A single arm Phase I/II trial on the combination of carboplatin, nab-paclitaxel and avastin as first-line treatment for advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (TORG1424/OLCSG1402: CARNAVAL).

BACKGROUND: Bevacizumab with platinum doublet therapy including paclitaxel + carboplatin improves the survival of patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer. However, in a previous trial (CA031), paclitaxel + carboplatin led to Grade > 3 neutropenia in a Japanese population. Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel exhibits an improved toxicity profile. We evaluated the safety, dosage and response rate of the nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel + carboplatin + bevacizumab combination in a Japanese population. METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer were included. The dosage schedule was established in the Phase I trial as follows: 4-6 cycles of carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve = 6 on Day 1) + nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (100 mg/m2 on Days 1, 8 and 15) + bevacizumab (15 mg/kg on Day 1), followed by maintenance therapy (nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel + bevacizumab). The response rate and presence of adverse effects were evaluated in the Phase II trial. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 56.5% (90% confidence interval: 44.5-68.5), and 93% of patients (43/46) showed tumor shrinkage or maintained a stable disease course. The primary endpoint was achieved. At the median follow-up duration of 42 months, the median overall survival was 18.9 (range: 10.5-32.4) months. The most frequently observed Grade ≥ 3 adverse effects were neutropenia (72%), leukopenia (50%) and anemia (30%). CONCLUSIONS: All adverse effects were manageable and none resulted in patient death. In conclusion, the nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel + carboplatin + bevacizumab combination is favorable and well tolerated in Japanese patients as first-line treatment for advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.

Phase 1 study of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in Japanese patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Part E of the KEYNOTE-011 (NCT01840579) study assessed the safety and antitumor activity of pembrolizumab plus platinum-etoposide chemotherapy in Japanese patients with previously untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). METHODS: Patients received 4 cycles of pembrolizumab (200 mg) every 3 weeks in combination with cisplatin (75 mg/m2) and etoposide (100 mg/m2; days 1, 2, 3) in cohort 1; with carboplatin (AUC 5 mg/mL/min) and etoposide (100 mg/m2; days 1, 2, 3) in cohort 2; or with cisplatin/etoposide and pegfilgrastim (3.6 mg; cycle 1, day 4) in cohort 3. Combination therapy was followed by pembrolizumab monotherapy (31 cycles). The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability (including dose-limiting toxicities; DLTs). RESULTS: Fifteen patients were included in the study (cohort 1, n = 6; cohort 2, n = 6; cohort 3, n = 3). Median time from treatment allocation to data cutoff was 22.1 months (range, 4.1‒32.4 months). DLTs occurred in 3 patients in cohort 1 (one patient with grade 4 laryngeal stenosis and grade 3 febrile neutropenia; two patients with grade 3 febrile neutropenia); no patients in cohorts 2 or 3 experienced DLTs. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events included leukopenia (67%) and neutropenia (87%). Among all patients, ORR was 67% (95% CI, 38%‒88%) and median DOR was 4.5 months (range, 2.8‒28.8 months). Median PFS was 4.2 months (95% CI, 3.0‒7.8 months) and median OS was 22.1 months (95% CI, 7.4‒25.9 months). CONCLUSION: Pembrolizumab in combination with platinum-etoposide therapy had manageable toxicity with no new safety signals and was associated with antitumor activity in Japanese patients with ES-SCLC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT01840579.

Effectiveness of crizotinib in patients with ROS1-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: real-world evidence in Japan.

Aim: Crizotinib, approved in Japan (2017) for ROS1-positive NSCLC, has limited real-world data. Materials & methods: Crizotinib monotherapy real-world effectiveness and treatment status were analyzed from claims data (June 2017-March 2021; Japanese Medical Data Vision; 58 patients tested for ROS1-NSCLC). Results: Median duration of treatment ([DoT]; primary end point), any line: 12.9 months; 22 patients on crizotinib, 23 discontinued, 13 receiving post-crizotinib treatment. 1L (n = 27) median DoT: 13.0 months (95% CI, 4.4-32.0 months); 13 patients on crizotinib; seven discontinued; seven receiving post-crizotinib treatment. 2L (n = 13) median DoT: 14.0 months (95% CI, 4.6-22.2 months); 2L+ (n = 31): nine patients on crizotinib; 16 discontinued; six receiving post-crizotinib treatment. Post-crizotinib treatments (chemotherapy, cancer immunotherapy, anti-VEGF/R) did not affect crizotinib DoT. Conclusion: Data supplement crizotinib's effectiveness in ROS1-positive NSCLC previously seen in clinical trials/real-world.

