DSM-IV internal construct validity: when a taxonomy meets data.

The use of DSM-IV based questionnaires in child psychopathology is on the increase. The internal construct validity of a DSM-IV based model of ADHD, CD, ODD, Generalised Anxiety, and Depression was investigated in 11 samples by confirmatory factor analysis. The factorial structure of these syndrome dimensions was supported by the data. However, the model did not meet absolute standards of good model fit. Two sources of error are discussed in detail: multidimensionality of syndrome scales, and the presence of many symptoms that are diagnostically ambiguous with regard to the targeted syndrome dimension. It is argued that measurement precision may be increased by more careful operationalisation of the symptoms in the questionnaire. Additional approaches towards improved conceptualisation of DSM-IV are briefly discussed. A sharper DSM-IV model may improve the accuracy of inferences based on scale scores and provide more precise research findings with regard to relations with variables external to the taxonomy.

Teacher reports of DSM-IV ADHD, ODD, and CD symptoms in schoolchildren.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the prevalence of DSM-IV symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), oppositional defiant disorder, and conduct disorder and age, gender, and comorbidity differences between ADHD subtypes. METHOD: Teachers completed a DSM-IV-referenced symptom inventory for 3,006 schoolchildren aged between 3 and 18 years. RESULTS: The screening prevalence rate of ADHD behaviors was 15.8%; rates for individual subtypes were 9.9% for inattentive, 2.4% for hyperactive-impulsive, and 3.6% for combined. The inattentive type was relatively uncommon in preschool children (3.9%), whereas the hyperactive-impulsive type was least common in teenagers (0.8%). Screening prevalence rates were higher for African-American (39.5%) than white (14.2%) students, but did not vary significantly (p < .05) as a function of geographic region or socioeconomic status. ADHD subtypes were rated as more impaired than the non-ADHD group on most measures and were easily differentiated on the basis of comorbid symptoms, social skills impairment, and special education services. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this and similar studies show relatively high convergence for the prevalence of ADHD behaviors and differences between ADHD subtypes.

DSM-IVSymptoms in community and clinic preschool children.

OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare ratings of psychiatric symptoms in community and clinic samples (ages 3-6 years) using a DSM-IV-referenced rating scale. METHOD: Parent (/and teacher) ratings were obtained for community (N = 531/398) and special education (N = 64/140) samples (1995-1997) and an outpatient clinic (N = 224/189) sample (1994-1996). RESULTS: Age and socioeconomic status were only minimally (r< 0.20) correlated with ratings of psychopathology. The most commonly endorsed symptom categories were attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), oppositional defiant disorder, anxiety disorder, conduct disorder (teacher), and pervasive developmental disorder (clinic). Groups were easily differentiated by the rate and severity of symptoms (clinic > special education > community). Males generally received higher scores than females (especially teacher ratings). Children with ADHD symptoms had higher ratings of impairment (developmental deficits) than the non-ADHD group. CONCLUSIONS: Although these findings share a number of similarities with studies of older children, there are also differences that attest to the uniqueness of this age group.

Comparison of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptom subtypes in Ukrainian schoolchildren.

OBJECTIVE: This study used a parent-completed, DSM-IV-referenced rating scale to examine prevalence rates of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) behaviors and differences between subtypes in 10- to 12-year-old Ukrainian children. METHOD: During 1997, a total of 600 parents and children residing in Kyiv, Ukraine, and their teachers participated in extensive clinical assessments using standard Western measures. RESULTS: The screening prevalence rate of ADHD behaviors was 19.8%: 7.2% for inattentive (I), 8.5% for hyperactive-impulsive (HI), and 4.2% for combined (C). Post hoc comparisons indicated a number of significant (p < .05) group differences. Mothers of children with ADHD symptoms reported higher rates of disruptive behavior, negative mother-child interactions, and physical punishment than the non-ADHD group. Teachers rated children with ADHD as more hyperactive and inattentive, but only the HI subtype was rated more oppositional than non-ADHD students. The I subtype was less academically proficient and socially adept (but less likely to have behavior problems). The C subtype was the most behaviorally disruptive (mother ratings), and their fathers were more likely to be aggressive and abuse alcohol. The HI subtype also had problems with disruptive behavior but were less socially impaired. CONCLUSIONS: Although symptom prevalence rates are higher in Ukraine than the United States, this study provides additional evidence supporting DSM-IV ADHD subtypes as distinct clinical entities.

Comparison of internalizing and externalizing symptoms in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder with and without comorbid tic disorder.

