Safety and Efficacy of Apitegromab in Patients With Spinal Muscular Atrophy Types 2 and 3: The Phase 2 TOPAZ Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Currently approved therapies for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) reverse the degenerative course, leading to better functional outcome, but they do not address the impairment arising from preexisting neurodegeneration. Apitegromab, an investigational, fully human monoclonal antibody, inhibits activation of myostatin (a negative regulator of skeletal muscle growth), thereby preserving muscle mass. The phase 2 TOPAZ trial assessed the safety and efficacy of apitegromab in individuals with later-onset type 2 and type 3 SMA. METHODS: In this study, designed to investigate potential meaningful combinations of eligibility and treatment regimen for future studies, participants aged 2-21 years received IV apitegromab infusions every 4 weeks for 12 months in 1 of 3 cohorts. Cohort 1 stratified ambulatory participants aged 5-21 years into 2 arms (apitegromab 20 mg/kg alone or in combination with nusinersen); cohort 2 evaluated apitegromab 20 mg/kg combined with nusinersen in nonambulatory participants aged 5-21 years; and cohort 3 blindly evaluated 2 randomized apitegromab doses (2 and 20 mg/kg) combined with nusinersen in younger participants ≥2 years of age. The primary efficacy measure was mean change from baseline using the Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale version appropriate for each cohort. Data were analyzed using a paired t test with 2-sided 5% type 1 error for the mean change from baseline for predefined cohort-specific primary efficacy end points. RESULTS: Fifty-eight participants (mean age 9.4 years) were enrolled at 16 trial sites in the United States and Europe. Participants had been treated with nusinersen for a mean of 25.9 months before enrollment in any of the 3 trial cohorts. At month 12, the mean change from baseline in Hammersmith scale score was -0.3 points (95% CI -2.1 to 1.4) in cohort 1 (n = 23), 0.6 points (-1.4 to 2.7) in cohort 2 (n = 15), and in cohort 3 (n = 20), the mean scores were 5.3 (-1.5 to 12.2) and 7.1 (1.8 to 12.5) for the 2-mg/kg (n = 8) and 20-mg/kg (n = 9) arms, respectively. The 5 most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events were headache (24.1%), pyrexia (22.4%), upper respiratory tract infection (22.4%), cough (22.4%), and nasopharyngitis (20.7%). No deaths or serious adverse reactions were reported. DISCUSSION: Apitegromab led to improved motor function in participants with later-onset types 2 and 3 SMA. These results support a randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial of apitegromab in participants with SMA. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03921528). CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that apitegromab improves motor function in later-onset types 2 and 3 spinal muscular atrophy.

Advances and limitations for the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy.

Spinal muscular atrophy (5q-SMA; SMA), a genetic neuromuscular condition affecting spinal motor neurons, is caused by defects in both copies of the SMN1 gene that produces survival motor neuron (SMN) protein. The highly homologous SMN2 gene primarily expresses a rapidly degraded isoform of SMN protein that causes anterior horn cell degeneration, progressive motor neuron loss, skeletal muscle atrophy and weakness. Severe cases result in limited mobility and ventilatory insufficiency. Untreated SMA is the leading genetic cause of death in young children. Recently, three therapeutics that increase SMN protein levels in patients with SMA have provided incremental improvements in motor function and developmental milestones and prevented the worsening of SMA symptoms. While the therapeutic approaches with Spinraza®, Zolgensma®, and Evrysdi® have a clinically significant impact, they are not curative. For many patients, there remains a significant disease burden. A potential combination therapy under development for SMA targets myostatin, a negative regulator of muscle mass and strength. Myostatin inhibition in animal models increases muscle mass and function. Apitegromab is an investigational, fully human, monoclonal antibody that specifically binds to proforms of myostatin, promyostatin and latent myostatin, thereby inhibiting myostatin activation. A recently completed phase 2 trial demonstrated the potential clinical benefit of apitegromab by improving or stabilizing motor function in patients with Type 2 and Type 3 SMA and providing positive proof-of-concept for myostatin inhibition as a target for managing SMA. The primary goal of this manuscript is to orient physicians to the evolving landscape of SMA treatment.

A Randomized Phase 1 Safety, Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Study of the Novel Myostatin Inhibitor Apitegromab (SRK-015): A Potential Treatment for Spinal Muscular Atrophy.