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a common type of cancer in the lung that is often caused by mutations in specific genes in the DNA. One type of NSCLC occurs when you have mutations in a gene called ROS1, whose normal function is not well understood. Crizotinib, an oral medicine, was approved in Japan for the treatment of NSCLC with mutations in ROS1 in 2017; however, this was based upon data from controlled clinical trials. This study was looking at crizotinib use in Japan based upon claims data from the Japanese Medical Data Vision database, which captures all use of medications provided in Japan. Data was collected from June 2017 to March 2021 for 58 Japanese patients who had NSCLC, tested positive for ROS1 mutations, and received crizotinib. Patients took crizotinib for a median of 13.0 months as a first treatment option and 14.0 months as a second treatment option for their NSCLC. The type of and duration of anticancer treatments given before crizotinib did not have an effect on the length of time crizotinib was used. Other treatments outside of crizotinib were given before or after crizotinib and include chemotherapy, therapy that modifies the immune system to treat cancer, or treatments that inhibit the growth of blood vessels that help the cancer grow/spread. Together, these real-world data provide evidence supporting the use of crizotinib in the treatment of patients with NSCLC and ROS1 mutations.

Biomarker analysis of the phase II JO25567 study comparing erlotinib with or without bevacizumab in first-line advanced EGFR+non-small-cell lung cancer.

Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), such as erlotinib, are standard-of-care for patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but most patients progress within 1 year. Previously, we demonstrated that erlotinib plus bevacizumab (EB) improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with EGFR-positive non-squamous NSCLC in the randomized JO25567 study. To understand this effect, we conducted comprehensive exploratory biomarker analyses. Methods: Using blood and tissue specimens from patients enrolled in the JO25567 study, angiogenesis-related serum factors, plasma vascular endothelial growth factor-A (pVEGFA), angiogenesis-related gene polymorphisms, and messenger RNAs (mRNAs) in tumor tissue were analyzed. Interactions between potential predictors and treatment effect on PFS were analyzed in a Cox model. Continuous variable predictors were evaluated by multivariate fractional polynomial interaction methodology and subpopulation treatment effect pattern plotting (STEPP). Results: Overall, 152 patients treated with EB or erlotinib alone (E) were included in the analysis. Among 26 factors analyzed in 134 baseline serum samples, high follistatin and low leptin were identified as potential biomarkers for worse and better outcomes with EB, with interaction P values of 0.0168 and 0.0049, respectively. Serum concentrations of 12 angiogenic factors were significantly higher in patients with high follistatin. Low pVEGFA levels related to better outcomes with EB, interaction P=0.033. VEGF-A165a was the only predictive tissue mRNA, showing a similar trend to pVEGFA. No valid results were obtained in 13 polymorphisms of eight genes. Conclusions: EB treatment showed better treatment outcomes in patients with low pVEGFA and serum leptin, and limited efficacy in patients with high serum follistatin.

Associations between Comorbidities and Acute Exacerbation of Interstitial Lung Disease after Primary Lung Cancer Surgery.

Acute exacerbation (AE) of interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a severe complication of lung resection in lung cancer patients with ILD (LC-ILD). This study aimed to assess the predictive value of comorbidities other than ILD for postoperative AE in patients with LC-ILD. We retrospectively evaluated 68 patients with LC-ILD who had undergone lung resection. We classified them into two groups: those who had developed postoperative AE within 30 days after resection and those who had not. We analyzed patient characteristics, high-resolution computed tomography findings, clinical data, pulmonary function, and intraoperative data. The incidence of postoperative AEs was 11.8%. In univariate analysis, performance status (PS), honeycombing, forced vital capacity (FVC), and high hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels without comorbidities were significantly associated with postoperative AE. Patients were divided into two groups according to cutoff levels of those four variables as determined by receiver operating characteristic curves, revealing that the rates of patients without postoperative AE differed significantly between groups. The present results suggested that preoperative comorbidities other than ILD were not risk factors for postoperative AE in patients with LC-ILD. However, a high preoperative HbA1c level, poor PS, low FVC, and honeycombing may be associated with postoperative AE of LC-ILD.

