ESMO expert consensus statements on the screening and management of financial toxicity in patients with cancer.

BACKGROUND: Financial toxicity, defined as both the objective financial burden and subjective financial distress from a cancer diagnosis and its treatment, is a topic of interest in the assessment of the quality of life of patients with cancer and their families. Current evidence implicates financial toxicity in psychosocial, economic and other harms, leading to suboptimal cancer outcomes along the entire trajectory of diagnosis, treatment, supportive care, survivorship and palliation. This paper presents the results of a virtual consensus, based on the evidence base to date, on the screening and management of financial toxicity in patients with and beyond cancer organized by the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) in 2022. METHODS: A Delphi panel of 19 experts from 11 countries was convened taking into account multidisciplinarity, diversity in health system contexts and research relevance. The international panel of experts was divided into four working groups (WGs) to address questions relating to distinct thematic areas: patients with cancer at risk of financial toxicity; management of financial toxicity during the initial phase of treatment at the hospital/ambulatory settings; financial toxicity during the continuing phase and at end of life; and financial risk protection for survivors of cancer, and in cancer recurrence. After comprehensively reviewing the literature, statements were developed by the WGs and then presented to the entire panel for further discussion and amendment, and voting. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: A total of 25 evidence-informed consensus statements were developed, which answer 13 questions on financial toxicity. They cover evidence summaries, practice recommendations/guiding statements and policy recommendations relevant across health systems. These consensus statements aim to provide a more comprehensive understanding of financial toxicity and guide clinicians globally in mitigating its impact, emphasizing the importance of further research, best practices and guidelines.

Transformation of Cancer Care during and after the COVID Pandemic, a point of no return. The Experience of Italy.

Policymakers everywhere struggle to introduce therapeutic innovation while controlling costs, a particular challenge for the universal Italian National Healthcare System (SSN), which spends only 8.8% of GDP to care for one of the world's oldest populations. Oncology provides a telling example, where innovation has dramatically improved care and survival, transforming cancer into a chronic condition. However, innovation has also increased therapy duration, adverse event management, and service demand. The SSN risks collapse unless centralized cancer planning changes gear, particularly with Covid-19 causing treatment delays, worsening patient prognosis and straining capacity. In view of the 750 billion Euro "Next Generation EU", released by the European Union to relieve Member States hit by the pandemic, the SSN tapped a multidisciplinary research team to identify key strategies for equitable uptake of innovations in treatment and delivery, with emphasis on data-driven technological and managerial advancements - and lessons from Covid-19.

Correction to: Standard (8 weeks) vs long (12 weeks) timing to minimally-invasive surgery after NeoAdjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: a multicenter randomized controlled parallel group trial (TiMiSNAR).

Following publication of the original article [1], the authors reported that the family name of the author, Ludovica Baldari, was misspelled.

Standard (8 weeks) vs long (12 weeks) timing to minimally-invasive surgery after NeoAdjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: a multicenter randomized controlled parallel group trial (TiMiSNAR).

BACKGROUND: The optimal timing of surgery in relation to chemoradiation is still controversial. Retrospective analysis has demonstrated in the recent decades that the regression of adenocarcinoma can be slow and not complete until after several months. More recently, increasing pathologic Complete Response rates have been demonstrated to be correlated with longer time interval. The purpose of the trial is to demonstrate if delayed timing of surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy actually affects pathologic Complete Response and reflects on disease-free survival and overall survival rather than standard timing. METHODS: The trial is a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled, unblinded, parallel-group trial comparing standard and delayed surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for the curative treatment of rectal cancer. Three-hundred and forty patients will be randomized on an equal basis to either robotic-assisted/standard laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery after 8 weeks or robotic-assisted/standard laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery after 12 weeks. DISCUSSION: To date, it is well-know that pathologic Complete Response is associated with excellent prognosis and an overall survival of 90%. In the Lyon trial the rate of pCR or near pathologic Complete Response increased from 10.3 to 26% and in retrospective studies the increase rate was about 23-30%. These results may be explained on the relationship between radiation therapy and tumor regression: DNA damage occurs during irradiation, but cellular lysis occurs within the next weeks. Study results, whether confirmed that performing surgery after 12 weeks from neoadjuvant treatment is advantageous from a technical and oncological point of view, may change the current pathway of the treatment in those patient suffering from rectal cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT3465982.

Non-surgical organ preservation strategies for locally advanced laryngeal tumors: what is the Italian attitude? Results of a national survey on behalf of AIRO and AIOM.

