Comparative effects of the potassium channel openers cromakalim and pinacidil and the cromakalim analog U-89232 on isolated vascular and cardiac tissue.

ATP-sensitive potassium (K+ATP) channel openers such as cromakalim and pinacidil exhibit both potent vasodilatory and anti-ischemic properties. U-89232, a cyanoguanidine analog of cromakalim, has recently been found to exhibit myocardial protection during ischemia without altering in vivo hemodynamics. We examined the effects of U-89232, cromakalim and pinacidil in isolated vascular and cardiac tissue and tested whether glyburide, a KATP channel blocker, could antagonize their effects. All three compounds produced concentration-dependent relaxation in isolated vascular segments, with cromakalim being approximately 100-fold more potent than either pinacidil or U-89232. Glyburide completely antagonized the effects of pinacidil but merely blunted the effects of cromakalim and U-89232. In an isolated rabbit cardiac tissue preparation, U-89232 had little effect on maximum tension in cardiac muscle, whereas cromakalim and pinacidil significantly decreased maximum developed tension in a concentration-dependent manner. Glyburide effectively antagonized the effects of cromakalim and pinacidil in cardiac tissue. These data suggest that U-89232, although chemically related to cromakalim, possesses activity which is not common to known potassium channel openers.

Limitation of myocardial injury with the potassium channel opener cromakalim and the nonvasoactive analog U-89,232: vascular vs. cardiac actions in vitro and in vivo.

Cromakalim has been shown to have anti-ischemic properties, but it also produces profound hypotension upon systemic administration. We hypothesized that U-89,232, a cromakalim analog, would reduce infarct size in an ischemia-reperfusion injury model without hemodynamic alteration. Twenty-four anesthetized, open chest New Zealand White rabbits were instrumented for occlusion of a marginal branch of the left coronary artery. All animals were subjected to coronary artery occlusion (30 min) and reperfusion (2 hr). Study animals received either cromakalim (20 micrograms/kg, i.v.) or U-89,232 (20 micrograms/kg, i.v.), which was given as a pretreatment 30 min before occlusion. Control animals (n = 10) received vehicle (10% dimethyl sulfoxide). At termination of the experiment, the necrotic area and the area at risk were determined with tetrazolium and India ink staining, and infarct size was calculated using planimetry. Treatment with cromakalim produced profound hypotension (greater than 30% decrease in mean arterial pressure), whereas U-89,232 had no such hemodynamic effect. With comparable areas at risk, infarct size (as a percent of risk area) in the control animals was 46.8 +/- 3.4%. Treatment with cromakalim or U-89,232 reduced infarct size to 33.1 +/- 4.4 and 24.4 +/- 4.0%, respectively (P < .05, both compared to control). In vitro studies demonstrate that although both of these compounds shorten the duration of the cardiac action potential, only cromakalim is active in vascular smooth muscle. We conclude that U-89,232 exhibits myoprotection without hypotension, and that its mechanism of action is most likely due to ability to affect cardiac electrophysiology.