Influence of facial width on the perception of lip protrusion and its differences between profile and 3-dimensional video clip.

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated the influence of facial width on the perception of lip protrusion and investigated the concordance between 2-dimensional (2D) profile images and 3-dimensional (3D) video clips in assessing lip protrusion. METHODS: An Asian female standard head model was created using 3D modeling software. Eight head models were constructed by modifying the standard head model in terms of facial width (broad, neutral, and slim) and lip protrusion (retrusive, straight, and protrusive). Overall, 97 Asian raters rated the lip protrusion from the 2D profiles and 3D rotation video clips of the 9 models. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in the perception of lip protrusion in terms of sex, age, or occupation. Compared with the 2D profiles, the 3D video clips were rated as more protrusive in 8 of the 9 head models, with the retrusive broad, retrusive neutral, straight broad, and straight slim faces showing statistical significance (P <0.01). The rating is significantly higher in slim faces than in broad faces across the 3 groups of 2D profiles (P <0.01). For 3D video clips, the rating was higher in slim faces than in broad faces in all 3 groups, whereas differences were significant in the straight and protrusive groups only (P <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, 3D video clips were more sensitive to the perception of lip protrusion than were 2D profiles to some extent. The lips were rated relatively more protrusive in a slim face than in a broad face. Therefore, the relationship between facial width and lip protrusion should be considered in orthodontic treatment goals and treatment plans.

Recovery bone formation on radiographic palatal bone dehiscences after incisor retraction with microimplants.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the difference in labial and palatal alveolar bone thickness and height during the retention period after incisor retraction treatment with microimplant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A sample of 21 patients (mean age: 17.80 ± 4.38 years) who underwent incisor retraction treatment using microimplants after premolar extraction was investigated. The cone-beam computed tomography images at pretreatment, posttreatment, and retention were used to measure anterior alveolar bone thickness (labial, palatal, and total; at three vertical levels) and height (labial and palatal) and differences in the incisor position during treatment or retention. Repeated-measures analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction was performed to compare the variables at T0, T1, and T2. RESULTS: The maxillary central incisor moved posteriorly by approximately 8.0 mm along with intrusive movement of 1.8 mm after treatment. The alveolar bone thickness significantly decreased on the palatal side and increased on the labial side after treatment. Thereafter, the palatal bone thickness significantly increased and labial bone thickness decreased during the retention period. The palatal interdental bone depressed by incisor retraction showed substantial bone deposition after retention. CONCLUSIONS: Radiographic palatal bone dehiscences on the incisor root and palatal bone depression between the incisor roots were apparent after treatment. This palatal bone loss around the incisor roots noticeably recovered with newly formed bone during retention.

The effect of different mechanical retention forms on shear bond strength of rebonding of ceramic brackets.

The objective of this study is to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) and the morphological characteristics and chemical compositions of the base surface of newly bonded and rebonded ceramic brackets with different mechanical retention bases. Sixty extracted human premolars were divided into the newly bonded and rebonded groups. Ceramic brackets with patterned, laser-etched, and particle-coated patterned bases were randomly bonded to the tooth samples in each group (n=10 per base type). The rebonded brackets exhibited significantly lower SBS than the newly bonded brackets (p<0.05). The main chemical composition of the brackets in both groups was aluminum on the energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. Scanning electron microscopy imaging showed the presence of regular-shaped undercuts or irregular micro-undercuts on the bracket bases which mostly remained intact even after debonding and sandblasting, while coated particles disappeared. The rebonded ceramic brackets with mechanical retention bases exhibited clinically acceptable bond strength regardless of retentive forms.

Commercial artificial intelligence lateral cephalometric analysis: part 1-the possibility of replacing manual landmarking with artificial intelligence service.

