Postoperative pelvic incidence (PI) change may impact sagittal spinopelvic alignment (SSA) after instrumented surgical correction of adult spine deformity (ASD).

OBJECTIVES: To study factors causing postoperative change of PI after surgical correction of ASD and to assess the effect of this variability on postoperative PI-LL mismatch. BACKGROUND: PI is used as an individual constant to define lumbar lordosis (LL) correction goal (PI-LL < 10). Postoperative changes of PI were shown but with opposite vectors. The impact of the PI variability on the postoperative PI-LL has not been studied. METHODS: The medical and radiographic data analyzed for patients who underwent long posterior instrumented spinal fusion. Inclusion criteria are age, ≥ 20 years old; ASD due to degenerative disk disease (DDD) or scoliosis (DS); ≥ 3 levels fused; and 2-year follow-up or revision. Studied parameters are LL (L1-S1), PI, sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), and PI-LL. Measurement error and postoperative changes were defined. Statistical analysis includes ANOVA, correlation, regression, and risk assessment by odds ratio; P ≤ 0.05 considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Eighty patients were included: mean age, 62.4 years-old (SD, 11.1); female, 63.7%; mean body mass index (BMI), 27.1 (SD, 5.6). Distribution of patients by follow-ups includes preoperative 100%; postoperative (1-3 weeks), 100%; 11-13 months. 90%; 22-26 months, 58%; and revision: 24%. Pre- versus postoperative PI (∆PI) changed both positively and negatively and the absolute value of change|∆PI| exceeded measurement error (P ≤ 0.05) reaching as high as 31°, and progressed with time; R2 dropped from 0.73 to 0.45 (P < 0.001); ∆PI depended on disproportional changes of SS and PT, preoperative PI, and change of LL. Obesity, DS, and absence of sacroiliac fixation increased |∆PI|. The risk of LL insufficient correction (PI-LL > 10°) associated with a |∆PI|> 6°, P = 0.05. Sacroiliac fixation diminished PI variability only during the first postoperative year. CONCLUSION: Preoperative variability and postoperative instability of PI diminish the applicability of the PI-LL < 10° goal to plan correction of LL. An alternative method is offered. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Comparison of Adverse Outcomes Following Placement of Superion Interspinous Spacer Device Versus Laminectomy and Laminotomy.

BACKGROUND: Current evidence suggests placement of the Superion interspinous spacer (SISS) device compared with laminectomy or laminotomy surgery offers an effective, less invasive treatment option for patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis. Both SISS placement and laminectomy or laminotomy have risks of complications and a direct comparison of complications between the 2 procedures has not been previously studied. The purpose of this study is to compare the short-term complications of the SISS with laminectomy or laminotomy and highlight device-specific long-term outcomes with SISS. METHODS: Via retrospective review, 189 patients who received lumbar level SISSs were compared with 378 matched controls who underwent primary lumbar spine laminectomy or laminotomy; data were collected from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Complications analyzed included rates of wound infection, pulmonary embolism, deep venous thrombosis, urinary tract infection, sepsis, septic shock, cardiac arrest, death, and reoperation within 30 days of index surgery. Differences between groups were analyzed using the χ2test. Device-specific complication (DSC) rates included device malfunction or misplacement (DM), device explantation (DE), spinous process fracture (SPF), and subsequent spinal surgery (SSS). RESULTS: No differences in demographics or comorbidities existed between groups. There was no significant difference in rates of complications between groups. A total of 44.4% of patients in the SISS group experienced DSCs with 11.1% of patients experiencing DM, 21.1% experiencing an SPF, 20.1% requiring DE, and 24.3% requiring SSS. Having at least 1 DSC significantly increased odds of SSS, odds ratio >120, P < .0001. CONCLUSION: Rates of 30-day complications in the SISS group were not significantly different from patients undergoing laminectomy or laminotomy. Rates of 2-year DSC within SISS and cumulative risk associated with these complications should be considered further as they likely represent need for additional procedures for patients and substantial cost to the healthcare system. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Having no differences in adverse events between laminectomies or laminotomies and SISS plus evidence of substantial device-specific long-term adverse outcomes and reoperation should be given consideration when deciding on surgical intervention of 1-2 level lumbar spinal stenosis.