INTRODUCTION: Apitegromab (SRK-015) is an anti-promyostatin monoclonal antibody under development to improve motor function in patients with spinal muscular atrophy, a rare neuromuscular disease. This phase 1 double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessed safety, pharmacokinetic parameters, pharmacodynamics (serum latent myostatin), and immunogenicity of single and multiple ascending doses of apitegromab in healthy adult subjects. METHODS: Subjects were administered single intravenous ascending doses of apitegromab of 1, 3, 10, 20, 30 mg/kg or placebo, and multiple intravenous ascending doses of apitegromab of 10, 20, 30 mg/kg or placebo. RESULTS: Following single ascending doses, the pharmacokinetic parameters of apitegromab appeared to be similar across all dose groups, following a biphasic pattern of decline in the concentration-time curve. The mean apparent terminal t1/2 after single intravenous doses of apitegromab ranged from 24 to 31 days across dose groups. Dose-related increases were observed in Cmax following multiple ascending doses. Single and multiple apitegromab doses resulted in dose-dependent and sustained increases in serum latent myostatin, indicating robust target engagement. Apitegromab was safe and well tolerated, on the basis of the adverse event (AE) profile with no clinically meaningful changes in baseline vital signs, electrocardiograms, or clinical laboratory parameters and no anti-drug antibody formation. CONCLUSION: These results support continued investigation of apitegromab for the treatment of patients with milder forms (type 2 and 3) of spinal muscular atrophy.

A novel study design for investigating relapse prevention in major depressive disorder: Preliminary data from the open-label period of a phase 4 vortioxetine study.

BACKGROUND: Traditional randomized withdrawal studies have assessed the efficacy of antidepressants for reducing relapse and recurrence of major depressive episodes (MDEs) but have not compared dose reduction, increase, or maintenance within the same study. METHODS: Here we present the development, implementation, and preliminary data from the open-label period of an ongoing phase 4, non-traditional, randomized withdrawal study. Designed to evaluate the efficacy of vortioxetine across its approved dose range for relapse prevention, the study enrolled adult patients with recurrent major depressive disorder (MDD), Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) ≥ 26, and history of ≥2 MDEs. After a 16-week, open-label, fixed-dose (vortioxetine 10 mg once daily) period, patients meeting response criteria (≥50% reduction in MADRS total score, Weeks 8-16) and remission criteria (MADRS total score ≤12, Weeks 14 and 16) were randomized to vortioxetine 5, 10, or 20 mg, or placebo in a 32-week double-blind treatment period. RESULTS: Of 1106 patients enrolled, 510 completed the open-label period (mean age: 45.7 years; mean MADRS = 5.0; predominantly female, white, and never smokers) and were eligible for randomization in the ongoing double-blind period. LIMITATIONS: Study is ongoing; only data from the open-label period are available for evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary analysis suggests that patient baseline characteristics were not a factor in response to and stabilization with vortioxetine during the open-label period. The lack of flexibility in dosing, however, may have reduced the number of patients qualifying for randomization. This study design may provide useful information for optimizing the long-term efficacy and tolerability of vortioxetine treatment for MDD.

SAGE-217, A Novel GABAA Receptor Positive Allosteric Modulator: Clinical Pharmacology and Tolerability in Randomized Phase I Dose-Finding Studies.

BACKGROUND: SAGE-217, a novel γ-aminobutyric acid A (GABAA) receptor positive allosteric modulator, was evaluated in phase I, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single ascending dose (SAD) and multiple ascending dose (MAD) studies to assess the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of SAGE-217 following administration as an oral solution. METHODS: In the SAD study, subjects were randomized 6:2 to a single dose of SAGE-217 or placebo. Doses ranged from 0.25 to 66 mg across nine cohorts. In the MAD study, subjects were randomized 9:3 and received SAGE-217 (15, 30, or 35 mg) or placebo once daily for 7 days. In both studies, PK, maximum tolerated dose (MTD; against predetermined criteria), safety, and tolerability were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 108 healthy volunteers enrolled in the studies-72 subjects in the SAD study and 36 subjects in the MAD study. SAGE-217 was orally bioavailable, with a terminal-phase half-life of 16-23 h and a tmax of approximately 1 h. The MTDs for the oral solution of SAGE-217 in the SAD and MAD studies were determined to be 55 and 30 mg daily, respectively. In both studies, SAGE-217 was generally well tolerated, and no serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported. Most AEs were mild, dose-dependent, transient, occurred around the tmax, and related to drug pharmacology. CONCLUSIONS: SAGE-217 was generally well tolerated, and its PK profile was well characterized. Based on this profile, SAGE-217 has been advanced into multiple phase II clinical programs and pivotal studies of major depressive disorder and postpartum depression.