Artificial intelligence (AI) technology has recently been introduced to dentistry. AI-assisted cephalometric analysis is one of its applications, and several commercial AI services have already been launched. However, the performance of these commercial services is still unclear. This study aimed to determine whether commercially available AI cephalometric analysis can replace manual analysis by human examiners. Eighty-four pretreatment lateral cephalograms were traced and examined by two orthodontists and four commercial AIs, and 13 commonly used cephalometric variables were calculated. Then, the Bland-Altman analysis was conducted to evaluate systematic and random errors between examiners. The interchangeability of an AI was determined if the random errors of the AI were smaller than the clinically acceptable limits derived from the random errors between human examiners. Finally, the inter-examiner reliability index was calculated, and Cohen's kappa was determined to assess the actual classification reliability of each examiner. The systematic errors of the AIs were clinically insignificant in general. However, the random errors of the AIs were approximately twice those of human examiners, which did not satisfy the interchangeability condition. Furthermore, even though the reliability indices of the AIs were in the good-to-excellent range, their classification reliability was unacceptable. Commercial AI is still at a level that makes it challenging to replace manual landmarking by human experts. Thus, a human examiner's landmark position review is mandatory when using commercial AIs.

Commercial artificial intelligence lateral cephalometric analysis: part 2-effects of human examiners on artificial intelligence performance, a pilot study.

At the current technology level, a human examiner's review must be accompanied to compensate for the insufficient commercial artificial intelligence (AI) performance. This study aimed to investigate the effects of the human examiner's expertise on the efficacy of AI analysis, including time-saving and error reduction. Eighty-four pretreatment cephalograms were randomly selected for this study. First, human examiners (one beginner and two regular examiners) manually detected 15 cephalometric landmarks and measured the required time. Subsequently, commercial AI services automatically identified these landmarks. Finally, the human examiners reviewed the AI landmark determination and adjusted them as needed while measuring the time required for the review process. Then, the elapsed time was compared statistically. Systematic and random errors among examiners (human examiners, AI and their combinations) were assessed using the Bland-Altman analysis. Intraclass correlation coefficients were used to estimate the inter-examiner reliability. No clinically significant time difference was observed regardless of AI use. AI measurement error decreased substantially after the review of the human examiner. From the standpoint of the human examiner, beginners could obtain better results than manual landmarking. However, the AI review outcomes of the regular examiner were not as good as those of manual analysis, possibly due to AI-dependent landmark decisions. The reliability of AI analysis could also be improved by employing the human examiner's review. Although the time-saving effect was not evident, commercial AI cephalometric services are currently recommendable for beginners.

Differences in facial soft tissue deviations in Class III patients with different types of mandibular asymmetry: A cone-beam computed tomography study.

Objective: : This study assessed the differences in soft tissue deviations of the nose, lips, and chin between different mandibular asymmetry types in Class III patients. Methods: : Cone-beam computed tomography data from 90 Class III patients with moderate-to-severe facial asymmetry were investigated. The sample was divided into three groups based on the extent of mandibular rolling, yawing, and translation. Soft tissue landmarks on the nose, lips, and chin were investigated vertically, transversely, and anteroposteriorly. A paired t test was performed to compare variables between the deviated (Dv) and nondeviated (NDv) sides, and one-way analysis of variance with Tukey's post-hoc test was performed for intergroup comparisons. Pearson's correlation coefficient was calculated to assess the relationship between the soft and hard tissue deviations. Results: : The roll-dominant group showed significantly greater differences in the vertical positions of the soft tissue landmarks between the Dv and NDv than other groups (P < 0.05), whereas the yaw-dominant group exhibited larger differences in the transverse and anteroposterior directions (P < 0.05). Moreover, transverse lip cant was correlated with the menton (Me) deviation and mandibular rolling in the roll-dominant group (P < 0.001); the angulation of the nasal bridge or philtrum was correlated with the Me deviation and mandibular yawing in the yaw-dominant group (P < 0.01). Conclusions: : The three-dimensional deviations of facial soft tissue differed based on the mandibular asymmetry types in Class III patients with similar amounts of Me deviation. A precise understanding of soft tissue deviation in each asymmetry type would help achieve satisfactory facial esthetics.

Mandibular asymmetry types and differences in dental compensations of Class III patients analyzed with cone-beam computed tomography.