This study examined the relation between internalizing and externalizing symptoms in two groups of prepubertal boys (with and without multiple chronic tic disorder) with diagnosed attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Parents and teachers completed the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and Teacher's Report Form (TRF), respectively. Children were carefully evaluated for the absence of a chronic tic disorder. Boys with ADHD and chronic multiple tic disorder (ADHD/+tics) received significantly higher (p = .0032, Bonferroni correction) scores for the Anxious/Depressed, Thought Problems, and Attention Problem scales of the CBCL and the Delinquent Behavior, Thought Problems, and Somatic Complaints scales of the TRF than did boys without chronic tic disorder (ADHD/-tics). Although many of the individual items that differentiated (p < .05) the two groups of boys pertained to behaviors that characterize motor tics, obsessions, or compulsions, the ADHD/+tics group exhibited higher rates of anxious behavior (CBCL) and obscene language (TRF) than did the ADHD/-tics group. Anxiety/depressive symptoms were associated with aggressive/oppositional behavior in both samples. Children with mild tic disorder were more similar (CBCL) to ADHD/-tics boys than they were to children with more severe tic disorder. The relatively higher rate of comorbidity in the ADHD/+tics group suggests that tics may be a marker for more severe symptomatology in clinic-referred samples of children with ADHD. Furthermore, these data suggest that it is not the presence, per se, but rather the severity of tic disorder that is associated with higher rates of emotional and behavioral disturbances.

Long-term methylphenidate therapy in children with comorbid attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and chronic multiple tic disorder.

BACKGROUND: This study examined changes in attention-deficit hyperactivity (ADHD) behaviors and motor and vocal tics during long-term treatment with methylphenidate. METHODS: Thirty-four prepubertal children with ADHD and chronic multiple tic disorder (who had participated in an 8-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled methylphenidate evaluation) were evaluated at 6-month intervals for 2 years as part of a prospective, nonblind, follow-up study. Treatment effects were assessed using direct observations of child behavior in a simulated (clinic-based) classroom and behavior rating scales completed by parents and physician. Videotapes of the simulated classroom were scored by coders who were blind to treatment status. RESULTS: There was no evidence (group data) that motor tics or vocal tics changed in frequency or severity during maintenance therapy compared with diagnostic or initial double-blind placebo evaluations. Behavioral improvements demonstrated during the acute drug trial were maintained during follow-up. There was no evidence (group data) of clinically significant adverse drug effects on cardiovascular function or growth at the end of 2 years of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term treatment with methylphenidate seems to be safe and effective for the management of ADHD behaviors in many (but not necessarily all) children with mild to moderate tic disorder. Nevertheless, careful clinical monitoring is mandatory to rule out the possibility of drug-induced tic exacerbation in individual patients.

Stimulant medication withdrawal during long-term therapy in children with comorbid attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and chronic multiple tic disorder.

OBJECTIVES: In this study we examined changes in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder behaviors and motor and vocal tics during withdrawal from long-term maintenance therapy with stimulant medication. METHODS: Subjects were 19 children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and chronic tic disorder who had received methylphenidate (n = 17) or dextroamphetamine (n = 2) for a minimum of 1 year. Children were switched to placebo under double-blind conditions. Treatment effects were assessed by using direct observations of child behavior in a simulated (clinic-based) classroom and behavior rating scales completed by parents and clinician. RESULTS: There was no change (group data) in the frequency or severity of motor tics or vocal tics during the placebo condition compared with maintenance dose of stimulant medication (ie, no evidence of tic exacerbation while receiving medication or of a withdrawal reaction). There was no evidence of tic exacerbation in the evening as a rebound effect. Treatment with the maintenance dose was also associated with behavioral improvement in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder behaviors, indicating continued efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Abrupt withdrawal of stimulant medication in children receiving long-term maintenance therapy does not appear to result in worsening of tic frequency or severity. Nevertheless, these findings do not preclude the possibility of drug withdrawal reactions in susceptible individuals.

Symptoms of depression and anxiety in pediatric epilepsy patients.

PURPOSE: We assessed rates of symptoms of anxiety and depression among pediatric patients with epilepsy. METHODS: We administered the Revised Child Manifest Anxiety Scale (RCMAS), and Child Depression Inventory (CDI) to 44 epilepsy patients aged 7-18 years (mean age 12.4 years). Demographic, socioeconomic, and epilepsy-related information was examined in relation to depression and anxiety scores. RESULTS: No patients had been previously identified to have depression or anxiety. However, 26% had significantly increased depression scores and 16% met criteria for significant anxiety symptomatology. CONCLUSIONS: Symptoms of depression and anxiety are common among pediatric patients with epilepsy and appear to be overlooked by care providers.