Strap stabilization for proximal junctional kyphosis prevention in instrumented posterior spinal fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective, single-institution, cohort study. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association of Mersilene tape use and risk of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), after surgical correction of adult spinal deformity (ASD) by posterior instrumented fusion (PIF). PJK, following long spinal PIF, is a complication which often requires reoperation. Mersilene tape, strap stabilization of the supra-adjacent level to upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) seems a preventive measure. METHODS: Patients who underwent PIF for ASD with Mersilene tape stabilization (case group) or without (control group) between 2006 and 2016 were analyzed preoperatively to 2-year follow-up. Matching of potential controls to each case was performed. Radiographic sagittal Cobb angle (SCA), lumbar lordosis, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, and pelvic incidence were measured pre- and postoperatively, using a deformity measuring software program. PJK was defined as progression of postoperative junctional SCA at UIV ≥ 10°. RESULTS: Eighty patients were included: 20 cases and 60 controls. The cumulative rate of PJK ≥ 10° at 2-year follow-up was 15% in cases versus 38% of controls (OR = 0.28; P = 0.04) with higher latent period in cases, (20 vs. 7.5 months), P = 0.018. Mersilene tape decreased risk of PJK linked with the impact of the following confounders: age, ≥ 55 years old (OR = 0.19; 0.02 ≥ P ≤ 0.03); number of spinal levels fused 7-15 (OR = 0.13; 0.02 ≥ P ≤ 0.06); thoracic UIV (T12-T1) (OR = 0.13; 0.02 ≥ P ≤ 0.06); BMI ≥ 27 kg/m2 (OR = 0.22; 0.03 ≥ P ≤ 0.08); and osteoporosis (OR = 0.13; 0.02 ≥ P ≤ 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Mersilene tape at UIV + 1 level decreases the risk of PJK following PIF for ASD. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Radius of Curvature in Patient-Specific Short Rod Constructs Versus Standard Pre-Bent Rods.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies support the need for sagittal alignment restoration when performing lumbar degenerative spinal fusions. The development of patient-specific spine rods (PSSRs) may help maintain or improve sagittal alignment in these surgeries. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted for patients who underwent posterior spinal surgeries involving 4 or less levels. The preplanned PSSR radii of curvature (ROC) was compared with standard prebent rods with a ROC of 125 mm. All surgeries were performed at a single institution by 3 surgeons from September 2016 through October 2018. Data were then compared using a 2-tailed paired t test. PSSR had either 1 or 2 definitive ROCs. RESULTS: For rods with 2 ROCs, the "cranial" curve was measured between the upper instrumented level and L4 or L5. The "caudal" curve was measured between L4 or L5 and the lower instrumented level. The PSSR with 1 ROC and the caudal portion of the rods with 2 ROCs were significantly smaller than the industry standard ROC. CONCLUSIONS: PSSR demonstrate more acute ROC than industry standard rods. In PSRs, the most lordosis occurs between L4-S1 and flattens out at the thoracolumbar junction, mimicking the normal distribution of lumbar lordosis. PSSRs could help achieve or maintain sagittal alignment and prevent the sequela of flat back syndrome.

