Assuntos
Objetivos Organizacionais , Saúde Pública/educação , Faculdades de Saúde Pública , Pesquisa Biomédica/organização & administração , Pesquisa Biomédica/tendências , Bases de Dados Factuais/normas , Bases de Dados Factuais/provisão & distribuição , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde/normas , Humanos , Saúde Pública/tendências , Faculdades de Saúde Pública/organização & administração , Faculdades de Saúde Pública/normas , SuíçaRESUMO
The Swiss health-care system (the second most expensive worldwide) is fragmented into 26 cantonal authorities for a population of 7.5 million. Cantons differ in policy, legislation and structure. Health insurance is compulsory although contributions vary greatly between cantons. A recent report by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) pointed out that weak governance has led to a system in which "efficiency can be improved", "a broader legal framework for health promotion and disease prevention is overdue", and "equity is not guaranteed". To a certain extent, this situation is due to the scarcity of specialists who know how to judge and respond to health needs and who also understand the complexities of financial flows and the effect of policy interventions in complex systems. As in most countries, health economics and public health have developed independent training programmes, mostly without any coordination or cooperation. Health services therefore are often managed by lawyers or business economists who apply free-market instruments to this regulated system. In the Swiss context, this leads to ever-increasing costs and inequalities without evaluation of potential health gains.
Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde , Educação Profissional em Saúde Pública , Competência Profissional , Especialização , Humanos , SuíçaAssuntos
Doença de Alzheimer/economia , Atitude Frente a Saúde , Financiamento Pessoal , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde/métodos , Valor da Vida/economia , Idoso , Doença de Alzheimer/psicologia , Doença de Alzheimer/terapia , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Análise Custo-Benefício , Guias como Assunto , Política de Saúde/economia , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde/economia , Humanos , Modelos Econométricos , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/economia , Formulação de Políticas , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , SuíçaRESUMO
The present work focuses on the choice of the elicitation technique within a contingent valuation (CV) framework. We simultaneously apply three different elicitation techniques to elicit willingness-to-pay (WTP) values for three programs against Alzheimer's disease. First, the dichotomous choice approach is used, which is the standard procedure. However, giving respondents only a yes/no response alternative seems to result in overestimated WTP values. Therefore, we secondly apply the dissonance-minimizing format which screens respondents for their preferences and thus avoids possible yea-saying and protest answers against the payment vehicle. The third format, a modified version of the payment card, allows respondents to express a level of voting certainty and to make less of a commitment. With our findings we show that a well-designed CV method is a suitable instrument for helping decision makers in the health care sector and that the Swiss population favors highly a program which improves the situation of informal caregivers.