Cell-free circulating RAS mutation concentrations significantly impact the survival of metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

PURPOSE: RAS mutations are predictors of an adverse outcome in EGFR-targeted therapies and have been proposed as prognostic biomarkers of survival in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The analysis of circulating tumor DNA from plasma samples, known as liquid biopsies, has indicated that the RAS mutation status may change over time, potentially affecting patients' prognosis. To further evaluate the clinical validity of RAS mutation retesting using liquid biopsies, we prospectively investigated the impact of the circulating quantitative RAS mutation status on the course of mCRC. METHODS: The present study included 81 consecutively recruited patients with mCRC. We used targeted next-generation sequencing of circulating cell-free DNA to determine and quantify plasma RAS mutation status. RESULTS: Patients with a RAS mutation detected by liquid biopsy (37%; n = 30) were at increased risk of death during the follow-up period compared to RAS wild-type patients. Patients with evidence of a RAS mutation in the primary tumor but a putative RAS mutation loss in plasma (28%; n = 11) showed a prolonged survival compared to patients with a preserved RAS mutation status. Also, circulating RAS mutation concentrations significantly affected the outcome: The mortality risk of patients with a high RAS mutation concentration increased fivefold compared to subjects with a putative RAS mutation loss or low RAS mutation concentration. CONCLUSION: Our results emphasize the clinical value of circulating RAS mutations in managing mCRC.

Circulating syndecan-1 and glypican-4 predict 12-month survival in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

Cell surface syndecans and glypicans play important roles in the development and prognosis of colorectal cancer (CRC). Their soluble forms from proteoglycan shedding can be detected in blood and have been proposed as new prognostic biomarkers in several cancer entities. However, studies on circulating syndecan-1 (SDC1) and glypican-4 (GPC4) in CRC are limited. We, therefore, evaluated the impact of plasma SDC1 and GPC4 on the prognosis of metastatic (m)CRC patients. The present study included 93 patients with mCRC. The endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) at 12 months. SDC1 and GPC4 levels were measured in plasma using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Plasma levels of SDC1 and GPC4 were significantly correlated. Significant correlations of these two markers were also found with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). Kaplan-Meier curve analyses indicated that PFS and OS probabilities significantly decreased with increasing levels of SDC1 and GPC4, respectively. Multivariable Cox regression analyses showed that both markers were significantly associated with PFS and OS independently from clinicopathological characteristics including CEA. Respective adjusted hazard ratios (HR) together with corresponding 95% confidence intervals for one standard deviation change of SDC1 were 1.32 [1.02-1.84] for PFS and 1.48 [1.01-2.15] for OS. Adjusted HRs [95% confidence intervals] of GPC4 were 1.42 [1.07-1.89] for PFS and 2.40 [1.51-3.81] for OS. Results from area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analyses suggest that GPC4 and SDC1 add additional prognostic values to CEA for OS. In conclusion, we showed significant associations of circulating SDC1 and GPC4 with poor survival of mCRC patients.

Clonal Evolution in Patients with Hormone Receptor Positive, HER-2 Negative Breast Cancer Treated with Chemotherapy or CDK4/6 Inhibitors.

INTRODUCTION: Somatic evolution of the cancer genome resulting in genetically different subclones is thought to be involved in the development of treatment resistance but might also offer new therapeutic opportunities in metastatic breast cancer. No data are available if clonal evolution differs in patients treated with chemotherapy (chemo) or CDK4/6 inhibitors given with endocrine treatment (CE treatment). METHODS: We performed a prospective analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) by targeted next-generation sequencing in 46 patients before the beginning of a systemic first-line (n = 37) or second-line (n = 9) treatment. Ct DNA was analyzed again upon disease progression. RESULTS: New mutations in ctDNA of patients with progressive disease were detected in 1/11 patients who started chemo, in 4/9 patients treated with chemo followed by CE maintenance treatment, and in 9/26 patients receiving CE therapy. The number of acquired new mutations did not differ significantly between the three therapy cohorts (all p values >0.05). However, in patients classified as secondary resistant (n = 37), occurrence of new mutations significantly differed between patients who started chemo (0/9) compared to patients treated with chemo followed by CE (4/11; p = 0.041) and patients receiving CE therapy (8/19; p = 0.024), respectively. CONCLUSION: Clonal evolution might differ significantly between metastatic breast cancer patients with hormone receptor positive and HER-2 negative disease treated with chemo or CDK4/6 inhibitors. These results should be confirmed in larger patient cohorts.

Elective Discontinuation of CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Patients with Metastatic Hormone Receptor-Positive, Her-2-Negative Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Single-Center Experience.

INTRODUCTION: Cyclin-dependent 4/6 kinase (CDK4/6) inhibitors given with endocrine therapy until disease progression are standard of care in the treatment of women with advanced HR-positive Her-2-negative breast cancer. No data are available if therapy can be safely de-escalated to endocrine monotherapy in patients with long-lasting disease control. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis on the clinical course of 22 patients at our center who received CDK4/6 inhibitors with aromatase inhibitors or fulvestrant. All patients had at least stable disease for >6 months and made a joint decision with their provider to electively discontinue CDK4/6 inhibitors. Best objective response (BOR) at treatment discontinuation, progression-free survival, and re-treatment characteristics were recorded. RESULTS: Of 138 patients who received CDK4/6 inhibitors as first- or second-line therapy at our center, 22 met the inclusion criteria. Median duration of CDK4/6 treatment was 18 months (range 6-45). BOR was complete response in 1, partial response in 8, and stable disease in 13 patients. After a median duration of endocrine monotherapy of 9.5 months (range 5-44 months), 6 of 22 patients had progressive disease (1 local relapse and 5 systemic progression). All patients with disease progression had at least stable disease to chemotherapy (N = 1) or re-treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors (N = 4). CONCLUSION: Elective discontinuation of CDK4/6 inhibitors is feasible in patients with long-lasting disease stabilization. This strategy should be evaluated in prospective trials.

Significant impact of circulating tumour DNA mutations on survival in metastatic breast cancer patients.

Mutational analysis of circulating tumour (ct) DNA holds promise as an effective tool to predict the course of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). In the present study we used targeted next generation sequencing of ctDNA to evaluate the impact of cancer driven mutations on the prognosis of MBC. The study included 59 oestrogen receptor-positive (ER+), HER2-negative MBC patients. Sequencing analysis was performed in ESR1, PIK3CA, ERBB2, PTEN, TP53, KRAS, HRAS, NRAS, and AR. At baseline, patients started receiving either chemotherapy (34%; n = 20) or cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor therapy in combination with endocrine therapy (CDK4/6i+ET; 66%; n = 39). Overall, 64.4% (n = 38) of the patients carried at least one pathogenic or likely-pathogenic mutation. Number of ctDNA mutations was significantly linked with worse progression free survival (PFS; p = 0.003) and overall survival (OS; p = 0.007). Furthermore, ctDNA load, defined by the number of mutant ctDNA molecules per mL plasma, significantly correlated with PFS (p < 0.001) and OS (p = 0.001). Furthermore, mutational status of ESR1 and TP53 significantly predicted PFS (p = 0.024 and p = 0.035, respectively) and OS (p < 0.001 and p = 0.035, respectively). These results emphasizes the clinical value of ctDNA mutational analysis in the management of advanced breast cancer.