Simple Symptom-Based Prediction of COVID-19: A Single-Center Study of Outpatient Fever Clinic in Japan.

INTRODUCTION: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) symptoms are not fully understood in non-hospitalized individuals in Japan, and COVID-19 differentiation by symptoms alone remained challenging. Therefore, this study aimed to examine COVID-19 prediction from symptoms using real-world data in an outpatient fever clinic. METHODS: We compared the symptoms of COVID-19-positive and negative patients who visited the outpatient fever clinic at Imabari City Medical Association General Hospital and tested for COVID-19 from April 2021 to May 2022. This retrospective single-center study enrolled 2,693 consecutive patients. RESULTS: COVID-19-positive patients had a higher frequency of close contact with COVID-19-infected patients compared with COVID-19-negative patients. Moreover, patients with COVID-19 had high-grade fever at the clinic compared with patients without COVID-19. Additionally, the most common symptom in patients with COVID-19 was sore throat (67.3%), followed by cough (62.0%), which was approximately twice as common in patients without COVID-19. COVID-19 was more frequently identified in patients having a fever (≥37.5℃) with a sore throat, a cough, or both. The positive COVID-19 rate reached approximately half (45%) when three symptoms were present. CONCLUSION: These results suggested that COVID-19 prediction by combinations of simple symptoms and close contact with COVID-19-infected patients might be useful and lead to recommendations for testing of COVID-19 in symptomatic individuals.

IMpower150 Final Exploratory Analyses for Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab and Chemotherapy in Key NSCLC Patient Subgroups With EGFR Mutations or Metastases in the Liver or Brain.

INTRODUCTION: Final overall survival (OS) analyses are presented for EGFR mutations and liver or brain metastases subgroups in the phase 3 IMpower150 study (NCT02366143) evaluating atezolizumab plus bevacizumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel (ABCP) or atezolizumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel (ACP) versus bevacizumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel (BCP). METHODS: Overall, 1202 patients (intention-to-treat population) with chemotherapy-naive, metastatic, nonsquamous NSCLC were randomized to ABCP, ACP, or BCP. Patients with treated, stable brain metastases were permitted. OS was evaluated in EGFR mutations and baseline liver metastases subgroups; rate and time to development of new brain metastases were evaluated in the intention-to-treat patients. RESULTS: At data cutoff (September 13, 2019; median follow-up, 39.3 mo), OS improvements were sustained with ABCP versus BCP in sensitizing EGFR mutations (all: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.31-1.14; previous tyrosine kinase inhibitor [TKI]: HR = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.38-1.46) and baseline liver metastases (HR = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.45-1.02) subgroups. ACP did not have survival benefit versus BCP in sensitizing EGFR mutations (all: HR = 1.0; 95% CI: 0.57-1.74; previous TKI: HR = 1.22; 95% CI: 0.68-2.22) or liver metastases (HR = 1.01; 95% CI: 0.68-1.51) subgroups. Overall, 100 patients (8.3%) developed new brain metastases. Although not formally evaluated, an improvement toward delayed time to development was found with ABCP versus BCP (HR = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.39-1.19). CONCLUSIONS: This final exploratory analysis revealed OS benefits for ABCP versus BCP in patients with sensitizing EGFR mutations, including those with previous TKI failures, and with liver metastases, although these results should be interpreted with caution. The impact of ABCP on delaying the development of new brain lesions requires further investigation.

Phase 1 study of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment in Japanese patients with advanced NSCLC.

