Health care system efficiency in otolaryngological surgeries during COVID-19 pandemic in years 2020-2021 compared to years 2018-2019: data from the Military Institute of Medicine in Warsaw.

<b>Introduction:</b> Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic had a great impact on the health care system. This resulted not only from changes in the way medical facilities operated but also from the need to treat a huge number of patients. On the other hand, uninfected people feared visiting the doctor.</br></br> <b>Aim:</b> The aim of the study was to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the diagnostics and treatment of patients with head and neck cancer.</br></br> <b>Materials and methods:</b> This retrospective study involved analysis of data of patients from a single hospital unit who underwent surgical procedures due to head and neck cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic in years 2020-2021 (pandemic group) compared to years 2018-2019 (pre-pandemic group).</br></br> <b>Results:</b> Patients in the pandemic group (n = 123) were older and were more likely to have grade 3 cancer than patients in the pre-pandemic group (n = 116). Cancer stages were similar in both groups. During the pandemic, time from the first outpatient visit to surgery was longer (median 1.6 vs. 0.8 months), while time to radiotherapy was shorter (median 50.5 vs. 63 days) than in the pre-pandemic period.</br></br> <b>Conclusion:</b> During the pandemic, patients had to wait slightly longer for surgery but not for radiotherapy when compared with the pre-pandemic period. Despite this, they did not have more advanced disease.

The Effect of Nasogastric Feeding after Surgery in Patients with Head and Neck Cancers - Retrospective Single Center Experience.

This study aimed to assess clinical factors that could predict the need for nasogastric feeding after surgery in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) and evaluate the effect of tube feeding on selected laboratory parameters.This single-center retrospective study included 153 patients who underwent surgery for HNC. Data on patient and tumor characteristics were collected, along with laboratory measurements. Logistic regression was used to identify the predictors of the need for nasogastric feeding. Laboratory parameters were compared between patients who required nasogastric feeding vs those who did not.Nasogastric feeding was required in 90 patients (59%). Significant predictors of nasogastric feeding in HNC patients after surgery, which were revealed by univariate regression analysis, included low body mass index (odds ratio [OR] = 0.84), squamous cell carcinoma histology (OR = 8.05), T2 tumor stage (OR = 2.27), red blood cell count (M/µL) (OR = 0.44), hemoglobin levels (g/dL) (OR = 0.80), and mean corpuscular volume (fL) (OR = 1.10). Multivariate analysis showed that low BMI (OR = 0.87) and red blood cell count (M/µL) (OR = 0.32) were prognostic factors for nasogastric feeding. A significant percentage increase in white blood cell count from admission to discharge was noted in patients who required nasogastric feeding vs those who did not (p = 0.003).Determining factors that predict the need for nasogastric feeding in HNC patients after surgery may support more personalized treatment planning to optimize clinical outcomes.