Long-Term Treatment Effect and Predictability of Spinopelvic Alignment After Surgical Correction of Adult Spine Deformity With Patient-Specific Spine Rods.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the short- and long-term treatment effect (TE) of spinopelvic parameters after surgical correction of adult spine deformity (ASD) utilizing preoperative planning and patient-specific spine rods (PSSRs), and to assess the correspondence between planned and real outcomes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: PSSR have been used in ASD correction for the last decade. However, a TE and predictability of spinopelvic alignment at long-term follow-up has not been studied. METHODS: Inclusion criteria: male or female; age more than 20 years; correction of ASD with PSSR; 24-month follow-up (or revision surgery). Studied parameters: sagittal vertical axis; lumbar lordosis (LL); pelvic tilt (PT); sacral slope; pelvic incidence (PI); and PI-LL. The measurement error, TE (the differences between postoperative and preoperative values), standardized TE, and predictability of the studied parameters assessed. The variables included categorical (optimal/nonoptimal) and continuous obtained by direct measurements and weighted by individual optimal values. Statistical significance was set at P ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were included: 56% women; the mean age, 63.4 (standard deviation, 12.7); at each follow-up: 32 at 1 to 3 months, 34 at 11 to 13, and 14 at 23 to 25 with 9 followed to the revision surgery. Strong or moderate TE was shown for sagittal vertical axis, LL, and PI-LL. The TE of PT and sacral slope was less significant and lower than planned. PI was not stable in 18%. The changes of continuous variables were more prominent and statistically significant then categorical. The mean values did not show significant differences between planned and postoperative outcomes except for PT. However, the individual deviations were substantial for all parameters. Significant predictability was shown only for LL and PI. CONCLUSION: Use of PSSR showed strong and relatively stable TE in ASD during 2 postoperative years. However, improvement of the planning accuracy may contribute to further enhancement of the method's efficacy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Mini-open sacroiliac joint fusion with direct bone grafting and minimally invasive fixation using intraoperative navigation.

BACKGROUND: Describe a novel technique for sacroiliac arthrodesis using intraoperative navigation, direct bone grafting, and minimally invasive implants. Report on the outcomes of the first cohort of these patients. METHODS: Institutional review board (IRB) approved, single center, two surgeon, retrospective study. RESULTS: All patients were 18 years or older, primary sacroiliac fusions, and underwent novel technique described. Fifty patients underwent 57 surgeries. Twelve male/38 female patients. All received three sacroiliac implants. Average blood loss 42.8 mL. Average length of stay 1.9 nights. Average follow-up 13.96±13 months. Statistically significant improvements in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores (<0.001) for all time periods 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months compared to preop. Other outcomes scores [Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Denver Sacroiliac Joint Questionnaire (DSIJQ)] also showed a general trend for clinical improvement at all postoperative time periods. Of 2/57 (3.5%) complications were identified. No patients required surgical revision within the study window. CONCLUSIONS: Limited open sacroiliac arthrodesis using minimally invasive implants, intraoperative navigation, and direct open bone grafting is safe and demonstrates clinical benefit, similar to other techniques for minimally invasive sacroiliac arthrodesis. There is potential for improved long-term outcomes from increased union rates. KEYWORDS: Sacroiliac dysfunction; minimally invasive sacroiliac fusion; open sacroiliac fusion; navigation.

Stand-alone Anterior Lumbar Interbody, Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody, and Anterior/Posterior Fusion: Analysis of Fusion Outcomes and Costs.

Fusion outcomes and costs of stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in association with posterior fusion, and anterior/posterior (A/P) fusion were compared using clinical, radiographic, and billing data. Adult patients with symptomatic 1- or 2-level degenerative disk disease in isolation or in association with a grade 1 or 2 degenerative or lytic spondylolisthesis and canal and/or foraminal stenosis who underwent elective stand-alone ALIF, TLIF, or A/P fusion were compared. The analysis focused primarily on fusion rates and costs and secondarily on radiographic and clinical parameters. One hundred six patients at least 2 years beyond surgery (ALIF, 53; TLIF, 17; A/P fusion, 36) were reviewed. Demographics were similar except for age, with the ALIF group being younger (mean, 37.8 years) than the other groups (TLIF, 53.1 years; A/P fusion, 48.2 years). There were no differences between the groups in fusion rates or outcomes as assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale. Compared with the other 2 groups, the ALIF group had a significantly shorter operative time, less blood loss, and a shorter stay (P<.0001). Evaluation of radiographic parameters revealed significant differences regarding disk angle (P<.001), disk height (P<.0001), and pelvic tilt (P=.001) favoring ALIF and A/P fusion over TLIF. Stand-alone ALIF should be considered in the management of patients with 1- or 2-level lumbar degenerative disk disease for which the pathology can be addressed adequately via this approach. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(5):e655-e662.].

