Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Mikrobiyol Bul ; 57(3): 490-497, 2023 Jul.
Artigo em Turco | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37462312

RESUMO

Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) emerged in the last months of 2019 and caused a pandemic effecting the whole world. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of COVID-19 has changed by various mutations since the day it was first identified, causing the pandemic to continue. Age, male gender, obesity, and comorbidity, which are general risk factors for COVID-19, can also cause prolonged PCR positivity. In this report, a case of 37-year-old male who is working in the hospital's COVID-19 molecular diagnostics laboratory was presented. He was vaccinated with three doses of inactivated vaccine, CoronaVac (Sinovac Biotech, Beijing-China), within the context of the vaccination program carried out in Türkiye. His first SARS-CoV-2 positivity was detected on 12.01.2021, four months after the last vaccination, and he continued to be detected positive for SARS-CoV-2 throughout a period of 39 days by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) tests performed with 2-3-day intervals. The patient has a 20-pack/year smoking history and his body mass index (BMI) was 29.8 kg/m2 at the time of his COVID-19. The case, which was clinically defined as mild COVID-19 with symptoms including back and headache, cough, fever (38.5°C), and loss of taste-smell, and without any additional complications or respiratory distress during the disease process. In the radiological examination, the lung was found within normal ranges. Prophylactic enoxaparin sodium anti-xa IU/0.6 ml was administered to the patient due to his cardiovascular risk, and no additional treatment was given. Whole genome sequencing was performed from nasopharyngeal swab samples of the patient at the beginning and 16th day of the infection to investigate the the specific genomic features and mutation pattern of the virus in the host over time, due to the prolonged SARS-CoV-2 PCR positivity. Library preparation for the whole next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed by the SARS-CoV-2 Panel, Paragon CleanPlex kit (Paragon Genomics, USA), and indexing of the library was done by Clean-Plex Dual-Indexed PCR Primers for Illumina Set B kit (Paragon Genomics, USA). NGS analysis was performed on the Illumina Miniseq (Illumina, USA) platform. As a result of the bioinformatics evaluation, both samples were determined as SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant (Nextclade; 21J-Delta variant, Pango lineage; AY.43). Remarkably, the SARSCoV-2 sequences in the two samples taken 15 days apart; several identical mutations; such as D614G in the S gene, P323L in the ORF 1b gene region, and P1228L in the Nsp3 gene region, were detected. Besides that, when compared to the first sample, three additional mutations (P383L, P539S, L838I) were observed in the sequence of the second sample, which led to three amino acid changes, the clinical significance of which has not yet been determined in the literature. It is thought that; these mutations that change amino acid expression, as well as the other three mutations detected, may contribute to the improvement of the fitness of the virus and may be one of the factors responsible for the prolonged SARS-CoV-2 PCR positivity. Additional data to be obtained by further epidemiological sequencing studies will shed light on this issue.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , COVID-19/diagnóstico , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Mutação , Teste para COVID-19
2.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 11(2)2023 Feb 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36851233

RESUMO

Numerous vaccines have been generated to decrease the morbidity and mortality of COVID-19. This study aims to evaluate the immunogenicity of the heterologous boosts by BioNTech against homologous boosts by CoronaVac at three-month intervals in two health care worker (HCW) cohorts, with or without prior COVID-19, for one year post-vaccination. This is a prospective cohort study in which the humoral responses of 386 HCWs were followed-up longitudinally in six main groups according to their previous COVID-19 exposure and vaccination status. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike-RBD total antibody levels were measured and SARS-CoV-2 neutralization antibody (NAbs) responses against the ancestral Wuhan and the Omicron variant were evaluated comparatively using international standard serum for Wuhan and Omicron, as well as with the aid of a conversion tool. The anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike-RBD total Ab and Nab difference between with and without prior COVID-19, three months after two-dose primary vaccination with CoronaVac, was statistically significant (p = 0.001). In the subsequent follow-ups, this difference was not observed between the groups. Those previously infected (PI) and non-previously infected (NPI) groups receiving BioNTech as the third dose had higher anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike total Ab levels (14.2-fold and 17.4-fold, respectively, p = 0.001) and Nab responses (against Wuhan and Omicron) than those receiving CoronaVac. Ab responses after booster vaccination decreased significantly in all groups at the ninth-month follow-up (p < 0.05); however, Abs were still higher in all booster received groups than that in the primary vaccination. Abs were above the protective level at the twelfth-month measurement in the entire of the second BioNTech received group as the fourth dose of vaccination. In the one-year follow-up period, the increased incidence of COVID-19 in the groups vaccinated with two or three doses of CoronaVac compared with the groups vaccinated with BioNTech as a booster suggested that continuing the heterologous CoronaVac/BioNTech vaccination, revised according to current SARS-CoV-2 variants and with at least a six-month interval booster would be an effective and safe strategy for protection against COVID-19, particularly in health care workers.

