Robotic mitral valve repair-the Bruxelles experience.

Background: Although the use of the surgical robot facilitates less invasive mitral valve surgery, both real and perceived limitations have slowed the application of this technology. Aim of the present investigation was to report the early and long-term results of robotic mitral valve repair in a single institution over a 10-year period. Methods: Between March 2012 and May 2022, a total of 278 consecutive patients underwent robotically assisted mitral valve repair at the Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc (Brussels, Belgium). Indications have evolved over time allowing the treatment of complex mitral valve lesions. Clinical and echocardiographic follow-up were 97.8% and 86.1% complete, respectively. Results: Mean age of the study population was 57.8±11.9 years and 221/278 (79.5%) patients were male. Despite being asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic [New York Heart Association (NYHA) class I-II], most of the patients presented with severe mitral regurgitation (MR). Degenerative mitral valve disease was the most common cause of MR. All patients underwent successful mitral valve repair using different techniques, and 25/278 (9.0%) had one or more concomitant procedures associated. The mean cardio-pulmonary bypass and aortic cross clamp times were 153±37 and 106±25 minutes, respectively. There was no operative or in-hospital mortality. Overall survival rate was 97.8%±3.2%, 95.8%±3.2% and 93.7%±3.0% at 3, 7 and 10 years. One early (0.4%) reoperation with re-repair was recorded for ring disruption, while late mitral valve re-repair was necessary in 4/279 (1.4%) patients for recurrent severe MR in three of them and mitral endocarditis in one. The overall freedom from mitral valve reoperation was 98.1%±1.0% at 3, 7 and 10 years. Overall freedom from MR (grade 2+ or more) was 91.7%±3.2%, 77.8%±4.8% and 67.1%±9.2% at 3, 7 and 10 years, respectively. Conclusions: Robotic mitral valve repair is safe and is associated with excellent clinical and echocardiographic results. The use of robotic technologies allows, after an appropriate learning curve, to reproduce all conventional techniques to treat MR, regardless of the complexity of the valve lesion.

Robotic mitral valve repair: A single center experience over a 7-year period.

BACKGROUND: We report the clinical and echocardiographic results of our experience in robotic mitral valve repair over a 7-year period. The outcomes of the earliest and the latest patients will be compared. METHODS: Between March 2012 and October 2019, 226 patients underwent robotic mitral valve repair for severe mitral regurgitation in a single institution. The first 113 patients (Group 1) were operated between March 2012 and September 2015 and the last 113 patients (Group 2) between October 2015 and October 2019. Conventional techniques employed in open surgery were used. Clinical and echographic follow-up were 96.0% and 94.2% complete, respectively. RESULTS: Successful mitral repair was achieved in all cases with no hospital mortality. The overall survival rate was 92.7 ± 2.8% and 91.0 ± 3.2% at 3 and 7 years, respectively, with no in between groups difference (p = 0.513). The overall freedom from mitral reoperation was 97.4 ± 1.2% at 3 and 7 years and was similar in both groups (p = 0.276). Freedom from mitral regurgitation Grade 2+ at 3 and 7 years were 89.1 ± 2.6% and 87.9 ± 2.8%, respectively, with no significant difference between groups (p = 0.056). CONCLUSIONS: Developing a robotic mitral repair program can be done without compromising the safety and efficacy of repair. After a well-conducted training, robotic approach allows to perform simple and complex mitral repair using similar techniques as in conventional approach and without additional risk for the patient.

Sutureless Valve in Repeated Aortic Valve Replacement: Results from an International Prospective Registry.