Clinical implications of directly switching antidepressants in well-treated depressed patients with treatment-emergent sexual dysfunction: a comparison between vortioxetine and escitalopram.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this work was to describe treatment-emergent sexual dysfunction (TESD) and tolerability following a switch from selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI: citalopram, paroxetine, or sertraline) monotherapy to vortioxetine or escitalopram monotherapy in adults with well-treated major depressive disorder (MDD) and SSRI-induced sexual dysfunction. METHODS: Data were analyzed from the primary study, an 8-week, randomized, double-blind, head-to-head study in which participants with well-treated depressive symptoms but experiencing TESD with SSRIs were directly switched to flexible doses (10/20 mg) of vortioxetine or escitalopram. Sexual functioning was assessed by the Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire-14 (CSFQ-14), efficacy by the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale scores (MADRS) and Clinicians Global Impression of Severity/Improvement (CGI-S/CGI-I), and tolerability by adverse events. Efficacy and tolerability were assessed by pre-switch SSRI therapy where possible, and by participant characteristics. RESULTS: Greater improvements in TESD were seen in the vortioxetine compared with escitalopram groups based on: participant demographics (≤45 years, women; P = 0.045), prior SSRI treatment (P = 0.044), number of prior major depressive episodes (MDEs) (1-3; P = 0.001), and duration of prior SSRI therapy (>1 year; P = 0.001). Prior SSRI treatment did not appear to influence the incidence or severity of TEAEs, except for nausea. Regardless of prior SSRI, both treatments maintained antidepressant efficacy after 8 weeks. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that vortioxetine is a safe and effective switch therapy for treating SSRI-induced sexual dysfunction in adults with well-treated MDD. Also, improvement in sexual dysfunction with vortioxetine or escitalopram may be influenced by prior SSRI usage, sex, age, and history of MDEs.

Suicidal ideation and behavior in adults with major depressive disorder treated with vortioxetine: post hoc pooled analyses of randomized, placebo-controlled, short-term and open-label, long-term extension trials.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the risk of suicidal ideation and behavior associated with vortioxetine treatment in adults with major depressive disorder (MDD). METHODS: Suicide-related events were evaluated post hoc using 2 study pools: one short-term pool of 10 randomized, placebo-controlled studies (6-8 weeks) and another long-term pool that included 3 open-label extension studies (52 weeks). Evaluation of suicide-related events was performed using Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) scores and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) data. RESULTS: At baseline, the percentage of patients reporting any C-SSRS ideation or behavior events in short-term studies was similar between placebo (14.7%), vortioxetine (19.8%, 13.0%, 11.2%, and 13.7% for 5-, 10-, 15-, and 20-mg groups, respectively), and duloxetine active reference (13.2%) and did not change throughout the 6- to 8-week treatment period for placebo (17.0%), vortioxetine (19.3%, 13.5%, 12.6%, and 15% for 5-, 10-, 15-, and 20-mg groups, respectively), or duloxetine (11.3%). The incidence of suicide-related events for TEAEs in the short-term pool was 0.4% for placebo, 0.2% or 1.0% for vortioxetine 5 mg or 10 mg, and 0.7% each for vortioxetine 15 mg and 20 mg, as well as duloxetine. After 52-week treatment with vortioxetine, suicidal ideation based on C-SSRS was 9.8%, C-SSRS suicidal behavior was 0.2%, and the incidence of suicide-related events based on TEAEs was <1%. There were no completed suicides in any study. CONCLUSIONS: Vortioxetine is not associated with increased risk of suicidal ideation or behavior in MDD patients.

Effects of vortioxetine on functional capacity across different levels of functional impairment in patients with major depressive disorder: a University of California, San Diego Performance-based Skills Assessment (UPSA) analysis.