Evaluation and Prediction of Human Lumbar Vertebrae Endplate Mechanical Properties Using Indentation and Computed Tomography.

Current implant materials and designs used in spinal fusion show high rates of subsidence. There is currently a need for a method to predict the mechanical properties of the endplate using clinically available tools. The purpose of this study was to develop a predictive model of the mechanical properties of the vertebral endplate at a scale relevant to the evaluation of current medical implant designs and materials. Twenty vertebrae (10 L1 and 10 L2) from 10 cadavers were studied using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to define bone status (normal, osteopenic, or osteoporotic) and computed tomography (CT) to study endplate thickness (µm), density (mg/mm3), and mineral density of underlying trabecular bone (mg/mm3) at discrete sites. Apparent Oliver-Pharr modulus, stiffness, maximum tolerable pressure (MTP), and Brinell hardness were measured at each site using a 3 mm spherical indenter. Predictive models were built for each measured property using various measures obtained from CT and demographic data. Stiffness showed a strong correlation between the predictive model and experimental values (r = 0.85), a polynomial model for Brinell hardness had a stronger predictive ability compared to the linear model (r = 0.82), and the modulus model showed weak predictive ability (r = 0.44), likely due the low indentation depth and the inability to image the endplate at that depth (≈0.15 mm). Osteoporosis and osteopenia were found to be the largest confounders of the measured properties, decreasing them by approximately 50%. It was confirmed that vertebral endplate mechanical properties could be predicted using CT and demographic indices.

Spinopelvic Parameters in Asymptomatic Subjects Without Spine Disease and Deformity: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review with meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE: To combine published data, focusing on the development of optimal spinopelvic parameters in adult asymptomatic subjects without spine deformity while taking into consideration the impact of potential confounders. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A well-grounded approach to define the optimal spinopelvic parameters is necessary for planning surgical correction of spine deformity. MATERIALS: Selection criteria: (1) randomized and nonrandomized prospective, cross-sectional, and retrospective studies; (2) participants: asymptomatic subjects without spine deformity aged above 18 years; (3) studied parameters: lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence, sacral slope, and pelvic tilt; (4) potential confounders: method of measurement, sex, age, ethnicity, weight, height, and body mass index. Search method: Ovid MEDLINE (1946-current) and EMBASE (1980-current), all years through October 2015 were included. Data were collected: number of enrolled subjects, means of the studied characteristics, SD, SE of the means, 95% confidence intervals. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the pooled means and range of optimal values (pooled mean±pooled SD) taking into consideration the impact of confounders. The GRADE approach was applied to evaluate the level of evidence. RESULTS: Seventeen of 1018 studies were included (2926 subjects from 9 countries). The pooled means and the optimal ranges were: LL (L1-S1), 54.6 (42-67) degrees; LL (L1-L5), 37.0 (22-53) degrees; pelvic incidence, 50.6 (39-62) degrees; sacral slope, 37.7 (28-48) degrees; pelvic tilt, 12.6 (3-22) degrees. The pooled results were statistically significant (P<0.001), but heterogeneous. Impact of the following confounders was revealed: method of measurement, ethnicity, age, and body mass index. A methodology was created to define an individualized optimal value and range of each studied parameter taking into consideration the influence of confounders. CONCLUSIONS: The pooled results and developed methodology can be used as diagnostic criteria for evaluation of the spinopelvic parameters, planning of surgical interventions and evaluation of the treatment effect.

Strain in Posterior Instrumentation Resulted by Different Combinations of Posterior and Anterior Devices for Long Spine Fusion Constructs.