Children with ADHD and tic disorder and their classmates: behavioral normalization with methylphenidate.

OBJECTIVES: To examine behavioral differences between children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and tics and their peers and the extent to which methylphenidate (0.1, 0.3, and 0.5 mg/kg) normalized the behavior of probands and indirectly influenced the behavior of peers (treatment spillover). METHOD: Thirty-four prepubertal children with ADHD and chronic tic disorder (who were participating in a double-blind, placebo-controlled methylphenidate evaluation) and their peers were observed for approximately 20 hours in the school setting (classroom seatwork activities, lunchroom, and playground). RESULTS: Children with ADHD and tics were more inattentive and more disruptive in the classroom and more aggressive in all school settings than their peers. Although treatment with methylphenidate made probands less easily distinguished from their peers (normalization), many children still scored in the deviant range for at least one ADHD behavior when receiving the 0.5-mg/kg dose. There was little evidence that peer behavior improved as a function of the proband's dose of medication. CONCLUSIONS: Although conventional doses of methylphenidate produced dramatic clinical improvement in ADHD-related behavior, complete behavioral normalization is often not attained.

Associated psychopathology in children with both ADHD and chronic tic disorder.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relation between severity of tic disorder and comorbid psychopathology in 47 prepubertal children with tic disorder who were referred for clinical evaluation of and treatment for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), oppositional behaviors, and aggressive behaviors. METHOD: Parents and teachers completed the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and Teacher's Report Form (TRF) for each child. RESULTS: Seventy-five percent of the sample was in the clinical range in at least two categories of psychopathology. When the children were divided into two groups on the basis of tic severity, significantly higher scores were obtained for children with more severe tics on the narrow-band Depressed, Uncommunicative, Obsessive-Compulsive, and Aggressive scales, and the broad-band internalizing scale of the CBCL. The severity groups did not differ on TRF scores. Children who were more aggressive also received higher CBCL scores. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this study suggest that the severity of chronic tics is a clinical indicator of complex psychopathology in children with ADHD who are referred for psychiatric evaluation.

Efficacy of methylphenidate for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in children with tic disorder.

BACKGROUND: The findings from case reports and patient questionnaire surveys have been interpreted as indicating that administration of stimulants is ill-advised for the treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in children with tic disorder. METHODS: Thirty-four prepubertal children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and tic disorder received placebo and three dosages of methylphenidate hydrochloride (0.1, 0.3, and 0.5 mg/kg) twice daily for 2 weeks each, under double-blind conditions. Treatment effects were assessed using direct observations of child behavior in a simulated (clinic-based) classroom and using rating scales completed by the parents, teachers, and physician. RESULTS: Methylphenidate effectively suppressed hyperactive, disruptive, and aggressive behavior. There was no evidence that methylphenidate altered the severity of tic disorder, but it may have a weak effect on the frequency of motor (increase) and vocal (decrease) tics. CONCLUSION: Methylphenidate appears to be a safe and effective treatment for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in the majority of children with comorbid tic disorder.

Observations and ratings of tics in school settings.

This paper describes the findings of a school-based tic assessment procedure (direct observations, teacher rating scales) for hyperactive children with comorbid tic disorder. Rates of motor tic frequency were found to be moderately stable across both days and school settings. Correlations between direct observations of tics and clinician rating scales were generally in the low to moderate range as were correlations between teacher and clinician rating scales. Overall rates of hyperactive/disruptive behaviors were not associated with rates of motor tic occurrence, and the behavioral symptoms of both disorders were also independent for specific intervals of time.

Methylphenidate in hyperactive boys with comorbid tic disorder: II. Short-term behavioral effects in school settings.

In this study, 11 prepubertal hyperactive boys with tic disorder received placebo and three doses of methylphenidate (0.1, 0.3, and 0.5 mg/kg) for 2 weeks each, under double-blind conditions. Each boy was observed for approximately 20 hours in the school setting (classroom seatwork activities, lunchroom, and playground). Results showed that methylphenidate effectively suppressed hyperactive/disruptive behaviors in the classroom and physical aggression in the lunchroom and on the playground. Methylphenidate also reduced the occurrence of vocal tics in the classroom and the lunchroom. None of the motor tic measures revealed drug effects, but the lowest mean rate of motor tics occurred on the 0.3 mg/kg dose. On an operationally defined minimal effective dose, only one boy experienced motor tic exacerbation.

Methylphenidate in Aggressive Hyperactive Boys: II. Indirect Effects of Medication Treatment on Peer Behavior.