Objective: To evaluate the consistency of vortioxetine's effects on functional capacity in adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) and self-reported cognitive symptoms at different levels of functional impairment.Methods: An exploratory analysis of data from a randomized, placebo-controlled, duloxetine-referenced study (NCT01564862) involving 529 patients with moderate to severe MDD treated once-daily with vortioxetine 10/20 mg, duloxetine 60 mg, or placebo for 8 weeks. Analysis of the University of California, San Diego Performance-based Skills Assessment (UPSA) composite scores stratified patients into subgroups by baseline functional impairment and assessed clinically important differences using several cutoffs for change from baseline (CFB) (least-square means) in UPSA composite score. A path analysis was also conducted to determine the proportion of direct versus indirect effects of vortioxetine on functional capacity.Results: Vortioxetine significantly separated from placebo across different baseline levels of functional impairment, particularly at the ≤70 cutoff (mean difference = 5.9, 95% confidence interval, 1.5-10.4). A greater proportion of patients treated with vortioxetine than placebo exhibited UPSA composite score response at each threshold analyzed and were classified as responders based on UPSA CFB of ≥7 (p = 0.006) or ≥9 (p = 0.016). No significant effects were observed for duloxetine versus placebo for any baseline levels of functional impairment or response thresholds. Path analysis demonstrated that 96.9% of the effects on functional capacity can be directly attributed to the treatment effect of vortioxetine and are not mediated by improvements in depressive symptoms as measured by MADRS.Conclusion: The effects of vortioxetine on functional capacity is robust across different level of functional impairment in patients with MDD. The effect on functional capacity was largely independent of the effect on depressive symptoms. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01564862: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01564862; European Clinical Trials Database [EudraCT] Number 2011-005298-22: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2011-005298-22/DE.

Paroxetine, but not Vortioxetine, Impairs Sexual Functioning Compared With Placebo in Healthy Adults: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Sexual dysfunction is prevalent among patients with depression, but assessment of treatment-emergent sexual dysfunction (TESD), a common side effect of antidepressants, can be confounded by the treatment of depressive symptoms in some patients. AIM: To evaluate sexual functioning in healthy volunteers administered vortioxetine compared with paroxetine, an antidepressant known to cause sexual dysfunction, and placebo. METHODS: This phase 4, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 4-arm, fixed-dose, head-to-head study compared sexual functioning in healthy volunteers administered vortioxetine (10 and 20 mg once daily [QD]), paroxetine (20 mg QD), or placebo for 5 weeks. Approximately equal numbers of men and women ages 18-40 years with normal sexual functioning (self-reported Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire Short-Form [CSFQ-14] score > 47 for men; > 41 for women) were enrolled. Two modified full analysis sets adjusting for treatment non-compliance were prespecified. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary endpoint was change in CSFQ-14 total score for vortioxetine (10 and 20 mg) vs paroxetine after 5 weeks. Additional endpoints included CSFQ-14 change scores vs placebo, CSFQ-14 subscales, and patient global impression. RESULTS: Of the 361 subjects enrolled (mean age, 28.4 years), approximately 57% were white, 34% black/African American, and 4% Asian. Vortioxetine 10 mg was associated with significantly less TESD than paroxetine (mean difference, +2.74 points; P = .009). Although vortioxetine 20 mg was associated with numerically less TESD than paroxetine (mean difference, +1.05 points), this difference did not reach statistical significance. Non-compliance appeared to influence results, particularly the paroxetine and vortioxetine 20 mg arms. Paroxetine, but not vortioxetine, was associated with statistically significantly more TESD vs placebo. Vortioxetine also had better outcomes than paroxetine in the 3 phases and 5 dimensions of sexual functioning measured by CSFQ-14. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: These data establish that vortioxetine is associated with less TESD than paroxetine in healthy individuals, suggesting that vortioxetine may be a drug of choice in managing depressive disorders when sexual functioning is a concern. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: Conducting the study in healthy adults mitigated the risk of an underlying condition (eg, depression) confounding the results. Assay sensitivity was demonstrated by statistically significant TESD with paroxetine vs placebo. The single comparator, paroxetine, and short study duration limit the generalizability of these results. CONCLUSION: Vortioxetine is associated with less TESD than paroxetine in healthy adults across all phases and dimensions of the sexual response cycle. Vortioxetine was not significantly different from placebo on sexual functioning; however, the difference was significant between paroxetine and placebo, validating study results. Jacobsen P, Zhong W, Nomikos G, et al. Paroxetine, but not Vortioxetine, Impairs Sexual Functioning Compared With Placebo in Healthy Adults: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. J Sex Med 2019; 16:1638-1649.

Evaluation of 5-HT7 receptor antagonism for the treatment of anxiety, depression, and schizophrenia through the use of receptor-deficient mice.