OBJECTIVE: To report early and midterm results registry of patients undergoing repeated aortic valve replacement (RAVR) with sutureless prostheses from an international prospective registry (SURE-AVR). METHODS: Between March 2011 and June 2019, 69 patients underwent RAVR with self-expandable sutureless aortic bioprostheses at 22 international cardiac centers. RESULTS: Overall mortality was 2.9% with a predicted logistic EuroSCORE II of 10.7%. Indications for RAVR were structural valve dysfunction (84.1%) and infective prosthetic endocarditis (15.9%) and were performed in patients with previously implanted bioprostheses (79.7%), mechanical valves (15.9%), and transcatheter valves (4.3%). Minimally invasive approach was performed in 15.9% of patients. Rate of stroke was 1.4% and rate of early valve-related reintervention was 1.4%. Overall survival rate at 1 and 5 years was 97% and 91%, respectively. No major paravalvular leak occurred. Rate of pacemaker implantation was 5.8% and 0.9% per patient-year early and at follow-up, respectively. The mean transvalvular gradient at 1-year and 5-year follow-up was 10.5 mm Hg and 11.5 mm Hg with a median effective orifice area of 1.8 cm2and 1.8 cm2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: RAVR with sutureless valves is a safe and effective approach and provides excellent clinical and hemodynamic results up to 5 years.

Structural and Functional Correlates of Gradient-Area Patterns in Severe Aortic Stenosis and Normal Ejection Fraction.

OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to characterize the functional and structural myocardial phenotypes of patients with moderate-to-severe aortic stenosis (AS) and to determine whether severe paradoxical low-gradient AS (LG-AS) is specifically associated with left ventricular (LV) remodeling and fibrosis. BACKGROUND: Recently, it was suggested that severe paradoxical LG-AS is a more advanced form of AS, with greater reduction of longitudinal deformation, adverse LV remodeling, and more interstitial fibrosis. METHODS: The study population includes 147 patients with moderate-to-severe AS and a normal LV ejection fraction, and 75 normal control subjects. They prospectively underwent 2-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance to evaluate myocardial deformation, LV remodeling, and age- and sex-adjusted extravascular volume fraction (ECV, %). Among AS patients, 18 had moderate AS, 74 had severe high-gradient AS (HG-AS), and 55 had severe paradoxical LG-AS. RESULTS: Reduced longitudinal and circumferential deformation was observed in 21% and 6% of the AS patients, respectively. Multivariate analyses identified increased ECV (ß = 1.99; p = 0.001) and the absence of normal LV geometry (ß = -1.37; p = 0.007) and as independent predictors of reduced longitudinal deformation. Increased ECV was an independent predictor of reduced circumferential deformation (ß = 2.19; p = 0.001). Over a median follow-up of 29 months, reduced longitudinal deformation (hazard ratio: 0.82; p = 0.023) and higher transvalvular gradients (hazard ratio: 1.05; p < 0.001) increased the risk of death or need for aortic valve replacement. LV hypertrophy was more frequently observed among patients with severe HG-AS (65%) than among the other AS patients (14%; p < 0.001). On average, ECV was within normal limits and did not differ among gradient-area subgroups. When present, increased ECV was associated with reduced longitudinal deformation. CONCLUSIONS: This study's data show that patients with severe paradoxical LG-AS less frequently display reduced longitudinal deformation, LV hypertrophy, or myocardial fibrosis than patients with HG-AS. Also, interstitial fibrosis only occurs when reduced longitudinal deformation and severe HG-AS are present together. Finally, this study suggests that reduced longitudinal deformation and higher transvalvular gradients adversely affect patients' outcomes.

Robotic-Assisted Lobectomy Favors Early Lung Recovery versus Limited Thoracotomy.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pulmonary recovery after lobectomy has showed early benefits for the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and sparing open techniques over nonsparing techniques. Robotic-assisted procedures offer benefits in term of clinical outcomes, but their advantages on pulmonary recovery and quality of life have not yet been distinctly prospectively studied. METHODS: Eighty-six patients undergoing lobectomy over a period of 29 months were prospectively studied for their pulmonary function recovery and pain score level during the in-hospital stay and at 1, 2, and 6 months. Quality of life was evaluated at 2 and 6 months. Forty-five patients were operated by posterolateral limited thoracotomy and 41 patients by robotic approach. The postoperative analgesia protocol differed for the two groups, being lighter for the robotic group. RESULTS: The pulmonary tests were not significantly different during the in-hospital stay. At 1 month, the forced expiratory volume in 1 second, forced vital capacity, vital capacity, and maximal expiratory pressure were significantly better for the robotic group (p = 0.05, 0.04, 0.05, and 0.02, respectively). There was no significant difference left at 2 and 6 months. Pain intensity was equivalent during the in-hospital stay but was significantly lower for the robotic group at 1 month (p = 0.02). At 2 and 6 months, pain and quality of life were comparable. CONCLUSION: Robotic technique can offer similar pulmonary and pain recovery during the in-hospital stay with a lighter analgesia protocol. It clearly favors the early term recovery compared with the open limited technique. The objective and subjective functional recovery becomes equivalent at 2 and 6 months.