OBJECTIVES: To assess differences in dental compensation of the incisors and first molars in skeletal Class III patients with roll-, yaw-, and translation-dominant mandibular asymmetries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 90 skeletal Class III adult patients (mean age, 22.00 ± 3.31 years; range, 18-37.9 years) with facial asymmetry were enrolled and divided into the roll-, yaw-, and translation-dominant type groups (n = 30 per group). The vertical, transverse, and anteroposterior distances and axial angles of the teeth were measured using cone-beam computed tomography images. The measurements were compared between the deviated and nondeviated sides using a paired t-test and among the three groups using one-way analysis of variance with a Tukey post hoc test. RESULTS: The roll-dominant groups showed the greatest values for the bilateral difference in the vertical position of the maxillary (2.42 ± 1.24 mm) and mandibular molars (2.23 ± 1.28 mm; P < .001). The transverse deviations of the maxillary (2.19 ± 1.51 mm) and mandibular incisors (-2.11 ± 1.39 mm) were greater in the yaw-dominant groups than those of other groups. Regarding tooth axial angle, the yaw-dominant group showed the greatest tipping of the mandibular incisor (-4.13 ± 3.30°; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Dental compensation differed depending on the type of facial asymmetry. The roll-dominant type showed more vertical compensation of the posterior teeth, whereas the yaw-dominant type exhibited more tipping of the molars and incisors. By precisely assessing dental compensation in each asymmetry type, sufficient dental decompensation could be achieved.

Differences in positions of cone-beam computed tomography landmarks in patients with skeletal Class III facial asymmetry according to midsagittal planes.

Objective: This study aimed to clarify differences in the positions of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) landmarks according to different midsagittal planes (MSPs) in patients with skeletal Class III facial asymmetry. Methods: Pre-treatment CBCT data from 60 patients with skeletal Class III were used. The patients were classified into symmetric (menton deviations of < 2 mm) or asymmetric (menton deviations of > 4 mm) groups. Six MSPs were established based on previous studies, and three-dimensional analyses were performed for the planes in both the groups. The measurement outcomes were compared statistically. Results: A statistically significant interaction (p < 0.01) was observed between MSPs and facial asymmetry. No significant differences were observed among MSPs in the symmetric group. However, significant differences in linear measurements were identified among MSPs in the asymmetric group. Specifically, the upper facial MSP revealed both maxillary and mandibular transverse asymmetries. On the other hand, anterior nasal spine (ANS)-associated MSP could not identify maxillary asymmetry. Furthermore, the menton deviation was approximately 3 mm lower when estimated using the ANS-associated MSP than that using upper facial MSP. Conclusions: The choice of MSP can significantly affect treatment outcomes while diagnosing patients with asymmetry. Therefore, care should be taken when selecting MSP in clinical practice.

Use of a novel body mandibular plane (mental foramen-protuberance menti) in analyzing mandibular asymmetry compared with conventional border mandibular plane.

OBJECTIVES: To compare a novel body mandibular horizontal plane (mental foramen-protuberance menti; Body-MHP) with the conventional border mandibular horizontal plane (gonion-menton [Me]; Border-MHP) to assess mandibular body inclination and dental compensation of skeletal Class III patients with and without facial asymmetry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective data obtained from diagnostic cone-beam computed tomography of 90 skeletal Class III patients (mean age, 21.67 ± 2.93 years; range, 15.0-30.6 years) were divided into symmetry (n = 30) and asymmetry groups (n = 60). The asymmetry group was subdivided into roll (n = 30) and non-roll types (n = 30). The differences in body inclination and dental measurements (distance and angle) according to two mandibular planes (Body-MHP and Border-MHP) were assessed in the groups and subgroups. RESULTS: Mandibular body inclinations relative to the Body-MHP were not different in the roll-type asymmetric mandible between the sides, while those relative to the Border-MHP were different (P < .001). For the mandibular first molar positions relative to the Border-MHP, the differences in vertical distance between the sides were undermeasured and the inclination differences were overmeasured when compared relative to the Body-MHP. CONCLUSIONS: The Body-MHP demonstrated better bilateral similarity in body inclination compared with the Border-MHP in patients with roll-type facial asymmetry. The novel body mandibular plane ensures an accurate diagnosis for tooth movement and jaw surgery, particularly in the roll-type asymmetric mandible.

