Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Radiol Med ; 120(6): 498-503, 2015 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25511184

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Clinical risk management is the basis of safety procedures also in radiological workflows. In the literature, it has been documented that the incidence of reconciled radiological studies ranges between 0.2 and 0.5 % of stored studies, a non-negligible value if we consider the high number of diagnostic tests performed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In radiology, "non-compliance" or, more generally, data to be reconciled means any circumstance in which wrong information is recorded in RIS and/or PACS, which requires processing to amend or correct images, reports or other information in order to attribute them to the right patient/episode. Non-compliance corrections account for almost 50 % of the medical system administrator's (SA) workload. This paper describes how the Reggio Emilia Province Diagnostic Imaging and Laboratory Medicine Department manages risk in clinical radiology, in compliance with Regional indications on RIS-PACS safety. A dedicated RIS webpage has been developed in order to manage reconciliation requests. Native integration with PACS makes information about ongoing reconciliations available to anyone who consults the images. RESULTS: In 2013, non-compliances reported by radiology staff ranged between 0.25 and 0.35 % of studies sent to the PACS. More than 50 % of non-compliances can be related to high clinical risk, which requires implementation of efficient and effective rapid mechanisms of action-reaction inside and outside the radiology department. CONCLUSIONS: The RIS-integrated module has been the starting point for managing and monitoring errors, allowing improvement initiatives to guarantee and optimise workflow. Request and event traceability have allowed us to define personalised training programmes, designed to minimise procedural and/or systematic errors. To protect the availability and consistency of information produced by radiology units, it is necessary to provide integrated and effective mechanisms for reconciliation management. The integrated tool described in this paper is now widely used (not only by our centre): radiographers and radiologists can indicate non-compliances in an efficient and effective manner, informing all the operators involved with just a click of the mouse. Similar functionality should be implemented in the next generation of RIS-PACS in order to maintain the highest possible safety level for patients and workers.


Assuntos
Segurança do Paciente , Sistemas de Informação em Radiologia , Gestão de Riscos/métodos , Computadores , Humanos , Serviço Hospitalar de Radiologia
2.
J Digit Imaging ; 26(3): 412-8, 2013 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23224607

RESUMO

In RIS-PACS systems, potential errors occurring during the execution of a radiologic examination can amplify the clinical risks of the patient during subsequent treatments, e.g., of oncologic patients or of those who must do additional treatments based on the initial diagnosis. In Reggio Emilia Province Diagnostic Imaging Department (REDID) we experienced different strategies to reduce clinical risks due to patient reconciliation errors. In 2010, we developed a procedure directly integrated in our RIS-PACS that uses Health Level 7 (HL7) standard messaging, which generates an overlay with the text "under investigation" on the images of the study to be corrected. All the healthcare staff is informed of the meaning of that overlay, and only the radiologist and the emergency services staff can consult these images on PACS. The elimination of image overlay and of any access limitation to PACS was triggered to confirm of the right correction made by RIS-PACS system administrator (SA). The RIS-PACS integrated tool described in this paper allows technologists and radiologists to efficiently highlight patient exam errors and to inform all the users to minimize the overall clinical risks, with a significant savings in costs. Over the years, we have observed a steady decrease in the percentage of reconciled studies. Error reconciliation requires an effective and efficient mechanism. The RIS-PACS integrated tool described in this paper enables technologists and radiologists to quickly and efficiently highlight patient exam errors and inform all the users. Next generation of RIS-PACS could be equipped with similar reconciliation tools.


Assuntos
Erros de Diagnóstico/prevenção & controle , Nível Sete de Saúde , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde , Sistemas de Informação em Radiologia/organização & administração , Difusão de Inovações , Eficiência Organizacional , Humanos , Risco
3.
J Digit Imaging ; 20(2): 140-8, 2007 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17318704

RESUMO

Reggio Emilia hospital installed Picture Archiving and Communications Systems (PACS) as the final step towards a completely digital clinical environment completing the HIS/EMR and 1,400 web/terminals for patient information access. Financial benefits throughout the hospital were assessed upfront and measured periodically. Key indicators (radiology exam turnaround time, number of radiology procedures performed, inpatients length of stay before and after the PACS implementation, etc.) were analyzed and values were statistically tested to assess workflow and productivity improvements. The hospital went "filmless" in 28 weeks. Between the half of 2004 and the respective period in 2003, overall Radiology Department productivity increased by 12%, TAT improved by more than 60%. Timelier patient care resulted in decreased lengths of stay. Neurology alone experienced a 12% improvement in average patient stay. To quantify the impact of PACS on the average hospital stays and the expected productivity benefits to inpatient productivity were used a "high level" and a "detailed" business model. Annual financial upsides have exceeded $1.9 millions/year. A well-planned PACS deployment simplifies imaging workflow and improves patient care throughout the hospital while delivering substantial financial benefits. Staff buy-in was the key in this process and on-going training and process monitoring are a must.


Assuntos
Eficiência Organizacional , Hospitais de Distrito , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde , Sistemas de Informação em Radiologia , Terminais de Computador , Capacitação de Usuário de Computador , Redução de Custos , Diagnóstico por Imagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Neurológico , Administração Financeira/economia , Sistemas de Informação Hospitalar , Hospitais de Distrito/economia , Hospitais de Distrito/organização & administração , Hospitais de Distrito/normas , Humanos , Medicina Interna , Internet , Itália , Tempo de Internação , Sistemas de Informação em Radiologia/organização & administração , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Torácicos , Fatores de Tempo , Gestão da Qualidade Total , Simplificação do Trabalho , Carga de Trabalho
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...