Long-term experience with valve-sparing root reimplantation surgery in tricuspid aortic valve.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze our long-term experience with valve-sparing reimplantation technique in treating aortic root aneurysm, aortic regurgitation, and aortic dissection in patients with tricuspid aortic valve. METHODS: Between March 1998 and October 2018, 303 consecutive patients underwent valve-sparing reimplantation in our institution. The mean age of this cohort was 52.9 ± 15 years. Time to event analysis was performed with the Kaplan-Meier method. Risk of death, reoperation, and aortic regurgitation (AR) recurrence were analyzed using the cox-regression method. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality was 1% (n = 3) of which two were admitted for acute aortic dissection. Median follow-up was 5.81 years ([IQR]: 2.8-10 years). Thirty-nine patients (14.4%) died during follow-up. At 5 and 10 years, overall survival was 92 ± 2%and 75 ± 4.9%, respectively. Seventeen patients required late aortic valve reoperation. Freedom from valve reoperation was 95 ± 2% and 90 ± 3%. Freedom from AR > 2+ and AR > 1+ at 10 years was 91 ± 4% and 71.5 ± 4.6%, respectively. Significant multivariate predictors of death included age, New York Heart Association dyspnea class (NYHA), type A acute dissection (TAAD), and preoperative left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD). Significant multivariate predictors of AR recurrence included indication for surgery, previous cardiac surgery, and presence of preoperative AR. Freedom from events like major bleeding, thromboembolic events, and infective endocarditis at 10 years were 97%, 98%, and 96%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Aortic valve-sparing with the reimplantation technique has been performed for over two decades in our institution, and the results in patients with tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) are excellent in terms of survival and freedom from valve-related adverse outcomes including valve reoperation. These results continue supporting the use of valve sparing root replacement using the reimplantation technique (VSRR) in patients with aortic aneurysm, irrespective of whether they have preoperative AR or not. VSRR is safe, durable, and reproducible, but further follow-up, well into the second decade is still necessary.

Aortic valve repair in endocarditis: scope and results.

PURPOSE: Infective endocarditis (IE) remains a prevalent and life-threatening disease. The choice to repair or replace the infected valve still remains a matter of debate, especially in aortic valve (AV) infections. We retrospectively analyze our two decades of experience in aortic valve repair (AVr) in IE. Long-term outcomes are described with particular attention to the impact of valve configuration and the use of patch techniques. METHODS: From September 1998 to June 2017, 42 patients underwent AVr in a single center for IE. Techniques include leaflet patch repair and resuspension and aortic annulus stabilization. RESULTS: Hospital mortality was 2.4% (n = 1). The median follow-up was 90.6 months. Survival was 89 ± 9.4% and 76.6 ± 16% at 5 and 10 years, respectively, with no significant differences between tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) and bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). Freedom from reoperation was 100% and 92.9 ± 7.1% in TAV and 81.8 ± 18.2% and 46.8 ± 28.8% in BAV at 5 and 10 years, respectively (TAV vs BAV, p = 0.02). BAV, degree of preoperative aortic insufficiency, and AVr including patch were factors predicting a higher risk of reoperation during the follow-up. CONCLUSION: In our experience, AVr is a safe, feasible, and efficient choice in selected patients with healed or active IE. Durability of the repair is excellent in patients with limited lesions and in patients with TAV even with patch repair. Reoperations occurred principally in patients with BAV and severe preoperative AI, in whom patch repair was performed. In those patients, we actually recommend to replace the valve in case of active endocarditis.