INTRODUCTION: Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy significantly improved outcomes over chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in phase 3 international trials. In the phase 1 KEYNOTE-011 study (parts B and C), we evaluated the safety/activity of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment in Japanese patients with advanced NSCLC. METHODS: Eligible patients received 4 cycles (every 3 weeks) of pembrolizumab 200 mg plus chemotherapy (cisplatin 75 mg/m2/carboplatin area under the curve [AUC] 5 mg/mL/min and pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 in part B [nonsquamous]; carboplatin AUC 6 mg/mL/min and paclitaxel 200 mg/m2/nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 (weekly) in part C [squamous]), followed by maintenance pembrolizumab (and pemetrexed, part B). The primary endpoint was incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) during the first 3 weeks of treatment. Overall response rate (ORR; RECIST v1.1 by central review) was exploratory. RESULTS: In part B (median follow-up, 16.0 months; n = 12) 1 DLT occurred (grade 4 hyponatremia). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 9 patients (75%). Two patients had grade 5 treatment-related AEs (pneumonitis and interstitial lung disease). In part C (median follow-up, 9.9 months; n = 14), 2 DLTs occurred (both grade 3 febrile neutropenia). Grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs occurred in 11 patients (79%); none were fatal. ORR was 73% in part B and 50% in part C, irrespective of PD-L1 status. CONCLUSION: Safety results show first-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy is feasible in Japanese patients with advanced NSCLC. Antitumor activity was observed irrespective of PD-L1 status and was comparable to that in international studies. TRIAL REGISTER: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01840579.

IMpower150 Final Overall Survival Analyses for Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab and Chemotherapy in First-Line Metastatic Nonsquamous NSCLC.

INTRODUCTION: We report the final overall survival (OS) analyses of atezolizumab-carboplatin-paclitaxel (ACP [experimental arm]) and OS data with approximately 39.8 months of median follow-up with atezolizumab-bevacizumab-carboplatin-paclitaxel (ABCP) versus bevacizumab-carboplatin-paclitaxel (BCP) in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC in the phase 3 IMpower150 study (NCT02366143). METHODS: In this randomized, open-label study (N = 1202), coprimary end points included investigator-assessed progression-free survival and OS in intention-to-treat (ITT) wild-type (WT; no EGFR or ALK alterations) patients. Secondary and exploratory end points included OS in ITT and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) subgroups defined by the VENTANA SP142 and SP263 immunohistochemistry assays. RESULTS: At the final analysis with ACP versus BCP (data cutoff: September 13, 2019; minimum follow-up: 32.4 mo), ACP had numerical, but not statistically significant, improvements in OS (ITT-WT: median OS = 19.0 versus 14.7 mo; hazard ratio = 0.84; 95% confidence interval: 0.71-1.00). OS benefit was sustained with ABCP versus BCP (ITT-WT: 19.5 versus 14.7 mo; hazard ratio = 0.80; 95% confidence interval: 0.67-0.95). Exploratory analyses in the SP142-defined PD-L1 subgroups revealed longer median OS with ABCP and ACP versus BCP in PD-L1-high and PD-L1-positive subgroups; in the PD-L1-negative subgroups, median OS was similar with ACP and ABCP versus BCP. Safety was consistent with that in earlier analyses (data cutoff: January 22, 2018). CONCLUSIONS: At the final IMpower150 OS analysis, ACP had numerical, but not statistically significant, OS improvement versus BCP. Updated data with an additional 20 months of follow-up revealed continued OS improvement with ABCP versus BCP in all patients.

Survival of chemo-naïve patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer after treatment with afatinib and bevacizumab: updates from the Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group Trial 1404.

BACKGROUND: In a phase I study, afatinib (30 mg/body daily) plus bevacizumab (15 mg/kg every 3 weeks) was well tolerated and showed favourable outcomes in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Herein, we report the 2-year progression-free survival, overall survival and safety profile of these patients. METHODS: Chemo-naïve patients with EGFR-mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer were enrolled. One group of patients received 40 mg afatinib daily and 15 mg/kg bevacizumab every 3 weeks (level 0) until disease progression or severe toxicity. Another group of patients received 30 mg afatinib daily and the same dose of bevacizumab (level 1). Dose-limiting toxicity was the primary endpoint, whereas long-term progression-free survival, overall survival and tolerability were secondary endpoints. Survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: The study included 19 patients (level 0: 5; level - 1: 14). Until the data cut-off date, seven patients continued the treatment, whereas 12 discontinued due to disease progression (n = 5) or toxicity (n = 7). The median PFS was 24.2 months, while the median overall survival was not reached. All patients developed adverse effects. Diarrhoea and skin rash were frequently observed as severe adverse events (grade 3). A secondary EGFR mutation (T790M) was detected in two patients after progression. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged follow-up revealed that combination therapy with afatinib and bevacizumab might improve survival outcomes in EGFR-mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients and seems to be promising. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000015944.

Pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed-platinum for metastatic nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer: KEYNOTE-189 Japan Study.

Pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed-platinum significantly improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) with manageable safety compared with placebo plus pemetrexed-platinum in patients with previously untreated metastatic nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without EGFR/ALK alterations in the global, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 KEYNOTE-189 study. We present results of Japanese patients enrolled in the KEYNOTE-189 global and Japan extension studies. Patients were randomized 2:1 to intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo every 3 weeks (Q3W) for up to 35 cycles. All patients received pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 plus the investigator's choice of cisplatin or carboplatin Q3W for four cycles, followed by maintenance pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 Q3W (all intravenous). Co-primary endpoints were OS and PFS. Forty Japanese patients enrolled (pembrolizumab, n = 25; placebo, n = 15). At data cutoff (20 May 2019; median time from randomization to data cutoff, 18.5 [range, 14.7-38.2] months), the median OS was not reached in the pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed-platinum arm; the median OS was 25.9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.9-29.0) months in the placebo plus pemetrexed-platinum arm (hazard ratio [HR] .29; 95% CI, .07-1.15). The median (95% CI) PFS was 16.5 (8.8-21.1) compared with 7.1 (4.7-21.4) months (HR, .62; 95% CI, .27-1.42), respectively. There were no grade 5 adverse events (AE). Grade 3/4 AE occurred in 72% vs 60% of patients in the pembrolizumab vs placebo arms; 40% vs 20% had immune-mediated AE, and 4% vs 0% had infusion reactions. Efficacy and safety outcomes were similar to those from the global study and support first-line therapy with pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed-platinum in Japanese patients with nonsquamous NSCLC without EGFR/ALK alterations.

[Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma with High Serum Granulocyte Coronary Stimulating Factor].

A 38-year-old man was admitted to our hospital because of right chest pain and high fever. Chest X-ray and computed tomography scan revealed right pleural effusion and pleural thickness. Diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma was established by pleural biopsy. Serum level of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) was high. We performed extrapleural pneumonectomy which improved high fever and inflammation, however the patient died three months after surgery.

Final survival results for the LURET phase II study of vandetanib in previously treated patients with RET-rearranged advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES: The LURET phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the multikinase inhibitor vandetanib in patients with previously treatedRET-rearranged advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Among the eligible patients included in the primary analysis, the objective response rate met the primary endpoint (53 %, 90 % confidence interval [CI]: 31-74). Here, we report final survival outcomes of the LURET study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nineteen patients with previously treated RET-rearranged advanced NSCLC continuously received 300 mg of oral vandetanib daily. This final analysis provides updated data on progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. This study was registered with UMIN-CTR (number UMIN 000010095). RESULTS: Among the 19 patients in the intention-to-treat population, 42 % had been heavily treated with 3 or more prior chemotherapy regimens. The median PFS was 6.5 months (95 % CI, 3.9-9.3) as determined by an independent radiology review committee. The median OS was 13.5 months (95 % CI, 9.8-28.1) and the overall survival rate at 12 months was 52.6 % (95 % CI 28.7-71.9). The most common adverse events were hypertension (84.2 %), diarrhea (78.9 %), and rash acneiform (63.2 %). Overall, 11 patients (57.9 %) had adverse events leading to a dose reduction, although the safety profile was consistent with that reported in previous studies. CONCLUSION: Our results indicated that vandetanib enabled a prolonged and clinically meaningful PFS and OS in patients with previously treatedRET-rearranged advanced NSCLC at the updated final analysis. The safety profile was consistent with that reported in previous studies, although most of the patients experienced off-target adverse events besides RET.

