A systematic review of discrete choice experiments in stroke rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVES: Existing research qualitatively explores consumer preferences for stroke rehabilitation interventions. However, it remains unclear which intervention characteristics are most important to consumers, and how these preferences may influence uptake and participation. Discrete choice experiments (DCE) provide a unique way to quantitatively measure preferences for health and health care. This study aims to explore how DCEs have been used in stroke rehabilitation and to identify reported consumer preferences for rehabilitation interventions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic review of published stroke rehabilitation DCEs was completed (PROSPERO registration: CRD42021282578). Six databases (including CINAHL, MEDLINE, EconLIT) were searched from January 2000-March 2023. Data extracted included topic area, sample size, aim, attributes, design process, and preference outcomes. Descriptive and thematic analyses were conducted, and two methodological checklists applied to review quality. RESULTS: Of 2,446 studies screened, five were eligible. Studies focused on exercise preference (n = 3), the structure and delivery of community services (n = 1), and self-management programs (n = 1). All had small sample sizes (range 50-146) and were of moderate quality (average score of 77%). Results indicated people have strong preferences for one-to-one therapy (over group-based), light-moderate intensity of exercise, and delivery by qualified therapists (over volunteers). CONCLUSIONS: Few DCEs have been conducted in stroke rehabilitation, suggesting consumer preferences could be more rigorously explored. Included studies were narrow in the scope of attributes included, limiting their application to practice and policy. Further research is needed to assess the impact of differing service delivery models on uptake and participation.

A cluster of leptospirosis cases associated with crocodile workers in the Northern Territory, Australia, 2022.

Leptospirosis is a worldwide zoonotic waterborne disease endemic in tropical and subtropical climates. Outbreaks have been observed in the Northern Territory (NT) of Australia. We briefly described the epidemiology of leptospirosis in the NT between 2012 and 2022, and undertook an investigation of a cluster of three leptospirosis cases observed in crocodile workers between January and December 2022 in the Top End of the NT. A descriptive case series was conducted to investigate the cluster; all three cases were male and non-Aboriginal with a median age of 46.5 years; none took chemoprophylaxis; only one of the three cases reported wearing appropriate protective attire; all reported receiving limited to no education about personal protective measures from their associated workplaces. Higher than average rainfall in both February and December 2022 likely contributed to the increased risk of infection in those months. Changing climate patterns are likely to result in more frequent periods of heavy rain, and risk of contracting leptospirosis in the NT may increase, particularly for those who work in wet and muddy conditions. Promoting the use of protective workplace clothing and equipment, the use of waterproof dressings for skin abrasions, regular hand hygiene, and the consideration of chemoprophylaxis in certain circumstances may prevent future cases.

Non-tuberculous mycobacterial skin and soft tissue infections in the Northern Territory, Australia, 1989-2021.

BACKGROUND: A previous review demonstrated that the majority of NTM infections in the Northern Territory (NT) are pulmonary in nature [1], however skin and soft tissue (SST) are likely the next most common sites of disease. The current epidemiology of NTM SST infections across the NT is not known. We aimed to establish the current and historical incidence rates, and the organisms involved. METHODS: All NTM cases reported to the Centre for Disease Control in Darwin from 1989-2021 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: 226 NTM notifications were reviewed. 73 (32%) cases were SST infections. The incidence of SST cases increased over the study period. Female cases were more common (p=0·002). Disease occurred across a wide age range (1-85 years). Only 16% of cases occurred in Aboriginal individuals which may reflect immunological factors requiring further investigation. Many cases had no clear provocation, but localised skin trauma was the most common risk factor. The most common organism identified was M. fortuitum (41%). Diagnosis was often delayed, with a median time to diagnosis of 69 days (IQR=31-149). Most cases (60%) underwent surgical intervention with adjunctive anti-mycobacterial medical therapy. CONCLUSION: NTM SST incidence rates increased over the study period. NTM SST infections are a rare but important differential diagnosis for non-healing cutaneous wounds.

Diagnosis of septic arthritis in the acute care setting: the value of routine intra-operative sample culture.

Objective: Diagnosing septic arthritis can be challenging and frequently involves clinical assessment, laboratory investigations and synovial fluid analysis. We sought to determine the utility of synovial aspiration and intra-operative synovial fluid and tissue culture for the accurate diagnosis of septic arthritis. Methods: We carried out a retrospective review of the records of patients referred to a tertiary orthopaedic unit with possible septic arthritis between 2015 and 2019 inclusive, including clinical and laboratory data for this cohort study. Performance characteristics were determined for synovial aspiration, intra-operative synovial fluid and tissue culture in diagnosing expert review-determined true septic arthritis. Concordance between discharge diagnosis, antibiotic prescribing and true septic arthritis was determined. Results: Of 268 patients identified with suspected septic arthritis, 143 underwent both synovial fluid aspiration and intra-operative synovial fluid and tissue biopsy culture. True septic arthritis was not differentiated significantly by laboratory parameters including serum white cell count (WCC), CRP or synovial WCC. Considering only patients with negative pre-operative synovial aspirate cultures, intra-operative samples led to diagnosis of true septic arthritis in 6 of 63 patients [number needed to treat (NNT) 10.5]. For all patients sampled in theatre, positive synovial tissue biopsy was the only evidence of true septic arthritis in six (NNT 23.9). Despite insufficient microbiological evidence, 27 of the 59 patients who did not have septic arthritis received a discharge diagnosis of septic arthritis, 26 of whom were discharged with antibiotics. Conclusion: Intra-operative sample collection, particularly tissue biopsy, increases the likelihood of a true septic arthritis diagnosis. Such measures might help to reduce diagnostic ambiguity in clinical practice and might therefore reduce overtreatment.