Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Isr Med Assoc J ; 11(11): 664-8, 2009 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20108552

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: It is common practice to use topical antiseptic formulations prior to specific therapy in superficial infections and injuries, but not in corneal bacterial ulcers. There is accumulating evidence proving chlorhexidine gluconate 0.02%, an antiseptic agent, as an effective treatment for infectious keratitis. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the safety and efficacy of chlorhexidine gluconate 0.02% as an adjunct therapy for corneal bacterial ulcers. METHODS: Twenty-six patients with corneal bacterial ulcers were treated with standard empirical antibiotic treatment. The study group was treated with chlorhexidine gluconate 0.02% while controls received placebo for one week. The patients were followed for at least 1 month. RESULTS: No allergic or toxic reactions were noted. Although a higher baseline severity of ulcers existed in the study group, no differences were found in final vision, scarring extent, or recovery duration. CONCLUSIONS: Chlorhexidine gluconate 0.02% may improve the clinical course of corneal ulcers.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos Locais/uso terapêutico , Clorexidina/análogos & derivados , Úlcera da Córnea/tratamento farmacológico , Úlcera da Córnea/microbiologia , Infecções Oculares Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Clorexidina/uso terapêutico , Úlcera da Córnea/patologia , Método Duplo-Cego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Infecções Oculares Bacterianas/patologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Instilação de Medicamentos , Israel , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Soluções Oftálmicas , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
2.
J Biomed Opt ; 14(6): 064016, 2009.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20059254

RESUMO

The common method of closing conjunctival incisions is by suturing, which is associated with several disadvantages. It requires skill to apply and does not always provide a watertight closure, which is required in some operations (e.g., glaucoma filtration). The purpose of the present study was to evaluate laser soldering as an alternative method for closing conjunctival incisions. Conjunctival incisions of 20 ex vivo porcine eyes were laser soldered using a temperature-controlled fiberoptic laser system and an albumin mixed with indocyanine green as a solder. The control group consisted of five repaired incisions by a 10-0 nylon running suture. The leak pressure of the repaired incisions was measured. The mean leak pressure in the laser-soldered group was 132 mm Hg compared to 4 mm Hg in the sutured group. There was no statistically significant difference in both the incision's length and distance from the limbus between the groups, before and after the procedure, indicating that there was no severe thermal damage. These preliminary results clearly demonstrate that laser soldering may be a useful method for achieving an immediate watertight conjunctival wound closure. This procedure is faster and easier to apply than suturing.


Assuntos
Túnica Conjuntiva/cirurgia , Terapia a Laser/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Oftalmológicos/métodos , Análise de Variância , Animais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Oftalmológicos/instrumentação , Pressão , Técnicas de Sutura , Suínos , Temperatura
3.
J Glaucoma ; 13(4): 278-82, 2004 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15226655

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of performing visual field with the Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) in children aged 5 to 10 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty healthy children and fifteen healthy adults, all with no previous experience with visual field testing, underwent visual field testing with the C20 threshold test of the Carl Zeiss Meditec FDT analyzer in both eyes. The subjects were divided into three groups. Group A (age 5-7), group B (age 8-10), and group C (adults). RESULTS: The mean explanation time for the test was 83 +/- 43 seconds for group A, 68 +/- 31 seconds for group B, and 37 +/- 15 seconds for group C (P < 0.001 for the difference between group C and groups A and B). Test performance time for the right eye was 347 +/- 57 seconds, 301 +/- 21 seconds, and 298 +/- 35 seconds for groups A to C, respectively (P < 0.001 for the difference between group A and groups B and C). Forty percent of the children, but none of the adults required two demonstrations prior to initiation of the test. In children fixation losses for the right and left eye were 10% and 37% respectively. No fixation losses occurred in adults. In both eyes a mean deviation <0.5% occurred significantly more often in group A than in group C (P = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Visual field testing with FDT in the young age group is feasible. Test reliability was similar between children aged 5 to 7 and 8 to 10. Pre-selection of children is suggested to achieve reliable results.


Assuntos
Testes de Campo Visual/métodos , Campos Visuais/fisiologia , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Nervo Óptico/fisiologia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...