[Tonsillar asymmetry in adults: review of the literature and management algorithm]. / Asymétrie amygdalienne chez l'adulte: revue de littérature et proposition de prise en charge.

Tonsillar asymmetry is both a common clinical finding and a potential sign of cancer. The diagnosis of the latter requires tonsillectomy, which is associated with two weeks off work and post-operative risk of bleeding, which ranges between 1.5 and 15% of the cases. Thus, it is crucial to determine which patients can be followed clinically and which ones will need a diagnostic tonsillectomy. This article provides a review of the literature on tonsillar asymmetry in the adult population and an algorithm for its management.

L'asymétrie amygdalienne est à la fois une découverte clinique fréquente et un potentiel signe de cancer. Le diagnostic de ce dernier se pose par une amygdalectomie. Celle-ci est associée à un arrêt de travail d'environ deux semaines, ainsi qu'à des risques postopératoires de saignement qui varient de 1,5 à 15% des cas. Il est donc crucial de déterminer quels patients peuvent être suivis cliniquement et quels sont ceux qui doivent bénéficier d'une amygdalectomie diagnostique. Cet article propose une revue de la littérature sur l'asymétrie amygdalienne dans la population adulte ainsi qu'un algorithme de prise en charge.

Chloe for COVID-19: Evolution of an Intelligent Conversational Agent to Address Infodemic Management Needs During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

There is an unprecedented demand for infodemic management due to rapidly evolving information about the novel COVID-19 pandemic. This viewpoint paper details the evolution of a Canadian digital information tool, Chloe for COVID-19, based on incremental leveraging of artificial intelligence techniques. By providing an accessible summary of Chloe's development, we show how proactive cooperation between health, technology, and corporate sectors can lead to a rapidly scalable, safe, and secure virtual chatbot to assist public health efforts in keeping Canadians informed. We then highlight Chloe's strengths, the challenges we faced during the development process, and future directions for the role of chatbots in infodemic management. The information presented here may guide future collaborative efforts in health technology in order to enhance access to accurate and timely health information to the public.

A test of positive suggestions about side effects as a way of enhancing the analgesic response to NSAIDs.

Side effects are frequent in pharmacological pain management, potentially preceding analgesia and limiting drug tolerability. Discussing side effects is part of informed consent, yet can favor nocebo effects. This study aimed to test whether a positive suggestion regarding side effects, which could act as reminders of the medication having been absorbed, might favor analgesia in a clinical interaction model. Sixty-six healthy males participated in a study "to validate pupillometry as an objective measure of analgesia". Participants were unknowingly randomized double-blind to positive vs control information about side effects embedded in a video regarding the study drugs. Sequences of moderately painful heat stimuli applied before and after treatment with diclofenac and atropine served to evaluate analgesia. Atropine was deceptively presented as a co-analgesic, but used to induce side effects. Adverse events (AE) were collected with the General Assessment of Side Effects (GASE) questionnaire prior to the second induced pain sequence. Debriefing fully informed participants regarding the purpose of the study and showed them the two videos.The combination of medication led to significant analgesia, without a between-group difference. Positive information about side effects increased the attribution of AE to the treatment compared to the control information. The total GASE score was correlated with analgesia, i.e., the more AEs reported, the stronger the analgesia. Interestingly, there was a significant between-groups difference on this correlation: the GASE score and analgesia correlated only in the positive information group. This provides evidence for a selective link between AEs and pain relief in the group who received the suggestion that AEs could be taken as a sign "that help was on the way". During debriefing, 65% of participants said they would prefer to receive the positive message in a clinical context. Although the present results cannot be translated immediately to clinical pain conditions, they do indicate the importance of testing this type of modulation in a clinical context.