STUDY DESIGN: Clinically related experimental study. OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of strain in posterior low lumbar and spinopelvic instrumentation for multilevel fusion resulting from the impact of such mechanical factors as physiologic motion, different combinations of posterior and anterior instrumentation, and different techniques of interbody device implantation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Currently different combinations of posterior and anterior instrumentation as well as surgical techniques are used for multilevel lumbar fusion. Their impact on risk of device failure has not been well studied. Strain is a well-known predictor of metal fatigue and breakage measurable in experimental conditions. METHODS: Twelve human lumbar spine cadaveric specimens were tested. Following surgical methods of lumbar pedicle screw fixation (L2-S1) with and without spinopelvic fixation by iliac bolt (SFIB) were experimentally modeled: posterior (PLF); transforaminal (TLIF); and a combination of posterior and anterior interbody instrumentation (ALIF+PLF) with and without anterior supplemental fixation by anterior plate or diverging screws through an integrated plate. Strain was defined at the S1 screws, L5-S1 segment of posterior rods, and iliac bolt connectors; measurement was performed during flexion, extension, and axial rotation in physiological range of motion and applied force. RESULTS: The highest strain was observed in the S1 screws and iliac bolt connectors specifically during rotation. The S1 screw strain was lower in ALIF+PLF during sagittal motion but not rotation. Supplemental anterior fixation in ALIF+PLF diminished the S1 strain during extension. Strain in the posterior rods was higher after TLIF and PLF and was increased by SFIB; this strain was lowest after ALIF+PLF, as supplemental anterior fixation diminished the strain during extension, in particular, cages with anterior screws more than anterior plate. Strain in the iliac bolt connectors was mainly determined by direction of motion. CONCLUSIONS: Different devices modify strain in low posterior instrumentation, which is higher after transforaminal and posterior techniques, specifically with spinopelvic fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.

Early Experience and Initial Outcomes With Patient-Specific Spine Rods for Adult Spinal Deformity.

The objectives of this study were to describe the process of preoperative planning and using patient-specific rods. This retrospective case series involved 18 patients with adult spinal deformity who were treated with posterior instrumentation and spine fusion, with lumbar or thoracic osteotomies, using patient-specific rods. Data extracted included demographic/surgical variables and preoperative, predicted (surgical plan), and postoperative spinopelvic parameters. The outcome analysis involved assessment of preoperative, planned, and postoperative variables. Treatment effect evaluation involved assessing differences between preoperative and postoperative values and correspondence between planned and achieved results. Surgery using preoperative planned patient-specific rods led to excellent adult spinal deformity correction and spinopelvic alignment.

What Is the Clinical Relevance of Radiographic Nonunion After Single-Level Lumbar Interbody Arthrodesis in Degenerative Disc Disease?: A Meta-Analysis of the YODA Project Database.

STUDY DESIGN: Meta-analysis of 4 randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs). OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine if patients with degenerative disc disease who achieve radiographic fusion after single-level lumbar interbody arthrodesis have better clinical outcomes than patients with radiographic pseudarthrosis at 12 and 24 months postoperative. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The clinical relevance of successful fusion after lumbar arthrodesis with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 or iliac crest bone autograft has recently been questioned in the literature. METHODS: Individual patient-level data of 4 RCTs were obtained from the Yale University Open Data Access Project project and analyzed. Clinical outcomes (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]; Numeric Rating Scales [NRSs] for back and leg pain) were compared between patients with radiographically confirmed fusion and those with radiographic nonunion 1 and 2 years postoperative. The results of each study were first analyzed separately, and then were pooled by meta-analysis. The GRADE approach was applied to evaluate the level of evidence. RESULTS: A total of 496 patients with clinical and radiographic data at 1- and 2-year follow-ups were identified. Of these, 5.5% (95% confidence interval: 3.7; 8.3) had radiographic nonunion which did not require reoperation. Patients with fusion had better improvements in ODI (P < 0.001) and NRS back pain scores (P < 0.001). The overall percentage of fused patients with ODI and NRS back pain scores that exceeded the criteria for minimal clinically important differences was also significantly higher than that of patients with nonunion (ODI, odds ratio [OR] = 2.7, P = 0.019; NRS back pain, OR = 3.5, P = 0.033). The predictive values of fusion for clinical outcomes, however, were poor, with low specificity and low negative predictive values. CONCLUSION: The presence of radiographic fusion is clinically significant, as patients with fusion had better clinical outcomes at 1 and 2 years postoperative than those with nonunion; however, patient-centered clinical outcomes should also be taken into consideration as independent, complimentary variables when assessing treatment success.