3.
Rheumatol Int ; 42(10): 1741-1750, 2022 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35779083

RESUMO

There are limited data about humoral response to vaccine in Behçet's syndrome (BS). We compared SARS-CoV-2 antibody response after two doses of inactivated (Sinovac/CoronaVac) or mRNA (Pfizer/BioNTech) vaccines in patients with BS and healthy controls (HCs). We studied 166 (92M/74F) patients with BS (mean age: 42.9 ± 9.6 years) and 165 (75M/90F) healthy controls (mean age: 42.4 ± 10.4 years), in a single-center cross-sectional design between April 2021 and October 2021. A total of 80 patients with BS and 89 HCs received two doses of CoronaVac, while 86 patients with BS and 76 HCs were vaccinated with BioNTech. All study subjects had a negative history for COVID-19. Serum samples were collected at least 21 days after the second dose of the vaccine. Anti-spike IgG antibody titers were measured quantitatively using a commercially available immunoassay method. We found that the great majority in both patient and HC groups had detectable antibodies after either CoronaVac (96.3% vs 100%) or BioNTech (98.8% vs 100%). Among those vaccinated with CoronaVac, BS patients had significantly lower median (IQR) titers compared to HCs [36.5 (12.5-128.5) vs 102 (59-180), p < 0.001]. On the other hand, antibody titers did not differ among patients with BS and HCs who were vaccinated with BioNTech [1648.5 (527.0-3693.8) vs 1516.0 (836.3-2599.5), p = 0.512). Among different treatment regimen subgroups in both vaccine groups, those who were using anti-TNF-based treatment had the lowest antibody titers. However, the difference was statistically significant only among those vaccinated with CoronaVac. Among patients vaccinated with BioNTech, there was no statistically significant difference between different treatment regimen groups. Compared to inactivated COVID-19 vaccine, mRNA-based vaccine elicited higher antibody titers among BS patients. Only in the CoronaVac group, patients especially those using anti-TNF agents were found to have low titers compared to healthy subjects. BS patients vaccinated with BioNTech were found to have similar seroconversion rates and antibody levels compared to healthy controls. Further studies should assess whether the low antibody titers are associated with diminished protection against COVID-19 in both vaccine groups.


Assuntos
Síndrome de Behçet , COVID-19 , Vacinas Virais , Adulto , Anticorpos Antivirais , Formação de Anticorpos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , RNA Mensageiro , SARS-CoV-2 , Inibidores do Fator de Necrose Tumoral , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados , Vacinas Virais/efeitos adversos
4.
Balkan Med J ; 39(1): 48-54, 2022 01 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34928231

RESUMO

Background: Widespread and effective use of molecular diagnostic tests is indispensable for protecting public health and containing the severe respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. More than 1 year into the pandemic, as resources have reached a point of depletion, grouping samples in pools of certain sizes appears to be a reasonable method to reduce both the costs and the processing time without necessitating additional training, equipment, or materials. Aims: To assess whether the pooling strategy that was used in past outbreaks and is used in blood tests prior to transfusion for screening large populations can also be used in SARS CoV-2 tests. Study Design: Diagnostic accuracy study. Methods: This prospective study was conducted with 2815 samples, sent to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Laboratory of our hospital between February 12 and 21, 2021, to be tested for the presence of SARS-CoV-2. The samples were examined individually and in pools of five 100 µl taken from each sequential sample, using 3 different SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) kits, the Allplex™ 2019-nCoV Assay kit (Seegene, Republic of Korea), the GeneMAP™ 2019-nCoV detection V.3 kit (GenMark, Türkiye), and the Bio-Speedy™ SARS-CoV-2 Double Gene™ RT-qPCR kit (Bioeksen, Türkiye) on the BioRAD CFX96™ Touch (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) platform available in our laboratory. Results: Following the extraction of serial dilutions prepared from the SARS-CoV-2 RNA positive (cycle of threshold: 20) sample, the standard curves of RT-PCR were analyzed. By evaluating the efficiency (E) values, all 3 kits showed high sensitivity and similar results; while the highest level was detected with the Allplex™ 2019-nCoV Assay kit in the nucleocapsid (N) gene (E: 124%), the lowest was detected with the Double Gene™ RT-qPCR kit in the N and ORF 1ab genes (E: 90%). Of the samples included in the study, only 1 positive sample with low viral load was found to be negative when studied by pooling. The total number of kits to be used in pooled tests and then to individually retest the 5 samples in positive pools was calculated as 827 and the savings rate as 69.91% (1968/2815). Conclusion: The pooling strategy is an effective approach to extend the impact of limited testing resources and reagents available in certain periods of the COVID-19 pandemic. Testing by pooling samples requires improvement of RNA extraction methods and careful monitoring of RT-PCR test sensitivity to avoid missing low-positive entities. Therefore, based on the prevalence of COVID-19 in their regions, laboratories should conduct their own validation of pooling studies for RNA extraction and amplification methods they use.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Humanos , Pandemias , Estudos Prospectivos , RNA Viral/genética , SARS-CoV-2/genética
5.
Infect Dis Clin Microbiol ; 4(3): 192-198, 2022 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38633395