Chemoradiotherapy is the treatment mostly used as organ preservation (OP) strategy worldwide in advanced laryngo-hypopharyngeal cancer. Due to the not homogeneous results of the literature data regarding the pre-treatment assessment and treatment schedule in this setting of patients, the Italian societies of radiation oncology and medical oncology surveyed (by an online survey) their memberships regarding the Italian attitude on larynx preservation in clinical practice. The survey outline addressed different items such as: demographics (11 items), pre-treatment evaluation (12 items), treatment schedules (10 items) and outcomes (3 items). The survey was filled in by 116 clinical oncologists (64 % radiation and 36 % medical oncologists). Results highlighted that pretreatment evaluation was not homogeneous among the respondents. The treatment of choice for the OP program resulted the concurrent chemoradiotherapy (66 %). Induction chemotherapy was proposed mostly in case of aggressive tumors such as advanced stage (T4 or N3) and/or unfavorable primary sites (hypopharynx). Moreover, after induction chemotherapy, for responders patients most participants (46 %) proposed concurrent chemoradiotherapy, while 18 and 19 % proposed radiotherapy alone or radiotherapy and cetuximab, respectively. For patients with stable disease after induction chemotherapy, the respondents declared to suggest surgery, radiotherapy and cetuximab or radiotherapy alone in 38, 32 and 15 % of cases, respectively. Results of the present survey highlighted the variability of therapeutic approaches offered in clinical practice for patients candidate to a larynx OP program. Analysis of abovementioned results may give the chance to modify some clinical attitudes and create the background for future clinical investigation in this field.

Pain management in head and neck cancer patients undergoing chemo-radiotherapy: Clinical practical recommendations.

Pain in head and neck cancer represents a major issue, before, during and after the oncological treatments. The most frequent cause of pain is chemo/radiation related oral mucositis, which involves 80% of the patients and worsens their quality of life inhibiting speaking, eating, drinking or swallowing and sometimes reducing the treatment compliance, the maximum dose intensity and thus the potential efficacy of treatment. Nevertheless pain is still often under estimated and undertreated. An Italian multidisciplinary group of head and neck cancer specialists met with the aim of reaching a consensus on pain management in this setting. The Delphi Appropriateness method was used for the consensus. External expert reviewers evaluated the final statements. The paper contains 30 consensus-reached statements about pain management in HNC patients and offers a review of recent literature in these topics.

New vascular disrupting agents in upper gastrointestinal malignancies.

Antivascular approaches aim to cause rapid and catastrophic shutdown in the vascular function of the tumour, leading to extensive tumour cell death. Tumour vascular disrupting agents (VDAs) are a new class of cancer therapies that target the existing vasculature of tumours, taking advantage of the relative instability of tumour vasculature and its supporting structures. Treatment with VDAs induces a rapid collapse and regression of tumour vessels, with a consequent deprivation of blood and oxygen which leads to ischemic or hemorrhagic necrosis of the tumour. In this review, an overview of the most recently developed vascular disrupting agents is reported, focusing on the biological effects exerted by these compounds on endothelial cells and tumour vasculature, potentially effective in the treatment of several malignancies including upper gastrointestinal tumours. In particular, we have focused on the antimitotic agent combretastatin and its numerous synthetic analogues such as combretastatin A-4-phosphate, OXI4503, and AVE8062, and on the colchicine analogue ZD6126.

The role of neck dissection after radical chemoradiation for locally advanced head and neck cancer: should we move back?.

Until a few decades ago neck dissection (ND) was the standard surgical approach for node-positive tumours. Nowadays patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer can be treated with definitive chemoradiation (CRT), which includes the treatment of the neck; however, results on residual viable tumour after conservative treatment are heterogeneous and depend on initial node stage and primary treatment. Many authors accept adjuvant surgery in patients with N2-3 disease. Regardless of the results of upfront CRT, even if there is no evidence of lymph node metastases, when the risk for persistent positive neck nodes exceeds 15-20%, elective ND might be indicated. However, despite the diffusion of innovative technologies and therapies, there are controversies about both response evaluation and surgical management of initially involved neck nodes after definitive CRT and organ preservation treatment. In this paper we will analyse state of art of neck evaluation after CRT and discuss the role of ND.

Radiation-induced pemphigus vulgaris of the breast.

