Immune Effects of M51R Vesicular Stomatitis Virus Treatment of Carcinomatosis From Colon Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to analyze the oncolytic and immunomodulatory functions of an M protein mutant of vesicular stomatitis virus (M51R VSV) in a murine model of peritoneal surface dissemination from colon cancer (PSD from CRC). METHODS: Luciferase-expressing CT26 peritoneal tumors were established in Balb/c mice to evaluate the impact of M51R VSV treatment on intraperitoneal tumor growth and overall survival. The mice were treated with either intraperitoneal phosphate buffered saline (n = 10) or 5 × 106 PFU M51R VSV (n = 10) at 5 d after tumor implantation. Tumor bioluminescence was measured every 3 d during the 60-day study period. The immunomodulatory effect of M51R VSV treatment was evaluated in mice treated with either intraperitoneal phosphate buffered saline (n = 21) or M51R VSV (n = 21). Peritoneal lavages were collected at days 1, 3, and 7 after M51R VSV treatment for flow cytometry and multiplex cytokine bead analysis. RESULTS: A single, intraperitoneal treatment with M51R VSV inhibited the growth of PSD from CRC as evidenced by decreased bioluminescence and improved survival. This treatment approach also resulted in significantly higher frequencies of peritoneal CD4+ T (10.95 ± 1.17 versus 6.19 ± 0.44, P = 0.004) and B1b cells (5.01 ± 0.97 versus 2.20 ± 0.2, P = 0.024). On the other hand, treatment with M51R VSV resulted in fewer myeloid-derived suppressor cells relative to controls (10.66 ± 1.48 versus 14.47 ± 1.06, P = 0.035). M51R-treated peritoneal cavities also contained lower concentrations of immunosuppressive monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and interleukin 6 cytokines relative to controls. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that M51R VSV alters the innate and adaptive immune responses in PSD from CRC. Future studies will delineate specific components of antitumor immunity that result in its therapeutic effect.

Molecular determinants of susceptibility to oncolytic vesicular stomatitis virus in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: M protein mutant vesicular stomatitis virus (M51R-VSV) has oncolytic properties against many cancers. However, some cancer cells are resistant to M51R-VSV. Herein, we evaluate the molecular determinants of vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) resistance in pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells. METHODS: Cell viability and the effect of ß-interferon (IFN) were analyzed using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium assay. Gene expression was evaluated via microarray analysis. Cell infectability was measured by flow cytometry. Xenografts were established in athymic nude mice and treated with intratumoral M51R-VSV. RESULTS: Four of five pancreatic cancer cell lines were sensitive to M51R-VSV, whereas Panc 03.27 cells remained resistant (81 ± 3% viability 72 h after single-cycle infection). Comparing sensitive MiaPaCa2 cells with resistant Panc 03.27 cells, significant differences in gene expression were found relating to IFN signaling (P = 2 × 10(-5)), viral entry (P = 3 × 10(-4)), and endocytosis (P = 7 × 10(-4)). MiaPaCa2 cells permitted high levels of VSV infection, whereas Panc 03.27 cells were capable of resisting VSV cell entry even at high multiplicities of infection. Extrinsic ß-IFN overcame apparent defects in IFN-mediated pathways in MiaPaCa2 cells conferring VSV resistance. In contrast, ß-IFN decreased cell viability in Panc 3.27 cells, suggesting intact antiviral mechanisms. VSV-treated xenografts exhibited reduced tumor growth relative to controls in both MiaPaCa2 (1423 ± 345% versus 164 ± 136%; P < 0.001) and Panc 3.27 (979 ± 153% versus 50 ± 56%; P = 0.002) tumors. Significant lymphocytic infiltration was seen in M51R-VSV-treated Panc 03.27 xenografts. CONCLUSIONS: Inhibition of VSV endocytosis and intact IFN-mediated defenses are responsible for M51R-VSV resistance in pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells. M51R-VSV treatment appears to induce antitumor cellular immunity in vivo, which may expand its clinical efficacy.

Oncolytic vesicular stomatitis virus as a treatment for neuroendocrine tumors.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic goals for neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) not amenable to operative cure are limited to relieving symptoms and slowing progression. Many malignancies acquire defective antiviral responses as they undergo unregulated proliferation. Therefore, we explored the abilities of recombinant wild-type vesicular stomatitis virus and an attenuated matrix protein mutant (M51R-VSV) to exploit defective antiviral pathways in NETs. METHODS: Viral infectivity and lethality were evaluated in a panel of human NET cell lines H727, UMC-11, and CNDT2.5. We evaluated ß-interferon pathways in these cells to define the acquired defect. Murine xenografts were treated with a single intratumoral injection of M51R-VSV to study viral efficacy in vivo. RESULTS: VSV infected >99% of cells within 24 hours and killed >95% within 72 hours. NET cells did not produce relevant amounts of ß-interferon after infection, but exogenous ß-interferon protected cells from oncolysis. Treatment with M51R-VSV resulted in suppressed tumor growth (mean value ± standard error of the mean) compared with mock-infected xenografts for H727 (87 ± 72% vs. 2,197 ± 335%; P < .001), UMC-11 (13 ± 59% vs. 1,471 ± 324%; P < .001), and CNDT2.5 (81 ± 121% vs. 1,576 ± 349%; P = .001). CONCLUSION: VSV infects and kills human NETs by exploiting their inability to produce a type I antiviral response. Therefore, M51R-VSV is an excellent candidate for the treatment of advanced NETs.

Variation in susceptibility of human malignant melanomas to oncolytic vesicular stomatitis virus.

BACKGROUND: Vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) is a novel, anti-cancer therapy that targets cancer cells selectively with defective antiviral responses; however, not all malignant cells are sensitive to the oncolytic effects of VSV. Herein, we have explored the mechanistic determinants of mutant M protein VSV (M51R-VSV) susceptibility in malignant melanoma cells. METHODS: Cell viability after VSV infection was measured by the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium (MTS) viability assay in a panel of melanoma cell lines. VSV infectability, viral protein synthesis, and viral progeny production were quantified by flow cytometry, (35)S-methionine electrophoresis, and viral plaque assays, respectively. Interferon (IFN) responsiveness was determined using MTS assay after ß-IFN pretreatment. Xenografts were established in athymic nude mice and treated with intratumoral M51R-VSV. RESULTS: Cell viability after M51R-VSV infection at a multiplicity of infection of 10 pfu/mL, 48 hours postinfection) ranged between 0 ± 1% and 59 ± 9% (mean ± standard deviation). Sensitive cell lines supported VSV infection, viral protein synthesis, and viral progeny production. In addition, when pretreated with ß-IFN, sensitive cells became resistant to M51R-VSV, suggesting that IFN-mediated antiviral signaling is defective in these cells. In contrast, resistant melanoma cells do not support VSV infection, viral protein synthesis, or viral replication, indicating that antiviral defenses remain intact. In a murine xenograft model, intratumoral M51R-VSV treatment decreased tumor growth relative to controls after 26 days in SK-Mel 5 (-21 ± 19% vs. 2,100 ± 770%; P < .0001) and in SK-Mel 3 (2,000 ± 810% vs. 7,000 ± 3,000%; P = .008) established tumors. CONCLUSION: M51R-VSV is a viable anti-cancer therapy, but susceptibility varies among melanomas. Future work will exploit specific mechanisms of resistance to expand the therapeutic efficacy of M51R-VSV.