RESUMO

Objective: In Turkey, the fourth wave of SARS-CoV-2 started in December 2021 and peaked in mid-January 2022. Afterward, peaks were seen in the number of COVID-19 cases because of Omicron BA.2 and BA.5 variants. Our study aimed to observe the prevalence and viral load-related transmissibility rates of the Omicron BA.2 and BA.5 variant infections in our region between January 21 and July 01, 2022, using an easy and cost-effective PCR screening method. Methods: The frequency of BA.2 and BA.5 were determined by the two-stage allele-specific and drop-out RT-PCR method targeting NSP6 105-107del, spike 69-70del, and spike L452R mutation-specific primers. Transmissibility of the Omicron variants was assessed using cycle threshold (Ct) values (a proxy for SARS-CoV-2 viral load and infectivity). Also, using the next generation sequencing (NGS) method, existing mutations were analyzed by generating full-length sequences of the representative, randomly selected samples from the Omicron variants determined by PCR screening test. Results: We defined the first case of BA.2 on January 19, 2022, in Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa School of Medicine COVID-19 Molecular Diagnosis Laboratory. Following this, it was observed that BA.1 lost its dominance due to the increased transmissibility of BA.2. On May 5, we defined the first case of BA.5, and as of July this Omicron variant rapidly became preponderant, with a frequency of more than 85%. Compared with BA.1, BA.2 and BA.5 were associated with 2.82 (95% CI: 2.33-4.12) and 2.49 (95% CI: 2.16-3.55) fewer cycles, respectively, meaning higher transmissibility. As confirmed by the NGS results, it was concluded that screening with NSP6 105-107del, spike 69-70del and spike L452R mutation targeted PCR method, which is used uniquely in our hospital in Turkey, can be an easy and cost-effective method in the follow-up of Omicron variants. Conclusion: The higher viral load detection in infections with BA.2 and BA.5 reflects a prolonged disease period, and increased transmissibility, so rapid expansion of these Omicron variants in Turkey is inevitable. Even though the prevalence of the Omicron variants in the population can be monitored in near real-time by the PCR screening method, more sequencing studies are needed for the early identification of new mutations that will emerge.

6.
Nutrients ; 13(11)2021 Nov 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34836309

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We aimed to establish an acute treatment protocol to increase serum vitamin D, evaluate the effectiveness of vitamin D3 supplementation, and reveal the potential mechanisms in COVID-19. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 867 COVID-19 cases. Then, a prospective study was conducted, including 23 healthy individuals and 210 cases. A total of 163 cases had vitamin D supplementation, and 95 were followed for 14 days. Clinical outcomes, routine blood biomarkers, serum levels of vitamin D metabolism, and action mechanism-related parameters were evaluated. RESULTS: Our treatment protocol increased the serum 25OHD levels significantly to above 30 ng/mL within two weeks. COVID-19 cases (no comorbidities, no vitamin D treatment, 25OHD <30 ng/mL) had 1.9-fold increased risk of having hospitalization longer than 8 days compared with the cases with comorbidities and vitamin D treatment. Having vitamin D treatment decreased the mortality rate by 2.14 times. The correlation analysis of specific serum biomarkers with 25OHD indicated that the vitamin D action in COVID-19 might involve regulation of INOS1, IL1B, IFNg, cathelicidin-LL37, and ICAM1. CONCLUSIONS: Vitamin D treatment shortened hospital stay and decreased mortality in COVID-19 cases, even in the existence of comorbidities. Vitamin D supplementation is effective on various target parameters; therefore, it is essential for COVID-19 treatment.


