Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Psychiatry ; 171(10): 1074-82, 2014 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25016974

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Relatively few studies have examined the long-term outcome of psychotherapy in social anxiety disorder. The authors previously reported findings of a clinical trial comparing cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), psychodynamic therapy, and a wait-list control. The purpose of the present study was to follow the participants' status over the ensuing 24 months. METHOD: Outpatients with social anxiety disorder who were treated with CBT (N=209) or psychodynamic therapy (N=207) in the previous trial were assessed 6, 12, and 24 months after the end of therapy. Primary outcome measures were rates of remission and response. RESULTS: For both CBT and psychodynamic therapy, response rates were approximately 70% by the 2-year follow-up. Remission rates were nearly 40% for both treatment conditions. Rates of response and remission were stable or tended to increase for both treatments over the 24-month follow-up period, and no significant differences were found between the treatment conditions after 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: CBT and psychodynamic therapy were efficacious in treating social anxiety disorder, in both the short- and long-term, when patients showed continuous improvement. Although in the short-term, intention-to-treat analyses yielded some statistically significant but small differences in favor of CBT in several outcome measures, no differences in outcome were found in the long-term.


Assuntos
Transtornos de Ansiedade/terapia , Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental , Psicoterapia Psicodinâmica , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Indução de Remissão , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
2.
Am J Psychiatry ; 170(7): 759-67, 2013 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23680854

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE Various approaches to cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) have been shown to be effective for social anxiety disorder. For psychodynamic therapy, evidence for efficacy in this disorder is scant. The authors tested the efficacy of psychodynamic therapy and CBT in social anxiety disorder in a multicenter randomized controlled trial. METHOD In an outpatient setting, 495 patients with social anxiety disorder were randomly assigned to manual-guided CBT (N=209), manual-guided psychodynamic therapy (N=207), or a waiting list condition (N=79). Assessments were made at baseline and at end of treatment. Primary outcome measures were rates of remission and response, based on the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale applied by raters blind to group assignment. Several secondary measures were assessed as well. RESULTS Remission rates in the CBT, psychodynamic therapy, and waiting list groups were 36%, 26%, and 9%, respectively. Response rates were 60%, 52%, and 15%, respectively. CBT and psychodynamic therapy were significantly superior to waiting list for both remission and response. CBT was significantly superior to psychodynamic therapy for remission but not for response. Between-group effect sizes for remission and response were small. Secondary outcome measures showed significant differences in favor of CBT for measures of social phobia and interpersonal problems, but not for depression. CONCLUSIONS CBT and psychodynamic therapy were both efficacious in treating social anxiety disorder, but there were significant differences in favor of CBT. For CBT, the response rate was comparable to rates reported in Swedish and German studies in recent years. For psychodynamic therapy, the response rate was comparable to rates reported for pharmacotherapy and cognitive-behavioral group therapy.


Assuntos
Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental , Transtornos Fóbicos/terapia , Psicoterapia , Adulto , Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Psicoterapia/métodos , Indução de Remissão
3.
Psychosomatics ; 50(5): 474-82, 2009.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19855033

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a major public health problem that is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE: The authors investigated the associations between health-related quality of life (HRQL) and Body Mass Index (BMI), gender, age, mental and somatic disorders, as well as therapy-seeking status. METHOD: A cross-sectional controlled study assessed 640 male and female individuals, clustered into four weight categories. RESULTS: Linear-regression analyses revealed that higher BMI, higher age, and higher numbers of current somatic and mental disorders negatively predicted the physical dimension of HRQL. Higher numbers of both mental and somatic disorders as well as female gender and younger age seemed to be independent negative predictors of mental HRQL, whereas BMI was not associated with mental HRQL. Therapy status was not related to mental or physical HRQL. CONCLUSION: Physical and mental disorders are important detrimental factors for both physical and mental dimensions of HRQL.


Assuntos
Transtornos Mentais/psicologia , Obesidade/psicologia , Qualidade de Vida , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Áustria , Índice de Massa Corporal , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Alemanha , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade/prevenção & controle , Fatores Sexuais , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...