Risk factors for rod fracture after posterior correction of adult spinal deformity with osteotomy: a retrospective case-series.

BACKGROUND: Osteotomies including pedicle subtraction (PSO) and/or Smith-Peterson (SPO) are used to facilitate surgical correction of adult spinal deformity (ASD), but are associated with complications including instrumentation failure and rod fracture (RF). The purpose of this study was to determine incidence and risk factors for RF, including a clinically significant subset (CSRF), after osteotomy for ASD. METHODS: A retrospective review of clinical records was conducted on consecutive ASD patients treated with posterolateral instrumented fusion and osteotomy. Seventy-five patients (50 female; average age, 59) met strict inclusion/exclusion criteria and follow-up of ≥1 year. Data was extracted pertaining to the following variables: patient demographics; details of surgical intervention; instrumentation; and postoperative outcomes. Patients were divided into two subgroups: 1) rod fracture (RF) and 2) non-RF. The RF subgroup was further divided into CSRF and non-CSRF. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated to evaluate the association between risk factors and RF. The χ (2)-test was used to define P-values for categorical variables, and T-test was applied for continuous variables, P-values ≤0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: Incidence rates of RF were: for entire population, 9.3 % (95 % Cl: 2.7 %; 15.9 %); for PSO, 16.2 % (95 % Cl: 4.3; 28.1); and for SPO, 2.6 % (95 % Cl: 0 %; 7.7 %); the OR of PSO versus SPO was 7.2 (95 % Cl: 0.8; 62.7, P = 0.1). CSRF incidence was 5.3 % (95 % CI: 0.2 %; 10.4 %). Significant risk of RF was revealed for following factors: fusion construct crossing both thoracolumbar and lumbosacral junctions (OR = 9.1, P = 0.05), sagittal rod contour >60° (OR = 10.0, P = 0.04); the presence of dominos and/or parallel connectors at date of rod fracture (OR = 10.0, P = 0.01); and pseudarthrosis at ≥1 year follow-up (OR = 28.9, P < 0.001). Statistically significant risk of CSRF was revealed for fusion to pelvis (P = 0.05) and pseudarthrosis at ≥1 year follow-up (OR = 50.3, CI: 4.2; 598.8, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of RF after posterolateral instrumented correction of ASD with osteotomy had statistically significant association with the following factors: pseudarthrosis at ≥1 year follow-up; sagittal rod contour >60°; presence of dominos and/or parallel connectors at date of fracture; and fusion construct crossing both thoracolumbar and lumbosacral junctions. Statistically significant risk for the CSRF subset was fusion to the pelvis and pseudarthrosis at ≥1 year follow-up.

Predictors of spine deformity progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

AIM: To evaluate published data on the predictors of progressive adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) in order to evaluate their efficacy and level of evidence. SELECTION CRITERIA: (1) study design: randomized controlled clinical trials, prospective cohort studies and case series, retrospective comparative and none comparative studies; (2) participants: adolescents with AIS aged from 10 to 20 years; and (3) treatment: observation, bracing, and other. SEARCH METHOD: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, PubMed and patent data bases. All years through August 2014 were included. Data were collected that showed an association between the studied characteristics and the progression of AIS or the severity of the spine deformity. Odds ratio (OR), sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were also collected. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the pooled OR and predictive values, if more than 1 study presented a result. The GRADE approach was applied to evaluate the level of evidence. RESULTS: The review included 25 studies. All studies showed statistically significant or borderline association between severity or progression of AIS with the following characteristics: (1) An increase of the Cobb angle or axial rotation during brace treatment; (2) decrease of the rib-vertebral angle at the apical level of the convex side during brace treatment; (3) initial Cobb angle severity (> 25(o)); (4) osteopenia; (5) patient age < 13 years at diagnosis; (6) premenarche status; (7) skeletal immaturity; (8) thoracic deformity; (9) brain stem vestibular dysfunction; and (10) multiple indices combining radiographic, demographic, and physiologic characteristics. Single nucleotide polymorphisms of the following genes: (1) calmodulin 1; (2) estrogen receptor 1; (3) tryptophan hydroxylase 1; (3) insulin-like growth factor 1; (5) neurotrophin 3; (6) interleukin-17 receptor C; (7) melatonin receptor 1B, and (8) ScoliScore test. Other predictors included: (1) impairment of melatonin signaling in osteoblasts and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC); (2) G-protein signaling dysfunction in PBMC; and (3) the level of platelet calmodulin. However, predictive values of all these findings were limited, and the levels of evidence were low. The pooled result of brace treatment outcomes demonstrated that around 27% of patents with AIS experienced exacerbation of the spine deformity during or after brace treatment, and 15% required surgical correction. However, the level of evidence is also low due to the limitations of the included studies. CONCLUSION: This review did not reveal any methods for the prediction of progression in AIS that could be recommended for clinical use as diagnostic criteria.

