Quality management in medical rehabilitative care by the German statutory pension insurance scheme.

This paper aims to provide an insight into the quality management approach for medical rehabilitation services of the German statutory pension insurance scheme. In the 1990s, the German statutory pension insurance scheme initiated a quality management programme in rehabilitation, which is subject to continuous development. The main objective of implementing quality management in rehabilitative care was quality control and quality improvement. To achieve these goals, five main tools for quality measurements were applied: a classification of therapeutic services, standards of rehabilitative interventions, patient surveys, peer review, and surveys that address structure of care. These tools enable the assessment of the structural and process quality of rehabilitative care, as well as aspects of rehabilitation outcome. As a result, quality of rehabilitation care becomes more measurable, transparent, and hence can be improved on well-founded grounds. These measurements allow implementing comparisons and benchmarking of rehabilitation facilities, thereby creating incentives for quality improvements. Therefore, the development and implementation of quality management measures in facilities of inpatient and outpatient medical rehabilitation is an ongoing process and expands to other areas of rehabilitation.

Short-Term Effects of a Multimodal 3-Week Inpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation Programme for Patients with Sarcoidosis: The ProKaSaRe Study.

BACKGROUND: Real-world data on the effects of a multicomponent pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) for patients with sarcoidosis are scarce. OBJECTIVE: To describe characteristics of patients with sarcoidosis referred for a 3-week inpatient PR, to assess the effects of PR on their quality of life (QoL) and clinical outcomes, and to investigate whether there are specific subgroups who particularly benefit from PR. METHODS: Using a prospective multicentre study design, data regarding 6-min walking distance (6MWD), QoL (Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire, SGRQ), and the secondary outcomes of dyspnoea and psychological burden (fatigue, anxiety, and depression) were collected. RESULTS: We included 296 patients in the study (average age 49.1 ± 9.7 years, 47% female, average vital capacity 3.5 ± 1.0 L [87.0 ± 20.6 predicted]). The 6MWD improved by the end of the rehabilitation by 39.8 m on average (p < 0.0001; standardised response mean, SRM = 0.61), SGRQ showed significant improvements in all 3 domains, and the total score (p < 0.001) improved by 5.69-8.28 points (SRM 0.46-0.62). For the secondary outcomes, significant improvement (p < 0.001) was seen for all measured parameters, e.g., dyspnoea (modified Medical Research Council Scale, mMRC), fatigue (Fatigue Assessment Scale [FAS]; SRM = -0.71), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS]; SRM -0.58/-0.38), and generic QoL (measured by the SF-36 scales of physical and mental health; SRM 0.31/0.55). CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide the first documented evidence that PR is a promising complementary therapy option for sarcoidosis patients who remain subjectively symptomatic despite optimised outpatient medical treatment.

[The Update of the Rehabilitation Therapy Standards of the German Pension Assurance]. / Die Aktualisierung der Reha-Therapiestandards der Deutschen Rentenversicherung.

OBJECTIVES: To report on the process of updating the German Pension Insurers' rehabilitation therapy standards (RTS) from 2013 to 2015. METHODS: Four methodical approaches were taken to gather evidence: a) systematic literature searches, b) the formation of expert groups, expert workshops, and online discussion forums to bring together the experiences from clinicians and patients, c) an analysis of the latest KTL data to understand the extent to which the RTS are currently being fulfilled, and d) conceptual consideration of the significance of current developments in rehabilitation in light of the RTS revision. RESULTS: There are now updated versions of all 9 RTS. Over half of the therapy modules are based on scientific evidence. Other modules are based on clinical experience with good clinical-practice standards. The scientific evidence has not changed much overall in the last few years, although there are some indications of higher evidence levels. CONCLUSION: The revised RTS can make a positive contribution to ensuring that rehabilitation is of high quality. Further research is needed to increase the level of evidence - especially regarding the intensity of therapy.