The 5-HT7 receptor is the most recently identified receptor subtype within a family of 5-HT receptors activated by the neurotransmitter serotonin. There has been significant interest in investigating the potential role of this receptor in psychiatric disorders including depression, anxiety, and schizophrenia. Behaviors of 5-HT7 +/+ (wild-type or WT) and 5-HT7 -/- (receptor knockout or KO) mice were compared across 10 different assays (7 for anxiety, 1 for depression, 2 for psychosis) to identify differences that could indicate clinical potential for 5-HT7 receptor antagonism. Evaluation of KO vs. WT mice demonstrated significant differences between the genotypes in the fear conditioning, shock-probe burying, novelty-suppressed feeding, punishment memory, forced swim test, and d-amphetamine hyperactivity assays. There was not consistency in either the direction of behavioral effects across genotypes or across assays. Thus, data from these behavioral assays did not uniformly support the idea that 5-HT7 receptors constitute an important drug target for these psychiatric disorders. The present findings are generally congruent with the mixed results in the literature on the behaviors of 5-HT7 -/-mice and with the data on effects of 5-HT7 receptor antagonists in rodent models that detect activity of anxiolytic, antidepressant, and antipsychotic effects.

Effects of Intrinsic Factors on the Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Vortioxetine.

Vortioxetine is an antidepressant agent with multimodal activity that is approved for the treatment of major depressive disorder at doses of 5 to 20 mg once daily. Vortioxetine is a medium-clearance drug that undergoes extensive metabolism via several cytochrome P450 isozymes. A series of single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetic studies were performed to evaluate the impact of intrinsic (ie, subject-related) factors, such as age, sex, race, and renal and hepatic function, on the pharmacokinetics of vortioxetine. The point estimates on the ratios and their 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the central values of AUC (area under the concentration-time curve) and Cmax (maximum plasma concentration) were obtained by taking the antilog of the differences and 90%CIs in the log-transformed least-squares means. The results demonstrate that there were no clinically meaningful differences (defined as exposure difference between 50% and 2-fold change) in the exposure to vortioxetine (as assessed by AUC and Cmax ) between elderly and younger subjects, men and women, and blacks and whites and among subjects with varying degrees of renal or hepatic impairment. These results suggest that no dosing adjustments of vortioxetine are required for the intrinsic factors investigated in these studies.

A Subgroup Analysis of the Impact of Vortioxetine on Functional Capacity, as Measured by UPSA, in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder and Subjective Cognitive Dysfunction.

Background: We evaluated vortioxetine's effects on functional capacity in demographic and clinical subgroups of patients with major depressive disorder. Methods: This was an exploratory analysis of the CONNECT study (NCT01564862) that evaluated changes in functional capacity using University of California San Diego Performance-based Skills Assessment data, categorized by sex, age, education, employment status, and baseline disease severity (Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness). Results: Greater changes in University of California San Diego Performance-based Skills Assessment composite scores were observed with vortioxetine vs placebo in specific subgroups: males (∆+3.2), females (∆+2.9), 45-54 or ≥55 years (∆+5.6, ∆+3.4), working (∆+2.8), high school or greater education (∆+2.7, ∆+2.8), disease severity (Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, <30, ∆+3.5; ≥30, ∆+2.5; Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness ≤4, ∆+2.8; >4, ∆+3.0), major depressive episodes (≤2, >2 [∆+2.7,+3.3]), and episode duration (≤22, >22 weeks [∆+3.7,+2.4]). Conclusions: Our findings support the need for additional studies to assess whether vortioxetine improves functional capacity within specific patient subgroups. Clinical Trial Registry: clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01564862.

Vortioxetine: Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Drug Interactions.

Vortioxetine is a novel antidepressant with multimodal activity currently approved for the treatment of major depressive disorder. Vortioxetine is orally administered once daily at 5- to 20-mg doses. The pharmacokinetics of vortioxetine are linear and dose proportional, with a mean terminal half-life of approximately 66 h and steady-state plasma concentrations generally achieved within 2 weeks of dosing. The mean absolute oral bioavailability of vortioxetine is 75%. No food effect on pharmacokinetics was observed. Vortioxetine is metabolized by cytochrome P450 enzymes and subsequently by uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase. The major metabolite is pharmacologically inactive, and the minor pharmacologically active metabolite is not expected to cross the blood-brain barrier, making the parent compound primarily responsible for in-vivo activity. No clinically relevant differences were observed in vortioxetine exposure by sex, age, race, body size, and renal or hepatic function. Dose adjustment is only recommended for cytochrome P450 2D6 poor metabolizers based on polymorphism of the cytochrome P450 enzymes involved. Similarly, except for bupropion, a strong cytochrome P450 2D6 inhibitor, and rifampin, a broad cytochrome P450 inducer, co-administration of other drugs evaluated did not affect the vortioxetine exposure or safety profile in any clinically meaningful way. Pharmacodynamic studies demonstrated that vortioxetine achieved high levels of serotonin transporter occupancy in relevant brain areas, affected neurotransmitter levels in the cerebrospinal fluid, and modified abnormal resting state networks in the brain over the therapeutic dose range. Overall, vortioxetine can be administered in most populations studied to date without major dose adjustments; however, dose adjustments should be considered on a patient-by-patient basis.

Treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, and costs following first-line antidepressant treatment in major depressive disorder: a retrospective US claims database analysis.

BACKGROUND: Although the symptoms of major depressive disorder (MDD) are often manageable with pharmacotherapy, response to first-line antidepressant treatment is often less than optimal. This study describes long-term treatment patterns in MDD patients in the United States and quantifies the economic burden associated with different treatment patterns following first-line antidepressant therapy. METHODS: MDD patients starting first-line antidepressant monotherapy and having continuous enrollment ≥12 months before and ≥24 months following the index date (i.e., the first documented prescription fill) were selected from the Truven Health Analytics MarketScan (2003-2014) database. Based on the type of first treatment change following initiation, six treatment cohorts were defined a priori ("persistence"; "discontinuation"; "switch"; "dose escalation"; "augmentation"; and "combination"). Treatment patterns through the fourth line of therapy within each cohort, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and cost analyses were restricted to patients with adequate treatment duration (defined as ≥42 days) in each line (analysis sub-sample, N = 21,088). HCRU and costs were described at the cohort and pattern levels. Treatment cohorts representing <5% of the analysis sub-sample were decided a priori not to be analyzed due to limited sample size. RESULTS: 39,557 patients were included. Mean age was 42.1 years, 61.1% of patients were female, and mean follow-up was 4.1 years. Among the analysis sub-sample, the discontinuation (49.1%), dose escalation (37.4%), and switch (6.6%) cohorts were the most common of all treatment cohorts. First-line antidepressant discontinuation without subsequent MDD pharmacotherapy (22.9%) and cycling between discontinuation and resumption (11.2%) were the two most common treatment patterns. Median time to discontinuation was 23 weeks. The switch cohort exhibited the highest HCRU (18.9 days with medical visits per-patient-per-year) and greatest healthcare costs ($11,107 per-patient-per-year) following the index date. Treatment patterns representing a cycling on and off treatment in the switch cohort were associated with the greatest healthcare costs overall. CONCLUSION: A high proportion of patients discontinue first-line antidepressant shortly after initiation. Patterns representing a cycling on and off treatment in the switch cohort were associated with the highest healthcare costs. These findings underscore challenges in effectively treating patients with MDD and a need for personalized patient management.

Adolescent Female Cannabinoid Exposure Diminishes the Reward-Facilitating Effects of Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol and d-Amphetamine in the Adult Male Offspring.

Marijuana is currently the most commonly abused illicit drug. According to recent studies, cannabinoid use occurring prior to pregnancy can impact brain plasticity and behavior in future generations. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether adolescent exposure of female rats to Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) induces transgenerational effects on the reward-facilitating effects of Δ9-THC and d-amphetamine in their adult male offspring. Female Sprague-Dawley rats received Δ9-THC (0.1 or 1 mg/kg, i.p.) or vehicle during postnatal days 28-50. As adults, females were mated with drug-naïve males. We then assessed potential alterations of the Δ9-THC's (0, 0.1, 0.5, and 1 mg/kg, i.p.) and d-amphetamine's (0, 0.1, 0.5, and 1 mg/kg, i.p.) reward-modifying effects using the curve-shift variant of the intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) procedure in their adult male F1 offspring. The reward-facilitating effect of the 0.1 mg dose of Δ9-THC was abolished in the F1 offspring of females that were exposed to Δ9-THC (0.1 or 1 mg/kg), whereas the reward-attenuating effect of the 1 mg dose of Δ9-THC remained unaltered. The reward-facilitating effects of 0.5 and 1 mg of d-amphetamine were significantly decreased in the F1 offspring of females that were exposed to Δ9-THC (1 mg/kg and 0.1 or 1 mg, respectively). The present results reveal that female Δ9-THC exposure during adolescence can diminish the reward-facilitating effects of Δ9-THC and d-amphetamine in the adult male offspring. These transgenerational effects occur in the absence of in utero exposure. It is speculated that Δ9-THC exposure during female adolescence may affect neural mechanisms that are shaping reward-related behavioral responses in a subsequent generation, as indicated by the shifts in the reward-facilitating effects of commonly used and abused drugs.

