Timing of reversal with respect to three nerve stimulator end-points from cisatracurium-induced neuromuscular block.

After elective ear surgery with cisatracurium neuromuscular blockade, 48 adults were randomly assigned to receive neostigmine: (a) at appearance of the fourth twitch of a 'train-of-four'; (b) at loss of fade to train-of-four; or (c) at loss of fade to double-burst stimulation, all monitored using a TOF-Watch SX® on one arm. For each of these conditions, the recovery from train-of-four (TOF) ratio was measured in parallel objectively using a TOF-Watch SX placed on the contralateral arm. The median (IQR [range]) time from administration of reversal to a train-of-four ratio ≥ 0.9 was 11 (9-15.5 [2-28]) min, 8 (4-13.5 [1-25]) min and 7 (4-10 [2-15]) min in the three groups, respectively. This recovery time was significantly shorter when reversal was given at loss of fade to double-burst stimulation (c), than when given at the appearance of the fourth twitch (a), p = 0.046. However, the total time to extubation may be unaffected as it takes longer for fade to be lost after double-burst stimulation than for four twitches subjectively to appear.

Prediction of fluid responsiveness using a non-invasive cardiac output monitor in children undergoing cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the ability of a non-invasive cardiac output monitoring device (NICOM) to predict fluid responsiveness in paediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: Children aged <5 yr undergoing congenital heart surgery were included. Once the sternum had been closed after repair of the congenital heart defect, 10 ml kg(-1) colloid solution was administered for volume expansion. Transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) was performed to measure stroke volume (SV) and respiratory variation in aortic blood flow peak velocity (ΔV(peak)) before and after volume expansion. Haemodynamic and NICOM variables, including SV(NICOM), stroke volume variance (SVV(NICOM)), cardiac index (CI(NICOM)), and percentage change in thoracic fluid content compared with baseline (TFCd0%), were also recorded. Patients in whom the stroke volume index (SVI), measured using TOE, increased by >15% were defined as fluid responders. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were included (13 responders and 16 non-responders). Before volume expansion, only ΔV(peak) differed between groups (P=0.036). The SVV(NICOM), HR, and central venous pressure did not predict fluid responsiveness, but ΔV(peak) did. The CI(NICOM) was not correlated with CI(TOE) (r=0.107, P=0.43). Using Bland-Altman analysis, the mean bias between CI(TOE) and CI(NICOM) was 0.89 litre min(-1) m(-2), with a precision of 1.14 litre min(-1) m(-2). Trending ability of NICOM for SVI and CI was poor when TOE was a reference method. CONCLUSIONS: The SVV(NICOM) did not predict fluid responsiveness in paediatric patients during cardiac surgery. In addition, there was no correlation between CI(TOE) and CI(NICOM). Fluid management guided by NICOM should be performed carefully. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01996956.