A Phase 1 study of gefitinib combined with durvalumab in EGFR TKI-naive patients with EGFR mutation-positive locally advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) induce cytolysis and release of tumour proteins, which can stimulate antigen-specific T cells. The safety and efficacy of durvalumab and gefitinib in combination for TKI-naive patients with advanced EGFRm NSCLC was evaluated. METHODS: This Phase 1 open-label, multicentre trial (NCT02088112) was conducted in 56 patients with NSCLC. Dose expansion permitted TKI-naive patients, primarily with activating L858R or Ex19del EGFRm. Arms 1 + 1a received concurrent therapy; Arm 2 received 4 weeks of gefitinib induction followed by concurrent therapy. RESULTS: From dose escalation, the recommended dose of durvalumab was 10 mg/kg Q2W with 250 mg QD gefitinib. Pharmacokinetics were as expected, consistent with inhibition of soluble PD-L1 and no treatment-emergent immunogenicity. In dose expansion, 35% of patients had elevated liver enzymes leading to drug discontinuation. In Arms 1 + 1a, objective response rate was 63.3% (95% CI: 43.9-80.1), median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.1 months (95% CI: 5.5-15.2) and median response duration was 9.2 months (95% CI: 3.7-14.0). CONCLUSIONS: Durvalumab and gefitinib in combination had higher toxicity than either agent alone. No significant increase in PFS was detected compared with historical controls. Therefore, concurrent PD-L1 inhibitors with gefitinib should be generally avoided in TKI-naive patients with EGFRm NSCLC.

Five-year follow-up results from phase II studies of nivolumab in Japanese patients with previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer: pooled analysis of the ONO-4538-05 and ONO-4538-06 studies.

BACKGROUND: Two phase II studies in Japan examined the efficacy and safety of nivolumab, a programmed cell death 1 receptor inhibitor, in patients with advanced squamous and non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (ONO-4538-05 and ONO-4538-06). We examined the long-term efficacy and safety of nivolumab in these patients treated for up to 5 years. METHODS: Patients with squamous (N = 35) or non-squamous (N = 76) non-small cell lung cancer received nivolumab (3 mg/kg every 2 weeks) until disease progression/death. Overall survival and progression-free survival were assessed at 5 years after starting treatment in separate and pooled analyses. Safety was evaluated in terms of treatment-related adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 17 patients were alive at the database lock (26 July 2019). The median overall survival (95% confidence interval) and 5-year survival rate were 16.3 (12.4-25.2) months and 14.3% in squamous patients, 17.1 (13.3-23.0) months and 19.4% in non-squamous patients and 17.1 (14.2-20.6) months and 17.8% in the pooled analysis, respectively. Programmed death ligand-1 expression tended to be greater among 5-year survivors than in non-survivors (P = 0.0703). Overall survival prolonged with increasing programmed death ligand-1 expression, with 5-year survival rates of 11.8, 21.8 and 41.7% in patients with programmed death ligand-1 expression of <1, ≥1-<50 and ≥50%, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events in ≥10% of patients (pooled analysis) included rash (15.3%), malaise (14.4%), decreased appetite (14.4%), pyrexia (14.4%) and nausea (10.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term survival with nivolumab was observed in patients with squamous or non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer. No new safety signals were reported after ≥5 years of follow-up.

Phase I/II study of erlotinib plus S-1 for patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer: Thoracic Oncology Research Group (TORG) 0808/0913.