Free margin length and geometric height in aortic root dilatation and leaflet prolapse: implications for aortic valve repair surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to assess the aortic leaflet free margin length (FML) and geometric height (gH) in a normal aortic valve (AV), aorta dilatation and aortic leaflet prolapse. METHODS: We measured the FML and gH intraoperatively in 132 patients operated on for aortic insufficiency, aortic dilatation, endocarditis or fibroelastoma. Patients were divided into 3 groups: normal tricuspid AV (group 1, n = 12), aortic dilatation (group 2, tricuspid = 43, bicuspid = 18) and leaflet prolapse (group 3, tricuspid = 32, bicuspid = 27). The FML and gH were compared between the groups and between the leaflets within each group. RESULTS: In a normal tricuspid AV, the mean FML and gH were 34.7 ± 3.1 mm and 18.8 ± 1.7 mm, respectively. In group 2 tricuspid, the FML and gH were greater than those in group 1 (FML 43.7 ± 4.4, P < 0.001; gH 21.2 ± 1.8, P = 0.003). In group 3, tricuspid, the FML of the prolapsing leaflet was greater than the FML of the non-prolapsing leaflet (48.3 ± 5.4 vs 42.2 ± 3.6; P < 0.001). In group 2, bicuspid, FML of both leaflets were similar in group 2, but augmented on the fused leaflet compared to the non-fused leaflet in group 3 (fused 55.4 ± 6.3; non-fused 46.2 ± 6.2; P < 0.001). In groups 2 and 3 bicuspid, the gH of the non-fused leaflet was systematically greater than the fused leaflet (group 2 non-fused 24.6 ± 2.5 vs fused 20.4 ± 2.1; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In aortic dilatation and leaflet prolapse, FML and, to a lesser extent, gH increased significantly compared to those of normal AV function. FML and gH dimensions also depended on the valve configuration (tricuspid/bicuspid). These data provide new insight into the pathomorphology of AV disease and will serve to further develop new methods of AV repair based on intraoperative measurements of the FML.

Do Guideline-Based Indications Result in an Outcome Penalty for Patients With Severe Aortic Regurgitation?

OBJECTIVES: The present study examines whether improvements have reduced the negative impact of guideline triggers on postoperative outcomes. BACKGROUND: European and American guidelines for the management of severe aortic regurgitation (AR) define the triggers for AR surgery. These triggers are based on the results of studies performed in the 1990s analyzing outcomes of patients who underwent AR surgery in the 1980s. Although these triggers are used to indicate surgery, they have all been associated with poorer postoperative outcomes. In the meantime, innovations in operative techniques, including aortic valve repair, have allowed reducing the risk of surgery. METHODS: A total of 356 consecutive patients undergoing surgical correction of severe AR were included in this study. Among them, 204 were operated on for a Class I, 17 for a Class IIa, 49 for a Class IIb, and 86 without any guideline triggers. Cox proportional hazards regression models and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to compare postoperative outcomes in the different groups. Inverse probability weighing was used to adjust for mismatched baseline characteristics. RESULTS: Adjusted 10-year survival was better among patients without operative triggers (89 ± 4%) or with Class II triggers (85 ± 6%) than in patients with Class I triggers (71 ± 4%, p = 0.010). Similar results were obtained for cardiovascular survival and hospitalizations for heart failure. Spline function analyses indicated that mortality started to increase for left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction <55% and LV end-systolic dimensions >20 to 22 mm/m2. LV end-diastolic dimensions did not influence outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Guideline-based Class I triggers for AR surgery carry major risks for long-term outcomes. This suggests that patients with severe AR should be operated on before the onset of these triggers; that is, at an asymptomatic stage, before LV ejection fraction falls below 55% or LV end-systolic dimensions exceeds 20 to 22 mm/m2.

