Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Rheumatol ; 30(6): 805-13, 2011 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21234632

RESUMO

Scleroderma is associated with intractable hand pain from vasospasm, digital ischemia, tenosynovitis, and nerve entrapment. This study investigated the effect of hydrodissection of the carpal tunnel followed by corticosteroid injection for the painful scleroderma hand. Twenty-six consecutive subjects [12 with painful scleroderma hand and 14 with rheumatoid arthritis and carpal tunnel syndrome (RA/CTS)] underwent sonographically observed carpal tunnel hydrodissection with 3 ml of 1% lidocaine administered with a 25-gauge 1-in. needle on a 3-ml RPD mechanical syringe (reciprocating procedure device). After hydrodissection, a syringe exchange was performed, and 80 mg of triamcinolone acetonide was injected. Baseline pain, procedural pain, pain at outcome, responders, therapeutic duration, and reinjection interval were determined. Hydrodissection and injection with corticosteroid significantly reduced pain scores by 67% in scleroderma (p < 0.001) and by 47% in RA/CT (p < 0.001). Scleroderma and RA/CTS were similar in outcome measures: injection pain (p = 0.47), pain scores at outcome (p = 0.13), responders (scleroderma, 83.3%; RA/CTS, 57.1%, p = 0.15), pain at 6 months (p = 0.15), and therapeutic duration (p = 0.07). Scleroderma patients responded better in time to next injection (scleroderma, 8.5 ± 3.0 months; RA/CTS, 5.2 ± 3.1 months, p = 0.03). Reduced Raynaud's attacks and healing of digital ulcers occurred in 83% of subjects. There were no complications. Hydrodissection with lidocaine followed by injection of triamcinolone reduces pain and vasomotor changes in the scleroderma hand. The mechanism may be a combination of hydrodissection-mediated mechanical freeing of entrapped arteries, nerves, and tendinous structures and corticosteroid-induced reduction of inflammatory vasospasm.


Assuntos
Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Dissecação/métodos , Mãos/diagnóstico por imagem , Esclerodermia Localizada/tratamento farmacológico , Triancinolona Acetonida/uso terapêutico , Corticosteroides/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Anestésicos Locais , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções Intra-Articulares , Lidocaína , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Medição da Dor , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Triancinolona Acetonida/administração & dosagem , Ultrassonografia
2.
J Rheumatol ; 38(2): 252-63, 2011 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21078710

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We studied whether sonographic needle guidance affected the outcomes of intraarticular (IA) injection for inflammatory arthritis. METHODS: Joints with inflammatory arthritis (n = 244; 76% rheumatoid arthritis, 3% small joints, 51% intermediate, and 46% large) were randomized to injection by conventional palpation-guided anatomic injection (120 joints) or sonographic image-guided injection enhanced with a 1-handed reciprocating procedure device mechanical syringe (124 joints). A 1-needle, 2-syringe technique was used. After IA placement and synovial space dilation were confirmed by sonography, a syringe exchange was performed, and triamcinolone acetonide was injected with the second syringe through the indwelling IA needle. Baseline pain, procedural pain, pain at outcome (2 weeks and 6 months), responders, therapeutic duration, reinjection rates, total cost, and cost per responder were determined. RESULTS: Relative to conventional palpation-guided methods, sonographic guidance for injection of inflammatory arthritis resulted in an 81% reduction in injection pain (p < 0.001), 35% reduction in pain scores at outcome (p < 0.02), 38% increase in the responder rate (p < 0.003), 34% reduction in the non-responder rate (p < 0.003), 32% increase in therapeutic duration (p = 0.01), 8% reduction ($7) in cost/patient/year, and a 33% ($64) reduction in cost/responder/year for a hospital outpatient (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Sonographic needle guidance improves the performance, clinical outcomes, and cost-effectiveness of IA injections for inflammatory arthritis. (Clinical Trial Identifier NCT00651625).


Assuntos
Artrite/economia , Inflamação/economia , Articulações/diagnóstico por imagem , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Artrite/diagnóstico por imagem , Artrite/tratamento farmacológico , Análise Custo-Benefício/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Inflamação/diagnóstico por imagem , Inflamação/tratamento farmacológico , Injeções Intra-Articulares/economia , Injeções Intra-Articulares/métodos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Medição da Dor , Resultado do Tratamento , Ultrassonografia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...