Outcomes from surgical treatment of middle-third clavicle fractures non-union in adults: a series of 21 cases.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of our study was to evaluate the results of surgical treatment of clavicle non-union after failure of conservative treatment. Our hypothesis was that stable fixation with bone graft derived from local bone stock (fracture site) or the iliac crest was essential to achieve bone union. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients with a symptomatic middle-third clavicle non-union after failure of initial conservative treatment were included in the study. Delay between the initial fracture and surgery for non-union was 27 months (6-144). In five cases, the non-union was hypertrophic and bone graft was obtained locally from the callus. In 16 patients, the non-union was atrophic. Bone was harvested from the iliac crest as cortico-cancellous graft (7 patients) and cancellous graft (8 patients). One patient refused bone grafting. A 3.5-mm plate with non-locking screws was placed anterior in 12 and superior in 9 patients. RESULTS: At 41 months average follow-up (minimum of 12 months), 20 patients were available for review. Bone healing was obtained initially in 15 cases. Six complications required a revision procedure: 3 for infection and 3 for mechanical failure. At last follow-up, 19 patients were satisfied with the surgery. Average Constant score was 84±26 points (7-100), and Quick DASH score 17±22 points (0-91). Radiographic bone healing was obtained in 19 of the cases. CONCLUSION: Treatment of middle-third clavicle non-union after initial failure of conservative treatment with stable fixation and bone graft is a reliable, well-suited and effective treatment. Our hypothesis was verified. Preoperative evaluation of appearance of the non-union X-rays can be used to determine the type of bone graft needed, but the final decision is often taken during surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Total elbow arthroplasty for acute distal humeral fractures in patients over 65 years old - results of a multicenter study in 87 patients.

INTRODUCTION: Fractures of the distal humerus represent 5% of osteoporosis fragility fractures in subjects over the age of 60. Osteoporosis, comorbidities and intra-articular comminution make management of this entity difficult. HYPOTHESIS: The hypothesis was that total elbow arthroplasty could be a reliable treatment option in subjects over the age of 65 presenting with a fracture of the distal humerus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight-seven patients (80 women and 7 men) mean age 79 years old (65-93) underwent total elbow arthroplasty for the treatment of an AO type A fracture in 9 cases, type B in 8 and type C in 70. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 37.5 months (6-106) the Mayo Elbow Performance Score MEPS was 86±14, the quick-DASH score was 24±19 and the Katz score was 5±1.5 points. The MEPS was better in patients with a high preoperative Katz score and a history of inflammatory arthritis who were living at home. Fifty-five patients (63%) presented with a pain-free elbow, and 20 (24%) with slight pain. The flexion-extension range of motion was 97±22° and 48% presented with a flexion-extension arc of at least 100°. Function was normal in 69 patients. Complications were identified in 20 cases (23%) and revision surgery was necessary in 8 (9%). Two arthroplasties had to be changed, one for a fracture of the humeral stem component and the other for loosening. Only one infection occurred in this series. CONCLUSION: Total elbow arthroplasties provide fractured patients with immediate satisfactory results and a stable, painless and functional elbow. These results seem to be reliable and durable. The rate of complications is low with revision surgery in approximately 10%. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.