1%) at which testing has been shown to be cost-effective.