Differential effects of serine proteases on the migration of normal and tumor cells: implications for tumor microenvironment.

The supporting role of proteases in tumor progression and invasion is well known; however, the use of proteases as therapeutic agents has also been demonstrated. In this article, the authors report on the differential effects of exogenous serine proteases on the motility of tumor and normal cells. The treatment of normal and tumor cells with a single dose of pancreatic serine proteases, trypsin (TR) and chymotrypsin (CH), leads to a concentration-dependent response by cells, first accelerating and then slowing mobility. Tumor cells are 10 to 20 times more sensitive to exogenous TR/CH, suggesting that a single dose of proteases may cause discordant movements of normal and tumor cells within the tumor environment. The inhibitory effects of TR on cell motility are contradicted by thrombin (TH), particularly in the regulation of normal cells' migration. The purpose of this investigation was to ascertain the role of protease-activated receptors (PARs) in terms of normal and tumor cell motility. Duplicate treatments with proteases resulted in diminished mobility of both normal and tumor cells. Repeated application of TR and TH in 1-hour treatment intervals initially desensitizes cell surface PARs. However, cell surface PARs reappear regardless of subsequent protease treatments in both normal and tumor cells. The resensitization process is retarded in tumor cells when compared with normal cells. This is evidenced by lower expression of PARs as well as by their relocalization at the tumor cell surfaces. Under these conditions, normal cells remain responsive to exogenous proteases in terms of cell motility. Exogenous proteases do not modulate motility of repeatedly stimulated tumor cells, and consequently, the migration of tumor cells appears disconnected from the PAR signaling pathways. The use of activating peptides in lieu of the cognate proteases for a given PAR system indicated that proteases may act through additional targets not regulated by PAR signaling. We hypothesize that the divergent migration patterns of normal and tumor cells due to exposure to proteases is in part mediated by PARs. Thus, treatment with exogenous proteases may cause rearrangement of the tumor and stromal cells within the tumor microenvironment. Such topographical effects may lead to the inhibition of tumor progression and metastasis development.

Constitutive and ligand-induced nuclear localization of oxytocin receptor.

Oxytocin receptor (OTR) is a membrane protein known to mediate oxytocin (OT) effects, in both normal and neoplastic cells. We report here that human osteosarcoma (U2OS, MG63, OS15 and SaOS2), breast cancer (MCF7), and primary human fibroblastic cells (HFF) all exhibit OTR not only on the cell membrane, but also in the various nuclear compartments including the nucleolus. Both an OTR-GFP fusion protein and the native OTR appear to be localized to the nucleus as detected by transfection and/or confocal immunofluorescence, respectively. Treatment with oxytocin causes internalization of OTR and the resulting vesicles accumulate in the vicinity of the nucleus and some of the perinuclear OTR enters the nucleus. Western blots indicate that OTR in the nucleus and on the plasma membrane are likely to be the same biochemical and immunological entities. It appears that OTR is first visible in the nucleoli and subsequently disperses within the nucleus into 4-20 spots while some of the OTR diffuses throughout the nucleoplasm. The behaviour and kinetics of OTR-GFP and OTR are different, indicating interference by GFP in both OTR entrance into the nucleus and subsequent relocalization of OTR within the nucleus. There are important differences among the tested cells, such as the requirement of a ligand for transfer of OTR in nuclei. A constitutive internalization of OTR was found only in osteosarcoma cells, while the nuclear localization in all other tested cells was dependent on ligand binding. The amount of OTR-positive material within and in the vicinity of the nucleus increased following a treatment with oxytocin in both constitutive and ligand-dependent type of cells. The evidence of OTR compartmentalization at the cell nucleus (either ligand-dependent or constitutive) in different cell types suggests still unknown biological functions of this protein or its ligand and adds this G-protein-coupled receptor to other heptahelical receptors displaying this atypical and unexpected nuclear localization.

Proenzyme therapy of cancer.

