Sacrectomy with Posterior-Only Approach in Sacral Tumors: An Analysis of 26 Cases and Review of Literature.

BACKGROUND: Sacral masses can be removed using anterior, posterior, or combined approaches. Achieving total sacrectomy through a posterior-only approach results in a shorter procedure time, minimal tissue damage, and a reduced risk of complications. In this study, we aimed to share our experience with performing total sacrectomy using a posterior-only approach in 26 patients and to assess their clinical outcomes at our center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study examines the clinical progression, surgical response, and outcomes of 26 patients with various sacral mass pathologies. We accessed patient information from our hospital records. RESULTS: The study included 14 men (54%) and 12 women (46%), with an average age of 49.8 years. Most cases had a normal body mass index, while 6 were overweight. Sacrectomy was performed at a high level in 12 patients and at a middle level in 14 patients. In addition to pain, motor deficits were observed in 9 patients, and sphincter dysfunction was found in 5. Preoperative embolization was conducted for 11 patients. The most prevalent lesions were chordoma (8 patients), malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (4 patients), giant cell tumor (3 patients), and solitary plasmacytoma (3 patients). Only 1 patient experienced a temporary partial motor deficit after surgery. There were no instances of cerebrospinal fluid leakage. Five patients experienced local recurrence, and 1 had distant metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: Performing sacrectomy for large or giant sacral tumors through a posterior approach is both feasible and safe, resulting in reduced morbidity and no significant change in overall survival.

Evaluation of bone mineral status in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

BACKGROUND: Several reports have suggested low bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). We determined bone mineral status in patients with AIS to evaluate the effect of brace treatment on BMD. METHODS: BMD was measured in 46 patients (mean age, 17.8 ± 4.9 years) with AIS (17 with brace and 29 without brace) by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan and compared the results to an age-matched (mean age, 16.6 ± 3.9 years) control group (n = 54). RESULTS: The AIS group had significantly lower bone mass at the lumbar spine (Z-score, -1.500 vs. -0.832) and hip (Z-score, -1.221 vs. -0.754) except at the femoral neck. No difference in BMD was found between patients with AIS who used a brace and those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: The results confirmed that BMD was low in AIS patients and it was not affected by brace treatment.