RESUMO
PURPOSE: We compare virtual cystoscopy (VC) and transabdominal ultrasonography (US) with conventional cystoscopy (CC),the gold standard, for detection of bladder tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-five patients suspected to have bladder neoplasms were evaluated prospectively.They underwent transabdominal US, followed by VC and CC. We compared sensitivity and specificity of US and VC and their positive and negative likelihood ratios. US and VC detection rates for tumors Assuntos
Cistoscopia/métodos
, Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/diagnóstico por imagem
, Adulto
, Idoso
, Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais
, Feminino
, Humanos
, Masculino
, Pessoa de Meia-Idade
, Ultrassonografia
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the pitfalls occurring during the virtual colonoscopy examination performed with a protocol designed for screening purposes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 40 patients underwent a spiral CT for virtual colonoscopic evaluation with the following parameters: collimation 3 mm, feed 6 mm.rot(-1), pitch 2 and increment 1 mm in supine position. Virtual colonography examination was carried out using a dedicated workstation equipped with a software which allows to generate 3D images and virtual endoscopic views. Colon distension, fluid and fecal material were assessed on a 3 point scale. RESULTS: Distension score was 0.50. Left colon and cecum score was 0.32 while in the sigmoid and rectum the score was worse with 0.86. Fluid and fecal residues scores were 0.31 and 0.19 respectively. On almost half of the patients additional scans would be necessary. The main cause of additional scans is suboptimal intestinal preparation and colon distension. CONCLUSION: The use of virtual colonoscopy for screening purposes will be possible through the further technical development and with the optimisation of the protocols, particularly by the improvement of colon cleansing and distension.