Long-term experience with valve-sparing reimplantation technique for the treatment of aortic aneurysm and aortic regurgitation.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze our long-term experience with valve-sparing reimplantation technique for the treatment of isolated root aneurysm, aneurysm with significant aortic regurgitation, and for isolated aortic regurgitation. METHODS: Between 1999 and 2017, 440 consecutive patients underwent valve-sparing reimplantation in our institution. The mean age of this cohort was 49 ± 15 years. Time-to-event analysis was performed with the Kaplan-Meier method, whereas significant predictors of late outcomes were explored with Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality was 0.7% (n = 3). Four hundred fourteen patients were available for long-term analysis. Median duration of follow-up was 5 years (interquartile range, 2-8.5 years). Thirty-six patients (8.5%) died during follow-up; therefore, survival was 79.7% ± 3.8% at 10 years. During follow-up we observed a linearized rate of 0.37%, 0.73%, and 0.2% patient-year, respectively, for major bleeding, thromboembolic events, and infective endocarditis. Nineteen patients required late aortic valve reoperation and freedom from valve reoperation was 89.6% ± 2.9% at 10 years and was not significantly different between groups or between tricuspid or bicuspid valve phenotypes. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that valve-sparing reimplantation is associated with low perioperative mortality, a remarkably low rate of valve-related complications, and excellent long-term durability. Further, it can be safely performed also in patients with isolated aortic regurgitation and the durability of valve repair is similar regardless of the indication for surgery of valve phenotype.

Active infective mitral valve endocarditis: is a repair-oriented surgery safe and durable?

OBJECTIVES: We retrospectively analysed our 20-year experience on surgical treatment of native mitral valve (MV) endocarditis in a single institution using an early and repair-oriented surgical approach. METHODS: From August 1991 to December 2015, 192 consecutive patients underwent MV surgery for active endocarditis. Of these, 81% (n = 155) had MV repair while 19% had MV replacement. In-hospital and late outcomes were analysed in the 2 groups and in the subgroups of repair with and without the use of a patch. Study end points were overall survival, MV reoperation and valve-related events. The median follow-up was 122 and 146 months in the repair and replacement groups, respectively. RESULTS: Patients undergoing MV replacement were significantly older with more severe preoperative comorbidities and clinical conditions compared to patients undergoing MV repair (P < 0.05). When the repair and replacement groups were compared, hospital mortality was 11.6% and 29.7%, respectively (P = 0.006); at 15 years, overall survival was 57 ± 6% and 36 ± 12%, respectively (P = 0.03); freedom from MV reoperation was 81 ± 6% and 73 ± 18%, respectively (P = 0.46); linearized rate of recurrent endocarditis was 0.1% and 2.4%, respectively. Fifteen-year freedom from reoperation was 75.4 ± 8.6% vs 92 ± 4.5% in the patch versus no-patch repair subgroups, respectively (P = 0.33). CONCLUSIONS: Active MV endocarditis remains a life-threatening disease. In experienced centres, an early and repair-oriented surgical approach can achieve relatively high reparability rates with good long-term durability of the repair and a very low recurrence rate of endocarditis. Patients could benefit from MV repair even if patch material is necessary to repair the valve.

Re-repair of the failed mitral valve: insights into aetiology and surgical management.