Long-term Treatment Effects of Lumbar Arthrodeses in Degenerative Disk Disease: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE: To (1) evaluate long-term patient-centered clinical outcomes after lumbar arthrodesis with or without decompression for lumbar spondylosis (LS); and (2) compare these outcomes with those of alternative treatments, including nonsurgical and surgical which maintain mobility of the lumbar spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The effective treatment of LS is a complex clinical and economic concern for patients and health care providers. SELECTION CRITERIA: (1) randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) comparing treatment effects of lumbar arthrodesis with other interventions; (2) participants: skeletally mature adults with lumbar degenerative disk disease. SEARCH METHODS: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and others. All years through February of 2013 were included. Patient-centered clinical outcomes before treatment, at 12, 24, or >24 months of follow-up, and rate of complications and additional surgical treatment were collected. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate pooled treatment effects. The GRADE approach was applied to evaluate the level of evidence. RESULTS: The review included 38 studies of 5738 participants. All studies showed strong or at least moderate treatment effects of lumbar arthrodesis at 12, 24, and 48-72 months of follow-up. The level of evidence was moderate at 12 and 24 months, and low at 48-72 months. The pooled long-term treatment effect of lumbar arthrodesis exceeded those of: nonsurgical treatment (P<0.0001) with a moderate level of evidence, and decompression without fusion (P=0.005) with a low level of evidence. The treatment effect of lumbar arthrodesis showed a small inferiority versus arthroplasty at 12 and 24 months of follow-up (P<0.001), but not after 24 months postoperative. CONCLUSIONS: This review indicates that surgical stabilization of the lumbar spine is an effective treatment for LS; in particular, for patients with severe chronic low back pain that has been resistant to ≥3 months of conservative therapy.

Perioperative and long-term clinical outcomes for bone morphogenetic protein versus iliac crest bone graft for lumbar fusion in degenerative disk disease: systematic review with meta-analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analysis. OBJECTIVES: To compare the perioperative and long-term postoperative effectiveness of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) for lumbar arthrodesis in skeletally mature adults with degenerative disk disease (DDD) to that of the current golden standard treatment, iliac crest autologous bone graft (ICBG). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The treatment efficacy of lumbar arthrodesis in DDD is a complex clinical and economic issue for patients and health care providers. METHODS: Comprehensive electronic literature search was performed using following databases: Ovid MEDLINE; Embase; Cochrane Library; Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects; Methodology Register; Technology Assessment Database; and Economic Evaluation Database. The full year ranges of each database until May of 2012 were included. RESULTS: Eight randomized controlled clinical trials of 383 citations were selected. The included studies involved 1138 participants. The pooled 2-year postoperative clinical outcomes were equivalent in BMP and ICBG groups, and exceeded minimum clinically important differences for Oswestry Disability Index, SF-36 (physical scale), and numeric rating scale (back pain). ICBG was associated with increased pain and complications at the donor site (P<0.01). The pooled average operative time was 21 minutes less in BMP versus ICBG (P<0.001). The pooled rate of additional surgical treatment was 2 times less in the BMP than in the ICBG groups (P=0.006). The pooled risk of nonunion at 24-month follow-up was 2 times less in the BMP than in the ICBG groups (P=0.037), however, this effect was likely biased. CONCLUSIONS: BMP, in particular rhBMP-2, is a good alternative to autogenous bone graft, especially in cases when harvesting of autologous bone is contraindicated or undesirable, operation time is limited, and there are no contraindications for BMP use.However, the current study did not reveal evidence robust enough to develop strong medical recommendations concerning BMP use for lumbar arthrodesis in degenerative disk disease.

