GSTM1 null and GSTT1 null: predictors of cisplatin-caused acute ototoxicity measured by DPOAEs.

Preventing the ototoxicity caused by cisplatin is a major issue yet to be overcome. Useful preventive treatments will soon be available. Consequently, the next step is to filter out those patients who are more prone to develop ototoxicity. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate potential predictive markers of acute ototoxicity as determined by measures of distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs). A total of 118 patients from our previous DPOAE analysis were put under evaluation. Ototoxic cases were divided according to unilateral (n = 45) or bilateral (n = 23) involvement. The clinicopathological characteristics, hearing test results, germline GSTT1, GSTM1, and GSTP1 polymorphisms, and common laboratory parameters were included in the new analysis. Univariate and multivariate statistical tests were applied. According to multivariate logistic regression, the only independent predictor of unilateral ototoxicity (vs. non-affected) was a GSTM1 null genotype (OR = 4.52; 95%CI = 1.3-16.3), while for bilateral damage, the GSTT1 null genotype (OR = 4.76; 1.4-16) was a predictor. The higher starting serum urea level was characteristic of bilateral ototoxicity; however, the only independent marker of bilateral (vs. unilateral) ototoxicity was the presence of GSTT1 null genotype (OR = 2.44; 1.23-4.85). Different processes, involving the GSTM1 and GSTT1 genotypes, respectively, govern the development of acute unilateral and bilateral ototoxicities. Further research is needed to clarify these processes. Based on the above findings, patients whom are at risk may be selected for otoprotective therapies. KEY MESSAGES: The acute ototoxicity was determined by DPOAE in 118 testicular cancer patients. GSTM1 null was the only marker of unilateral ototoxicity (vs. non-affected). The only marker of bilateral hearing loss (vs. non-affected) was the GSTT1 null. GSTT1 null was also the marker of bilateral vs. unilateral ototoxicity. A high-risk group may be selected for new, individualized otoprotective treatment.

Early ototoxic changes in patients with germ cell tumor after first cycle of cisplatin-based therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively examine early hearing damage detectable with distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) after the first cycle of cisplatin treatment of patients with testicular tumor. STUDY DESIGN: Both ears of 137 consecutive patients were examined at 0.75 to 8 kHz before (B) and after (A) the first cycle of cisplatin (dose: 100 mg/m2 / 5 days). METHODS: The mean amplitudes (B vs. A) were compared with paired t test at each frequency. Ototoxic changes were considered when an individual amplitude difference (B-A) > 14 dB at 0.75 Hz or > 7 db at 1 to 8 kHz occurred. RESULTS: The mean amplitudes were statistically significantly lower after first cycle at 0.75, 6, and 8 kHz. The majority of patients (96%) presented positive differences (B-A) in one or both ears; in 85 (62%) cases, the positive difference reached the level of ototoxicity out of which 34 (40%) and 19 (22%) of patients suffered ototoxicity in one or both ears, respectively. The difference between right and left ears in distribution of ototoxic cases was nonsignificant. Forty-five (33%) and four (3%) patients showed ototoxicity at two or more frequencies in one or both ears, respectively. An increased proportion of ototoxic cases can be seen at 0.75 to 1 kHz and 6 to 8 kHz. CONCLUSION: After the first cycle of cisplatin treatment, early ototoxicity occurs in close to two-thirds of patients, as identified by measuring DPOAE. Therefore, further research for biomarkers is required, which can predict patients at risk in order to avoid an irreversible hearing loss by personalized, preventive therapies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. Laryngoscope, 127:1909-1915, 2017.

Synergistic Survival: A New Phenomenon Connected to Adverse Events of First-Line Sunitinib Treatment in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The aim was to assess the relationship between treatment efficacy and adverse events (AEs) for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with first-line sunitinib. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 274 patients were treated with sunitinib (50 mg/d, 4-weeks-on and 2-weeks-off schedule). Physical and laboratory evaluations were done every sixth week. AEs were diagnosed at every visit. Clinical response was assessed every 3 months. The objective response rate (ORR), median progression-free (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) and AEs were evaluated. Besides χ(2) and log rank tests, multivariate Cox regression analysis and for synergism 1-sided t tests were used. RESULTS: The ORR was 25%. After a median follow-up of 32 months, the mPFS and mOS were 9 and 19 months, respectively. Hypertension, diarrhea, hypothyroidism, mucositis, hand-foot syndrome (HFS), skin toxicity, and leukopenia were the most frequent treatment-associated AEs. Significantly longer (P < .01) mPFS and mOS were observed when hypertension, diarrhea, HFS, hypothyroidism, skin toxicity, or leukopenia occurred. A statistically significant synergistic effect of the listed AEs was observed for progression-free survival (P < .001) and overall survival (P < .001). Multivariate analysis revealed that besides the prognostic category, the higher number of AEs (3-6 vs. 0-2) was an independent marker of longer mPFS (24 vs. 5 months, respectively; P < .001) and mOS (51 vs. 9 months, respectively; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Results of this study provide evidence for the synergistically enhanced efficacy of sunitinib treatment in patients who present multiple AEs. These AEs are diagnosed routinely and their coexistence can help physicians to predict which group of patients would benefit the most from first-line sunitinib treatment.

[Detection of late ototoxic side effect of cisplatin by distortion otoacoustic emission (DPOAE)]. / Ciszplatinnal kezelt heretumoros betegek késôi halláskárosodásának vizsgálata disztorziós otoakusztikus emissziós (DOAE) készülékkel.

Cisplatin-based chemotherapy results in high cure rate in testicular cancer. The issue of toxicity is of special concern in young men with a probability of cure of at least 70-80% even in disseminated disease. As the literature shows, the ototoxic side effects of cisplatin have been studied mostly by conventional method. The authors used distortion product otoacoustic emission to detect the long-term ototoxic effect of cisplatin in 223 patients with a median follow-up time of 4.27 years (range 0.5-20 years) and a median age of 37 years (range 18-55 years). Cisplatin (20 mg/m(2) body surface) was administered for five days per cycle, in combination with other antitumor drugs. The control group consisted of 40 testicular cancer patients who did not receive chemotherapy, with a median age of 35 years (range 16-54 years). A detailed medical history based on a standardized questionnaire evaluated hearing complaints and audiological risk factors, such as head injuries, chronic otitis media, previous noise exposure and familial hearing loss. DPOAE was measured at 8 frequencies from 750 to 8000 Hz. No amplitude changes were detected in patients receiving =300 mg/m(2) cisplatin. At higher doses, contrary to the literature, not only high frequencies were affected: our method could detect significant hearing impairment at lower frequencies important for speech perception in patients receiving at least 400 mg/m(2) cisplatin. The lower frequencies where significant amplitude changes were detected were 3000 Hz at 400 mg/m(2), and 1500, 2000 and 3000 Hz at 500-600 mg/m(2). We detected the worst hearing in the case of patients who had symptomatic ototoxicity. Age and the cumulative dose of cisplatin proved statistically significant risk factors, while smoking or noise exposure did not have predictive value. As a conclusion, DPOAE is a fast, noninvasive and reliable method for the detection of late ototoxicity in testicular cancer patients. In our study hearing loss correlated with the cumulative dose of cisplatin. Hearing impairment contributes to the already compromised situation of cancer patients.