Robustly optimized hybrid intensity-modulated proton therapy for craniospinal irradiation.

Aim: The aim of the study was to investigate the hybrid robust optimization planning approach in intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) of craniospinal irradiation (CSI). Subjects and Methods: Five IMPT-based adult CSI plans in supine position were created using Raystation treatment planning system (TPS) modelled for Proteus plus proton therapy system. A hybrid planning strategy was implemented, where clinical target volume was robustly optimized (RB) for set up uncertainties and planning target volume was optimized for target coverage using minimax algorithm in the TPS. Beam angle selection, optimization, and dose calculation approach were carefully performed to ensure optimum organ at risk (OAR) sparing, even with potential setup and range errors. The complementary dose gradients in junctions were generated using spot assignment and RB technique. Dosimetric outcomes in both nominal plan and the 16 error scenarios (±3 mm setup and 3.5% range) were analyzed using standard dose volume histogram. Results: This planning approach resulted in a homogeneous dose distribution in the target volume of CSI, including the junction regions, by explicitly reducing number of robust optimization scenarios. The proposed technique was also able to achieve excellent coverage to cribriform plate with lower lens doses and minimal dose to other OARs. Target and OAR doses in the nominal plans as well as in the worst case scenarios with setup and range errors were able to meet the predefined clinical goal. Conclusions: This proposed planning technique is efficient, robust against the uncertainties. It could be adopted in other proton therapy centers.

Impact of spot positional errors in robustly optimized intensity-modulated proton therapy plan of craniospinal irradiation.

We investigated the influence of random spot positioning errors (SPEs) on dosimetric outcomes of robustly optimized intensity-modulated proton therapy (RB-IMPT) plans in craniospinal irradiation (CSI). Six patients with CSI treated using the RB-IMPT technique were selected. An in-house MATLAB code was used to simulate a random SPE of 1 mm in positive, negative, and both directions for 25%, 50%, and 75% of the total spot positions in the nominal plan. The percentage dose variation (ΔD%) in the six nominal and 54 error-introduced plans was evaluated using standard dose-volume indices, line dose difference, and 3D gamma analysis method. The introduction of a random SPE of 1 mm resulted in a reduction in D99%, D98%, and D95% of both CTVs and PTVs by < 2% compared with the corresponding nominal plans. However, this leads to an increase in D1% of the lens by up to 16.9%. The line dose in the junction region showed ΔD% < 2% for the brain and upper spine and < 4% for the upper and lower spine. The 3D gamma values for 3% at 3 mm and 2% at 2 mm were above 99% and 95%, respectively, in all 54 error-introduced plans. The worst decrease in gamma values was observed for 1% at 1 mm, with values ranging from 64 to 78% for all types of SPE. The RB-IMPT plan for CSI investigated in this study is robust enough for target coverage, even if there are random SPEs of 1 mm. However, this leads to an increase in the dose to the critical organ located close to the target.

The Role of Plan Robustness Evaluation in Comparing Protons and Photons Plans - An Application on IMPT and IMRT Plans in Skull Base Chordomas.

PURPOSE: To analyze robustness of treatment plans optimized using different approaches in intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and investigate the necessity of robust optimization and evaluation in intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans for skull base chordomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two photon plans, standard IMRT and robustly optimized IMRT (RB-IMRT), and two IMPT plans, robustly optimized multi field optimization (MFO) and hybrid-MFO (HB-MFO), were created in RayStation TPS for five patients previously treated using single field uniform optimization (SFO). Both set-up and range uncertainties were incorporated during robust optimization of IMPT plans whereas only set-up uncertainty was used in RB-IMRT. The dosimetric outcomes from the five planning techniques were compared for every patient using standard dose volume indices and integral dose (ID) estimated for target and organs at risk (OARs). Robustness of each treatment plan was assessed by introducing set-up uncertainties of ±3 mm along the three translational axes and, only in protons, an additional range uncertainty of ±3.5%. RESULTS: All the five nominal plans provided comparable and clinically acceptable target coverage. In comparison to nominal plans, worst case decrease in D95% of clinical target volume-high risk (CTV-HR) were 11.1%, 13.5%, and 13.6% for SFO, MFO, and HB-MFO plans respectively. The corresponding values were 13.7% for standard IMRT which improved to 11.5% for RB-IMRT. The worst case increased in high dose (D1%) to CTV-HR was highest in IMRT (2.1%) and lowest in SFO (0.7%) plans. Moreover, IMRT showed worst case increases in D1% for all neurological OARs and were lowest for SFO plans. The worst case D1% for brainstem, chiasm, spinal cord, optic nerves, and temporal lobes were increased by 29%, 41%, 30%, 41% and 14% for IMRT and 18%, 21%, 21%, 24%, and 7% for SFO plans, respectively. In comparison to IMRT, RB-IMRT improved D1% of all neurological OARs ranging from 5% to 14% in worst case scenarios. CONCLUSION: Based on the five cases presented in the current study, all proton planning techniques (SFO, MFO and HB-MFO) were robust both for target coverage and OARs sparing. Standard IMRT plans were less robust than proton plans in regards to high doses to neurological OARs. However, robust optimization applied to IMRT resulted in improved robustness in both target coverage and high doses to OARs. Robustness evaluation may be considered as a part of plan evaluation procedure even in IMRT.

