Phallus preservation and reconstruction: 5-year outcomes of national penile cancer centralisation in the Republic of Ireland.

INTRODUCTION: Penile cancer is a rare urological malignancy with an age-standardised incidence of 0.8 per 100,000 person-years [1]. Given this low incidence it has been suggested that centralised care may improve patient outcomes in relation to phallus sparing surgery and nodal assessment [2]. We aim to assess the outcomes after 5-years of national centralisation of penile cancer care. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed. All patients undergoing penile cancer surgery from January 2018 to December 2022 following centralisation of care were included. The primary outcome was proportion of phallus sparing procedures performed. Secondary outcomes were patient characteristics, histologic outcomes and procedures performed. RESULTS: 124 patients underwent surgery in the study period. Mean age was 64.49 (±13.87). Overall, 82.3% of patients underwent phallus sparing surgery. This remained stable over the 5-year period from 2018 to 2022 â€‹at 92%, 85%, 76%, 79% and 78% respectively (p â€‹= â€‹0.534). 62.7% had reconstruction performed, including split-thickness skin graft neoglans formation, (57.8% [n â€‹= â€‹37]), preputial flap (32.8% [n â€‹= â€‹21]), glans resurfacing (4.7% [n â€‹= â€‹3]), shaft advancement flap (1.6% [n â€‹= â€‹1]), penile shaft skin graft (1.6% [n â€‹= â€‹1]), and partial penectomy with urethral centralisation (1.6% [n â€‹= â€‹1]). Phallus preservation was not affected by positive nodal status (OR 0.75 [95% CI 0.249-2.266], p â€‹= â€‹0.564) or T-stage ≥1b (OR 0.51 [95% CI 0.153-1.711], p â€‹= â€‹0.276). There has been a significant reduction in Nx nodal status from 64% in 2017 to 15% in 2021 (p â€‹= â€‹0.009). CONCLUSION: Centralisation of treatment for rare malignancies such as penile cancer may improve oncologic outcomes and rates of phallus preservation. This study has shown centralisation to has a high rate of phallus preservation. Further long-term analysis of outcomes in Ireland is required.

Surgical management and post-operative functional outcomes of patients with a penile fracture-a single centre experience over 10 years.

BACKGROUND: Penile fractures are uncommon urological emergencies which occur when there has been a breach in the tunica albuginea of the corpora cavernosum that may be unilateral and bilateral and can extend to involve the urethra. AIM: To assess the management and outcomes of penile fractures in a single institution in Ireland. METHODS: A retrospective review of the emergency theatre logbooks was performed between 2011 and 2021 to identify patients who had undergone an exploration for a suspected penile fracture. OUTCOMES: Seventeen patients were initially identified on review of theatre logbooks as having an exploration for a suspected penile fracture. Two patients were excluded from the study due to a lack of clinical notes being available. A further 4 patients on chart review were found to not have a penile fracture at exploration. RESULTS: Eleven patients had a confirmed penile fracture intra-operatively, four of whom had an associated urethral injury. Nine (9/11) patients had preserved normal erections post-operatively documented on follow-up; two, however, reported erectile dysfunction requiring phosphodiesterase inhibitors. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Our study supports urgent surgical exploration for penile fractures to ensure good functional outcomes. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: This is a retrospective review of theatre logbooks to identify patients with a suspected penile fracture. CONCLUSION: The results of our cohort show a good outcome of erectile function following surgical repair of a penile fracture (9/11; 82%). Four patients (4/11; 36%) had a urethral injury diagnosed intra-operatively, one of whom required a formal urethroplasty.

Male urethral stricture disease in a regional centre: 10 years of experience.

BACKGROUND: Male urethral stricture disease is a challenging condition with a propensity for recurrence following endoscopic management. In recent years, earlier definitive urethral reconstruction has been advocated through international guidelines, prompted by series suggesting the underutilization of urethroplasty at rates of 0.6-0.8%. However, little local data exists to characterize our urethral stricture patients and we aimed to characterize the management of patients with urethral stricture disease presenting over a 10-year period to a single regional centre. METHODS: Patients with urethral stricture disease and admitted to a regional health service were identified. Retrospective chart review was undertaken for patients detailing basic demographics, stricture characteristics, clinical management and follow up. RESULTS: We identified 360 patients with median age 69 years (interquartile range 56-77). A total of 191 (53%) presented with lower urinary tract symptoms, 122 (34%) urethral strictures were incidental, and 13% presented in urinary retention. Bulbar urethral strictures were the commonest strictures at 40% with most being spontaneous or idiopathic (67%). A total of 339 patients had treatment during their first admission, 48% of patients had subsequent treatment on a second episode, and over 20% had a third or subsequent treatment. Only 21 (5.8%) underwent urethroplasty. Urethral dilatation and optical urethrotomy were most commonly performed (54%). With follow up 19 months (interquartile range 2-56), 205 (57%) were voiding, 38 (11%) were performing intermittent catheterization, and 59 were catheterized permanently. CONCLUSION: Definitive urethral reconstruction appears underutilized in our cohort of patients. A high proportion of incidentally presenting urethral strictures emphasizes the importance of wider education to optimize patient outcomes.