Assessment using serum insulin-like growth factor-I and bone mineral density is useful for detecting prevalent vertebral fractures in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Bone mineral density (BMD) is less useful for evaluating fracture risk in type 2 diabetes. This study showed for the first time that combined evaluation by serum insulin-like growth factor-I and BMD is useful to assess the risk of vertebral fracture in postmenopausal women and men with type 2 diabetes. INTRODUCTION: BMD is less useful for evaluating fracture risk in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We aimed to examine the usefulness of combined evaluation by BMD and serum insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) to assess the risk of vertebral fracture (VF) in T2DM. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 412 postmenopausal women and 582 men with T2DM, whose BMD, bone turnover markers, and serum IGF-I were measured, were enrolled. The association of BMD alone, serum IGF-I alone, and combined assessment by BMD and IGF-I with the presence of VF was examined. RESULTS: Multiple logistic regression analyses showed that IGF-I as well as BMD T-score at lumbar (L) and femoral neck (FN) were significantly associated with VF except for IGF-I in men, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic curves showed that the cutoff values of IGF-I, L T-score and FN T-score were 127 ng/mL, - 1.78, and - 2.02 in postmenopausal women and 127 ng/mL, - 1.67, and - 1.24 in men. Based on the cutoff vales, the subjects were divided into four categories. The category of lower IGF-I and lower T-scores had a significant increased risk of VF compared to higher IGF-I and higher T-scores both in postmenopausal women and in men. The sensitivity and specificity of the combined assessment to detect VF were better compared to using BMD alone or IGF-I alone. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to show that in addition to BMD measurement, the assessment using serum IGF-I is useful to estimate the prevalence of VF in patients with T2DM.

Creation of a dental X-ray unit with a contactless exposure control switch.

OBJECTIVE: A new dental radiographic unit (DXRU) with a contactless switch for adjusting exposure conditions and a foot-pedal exposure switch was developed to prevent bacterial or viral contamination from patients and was compared with a conventional DXRU with a panel push-button switch with respect to user friendliness. METHODS: 45 fourth-year dental school students carried out intraoral radiography using both types of DXRU. Errors regarding dose shortages of X-rays were compared and a questionnaire completed. RESULTS: 22 (49%) of the 45 students failed to provide the correct radiographic exposure and the number of errors was 32 for the conventional DXRU, and 4 (9%) students failed to provide the correct radiographic exposure and the number of errors was 4 for our new DXRU, at the first stage (p < 0.001). At the second stage, the number of students who failed to provide the correct radiographic exposure and the number of errors decreased to 12 and 16, respectively, for the conventional DXRU (p < 0.05). 37 (82%) of the 45 students preferred our DXRU because of its contactless switch and the push-pedal exposure switch. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggested that our new contactless mechanism should be used for other DXRUs for contamination control.