Pancreatic resections in renal failure patients: is it worth the risk?

Background. Chronic kidney disease affects 20 million US patients, with nearly 600,000 on dialysis. Long-term survival is limited and the risk of complex pancreatic surgery in this group is questionable. Previous studies are limited to case reports and small case series and a large database may help determine the true risk of pancreatic surgery in this population. Methods. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried (2005-2011) for patients who underwent pancreatic resection. Renal failure was defined as the clinical condition associated with rapid, steadily increasing azotemia (rise in BUN) and increasing creatinine above 3 mg/dL. Operative trends and short-term outcomes were reviewed for those with and without renal failure (RF). Results. In 18,533 patients, 28 had RF. There was no difference in wound infections, neurologic or cardiovascular complications. Compared to non-RF patients, those with RF had more unplanned intubation (OR 4.89, 95% CI 1.85-12.89), bleeding requiring transfusion (OR 3.12, 95% CI 1.37-14.21), septic shock (OR 8.86, 95% CI 3.75-20.91), higher 30-day mortality (21.4% versus 2.3%, P < 0.001) and longer hospital stay (23 versus 12 days, P < 0.001). Conclusions. RF patients have much higher morbidity and mortality after pancreatic resections and surgeons should consider this before proceeding.

Patient awareness of health precautions after splenectomy.

Sepsis after splenectomy is a lifelong risk, and patients who have had splenectomy should be educated about this risk. This study examines patient knowledge after splenectomy. We reviewed hospital records of 118 patients who had splenectomies performed between 1982 and 1988 at New Hanover Memorial Hospital. Twenty-four patients have died since their surgery; one death was suspected to be due to postsplenectomy sepsis. Of the 89 patients alive and eligible for follow-up, we were able to query 63. Only 16% were aware of any health precautions. After prompting, patient awareness improved to 40%. We also surveyed 11 of the 14 surgeons who performed the splenectomies. They indicated that they always discuss with their patients the immunologic consequences of spleen removal and the increased risks of infection, although they do not always recommend pneumococcal vaccine. We conclude that splenectomy patients have a low level of knowledge about postsplenectomy infection risks and precautions. We developed an educational pamphlet to aid the surgeon in patient education.