Infection after primary total hip arthroplasty.

The number of primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) performed in the United States each year continues to climb, as does the incidence of infectious complications. The changing profile of antibiotic-resistant bacteria has made preventing and treating primary THA infections increasingly complex. The goal of this review was to summarize (1) the published data concerning the risk of surgical site infection (SSI) after primary THA by type of bacteria and (2) the effect of potentially modifying factors. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, EMBASE, Web of Science, and PubMed were searched. Studies dated between 2001 and 2011 examining primary THA in adults were included. Meta-analysis of the collected data was performed. The pooled SSI rate was 2.5% (95% confidence interval [Cl], 1.4%-4.4%; P<.001; n=28,883). The pooled deep prosthetic joint infection (PJI) rate was 0.9% (95% Cl, 0.4%-2.2%; P<.001; n=28,883). The pooled rate of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus SSI was 0.5% (95% Cl, 0.2%-1.5%; P<.001; n=26,703). This is approximately 20% of all SSI cases. The pooled rate of intraoperative bacterial wound contamination was 16.9% (95% Cl, 6.6%-36.8%; P=.003; n=2180). All these results had significant heterogeneity. The postoperative risk of SSI was significantly associated with intraoperative bacterial surgical wound contamination (pooled rate ratio, 2.5; 95% Cl, 1.4%-4.6%; P=.001; n=19,049).

Correlation of vertebral strength topography with 3-dimensional computed tomographic structure.

STUDY DESIGN: Biomechanical and radiographical study. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that stiffness and strength at discrete sites of human lumbar vertebrae depend on the 3-dimentional structure and density of the vertebral-body bone elements, and can be evaluated using models based on vertebral bone characteristics obtained from quantitative computed tomogrphy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: We have not found published methods that allow in vivo evaluation of bone mechanical properties at discrete sites of vertebral body applicable for clinical use.We hypothesize that human lumbar vertebral strength topography depends on the local 3-dimensional structural features of the bone structure, and that the stiffness and strength can be evaluated at discrete sites using models based on data obtained from quantitative computed tomographic (CT) images. METHODS: Forty-eight vertebrae (8 L1, 8 L2, 8 L3, 10 L4, and 14 L5) from 14 cadaveric subjects (9 men and 5 women; age, 43-99 yr) were studied. Stiffness (modulus of elasticity) and strength (maximum load and maximum tolerable pressure) were defined by an indentation test at 11 discrete sites on the cranial and caudal surfaces of each vertebral endplate. Before the indentation test radiography, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, micro-CT, and conventional-CT (con-CT) of the vertebrae were performed. Micro-CT characteristics of cortical and cancellous bones of 18 vertebrae were measured at each region of interest defined by a 3-dimensional coordinate system. The most informative indices regarding endplate strength were selected by correlation analysis. Predictive models of local stiffness and strength were created using selected indices obtained by micro-CT and con-CT (40 vertebrae) images. RESULTS: Local stiffness and strength of the tested specimens were highly variable. Endplate thickness and density in combination with adjacent trabecular bone density, existence of endplate defects, and subject's age were good predictors of local stiffness and strength, applicable for con-CT. Polynomial multiple regression of these characteristics provides the best correlation with stiffness (r2 = 0.82; P < 0.001) and strength (r2 = 0.74). CONCLUSION: Stiffness and strength at discrete sites of human lumbar vertebrae depend on the superficial vertebral bone structure and density and can be evaluated using models based on quantitative analysis of micro-CT and con-CT images.