Determination of a clinically important difference and definition of a responder threshold for the UCSD performance-based skills assessment (UPSA) in patients with major depressive disorder.

BACKGROUND: This article reports an evaluation of the psychometric properties and clinically important difference (CID) threshold of the UCSD Performance-Based Skills Assessment (UPSA) in major depressive disorder (MDD), using data from a large-scale study of the effects of vortioxetine on cognitive functioning and functional capacity in MDD patients. METHODS: Adults with moderate-to-severe recurrent MDD and self-reported cognitive dysfunction were randomized to 8 weeks of double-blind treatment with vortioxetine 10/20mg QD (flexible), duloxetine 60mg QD, or placebo. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated between UPSA composite score and demographic/disease characteristics at baseline to examine construct validity. Two methods (distribution-based and anchor-based) were used to establish a CID threshold. RESULTS: A total of 602 patients were randomized; 528 comprised the full analysis set. For the entire sample mean UPSA composite scores were 77.8 at baseline and 83.9 at week 8 (mean change, +6.1). As hypothesized, at baseline, the UPSA composite score correlated with cognitive functioning (Digit Symbol Substitution Test: r=0.36, P<0.001) and workplace productivity (Work Limitations Questionnaire: r=-0.17, P=0.008), but not depressive symptoms (Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale: r=0.02, P=0.707) or subjective cognitive dysfunction (Perceived Deficits Questionnaire: r=-0.02, P=0.698). LIMITATIONS: Two versions of the UPSA were used and no inclusion/exclusion criteria were based on the UPSA. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the construct validity of UPSA for assessing functional capacity independent of mood symptoms. The estimated CID for changes in UPSA scores was quite consistent at +6.4 points and +6.7 based on distribution-based and anchor-based methods, respectively.

Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of vortioxetine for the treatment of major depressive disorder in patients aged 55 years or older.

OBJECTIVE: These post hoc analyses evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of vortioxetine versus placebo in patients aged ≥55 years with major depressive disorder (MDD). METHODS: Study-level efficacy data from 12 short-term, fixed-dose, randomized, placebo-controlled trials of vortioxetine 5-20 mg/day were assessed using a random-effects meta-analysis. Adverse events (AEs), vital signs, ECG values, liver enzymes, and body weight were pooled from the same studies. Patients had baseline Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total scores ranging from 22-30. RESULTS: 1508 patients (mean age=62.4 years; range, 55-88 years) were included. Mean differences from placebo in change from baseline to study end (6/8 weeks) in MADRS were -2.56 (5 mg, n=324, P=0.035), -2.87 (10 mg, n=222, P=0.007), -1.32 (15 mg, n=90, P=NS), and -4.65 (20 mg, n=165, P=0.012). Odds ratios for response versus placebo were 1.6 (5 mg, P=NS), 1.8 (10 mg, P=0.002), 1.2 (15 mg, P=NS), and 2.5 (20 mg, P<0.001), and for remission versus placebo were 1.5 (5 mg, P=NS), 1.5 (10 mg, P=NS), 1.4 (15 mg, P=NS), and 2.7 (20 mg, P=0.001). The proportion of patients with AEs for placebo and vortioxetine 5-20 mg was 61.5% and 62.3%, respectively, with no increase at increased doses. Vortioxetine demonstrated a placebo-level incidence of serious AEs (1.2%). AEs occurring in ≥5% of any treatment group were nausea, headache, diarrhea, dizziness, dry mouth, constipation, fatigue, vomiting, and anxiety. No clinically significant mean changes in vital signs, ECG values, liver enzymes, or body weight emerged during treatment. CONCLUSION: Vortioxetine 5-20 mg/day is efficacious and well tolerated in MDD patients aged ≥55 years, a group that is often comorbid with other conditions and treated with other medications.

Attenuation of Cocaine-Induced Conditioned Place Preference and Motor Activity via Cannabinoid CB2 Receptor Agonism and CB1 Receptor Antagonism in Rats.

