Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther ; 20(10): 1365-1379, 2022 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35912881

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In Namibia, overuse of medically important antibiotics in animals is common and is a considerable driver of antimicrobial resistance. The study aims to analyze policies, resistance patterns, and consumption of these antibiotics used in animals in Namibia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A scoping review and retrospective descriptive analysis of policies, resistance patterns, and use of these antibiotics in Namibia was conducted, and assessed against the Access, Watch and Reserve (AWaRe) antimicrobial use guidance. RESULTS: Of the forty-five antibiotic products registered for use in animals, 77.8% are Access antibiotics, 68.9% are broad-spectrum and 60% are over-the-counter antibiotics - mainly tetracyclines, penicillins and sulfonamides. There is misalignment of antibiotic use policies for animals and humans and currently no guideline for antibiotic use in animals. Most medically important antibiotics are indicated for control of gastrointestinal (77.7%), musculoskeletal (71.1%), and respiratory (46.7%) infections, and for growth promotion (4.4%). There is high resistance to AWaRe Access antibiotics- sulfonamides (19.5-100%), tetracyclines (56-100%), and penicillin (13.5-100%). CONCLUSION: Whilst Namibia banned the use of antibiotics in farming, current policy frameworks are inconsistent across sectors, and promote overuse of broad-spectrum important antibiotics in animals. A multi-sectoral one health approach is required to harmonize antibiotic use policies and reduce resistance.


Assuntos
Gestão de Antimicrobianos , Animais , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Namíbia , Penicilinas , Políticas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sulfonamidas , Tetraciclinas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...