Proteases and their inhibitors have long been investigated in numerous tumor systems, and at the tumor growing front, their balance has been universally found to be shifted towards higher proteolytic activities. However, out of many promising serine and metalloproteinase inhibitors, none are included in cancer treatment regimens at present. The current search for active antiproteolytic compounds is in contrast to the classical approach developed by John Beard, who suggested treating advanced cancer by fresh pancreatic extracts whose antitumor activity was based on their proteolytic potential. We followed John Beard's recommendations by using purified pancreatic proenzymes/enzymes, trypsinogen/trypsin (TG/TR), chymotrypsinogen/chymotrypsin (CG/CH) and amylase (AM). The mixture of these enzymatic activities produces potent antimetastatic and antitumor effects in cellular, animal and human systems. The treatment of cultured tumor cells with TR and CH at nanomolar [corrected] concentrations, comparable to those achieved in the blood of the patients, causes complete arrest of the directional movement of metastatic cells. Conversely, the same treatment of normal cells results in enhanced motility and an accelerated closure of the gap created in cell monolayers. Further, treatment of cells with serine proteases results in the formation of cellular 3-dimensional structures such as lamellae, cell streams and aggregates. In some cell types, the aggregates are compacted via cadherin-based cell-cell communication systems and form compact spheroids. In the highly metastatic cells with lower cadherin expression, the ability to form spheroids also diminishes. Tumor cells unable to form spheroids when treated with proteases are subject to elimination by apoptosis. In contrast, a large proportion of cells that form spheroids remain viable, although they are metabolically suppressed. Protease-treated tumor cells contain a disrupted actin cytoskeleton and exhibit a loss of front-to-back polarity. We hypothesize that the provision of zymogens, rather than the enzymes, was of crucial importance to the clinical effectiveness in the human trials conducted by Beard and his co-workers. The precursor nature of the active enzymes may offer protection against numerous serpins present in the tissues and blood. Experimental evidence supports the assertion that the conversion from proenzyme to enzyme occurs selectively on the surface of the tumor cells, but not on normal cells. We believe that this selectivity of activation is responsible for the antitumor/antimetastatic effect of proenzyme therapy and low toxicity to normal cells or tumor host. Elevated levels of endostatin and angiostatin appear in the blood of TG/CG/AM-treated tumor-bearing mice, but not in tumor mice treated with the vehicle alone or in proenzyme-treated tumor-free mice. These findings support the conclusion that proteolysis is the active mechanism of the proenzyme treatment. Future studies will focus on the molecular mechanisms of the proenzyme therapy including the identification of molecular target(s) on the tumor cells. In conclusion, we have discovered that proenzyme therapy, mandated first by John Beard nearly one hundred years ago, shows remarkable selective effects that result in growth inhibition of tumor cells with metastatic potential.

Transformation of MC3T3-E1 cells following stress and transfection with pSV2neo plasmid.

A continuous cell line, MC3T3-E1 cells, originally derived from murine calvaria bones, loses its osteogenic properties as a result of extended passage number under stress conditions. These aged/stressed MC3T3-S cells, although nontumorigenic, do not display some of the osteogenic properties characteristic of the MC3T3-E1 cells. Altered properties include low expression of alkaline phosphatase, diminished collagen synthesis and inability to form mineralized nodules in vitro. We attempted to reactivate these osteogenic properties by transfections with a pSV2neo plasmid containing the TGFbeta1 gene. During these experiments we found that transfected MC3T3-S cells not only acquired high alkaline phosphatase activity and a potent mineralization potential, but also properties akin to the transformed state, such as ability to grow in soft agar and ability to produce tumors in immunodeficient animals. Further analysis showed that the TGFbeta1 gene is not required and that the changes can be introduced by transfections with pSV2neo alone. In contrast, MC3T3-S cells transfected with pcDNA3 (a plasmid containing only the SV40 origin of replication, early promoter, enhancer and polyadenylation signals) or mock-transfected MC3T3-S cells did not show any transformation traits. The results identify two additional SV40 fragments present in pSV2neo (SV40 virus sequence; Genbank accession number: NC_001669: 4100-4191 and 2668-2774) as functional elements contributing to the transformation of aged/stressed and immortalized osteoblastic cells. These findings are analogous to earlier reports describing the cell modifying potential of pSV2neo. We conclude that stressed and aged MC3T3-S can be transformed by transfection with pSV2neo and that such cells acquire not only the tumorigenic potential but exhibit also some of the osteogenic properties characteristic of the parent MC3T3-E1 cells.