Nonsurgical orthodontic correction of facial asymmetry by condylar remodeling and mandibular repositioning following occlusal cant correction with microimplants: a case report.

Recently, the demand for correcting facial asymmetry has been increasing, even when the extent of asymmetry is small. This case report describes nonsurgical orthodontic treatment for facial asymmetry in a 13-year-old female patient, facilitated by moving the deviant mandible to the nondeviated side after correcting for relevant dental compensation using microimplants. Mandibular repositioning was attempted using intermaxillary elastics between the microimplants placed into each jaw and guided by resin that was bonded on the maxillary first molar of the deviated side. To enhance mandibular movement, correction of the transverse occlusal cant and buccolingual inclination of the teeth were also performed. After 65 months of gradual treatment, facial symmetry, with favorable occlusion and jaw function, was achieved. These satisfactory results, including a well-balanced face and good occlusal interdigitation, were well maintained at the 53-month follow-up. Direct and functional forces applied against deviant functional forces can reduce facial asymmetry by differential growth or modeling of the condyle.

Does maxillary yaw exist in patients with skeletal Class III facial asymmetry?

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to evaluate maxillary skeletal and dental yaw in patients with skeletal Class III facial asymmetry and investigate its correlation with menton deviation. METHODS: Initial cone-beam computed tomography data from 60 patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion were used. There were 30 patients in both the symmetrical group (menton deviation <2 mm) and the asymmetrical group (menton deviation >4 mm). After reconstruction of 3-dimensional (3D) cone-beam computed tomography data, maxillary yaw and 3D positions of skeletal and dental landmarks were measured and compared between the groups. After that, correlations between menton deviation and the other variables were assessed. RESULTS: No significant difference was noted in maxillary skeletal and dental yaw between the 2 groups. In the assessment of 3D positions, translation of the maxillary bone and maxillary dentition toward the menton deviation was observed (P <0.01). Maxillary skeletal and dental yaw was not significantly correlated with menton deviation in the asymmetrical group. CONCLUSIONS: Maxillary skeletal and dental yaw was not evident in either group. Therefore, when planning maxillary surgery for patients with skeletal Class III facial asymmetry malocclusion, it may be appropriate to shift the focus of decompensation from maxillary yaw to maxillary translation.

Considerations for vertical control with microimplants in a idiopathic condylar resorption patient: A case report.

Idiopathic condylar resorption (ICR) is a rare, destructive temporomandibular joint disease characterised by progressive resorption of the condyles. This case report presents a record of an orthodontically treated patient with ICR with favourable posttreatment remodelling of the condyles. An 18-year-old woman sought treatment for ICR. A severe Class II high-angle facial pattern with resorption of bilateral condyles was evident. The treatment plan was determined after careful examination of condylar radiographs and comprised forward rotation of the mandible through full-arch intrusion with microimplants after extraction of the four premolars. The treatment was completed in 35 months, and the patient was noted to have a straight profile, good interdigitation and slightly increased condylar volume. Two years after retention, the condyles were stable, and the patient's profile and occlusion remained acceptable despite a mild relapse of the mandibular position. ICR was successfully corrected with orthodontic treatment. Counter-clockwise mechanics applied during the ICR remission period not only improved facial aesthetics but were also suitable for condylar unloading.

An efficient and noncompliant method for forced eruption with microimplants that is bracket free, and its long-term stability.

BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The authors describe a bracket-free forced eruption technique using microimplants that does not require patient compliance and report relapse after long-term observation. CASE DESCRIPTION: In 2 patients who needed to undergo forced eruption of carious and fractured roots of anterior teeth, the authors erupted the roots forcefully with a cantilever wire and microimplants as an anchorage. The microimplants provided sufficient anchorage by approximately 6 to 7 millimeters for forced eruption of the roots. The authors observed minor relapse of approximately 0.5 mm in both cases at the 1.5-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS AND PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The forced eruption method using microimplants and a sectional wire is simple and does not require patient compliance, but it does provide precise tooth movement. Clinicians can consider using long retention, overcorrection, and delayed cementation of prosthetic crowns to manage relapse.