Analysis of Influence of Errors in Angular Settings of Couch and Collimator on the Dosimetric and Radiobiological Parameters in VMAT Plans.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of couch and collimator angular variations on dose volume histogram (DVH), tumour control probability (TCP), and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of the volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans. METHODS: Stereotactic radiosurgery and stereotactic body radiation therapy VMAT plans were generated for three different hypothetical planning target volumes (PTVs) that mimic brain metastases, single brain lesion, and single spine lesion. Thirty routine VMAT plans (10 prostate, 10 head and neck, and 10 brain cases) treated in our clinic were also selected for this study. The plans were generated using an Eclipse Treatment Planning System and delivered using a Clinac iX linear accelerator equipped with a Millennium 120 multileaf collimator. All the plans were generated using two complementary full arcs (with gantry angle from 179° to 181° and collimator rotation of 30° and 330°) except the brain tumour cases, which used single full arc with collimator rotation of 30°. In all the cases, the couch angle was zero. Impact of the angular variations in the collimator and couch was studied by varying the collimator and couch angular settings by 1°, 2°, and 3°, and creating six erroneous plans corresponding to the original plans. The variation due to these errors on different DVH and radiobiological parameters (TCP, equivalent uniform dose (EUD), and NTCP) of the PTVs and organs-at-risk (OARs) were observed. The relative percentage of difference in these parameters (ΔD, ΔTCP, ΔEUD, and ΔNTCP) were analysed, and statistical significance was tested. RESULTS: The variation due to collimator misplacement was observed to be larger than the couch misplacement. Furthermore, in both cases, the variation increased as the degree of error increased. Among the DVH parameters, D98%, D95%, and V95Gy were affected more by the errors than D2%, D5%, and D50%, in both hypothetical and clinical PTVs. In the clinical PTVs, the TCP showed the most variation among all parameters. The ΔNTCP of the bladder and brain OARs were zero, whereas for head and neck OARs, it was high. CONCLUSIONS: The couch and collimator angular variation has different effects on different planning situations and different parameters. The outcome produced by the errors is specific to the treatment sites.

Effect of fluence smoothing on the quality of intensity-modulated radiation treatment plans.

A fluence-smoothing function applied for reducing the complexity of a treatment plan is an optional requirement in the inverse planning optimization algorithm of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). In this study, we investigated the consequences of fluence smoothing on the quality of highly complex and inhomogeneous plans in a treatment-planning system, Eclipse™. The smoothing function was applied both in the direction of leaf travel (X) and perpendicular to leaf travel (Y). Twenty IMRT plans from patients with cancer of the nasopharynx and lung were selected and re-optimized with use of various smoothing combinations from X = 0, Y = 0 to X = 100, Y = 100. Total monitor units (MUs), dose-volume histograms, and radiobiological estimates were computed for all plans. The study yielded a significant reduction in the average total MUs from 2079 ± 265.4 to 1107 ± 137.4 (nasopharynx) and from 1556 ± 490.3 to 791 ± 176.8 (lung) while increasing smoothing from X, Y = 0 to X, Y = 100. Both the tumor control and normal tissue complication probabilities were found to vary, but not significantly so. No appreciable differences in doses to the target and most of the organs at risk (OARs) were noticed. The doses measured with the I'MRT MatriXX 2-D system indicated improvements in deliverability of the plans with higher smoothing values. Hence, it can be concluded that increased smoothing reduced the total MUs exceptionally well without any considerable changes in OAR doses. The observed progress in plan deliverability in terms of the gamma index strongly supports the recommendation of smoothing levels up to X = 70 and Y = 60, at least for the nasopharynx and lung.

Analysis of Dosimetric Impacts of Cone Beam Computed Tomography-Based Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Planning.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the Hounsfield unit (HU) variations between computed tomography (CT) and cone beam CT (CBCT) and study its impact on volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans. METHODS: HU number variations in CT and CBCT images were evaluated using the Catphan-504 phantom, and changes in seven different materials within the phantom (air, polymethylpentene, low-density polyethylene, polystyrene, acrylic, Delrin, and Teflon) were studied. The HU variations in half-fan and full-fan modes of CBCT were evaluated. The effect of variations in the shape of the body cross sections was assessed by reducing the body of the Catphan by 0.5 cm and 1.0 cm. CBCT-based VMAT plans in 27 patients (10 prostate, 10 brain, and 7 head and neck (HN)) were compared with corresponding CT-based plans. The dosimetric variations were assessed referring to different points on the dose volume histogram (D5%, D50%, and D95% for PTVs and D1%, Dmax, and Dmean for organs at risk). The relative percentage of difference (ΔD (%)) between CT- and CBCT-based VMAT plans were examined on these points. To evaluate the dosimetric accuracy, dose distributions were compared using Omnipro-I'mRT software. The VMAT plans were evaluated based on 3 mm-3%, 2 mm-2%, and 1 mm-1% gamma criteria. RESULTS: The HU difference in CT and CBCT was highest for air, Delrin, and Teflon, whereas the difference was less than 20 HU for the other materials. The dose volume histograms of both CT- and CBCT-based plans were in excellent agreement in both phantom and patients, except in HN cases where the difference was 7%. The average 3 mm-3% gamma pass points in brain, prostate, and HN patients were 97 ± 0.2%, 96 ± 0.06%, and 93.3 ± 1.1%, respectively. The gamma pass rates reduced to 88.8 ± 0.06%, 91 ± 0.04%, and 79 ± 6% in 2 mm-2%, and further declined to 76.6 ± 0.09%, 75.2 ± 0.5%, and 60 ± 6% using the stringent 1 mm-1% gamma criteria for brain, prostate, and HN cases, respectively. CONCLUSION: Based on the results of this study, it is our belief that CBCT images can be used as a tool for evaluating the dosimetric variation in patient VMAT plans.