Introduction In preclinical data, the combination therapy with S-1 and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) had a synergistic antitumor effect on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), regardless of the EGFR mutation status. Patients and Methods Patients with previously treated NSCLC and adequate organ function regardless of EGFR mutation status were eligible for the phase I study, with wild-type EGFR were eligible for the phase II study. Treatment consisted of erlotinib 150 mg/body orally once every day and S-1 60 mg/m2, 70 mg/m2, or 80 mg/m2 (level 0, level 1, or level 2) orally on days 1-14 every three weeks. The primary endpoint for the phase I study was the determination of the recommended dose (RD), the phase II study was the overall response rate (ORR). Results A total of 7 patients with performance-status (PS) 0 or 1 were enrolled as subjects in phase I. Five of these subjects were EGFR-mutation positive. Four subjects were enrolled at S-1 dose level 1 and 3 were enrolled at S-1 dose level 2. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed in these subjects. The RD was decided as erlotinib 150 mg/body and S-1 80 mg/m2. In phase I, 5 subjects achieved partial response, and the ORR was 71.4%. A total of 10 patients with PS 0, 1, or 2 EGFR-wild type NSCLC were enrolled in phase II. In phase II, the ORR was 10.0%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 40.0%. After the enrollment of 10 subjects, enrollment was stopped based on two treatment-related deaths. Conclusion The combination therapy of erlotinib plus S-1 was not feasible in the EGFR wild-type NSCLC at least and early stopped. Trial registration: UMIN-CTR Identifier: 000003421 (2010/03/31, phase I), 000003422 (2010/03/31, Phase II).

5-Hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone as prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting during moderately emetic chemotherapy for solid tumors: a multicenter, prospective, observational study.

BACKGROUND: Of patients receiving moderate emetic risk chemotherapy (MEC), 30-90% experience chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV); however, the optimal antiemetic treatment remains controversial. METHODS: In this multicenter, prospective, observational study of adults treated with MEC while receiving chemotherapy for various cancer types in Japan, the enrolled patients kept diaries documenting CINV. All participants received a 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone. RESULTS: Of the 400 patients enrolled from May 2013 to January 2015, 386 were eligible for evaluation. The median age was 64 (range, 26-84). The overall complete response (CR; no emetic events and no antiemetic measures) rate was 64%. The proportion of patients showing CR was low in the carboplatin (CBDCA)- and oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy groups, especially among women. We showed that the CR rates in men were high in the CBDCA (AUC5) + etoposide (ETP) (80%), capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX) (78%), and CBDCA+ paclitaxel (PTX) groups for lung cancer (73%). Total control (TC; no emetic events, no antiemetic measures, and no nausea) and complete control (CC; no emetic events, no antiemetic measures, and less than mild nausea) were achieved in 51 and 61% of patients, respectively. Logistic regression analysis revealed history of motion sickness, history of pregnancy-associated vomiting and CBDCA-based chemotherapy as risk factors for CR and history of motion sickness and history of pregnancy-associated vomiting as risk factors for TC. Additional, Ages ≥65 years is an independent predictive factor for achieving TC. CONCLUSIONS: Our data showed that two antiemetics were insufficient to control CINV in patients receiving CBDCA- or oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. However, two antiemetics may be sufficiently effective for elderly male patients receiving CBDCA (AUC5) + ETP, CBDCA+PTX for lung cancer, or CAPOX. Additionally, we consider that three antiemetics are necessary for women with colorectal cancer receiving CAPOX. Risk factor analysis related to CR showed that CINV prophylaxis in patients treated with CBDCA-based chemotherapy was generally supportive of the guideline-recommended three antiemetics. However, the control of nausea in patients receiving non-CBDCA-based chemotherapy is a key point to note. The further individualization of antiemetic regimens for patients receiving MEC based on both types of chemotherapy regimens and sex is needed.

Early response of bone metastases can predict tumor response in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer with bone metastases in the treatment with nivolumab.

The effect of nivolumab and the relation between bone response and tumor control in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with bone metastases are not clear. The outcome of nivolumab monotherapy was investigated, and whether the response of bone metastases is useful as an early predictor of tumor control in patients with NSCLC with bone metastases was examined. The participants included 15 patients who received nivolumab monotherapy for NSCLC with bone metastases in our institution between 2015 and 2017. Tumor control was defined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST1.1). Response of bone metastases was assessed by the MD Anderson response criteria (MDA criteria). Responses according to RECIST1.1 and the MDA criteria were classified as responder (complete response or partial response) and non-responder [progressive disease (PD) or stable disease]. Progression-free survival (PFS) was investigated using the Kaplan-Meier method. With RECIST1.1, the overall response rate was 20%. Multivariate analysis showed that the MDA criteria were the only risk factor for patients with PD (RECIST1.1). Median PFS was 1.9 months, with PFS of 20% at 6 months. Univariate analysis showed that being a non-responder according to the MDA criteria was the only risk factor for PFS. In patients who were responders (MDA criteria) within 3 months, PFS was 83 and 50% at 3 and 6 months, respectively, though all non-responder (MDA criteria) patients converted to PD (RECIST1.1) within 3 months. Response according to RECIST1.1 was significantly correlated with response according to the MDA criteria (P<0.05). In patients who were both responders according to RECIST1.1 and the MDA criteria, time to response with the MDA criteria (1.4-2.0 months) was earlier than with RECIST1.1 (2.8-3.0 months) in all patients. In conclusion, application of the MDA criteria within 2 months of nivolumab monotherapy is useful for early prediction of response and prognosis in patients with NSCLC with bone metastases.