OBJECTIVES: Mitral valve (MV) repair is the gold standard for treatment of degenerative mitral regurgitation. A variety of surgical techniques allow surgeons to achieve a high rate of MV repair even with MV diseases of other aetiologies. However, a certain number of repairs fail over time. The aim of this study was to review our single-centre experience of MV re-repair and analyse the mode of repair failure, re-repair safety and efficiency in relation to the initial aetiology. METHODS: Between 1997 and 2015, 91 patients underwent redo MV re-repair. The first MV repair was performed in our institution in 59% of cases. Follow-up information was available for 93% of our patients. The median follow-up was 56 months. RESULTS: The initial aetiology was degenerative disease in 40 (44%) patients, rheumatic disease in 25 (27.5%), endocarditis in 10 (11%), ischaemic in 6 (7%), severe mitral annulus calcification in 5 (5.5%), congenital disease in 4 (4%) and unknown in 1 (1%). The mean age was 58 ± 15 years. The median delay between the 1st and 2nd repair was 49 months with 6 early re-repairs. Re-repair was urgent or emergent in 19% of cases; indications for surgery were mitral regurgitation in 48%, stenosis in 19%, endocarditis in 19%, mitral disease in 11%, ring thrombosis in 2% and systolic anterior motion in 1%. The main mechanisms of failure included technical error (30%), progression of disease (35%), new disease (29%) and unknown (6%.) Re-repair was performed through a median sternotomy in 96% of cases, and 34% of patients had concomitant procedures. Eight (9%) postoperative deaths (4 of mitral annulus calcification, 2 of endocarditis, 1 of degenerative disease, 1 of ischaemia) and 5 (6%) early failures occurred (3 of rheumatic disease, 1 of degenerative disease, 1 of a congenital condition), requiring MV replacement in 4 and new repair in 1. Overall survival at 5 and 10 years was 76% and 57%, 83% and 49% in patients with degenerative diseases and 95% and 95% in patients with rheumatic disease. Overall freedom from reoperation at 5 and 10 years was 82% and 61%, 94% and 87% with degenerative disease and 60% and 45% with rheumatic disease. CONCLUSIONS: MV re-repair is feasible and has good mid-term results in patients with degenerative MV disease. Rheumatic MV disease is associated with a certain risk of failure over time; nevertheless, these patients show excellent survival after re-repair.

Free margin length and coaptation surface area in normal tricuspid aortic valve: an anatomical study.

OBJECTIVES: Aortic cusp free margins are a central target in most aortic valve repair operations to optimize valve coaptation. The objective of this anatomical study was to analyse the normal dimensions of free margin length (FML) and coaptation surface and to analyse their relationship with other valve and root dimensions in normal tricuspid aortic valves. METHODS: We analysed 25 aortic root homografts. Eight valve and root measurements were obtained from fresh specimens including the length of the free margin while applying appropriate tension on the structures. The valves were then fixed with formalin in the diastolic position under pressure to allow measurement of the coaptation surface. In addition to normal values, we analysed the correlations and ratios between the different measures. RESULTS: The mean FML was 34.3 ± 3.1 mm. The FML was similar between the 3 cusps and correlated with all other valve and root measures. The ratio of the FML to the geometric height was 1.81, and the free edge length/sinotubular junction was 1.29. The mean coaptation surface was 122 ± 21 mm2 per cusp and corresponded to 41% of the cusp surface. The central coaptation length was 3.3 ± 0.8 mm, and the lateral coaptation length was 5.9 ± 0.6 mm. The total coaptation surface per specimen was 184 ± 32 mm2. CONCLUSIONS: We described the normal dimensions of the FML and coaptation surface in the tricuspid aortic valve. These measurements will serve in the further development of an objective method of free margin shortening based on intraoperative measurements of the FML to treat cusp prolapse and low coaptation after valve-sparing surgery.

Assessment of aortic valve calcium load by multidetector computed tomography. Anatomical validation, impact of scanner settings and incremental diagnostic value.

OBJECTIVES: To validate aortic valve calcium (AVC) load measurements by multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT), to evaluate the impact of tube potential and slice thickness on AVC scores, to examine the accuracy of AVC load in distinguishing severe from nonsevere aortic stenosis (AS) and to investigate its effectiveness as an alternative diagnosis method when echocardiography remains inconclusive. METHODS: We prospectively studied 266 consecutive patients with moderate to severe AS who underwent MDCT to measure AVC load and a comprehensive echocardiographic examination to assess AS severity. AVC load was validated against valve weight in 57 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement. The dependence of AVC scores on tube potential and slice thickness was also tested, as well as the relationship between AVC load and echocardiographic criteria of AS severity. RESULTS: MDCT Agatston score correlated well with valve weight (r = 0.82, p < 0.001) and hemodynamic indices of AS severity (all p < 0.001). Ex-vivo Agatston scores decreased significantly with increasing tube potential and slice thickness (repeated measures ANOVA p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified mean gradient, the indexed effective orifice area, male gender and left ventricular outflow tract cross-sectional area as independent correlates of the in-vivo AVC load. CONCLUSIONS: MDCT-derived AVC load correlated well with valve weight and hemodynamic indices of AS severity. It also depends on tube potential and slice thickness, thus suggesting that these parameters should be standardized to optimize reproducibility and accuracy.