Assuntos
Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Vitamina D/administração & dosagem , Peptídeos Catiônicos Antimicrobianos/sangue , Peptídeos Catiônicos Antimicrobianos/genética , Peptídeos Catiônicos Antimicrobianos/metabolismo , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/mortalidade , Suplementos Nutricionais , Regulação da Expressão Gênica/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Molécula 1 de Adesão Intercelular/sangue , Molécula 1 de Adesão Intercelular/genética , Molécula 1 de Adesão Intercelular/metabolismo , Interferon gama/sangue , Interferon gama/genética , Interferon gama/metabolismo , Interleucina-1beta/sangue , Interleucina-1beta/genética , Interleucina-1beta/metabolismo , Óxido Nítrico Sintase Tipo II/sangue , Óxido Nítrico Sintase Tipo II/genética , Óxido Nítrico Sintase Tipo II/metabolismo , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Vitamina D/sangue , Vitamina D/farmacologia , Vitaminas/administração & dosagem , Vitaminas/farmacologia , Catelicidinas
8.
Mikrobiyol Bul ; 46(3): 366-74, 2012 Jul.
Artigo em Turco | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22951649

RESUMO

Fluoroquinolones which are in use since 1986, are effective agents both against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Quinolones show bactericidal effect as a result of inhibition of DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV enzymes. Main quinolone resistance mechanisms are chromosomal mutations in these enzymes and decreased intracellular accumulation due to efflux pumps or decreased membrane uptake. Recently a new quinolone resistance mechanism mediated by plasmids has been defined. These plasmids carry genes called as qnr. Qnr genes do not cause quinolone resistance but they cause decreased quinolone susceptibility and lead to higher minimum inhibitory concentrations. Currently there are qnrA, qnrB, qnrC, qnrD and qnrS genes. This study was aimed to investigate the presence of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance determinants in Enterobacteriaceae isolates collected from four different centers in Turkey. A total of 647 isolates (387 from Trabzon, Black Sea region; 82 from Canakkale, Trace region; 96 from Ankara, Central Anatolia region; 82 from Tokat, Black Sea region) belonging to the Enterobacteriaceae family collected between May-July 2009, were included in the study. Presence of qnrA, qnrB, qnrS and qnrC genes were investigated by multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method and confirmed by gene sequencing. The results of the PCR amplification revealed that 2 isolates were positive for qnrA, 12 isolates were positive for qnrB, 4 isolates were positive for qnrC and 10 isolates were positive for qnrS. However, the number of positive strains decreased with the use of gene sequencing, and this method led to the identification of qnrA1 in two isolates [Enterobacter cloacae (code. 796), Salmonella group B (code. 491)], qnrB1 in two isolates [Salmonella group B (code. 491), Citrobacter freundii (code. 768)], qnrB6 in one isolate [Escherichia coli (code. CC1800)], qnrB9 in one isolate [E.coli (code. CC1873)], qnrB24 in one isolate [Citrobacter koseri (code. MP5200)], qnrB27 in one isolate [C.freundii (code. 842)], qnrS1 in two isolates [E.coli (code. CC1705), E.coli (code.159)] and qnrB2 in one isolate [E.coli (code. 843)]. One of the isolates that carried the qnr gene was ciprofloxacin-resistant and two isolates were nalidixic-acid resistant. Transferable quinolone resistance due to the dissemination of qnr genes may have important impacts in terms of infection control and treatment problems. Survey of plasmid mediated quinolone resistance will help to determine the size of the issue and guide the measures that should be taken to avoid escalation of resistance and dissemination problem.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana/genética , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiologia , Enterobacteriaceae/efeitos dos fármacos , Fluoroquinolonas/farmacologia , Proteínas de Bactérias/genética , DNA Girase/genética , DNA Topoisomerase IV/antagonistas & inibidores , DNA Topoisomerase IV/genética , Testes de Sensibilidade a Antimicrobianos por Disco-Difusão , Enterobacteriaceae/enzimologia , Enterobacteriaceae/genética , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Multiplex , Fatores R , Inibidores da Topoisomerase II , Turquia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...