Background: Studies have shown the involvement of cannabinoid (CB) receptors in the behavioral and neurobiological effects of psychostimulants. Most of these studies have focused on the role of CB1 receptors in the psychostimulant effects of cocaine, while very few have investigated the respective role of CB2 receptors. Further studies are warranted to elucidate the extent of CB receptor involvement in the expression of cocaine-induced effects. Methods: The role of CB1 and CB2 receptors in the rewarding and motor properties of cocaine was assessed in conditioned place preference, conditioned motor activity, and open field activity in rats. Results: The CB1 receptor antagonist rimonabant (3 mg/kg) decreased the acquisition and the expression of conditioned place preference induced by cocaine (20 mg/kg). Rimonabant inhibited cocaine-elicited conditioned motor activity when administered during the expression of cocaine-induced conditioned place preference. Rimonabant decreased ambulatory and vertical activity induced by cocaine. The CB2 receptor agonist JWH-133 (10 mg/kg) decreased the acquisition and the expression of cocaine-induced conditioned place preference. JWH-133 inhibited cocaine-elicited conditioned motor activity when administered during the acquisition and the expression of cocaine-induced conditioned place preference. JWH-133 decreased ambulatory activity and abolished vertical activity induced by cocaine. The effects of JWH-133 on cocaine conditioned and stimulated responses were abolished when the CB2 receptor antagonist/inverse agonist AM630 (5 mg/kg) was preadministered. Conclusions: Cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptors modulate cocaine-induced rewarding behavior and appear to have opposite roles in the regulation of cocaine's reinforcing and psychomotor effects.

A meta-analysis of the efficacy of vortioxetine in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and high levels of anxiety symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Coexisting anxiety is common in major depressive disorder (MDD) and more difficult to treat than depression without anxiety. This analysis assessed the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of vortioxetine in MDD patients with high levels of anxiety (baseline Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale [HAM-A] total score ≥20). METHODS: Efficacy was assessed using an aggregated, study-level meta-analysis of 10 randomized, placebo-controlled, 6/8-week trials of vortioxetine 5-20mg/day in adults (18-75 years), with a study in elderly patients (≥65 years) analyzed separately. Outcome measures included mean differences from placebo in change from baseline to endpoint (Δ) in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), HAM-A total, and HAM-A subscales. Safety and tolerability were assessed by treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). RESULTS: A total of 1497 (48.6%) vortioxetine-treated and 860 (49.1%) placebo-treated patients had baseline HAM-A≥20. There were significant differences from placebo in MADRS (vortioxetine 5mg/day, n=415, Δ-2.68, P=0.005; 10mg/day, n=373, Δ-3.59, P<0.001; 20mg/day, n=207, Δ-4.30, P=0.005) and HAM-A total (5mg/day, n=419, Δ-1.64, P=0.022; 10mg/day, n=373, Δ-2.04, P=0.003; 20mg/day, n=207, Δ-2.19, P=0.027). There were significantly greater improvements versus placebo on the HAM-A psychic subscale for all doses. The most common TEAEs (≥5.0%) were nausea, headache, dizziness, dry mouth, diarrhea, nasopharyngitis, constipation, and vomiting. Incidence of serious TEAEs was 1.3% (placebo) and ≤1.3% (vortioxetine, across doses). LIMITATIONS: Study heterogeneity limits this analysis. Patients with baseline HAM-A≥20 were not directly compared to baseline HAM-A<20 or total MDD population. CONCLUSIONS: Vortioxetine was efficacious in reducing depressive and anxiety symptoms in patients with MDD and high levels of anxiety.

Patient phenotyping in clinical trials of chronic pain treatments: IMMPACT recommendations.

There is tremendous interpatient variability in the response to analgesic therapy (even for efficacious treatments), which can be the source of great frustration in clinical practice. This has led to calls for "precision medicine" or personalized pain therapeutics (ie, empirically based algorithms that determine the optimal treatments, or treatment combinations, for individual patients) that would presumably improve both the clinical care of patients with pain and the success rates for putative analgesic drugs in phase 2 and 3 clinical trials. However, before implementing this approach, the characteristics of individual patients or subgroups of patients that increase or decrease the response to a specific treatment need to be identified. The challenge is to identify the measurable phenotypic characteristics of patients that are most predictive of individual variation in analgesic treatment outcomes, and the measurement tools that are best suited to evaluate these characteristics. In this article, we present evidence on the most promising of these phenotypic characteristics for use in future research, including psychosocial factors, symptom characteristics, sleep patterns, responses to noxious stimulation, endogenous pain-modulatory processes, and response to pharmacologic challenge. We provide evidence-based recommendations for core phenotyping domains and recommend measures of each domain.