Robotic mitral valve repair: a European single-centre experience.

OBJECTIVES: We report the outcomes of robotic valve repair for degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR) in our Institution. METHODS: Between February 2012 and July 2016, 134 patients underwent robotic mitral valve (MV) repair with the da Vinci Si system. All the operations were performed through a mini-thoracotomy in the fourth right intercostal space, cardiopulmonary bypass and mild hypothermia. The clinical and echocardiographic follow-up was 100% complete. RESULTS: There was no hospital death. The mean cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass time were 112±23 and 159±33 min, respectively. Pre-discharge echocardiograms showed none-to-mild residual MR in all patients. Median follow-up was 24.1 months. We observed 1 early and 4 late reoperations on the MV for an overall freedom from reoperation of 98.2% and 94.1% at 12 and 36 months, respectively. Furthermore, echocardiographic follow-up revealed freedom from recurrence of MR greater than Grade 1+ of 92.5% and 80.7% at 12 and 36 months, respectively. Nevertheless freedom from recurrence of MR greater than Grade 2+ was 97.2% at 12 and 36 months. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic MV repair is a feasible and safe option for the treatment of degenerative MR in selected patients with excellent perioperative outcomes. Early and midterm results are remarkable and are associated with low risk of late recurrence of MR and reoperation. Long-term follow-up is needed to confirm the durability of valve repair.

The state of robotic cardiac surgery in Europe.

BACKGROUND: In the past two decades, the introduction of robotic technology has facilitated minimally invasive cardiac surgery, allowing surgeons to operate endoscopically rather than through a median sternotomy. This approach has facilitated procedures for several structural heart conditions, including mitral valve repair, atrial septal defect closure and multivessel minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting. In this rapidly evolving field, we review the status of robotic cardiac surgery in Europe with a focus on mitral valve surgery and coronary revascularization. METHODS: Structured searches of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were performed from their dates of inception to June 2016. All original studies, except case-reports, were included in this qualitative review. Studies performed in Europe were presented quantitatively. Data provided from Intuitive Surgical Inc. are also presented. RESULTS: Fourteen papers on coronary surgery were included in the analysis and reported a mortality rate ranging between 0-1%, revision for bleeding between 2-7%, conversion to a larger incision between 2-15%, and patency rate between 92-98%. The number of procedures ranged between 23 and 170 per year. There were only a small number of published reports for robotic mitral valve surgery from European centers. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary robotic surgery in Europe has been performed safely and effectively with very few perioperative complications in the last 15 years. On the other hand, mitral surgery has been developed later with increasing applications of this technology only in the last 5-6 years.

Pain, Quality of Life, and Clinical Outcomes after Robotic Lobectomy.

Background To evaluate pulmonary function, pain, and quality of life at midterm after robotic lobectomy performed in a single institution. Methods Sixty-five consecutive patients underwent robotic thoracic surgery over 32 months using a complete four-arm portal technique. Sixty-one patients underwent lobectomies predominantly for stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Pulmonary function tests were repeated at midterm follow-up. Pain and quality of life were evaluated during the follow-up on a subgroup of 39 patients, excluding the learning period. Results At a mean of 7-month follow-up, there was no significant difference in preoperative and midterm postoperative pulmonary function. A total of 62.5% of the patients reported a variable intensity of discomfort or pain at the surgical site, with a mean pain intensity score of 2.1 ± 1.4. Mean pain interference score were weak (1.8 ± 1.9), with patients with moderate pain reporting significantly higher pain interference scores than those with mild pain (p = 0.0025). Only one patient suffered from neuropathic-like pain. Quality of life was globally favorable and related to the pain level, with a significant interference on the physical component. Conclusion Robotic lobectomy does not appear to have an impact on midterm pulmonary function. Persistent postoperative pain is mild, nonneuropathic-like, with weak interference on daily activities. Quality of life is satisfactory but related to the pain level.