Open-label, multicenter, randomized phase II study on docetaxel plus bevacizumab or pemetrexed plus bevacizumab for treatment of elderly (aged ≥75 years) patients with previously untreated advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: TORG1323.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of bevacizumab monotherapy in elderly patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is unclear. The efficacy of the combinations for elderly patients was explored. METHODS: Untreated patients (≥75 years; performance status 0-1) with stage IIIB, IV, or recurrent non-squamous NSCLC were included. Patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangements were eligible even if they received tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive docetaxel (50 mg/m2) (DB) or pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) (PB) with bevacizumab (15 m/kg). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Treatment was administered every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: Overall, 103 patients (DB: n=51; PB: n=52) were enrolled. In the DB and PB arms, median ages [range] were 78 [75-88] and 79 [75-94] years, respectively; median PFS were 6.1 and 4.6 months, respectively [hazard ratio (HR), 1.03; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.66-1.61]; and response rates were 43%, and 40%, respectively (P=0.840). Grade ≥3 leukopenia, neutropenia, and fatigue incidences were significantly higher in the DB arm. Febrile neutropenia incidence did not differ significantly (16% vs. 12%, P=0.578). One patient in the PB arm died from a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Quality of life (QoL) analysis revealed less deterioration in the PB arm. CONCLUSIONS: In previously untreated elderly patients with non-squamous NSCLC, PB shows feasibility, better QoL, and promising efficacy in terms of PFS, and an objective response rate for further analysis (UMIN000012786).

Lorlatinib in previously treated anaplastic lymphoma kinase-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer: Japanese subgroup analysis of a global study.

Lorlatinib is a potent, brain-penetrant, third-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)/ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that is active against most known resistance mutations. This is an ongoing phase 1/2, multinational study (NCT01970865) investigating the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of lorlatinib in ALK-rearranged/ROS1-rearranged advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with or without intracranial (IC) metastases. Because patterns of ALK TKI use in Japan differ from other regions, we present a subgroup analysis of Japanese patients. Patients were enrolled into six expansion (EXP) cohorts based on ALK/ROS1 mutation status and treatment history. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) and the IC-ORR based on independent central review. Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetic evaluations. At data cutoff, 39 ALK-rearranged/ROS1-rearranged Japanese patients were enrolled across the six expansion cohorts; all received lorlatinib 100 mg once daily. Thirty-one ALK-rearranged patients previously treated with ≥1 ALK TKI (EXP2 to EXP5) were evaluable for ORR and 15 were evaluable for IC-ORR. The ORR and the IC-ORR for Japanese patients in EXP2-5 were 54.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 36.0-72.7) and 46.7% (95% CI: 21.3-73.4), respectively. Among patients who had received prior alectinib only (EXP3B), the ORR was 42.9%; 95% CI: 9.9-81.6). The most common treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) was hypercholesterolemia (79.5%). Hypertriglyceridemia was the most common grade 3/4 TRAE (25.6%). Single-dose and multiple-dose pharmacokinetic profiles among Japanese patients were similar to those in non-Japanese patients. Lorlatinib showed clinically meaningful responses and IC responses among ALK-rearranged Japanese patients with NSCLC who received ≥1 prior ALK TKI, including meaningful responses among those receiving prior alectinib only. Lorlatinib was generally well tolerated.