Smart and connected devices in point-of-care molecular diagnostics: what role can they play in the response to COVID-19?

INTRODUCTION: Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) has been a huge public health challenge that has led to significant morbidity and mortality across the globe. Given the high prevalence and continued circulation of SARS-CoV-2 infection globally, accurate and rapid point-of-care testing is critical. AREAS COVERED: Knowledge of role of digital technology including smart and connected devices in rapid diagnosis of COVID-19 is an evolving area of scientific investigation. This review discusses the importance of rapid at-home point-of-care testing, highlighting the possible role of smart and connected device-based molecular diagnostics for COVID-19. EXPERT OPINION: Accurate and rapid diagnostic modalities have the potential to improve accessibility and efficiency of diagnosis of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients and could be instrumental in timely implementation of appropriate therapeutic interventions as well as public health measures to mitigate spread of infection. With emerging challenges like newer viral variants, global vaccine shortages and vaccine hesitancy, accurate diagnostic testing with the ability to rapidly identify infection remains critical. Digital technologies are likely to become important tools in future of healthcare and technological advancements may play a crucial role in response to COVID-19 with the goal of ultimately overcoming this pandemic.

Programmed death ligand 1 testing in non-small cell lung carcinoma cytology cell block and aspirate smear preparations.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting the programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) receptor and its ligand, programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), have emerged as a therapeutic approach for patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). PD-L1 expression, assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC), is used to select patients for PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor therapy. Most studies have been performed with histology specimens, with limited data available on the performance in cytology specimens. This study evaluated PD-L1 in cytology specimens and compared the results with those from paired core-needle biopsy for concordance. METHODS: Forty-one NSCLC fine-needle aspiration cases that had paired core-needle biopsy specimens with PD-L1 IHC were selected. A Papanicolaou-stained direct smear and a cell block section from each case were stained with a Dako PD-L1 pharmDx antibody (clone 22C3). Only slides with 100 or more tumor cells (37 smears and 38 cell blocks) were evaluated. Tumor proportion scores (TPS) were assessed on the basis of the partial/complete membranous staining of tumor cells and were correlated with those of paired core-needle biopsy. RESULTS: All 9 smears that were negative for PD-L1 staining showed 100% concordance with the paired core-needle biopsy, whereas 28 smears with PD-L1 expression showed a similar TPS, except for 1 smear that was discordant. In contrast, 10 negative paired core-needle biopsy cases corresponded to 9 concordant negative cell blocks, whereas 1 cell block had a TPS of 1% to 5%. The remaining 28 cell blocks demonstrated PD-L1 expression, with 22 cases showing a TPS similar to that of the paired core-needle biopsy, whereas 6 cell blocks were discordant, likely because of intratumoral heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that NSCLC cytology samples evaluated for PD-L1 have high concordance with paired core-needle biopsy samples and can be used for assessing PD-L1 expression. Cancer Cytopathol 2018;126:342-52. © 2018 American Cancer Society.