Pemphigus vulgaris is a rare autoimmune mucocutaneous bullous disease. Patients with a history of pemphigus vulgaris - who need radiotherapy - may show a long lasting bullous cutaneous manifestation, typical of pemphigus, within radiation fields. The literature describes fewer than 20 radio-induced cases. While systematic corticosteroid therapy has proven to be useful, topical treatment used in association with corticosteroid therapy is rarely described. To our knowledge the use of modern dressing products has never been described. We report our experience in a case in which modern dressing products were usefully associated to systemic therapy.

Cisplatin-based chemoradiation plus cetuximab in locally advanced head and neck cancer: a phase II clinical study.

BACKGROUND: Intensification of chemoradiation for advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is unlikely due to toxicity. Cetuximab combined either with radiotherapy or with chemotherapy showed favourable toxic profile with positive results in both combinations. Therefore, cetuximab could intensify chemoradiation without worsening toxicity. We conducted a phase II study of chemoradiation and cetuximab. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had stage III-IV M0 HNSCC. Treatment consisted of three cycles of cisplatin (20 mg/m(2)/day × 5 days) and fluorouracil (200 mg/m(2)/day × 5 days) rapidly alternated to three split courses of radiotherapy up to 70 Gy and concurrent weekly cetuximab. The primary end point of the study was complete response (CR) rate. Secondary end points were toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Fourty-five patients were enrolled: median age was 56 years, 38 had stage IV disease and 40 nodal involvement. CR occurred in 32 patients (71%). PFS and OS was 21+ months and 32.6+, respectively. Acute grade 3-4 toxic effects were in the expected range, but grade 3 radiodermatitis occurred in 33 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of cetuximab, cisplatin, fluorouracil and radiotherapy leads to a very high proportion of CR and it is feasible with toxic effects similar to those expected by radiochemotherapy. The only unexpected toxicity was skin toxicity: grade 3 radiodermatitis occurred in 73% of the patients.

Update on capecitabine alone and in combination regimens in colorectal cancer patients.

Capecitabine is an orally administered fluoropyrimidine carbamate which has been developed as a prodrug of 5-FU with the goal to improve its tolerability and intratumoral drug concentration. The review aims to provide an evidence-based update of clinical trials investigating the clinical efficacy, adverse-event profile, dosage and administration of this drug, alone or in combination with conventional chemotherapeutics and/or new target-oriented drugs, in the management of colorectal cancer patients.

The process of truth disclosure: an assessment of the results of information during the diagnostic phase in patients with cancer.

BACKGROUND: Surveys carried out in Mediterranean countries demonstrated very low rates of awareness of both diagnosis and prognosis among cancer patients. In our institution, a long-term training program aimed at improving communication skills among all physicians interacting with cancer patients was conducted. We report here the results of an extensive assessment of patients' awareness conducted after the first training period. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a 2-year period, after every first visit of patients with a histological diagnosis of cancer, oncologists elicited perception of the patients and completed a structured questionnaire focusing on the understanding of the diagnosis and prognosis. Our data are thus a photograph of the results of the informative process conducted during the diagnostic phase. RESULTS: Among the enrolled 649 patients, 79.3% were aware of their diagnosis; factors significantly associated with higher levels of awareness were age younger than 70 and referral from surgery (versus internal medicine). Knowledge about the palliative or curative aims of future treatments (a surrogate sign of prognostic consciousness) was evident in 55.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with historical data, our results show a high level of comprehension of the diagnosis of malignancy, probably due to the extensive training effort together with the method chosen for assessment.

Weekly cisplatin paclitaxel and continuous infusion fluorouracil in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Cisplatin, paclitaxel and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) have demonstrated significant activity in patients with advanced squamous head and neck cancer (HNSCC) despite relevant toxicity. A weekly administration of cisplatin and paclitaxel with continuous infusion of 5-FU could offer a better toxicity profile without affecting dose intensity or treatment outcome. We evaluated the toxicity and the activity of weekly cisplatin/paclitaxel with continuous infusion 5-FU in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic HNSCC. METHODS: A total of 44 patients were studied. Treatment consisted of two 6-week cycles with weekly cisplatin 20 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 60 mg/m2 and daily continuous infusion 5-FU 200 mg/m2 from day 1 to 42. Patients were evaluated for toxicity and response. RESULTS: 40 out of 44 patients were evaluable for response. After two cycles we observed seven complete responses (16%) and 12 partial responses (27%), with a 43% (95% CI 28-58%) overall response rate. Stable disease was seen in 13 patients (29%) and progressive disease in 12 patients (27%). Toxicity was mild in treated patients: we observed less than 10% of grade 3/4 hematological and gastroenteric toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: A weekly schedule of cisplatin and paclitaxel associated with continuous infusion 5-FU showed low toxicity in the treatment of advanced HNSCC while significant activity was conserved.