ABSTRACT The present study examines the indirect "spillover" effects of methylphenidate on the behavior of the classmates of drug-treated children in public school settings, and it measures the extent to which medication normalizes hyperactive and noncompliant-aggressive behaviors. Eleven aggressive hyperactive boys, who met DSM-III diagnostic criteria for attention deficit disorder, received placebo and methylphenidate in a double-blind crossover design. Medication effects were assessed by conducting observations of the drug-treated boy and his peers in the classroom and lunchroom settings. In most classrooms, a spillover effect did not occur for most of the behaviors assessed, but there was a decrease in the rate of nonphysical aggression exhibited by peers as a function of the hyperactive child's methylphenidate dose. Peers were generally less aggressive when the hyperactive boys were receiving methylphenidate than when they received placebo. In the lunchroom, in contrast, peers appeared slightly more noncompliant and aggressive when the aggressive hyperactive boys were receiving medication compared with placebo, but these differences did not attain statistical significance. Methylphenidate effectively normalized the negativistic behaviors of the aggressive hyperactive boys in the classroom. In some cases, the frequency of occurrence of certain behaviors dropped significantly below the level of the hyperactive child's peers. This "supranormalization" may reflect behavioral toxicity of the psychostimulant.

A procedure for monitoring stimulant medication in hyperactive mentally retarded school children.

ABSTRACT Many hyperactive mentally retarded children in public school programs receive stimulant medication, but studies indicate that treatment monitoring practices are less than adequate. Standardized drug assessment instruments rarely are used, and the school typically plays a minor role in evaluating response to treatment. To improve upon this situation, a procedure developed originally for nonretarded children was adapted to evaluate drug effects in mentally retarded children in public school settings. This assessment procedure generates ecologically valid data, enables a high degree of precision in specifying target symptoms and measuring the magnitude of the therapeutic effect, and appears to generate useful information for making dosage adjustment decisions. Two case studies are presented to illustrate the use of this procedure and to highlight differences in the clinical utility of data from behavior rating scales versus direct observations. Although ratings and observations sometimes reveal similar dose-response profiles, the sole reliance on rating scales can lead to gross misperceptions of drug efficacy, even when the ratings are completed by highly motivated and cooperative teachers. Our experience in evaluating mentally retarded children supports (1) the value of assessment instruments designed specifically for this patient population (e.g., Aberrant Behavior Checklist), (2) the need for evaluating a broader range of target symptoms, and (3) the importance of being alert to the somewhat greater variability of responses to stimulant drugs in these children.

Methylphenidate in aggressive-hyperactive boys: I. Effects on peer aggression in public school settings.

One of the least documented "known" effects of methylphenidate in hyperactive children is the suppression of peer aggression. In this study, 11 aggressive-hyperactive children received a low (0.3 mg/kg) and moderate (0.6 mg/kg) dose of methylphenidate and placebo for 2 weeks each under double-blind conditions. Children were observed in public school settings during classroom seatwork activities, lunch, and recess. Results showed that methylphenidate suppressed nonphysical aggression (p = 0.06) in the classroom, and a moderate dose decreased physical aggression (p less than 0.01) and verbal aggression (p = 0.07) on the playground. The effect on the rate of appropriate social interaction was variable. The majority of subjects exhibited either the same or higher levels of appropriate social interaction on the 0.6 mg/kg dose compared with placebo. In the classroom, both doses of methylphenidate also resulted in reduced levels of motor movement, off-task behavior, noncompliance, and disruptiveness. Teacher ratings of hyperactivity and conduct problem symptoms revealed drug effects, whereas parallel parent instruments did not.

Grafting of cultured allogeneic epidermis on second- and third-degree burn wounds on 26 patients.

Twenty-six individuals with second- and third-degree burn wounds have been grafted with cultured allogeneic epidermal cells. These epidermal cell grafts were grown in culture from cadaver skin according to a technique which we have developed. After being grafted with cultured allogeneic epidermal cells, superficial wounds, e.g., donor sites, healed within 7 days, compared to 14 days for mirror image control sites. Deep second-degree burn wounds which were excised before grafting with cultured cells healed in a mean time of 10 days. Deep second-degree burn wounds which were not excised before grafting healed in a mean time of 14 days. The cultured cells produced rapid healing in 11 of the 12 patients with deep second-degree burn wounds. The deep second-degree wounds grafted with cultured allogeneic epidermal cells healed with results which were comparable to the deep second-degree wounds which were autografted. Grafts of cultured allogeneic epidermal cells placed on full-thickness, or third-degree burn, wounds did not grow well.