Digital full arch implant supported Poly (methyl Methacrylate) interim prosthesis: a practice-based cohort study on survival and quality of life.

PURPOSE: Digitally planned and manufactured PMMA for full arch implant supported immediate loading interim prosthesis are becoming popular comparing with conventional acrylic prosthesis. Studies on prosthodontic performance and patient related outcomes are scarce but needed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical survival and impact on oral health related quality of life of immediate loading implant supported full arch CAD-CAM milled PMMA interim rehabilitations. METHODS: This was a practice based prospective cohort study performed in a Portuguese dental clinic. Eleven patients received a total of seventeen CAD CAM full implant-supported, screw-retained, full arch rehabilitation with milled PMMA and were followed up for 1 year. Primary outcome was Prosthesis survival determined with a modification of the California Dental Association score and a Kaplan Meyer survival function analysis. Secondary outcome was patient's quality of life as defined by application of the OHIP 14 PT questionnaire and standardized effect size variation between two visits. Significance was set at 5%. RESULTS: Survival probability at 12 months was 76%, complete fracture of the prosthesis occurred in 17,6 % of the cases and small fractures without lab involvement in 5,9%. There was a significant improvement in oral health related quality of life between visit 1 and 4. Mean difference and effect size for total OHIP-14 PT score were -32.91 (± 3.68 SD) and 3.66 (95% CI -1.83 to -5.80) P < 0.001* Wilcoxon matched paired rank test. CONCLUSIONS: Full arch implant supported CAD-CAM milled PMMA interim prosthesis seems a viable approach with good survival rate and great impact on patient's oral health related quality of life.

STAR concept: A technique to improve the predictability of immediate implant placement and loading in edentulous arches.

The digital workflow in implant dentistry aims to provide safer and predictable implant placement. This is facilitated through visualization of the anatomical structures as well as the integration of the prosthetic information to dictate implant placement. Guided surgery is useful in edentulous arches planned for fixed rehabilitations, where the unfavorable position of the implants may limit the possibility to realize such a treatment option. In full-arch immediate implant placement and immediate loading, computer-guided implant surgery gains a significant importance. Here, clinicians rely on either soft tissue or bone to provide support for the surgical guide during implant placement. Due to tooth extraction and the loss of anatomical structures that improve the support of the surgical guide, the correct positioning of the guide can be challenging. Further, the procedure that follows to deliver the immediate temporary rehabilitation can also be challenging due to the lack of workflow integrity between the surgical and restorative phases. The present case report describes a novel digital workflow for immediate implant placement and immediate loading of a full-arch rehabilitation, which aims to improve the accuracy of implant placement surgery and simplify the procedure of delivering immediate provisional restorations. (Int J Comput Dent 2022;25(3):303-323; doi: 10.3290/j.ijcd.b3380919).

Obstacles to implementing evidence-based dentistry: a focus group-based study.

In many countries, questions have been raised about the use of evidence-based practice (EBP) in oral health care. The call for an increase in EBP seems to face many obstacles. Only limited empirical studies address these obstacles. We present a qualitative study that explores the obstacles that Flemish (Belgian, Dutch-speaking) dentists experience in the implementation of EBP in routine clinical work. We collected data from discussions in focus groups. Seventy-nine dentists participated. The data were analyzed using constant comparative analysis. Three major categories of obstacles were identified. These categories relate to obstacles in 1) evidence, 2) partners in health care (medical doctors, patients, and government), and 3) the field of dentistry. Our findings suggest that educators should provide communication skills to aid decision making, address the technical dimensions of dentistry, promote lifelong learning, and close the gap between academics and general practitioners (dentists) in order to create mutual understanding. The obstacles identified are considered useful to support future quantitative research that can be generalized to a broader group.