The activity of raltitrexed (Tomudex) in malignant pleural mesothelioma: an EORTC phase II study (08992).

We investigated the activity and toxicity of raltitrexed (Tomudex) as a single agent treatment in patients with Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (MPM) in a multicentre phase II European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) study. This study enrolled chemonaíve patients with histologically-confirmed measurable MPM. Raltitrexed was administered at the dose of 3 mg/m(2) intravenous (i.v.) bolus on an outpatient basis every 3 weeks. A maximum of eight cycles was planned in cases with an absence of progression or unacceptable toxicity. 24 patients received a total of 104 courses. 5 patients (20.8%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 7.1-42.2%) had a partial response (PR), which was confirmed by an independent radiology committee. Toxicity was mild, with diarrhoea, nausea, vomiting, fatigue and neutropenia as the major side-effects, but not exceeding grade 3 toxicity. We conclude that raltitrexed has activity as a single agent in the treatment of MPM, and that further studies with this drug in MPM are warranted.

Best supportive care in non-small cell lung cancer: is there a role for radiotherapy and chemotherapy?

Best Supportive Care (BSC) is the treatment of choice when cure is not achievable with anticancer treatments and involves management of disease-related symptoms. In the palliative treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) radiation therapy has for a long time been the cornerstone of symptom management, although the best schedule is still to be defined. Chemotherapy, on the other hand, has been excluded from classical definitions of BSC and has been reserved only for selected patient populations in which a survival benefit was demonstrated using cisplatin-based regimens. We reviewed randomized trials on both palliative radiotherapy and chemotherapy in order to assess the impact of anticancer treatments on quality of life in advanced NSCLC patients. While no randomized trials compared radiation therapy with a control arm not including it, several randomized trials assessed the use of different schedules. Hypofractionated schedules seem to have comparable palliative activity when compared with the standard fractionated regimens, at least in metastatic, poor-prognosis patients. In locally advanced, inoperable NSCLC higher radiation doses administered with conventional fractionation achieve better results in terms of local control and survival. The rate of palliation of local symptoms is high, being 60-80% for chest pain and hemoptysis, while breathlessness and cough are controlled at a somewhat lower rate (50-70%). General symptoms (fatigue, anorexia, and depression) are affected in a minority of patients. Chemotherapy was compared with BSC in several randomized trials, in some of which an analysis of the quality of life was included. Results are consistent in favor of its palliative role and, when local symptom control is assessed, rates of palliation seem similar to those achieved by radiation. Benefits apply to metastatic NSCLC patients with good performance status, low body weight loss, age below 70-75. However, some studies support the use of chemotherapy also in patients with poor prognostic features. A comparison in terms of quality of life and symptom palliation between different chemotherapy regimens is the object of few trials. Both chemotherapy and radiation have an important role in the palliative treatment of advanced NSCLC patients and should be included in BSC programs. Future randomized trials should assess the best way of combining these two approaches.

Gemcitabine, cisplatin, and radiation in advanced, unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a feasibility study.

Alternating chemoradiotherapy was shown by our institution to be superior to standard radiation in patients with nonsurgical squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCC-HN). Gemcitabine has shown in vitro and in vivo radiosensitizing properties, synergistic activity with cisplatin, and cytotoxic activity against SCC-HN. Thus, the authors tested the feasibility and antitumoral activity of a modified alternating chemoradiotherapy program that includes gemcitabine. Fourteen patients with stage IV (nine patients) or relapsed after surgery (five patients) unresectable SCC-HN were enrolled. None had previously received chemotherapy or radiotherapy. The treatment plan consisted of cisplatin, 20 mg/m2/day, days 1 to 5, weeks 1 and 5, and gemcitabine 800 mg/m2, day 5, weeks 1, 2, 3, and 5, 6, 7. Radiation was administered during weeks 2, 3, and 4 and 6, 7, and 8 with conventional fractionation up to 60 Gy. At the end of the combined therapy, patients had to receive two additional courses of cisplatin, 20 mg/m2/day, and fluorouracil, 200 mg/m2/day, for 5 days every 21 days. All the patients are evaluable for toxicity and 11 for response. Main grade III-IV toxicities and frequencies were: neutropenia (79%), neutropenia with fever (50%), thrombocytopenia (57%), anemia (35%), mucositis (100%), and cutaneous toxicity (14%). Ten patients (71%) had a weight loss greater than 10%. All but two patients needed hospitalization and tube feeding or parenteral nutrition. The median relative dose intensity of gemcitabine actually delivered was 83%. Two patients died 1 month after the end of treatment before the final evaluation. One patient died of sepsis during the additional cisplatin and fluorouracil courses before response assessment. Ten patients reached a complete response (intention to treat: 71%), and 1 patient had a partial response (9%). At a median follow-up of 34 months, the actuarial 3-year progression-free survival and overall survival are 41% and 63%, respectively. The estimated 3-year locoregional control is 70%. Considering the expected poor prognosis of the enrolled patients, this combined regimen showed an impressive antitumoral activity, but the severity of acute local and hematologic toxicity correlated makes the exportation of this regimen unproposable. However, the activity observed warrants the exploration of different, less toxic, chemo-radiotherapy programs including gemcitabine.

Induction chemotherapy followed by alternating chemo-radiotherapy in stage IV undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

In locally advanced undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma (UNPC), concomitant chemo-radiotherapy is the only strategy that gave better results over radiation alone in a phase III trial. Adding effective chemotherapy to a concomitant chemo-radiotherapy programme may be a way to improve the results further. 30 patients with previously untreated T4 and/or N2-3 undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma were consecutively enrolled and initially treated with 3 courses of epidoxorubicin, 90 mg/m2, day 1 and cisplatin, 40 mg/m2, days 1 and 2, every 3 weeks. After a radiological and clinical response assessment patients underwent 3 courses of cisplatin, 20 mg/m2/day, days 1-4 and fluorouracil, 200 mg/m2/day, days 1-4, i.v. bolus, (weeks 1, 4, 7) alternated to 3 courses of radiation (week 2-3, 5-6, 8-9-10), with a single daily fractionation, up to 70 Gy. WHO histology was type 2 in 30% and type 3 in 70% of the patients. 57% had T4 and 77% N2-3 disease. All the patients are evaluable for toxicity and response. All but one received 3 courses of induction chemotherapy. Toxicity was mild to moderate in any case. At the end of the induction phase 10% of CRs, 83.3% of PRs and 6.7% of SD were recorded. All the patients but one had the planned number of chemotherapy courses in the alternating phase and all received the planned radiation dose. One patient out of 3 developed grade III-IV mucositis. Haematological toxicity was generally mild to moderate. At the final response evaluation 86.7% of CRs and 13.3% of PRs were observed. At a median follow-up of 31 months, 13.3% of patients had a loco-regional progression and 20% developed distant metastases. The 3-year actuarial progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 64% and 83%. Induction chemotherapy followed by alternating chemo-radiotherapy is feasible and patients' compliance optimal. This approach showed a very promising activity on locally advanced UNPC and merits to be investigated in phase III studies.

Sequence effect of epirubicin and paclitaxel treatment on pharmacokinetics and toxicity.

PURPOSE: Sequence-dependent clinical and pharmacokinetic interactions between paclitaxel and doxorubicin have been reported. Some data have shown an influence of paclitaxel on epirubicin metabolism, but no data are available about the effect of diverse sequences of these drugs. We investigated whether reversing the sequence of epirubicin and paclitaxel affects the pattern or degree of toxicity and pharmacokinetics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients receiving epirubicin 90 mg/m(2) by intravenous bolus followed by paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) over 3-hour infusion or the opposite sequence every 3 weeks for four cycles were eligible. Toxicity was recorded at nadir. Pharmacokinetic data were evaluated at the first and the second cycle and were correlated with toxicity parameters. RESULTS: Thirty-nine consecutive stage II breast cancer patients were treated. Twenty-one patients received epirubicin followed by paclitaxel (ET group), and 18 received the opposite sequence (TE group). No significant difference in nonhematologic toxicity was seen. A lower neutrophil and platelet nadir and a statistically significant slower neutrophil recovery was observed in the TE group. Area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of epirubicin was higher in the TE group (2,346 ng/mL. h v 1,717 ng/mL. h; P =.002). An inverse linear correlation between epirubicin AUC and neutrophil recovery was also observed (P =.012). No difference was detected in paclitaxel pharmacokinetics. CONCLUSION: Our results support a sequence-dependent effect of paclitaxel over epirubicin pharmacokinetics that is associated with increased myelotoxicity. Because schedule modifications of anthracyclines and paclitaxel can have clinical consequences, the classical way of administration (ie, anthracyclines followed by paclitaxel) should be maintained in clinical practice.